VAR and Refs | General Discussion

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
134,236
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
100%. It's just human nature on their part, but I just don't believe refs haven't tuned their attempts at precision and accuracy down a margin, because in their mind they know there's a video to help them or undermine them. Then the application of this video technolody just enrages people more as it opens up a second layer of often subjective opinion.

The disallowed McTominay one at the weekend for example - nothing is ruled out on field. Then we have 4 minutes, where Var suggest it's a subjective offisde call, and the goal gets disallowed with people perfectly capable of arguing it both ways. Pre VAR, had that goal stood, there would have been a minimal sense of injustice from Fulham fans. The stakes of goals in tight games are too high for this sort of thing, and I wonder if we wouldn't be better off returning to the old school idea that the ref tries his best and might make a mistake.

At least then we could celebrate goals. I miss the glance of an attacker towards the linesman, and knowing when he keeps celebrating that the flag stayed down. Now I just wait until the game has restarted, and give a pathetic little fist bump.
100%. In my 40ish years watching football I’ve never known another change come anywhere near VAR in terms of how it’s fundamentally changed the experience of watching football (for the worse, obviously!)
 

terraloo

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Nov 6, 2012
Messages
393
Supports
Chelsea
100%. In my 40ish years watching football I’ve never known another change come anywhere near VAR in terms of how it’s fundamentally changed the experience of watching football (for the worse, obviously!)
100% with you on this.

What I find the real funny part of all this is that so many that called for VAR now seem to be the greatest critics.
 

SuperiorXI

Full Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2012
Messages
14,691
Location
Manchester, England
100% with you on this.

What I find the real funny part of all this is that so many that called for VAR now seem to be the greatest critics.
It's clear that it's being misused. VAR can be great for the game if implemented in the correct way. A lot of those who wanted it probably thought it was going to be done in the right way.
 

Sunny Jim

Full Member
Joined
May 8, 2007
Messages
29,424
Location
Warsaw...that's too far away from Edinburgh...
People need to stop with the conspiracy shit. Every club can bring a case for there being a conspiracy against them based on events and mistakes. The actual issue is the incompetence and lack of practical vision. Scrapping VAR will just make everything much worse.
Well, i agree with you. It's not conspiracy. the evidence suggest that we are by far the most affected club in terms of VAR.

How VAR decisions affect each Premier League club in 2023-24 - ESPN
 

cyberman

Full Member
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
37,331
Whatever you say. That is not what is discussed though. And I am not sure how clear and obvious comes into play with offsides, if it even does. The correct call in this instance, however, is offside considering he commits an offside offence from an offside position.
Clear and obvious is in play because the ref was called over to the pitch side monitor.
 

Red in STL

Turnover not takeover
Joined
Dec 1, 2022
Messages
10,046
Location
In Bed
Supports
The only team that matters
Careful posting things like this, you'll have people bringing up the whole Fergie had the refs in his pocket myth again.
Fergie didn't have the refs in his pocket, they were just shit-scared of him :D
 

90 + 5min

Full Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2019
Messages
5,329
People need to stop with the conspiracy shit. Every club can bring a case for there being a conspiracy against them based on events and mistakes. The actual issue is the incompetence and lack of practical vision. Scrapping VAR will just make everything much worse.
Conspiracy is not far away when you check how we have been treated this year alone. Not to mention other years. If we just check this year here a some incidents that we can take from many, many more.

Wolverhampton
We should have 2 penalties. Nothing. Wolves should have one. I wonder which was it was talked about all week?

Arsenal
Garnacho score beautifle goal just to get it disallowed. Lets put lines here and there so we can disallow it. Not only that. Let Arsenal players score goal and let us pretend it wasn't freekick in that situation.

Tottenham
How we don't get penalty in that important time when game was so tight we will never know. Shocking decision.

ManCity
Ghost penalty give to ManCity when the game was equal. Same things that happens at every corner kick. But lets make ManUtd pay for it.

Burnley
Lets disallow that Evans goal but lets make sure that we give them in other games.

Crystal Palace
Nothing to see when it comes to a handball. Lets also allow CP goal that was almost same as Evans got disallowed. Only difference. Scored by foot and colour of the shirt.

