Utd v Wolves Officials dropped for next week

DavidDeSchmikes

Full Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2013
Messages
17,392
The non penalty will get little to no media/pundit backlash so the PGMOL won't need to do anything
 

Dansk

Full Member
Joined
May 7, 2017
Messages
1,413
Everyone knew it would go like this, and that this will continue for months. We'll be denied ten stonewall penalties and then receive one marginally debatable one in January, and then all non-United fans will scream and shout about the refs always being on our side. Then it'll be another several months of us getting absolutely swindled in every game, and then one call goes our way, and another insane witch hunt against that ref. It isn't even a surprise anymore. It has been proven beyond the possibility of doubt that the zeitgeist of English football can successfully sabotage our seasons by just lying about reality and attacking any ref who gives us anything, while Sky won't even mention when we get utterly conned.
 

Dansk

Full Member
Joined
May 7, 2017
Messages
1,413
Why can't we get former player pundits like Liverpool, who actually advocate for their club.
The ABU movement has mandated that in order for a former United player to be accepted as a regular commentator, they must turn rabidly anti-United. Case in point: Gary Neville. Meanwhile, any other pundit is allowed to actively support their old club. If a former United man was to say anything positive about United, they will at best be dragged in to answer a few questions during half-time, like Keane and Scholes. If you want to make a real career in the post-player football business, and are considered a United man, you are not allowed to show any sign of caring for the club. You must hate it or they'll shun you. In England, there are different rules for United and its former players that are significantly more stringent and punitive.