calodo2003
Flaming Full Member
Tulsi Gabbard - would you?
No point in even trying since halfway through she would change her mind.Tulsi Gabbard - would you?
This made me chuckle.No point in even trying since halfway through she would change her mind.
At least from the bits I heard he did sound quite ancient. Was wondering if I continue listening, who will fall asleep faster - me or him.I listened to some of Biden's speech on the radio on my drive home from work, and he didn't sound as old as he usually does. It wasn't a bad speech, really, though I doubt it has any actual effect.
I don't think we are going to get an answer as he has expired.@Statue of Limitations
The Democrats here all drink the same cool aid.
So what will the Trump party do for people when they control Congress this year?
niceI don't think we are going to get an answer as he has expired.
I don't think we are going to get an answer as he has expired.
She's better off as the creepy emissary of a cult leader who greets people as they land on a remote island.No point in even trying since halfway through she would change her mind.
Or a Ghislaine Maxwell typeShe's better off as the creepy emissary of a cult leader who greets people as they land on a remote island.
She gives me priti Patel vibes. Nope.Tulsi Gabbard - would you?
Did he say "person, woman, man, camera and tv"?I listened to some of Biden's speech on the radio on my drive home from work, and he didn't sound as old as he usually does. It wasn't a bad speech, really, though I doubt it has any actual effect.
Very goodI don't think we are going to get an answer as he has expired.
It was a very good speech, it’s just a shame that the idiots that need to hear it are going to dismiss it by default.I listened to some of Biden's speech on the radio on my drive home from work, and he didn't sound as old as he usually does. It wasn't a bad speech, really, though I doubt it has any actual effect.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Mayor crimes? ShieeeeetThis Mayor is going to go down in flames
Errrmmm, WHAT!?!?!?More madness from Wisconsin. Looks the WI GOP is just going to hold off confirming until they regain power.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Welcome to Wisconsin. We are the GOP's lab for testing out fun and fascistic policies. It's the only way a state could have voted for Biden and have Dems in every statewide position but still have a 66% state GOP legislature. When it comes to our legislature the whole thing is a joke and people are just tired of worrying about it. They have gerrymandered the state so thoroughly that there is literally no chance of ever flipping it.Errrmmm, WHAT!?!?!?
How is this not major front page news!?!?!?!
Is it that gerrymandered, no real hope of ever reversing it?Welcome to Wisconsin. We are the GOP's lab for testing out fun and fascistic policies. It's the only way a state could have voted for Biden and have Dems in every statewide position but still have a 66% state GOP legislature. When it comes to our legislature the whole thing is a joke and people are just tired of worrying about it. They have gerrymandered the state so thoroughly that there is literally no chance of ever flipping it.
It's actually less about gerrymandering and more about population concentration. There are essentially 2.5 major urban centers (GB gets a half point) in WI that are overwhelmingly blue. All the GOP needs to do is shrug their shoulders and pack all those voters in as few districts as they can and job done.Is it that gerrymandered, no real hope of ever reversing it?
Population Represented | ||
Senate | Assembly | |
Rep | 2,772,350 | 2,695,006 |
Dem | 1,575,144 | 1,652,488 |
Population Difference | 76% | 63% |
Rep | Dem | Difference | |
President (2020) | 1,610,065 | 1,630,673 | 1.3% |
Gov (2018) | 1,295,080 | 1,324,307 | 2.3% |
AG (2018) | 1,288,712 | 1,305,902 | 1.3% |
SOS (2018) | 1,235,034 | 1,380,752 | 11.8% |
Treasurer (2018) | 1,216,811 | 1,324,110 | 8.8% |
US Senate (2018) | 1,184,885 | 1,472,914 | 24.3% |
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Doubt it, though that would be the smart thing to do.Maddow ran a segment on five states submitting fraudulent state voting certifications, and how the documents are near replicas of one another; Arizona submitted two separate faked documents. It is amazing actual elected officials would sign/certify a document and submit to the Fed. Surely, every person that signed will be prosecuted and removed from office.
"Controlled opposition". Considering the democrats are funded by big business, and many of the same people and pacs who contribute to the Republicans also contribute to the Democrats, it's not really much of a stretch.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
FUBAR.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date