Fulham
Lets disallow McTominay goal. Why? Lets pretend Maguire was involved in that play so much that it made impact on that goal.


So, if they don't want people to think like it is conspiracy, release the tapes. Have mic och cam on referees and VAR room. Let them do interview after games. Start following own rules and punish clubs. Make sure that referees don't have jobs outside country in countries that actually own clubs. And so on.
 

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
134,236
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
100% with you on this.

What I find the real funny part of all this is that so many that called for VAR now seem to be the greatest critics.
It was predictable, to be fair. Anyone who was already refusing to accept human error and subjectivity was inevitably going to lose their shit when it turned out that VAR can't magic away the human element of officiating.
 

Frank Grimes

Full Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2014
Messages
8,710
Location
Newbies 15/16 FPL Champion.
Conspiracy is not far away when you check how we have been treated this year alone. Not to mention other years. If we just check this year here a some incidents that we can take from many, many more.

Wolverhampton
We should have 2 penalties. Nothing. Wolves should have one. I wonder which was it was talked about all week?

Arsenal
Garnacho score beautifle goal just to get it disallowed. Lets put lines here and there so we can disallow it. Not only that. Let Arsenal players score goal and let us pretend it wasn't freekick in that situation.

Tottenham
How we don't get penalty in that important time when game was so tight we will never know. Shocking decision.

ManCity
Ghost penalty give to ManCity when the game was equal. Same things that happens at every corner kick. But lets make ManUtd pay for it.

Burnley
Lets disallow that Evans goal but lets make sure that we give them in other games.

Crystal Palace
Nothing to see when it comes to a handball. Lets also allow CP goal that was almost same as Evans got disallowed. Only difference. Scored by foot and colour of the shirt.

Fulham
Lets disallow McTominay goal. Why? Lets pretend Maguire was involved in that play so much that it made impact on that goal.


So, if they don't want people to think like it is conspiracy, release the tapes. Have mic och cam on referees and VAR room. Let them do interview after games. Start following own rules and punish clubs. Make sure that referees don't have jobs outside country in countries that actually own clubs. And so on.
Rashford crossing for Hojlund ruled out of play. I'm sure there's more.

Absolutely getting roasted by VAR this season, thankfully we haven't looked for the sympathy vote like other clubs and have maintained a modicum of dignity.
 

Gio

★★★★★★★★
Joined
Jan 25, 2001
Messages
20,348
Location
Bonnie Scotland
Supports
Rangers
It was predictable, to be fair. Anyone who was already refusing to accept human error and subjectivity was inevitably going to lose their shit when it turned out that VAR can't magic away the human element of officiating.
Yep. All the complaints about inconsistent refereeing, about the handball rule - 95% of it was managers passing the buck to an easy scapegoat. The solutions diagnosed the wrong problems.
 

Hammondo

Full Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2015
Messages
6,978
Conspiracy is not far away when you check how we have been treated this year alone. Not to mention other years. If we just check this year here a some incidents that we can take from many, many more.

Wolverhampton
We should have 2 penalties. Nothing. Wolves should have one. I wonder which was it was talked about all week?

Arsenal
Garnacho score beautifle goal just to get it disallowed. Lets put lines here and there so we can disallow it. Not only that. Let Arsenal players score goal and let us pretend it wasn't freekick in that situation.

Tottenham
How we don't get penalty in that important time when game was so tight we will never know. Shocking decision.

ManCity
Ghost penalty give to ManCity when the game was equal. Same things that happens at every corner kick. But lets make ManUtd pay for it.

Burnley
Lets disallow that Evans goal but lets make sure that we give them in other games.

Crystal Palace
Nothing to see when it comes to a handball. Lets also allow CP goal that was almost same as Evans got disallowed. Only difference. Scored by foot and colour of the shirt.

Fulham
Lets disallow McTominay goal. Why? Lets pretend Maguire was involved in that play so much that it made impact on that goal.


So, if they don't want people to think like it is conspiracy, release the tapes. Have mic och cam on referees and VAR room. Let them do interview after games. Start following own rules and punish clubs. Make sure that referees don't have jobs outside country in countries that actually own clubs. And so on.
Garnacho was offside vs Arsenal.

Man City pen was soft, but it's accurate for the rules.

Out goal vs Burnley was offside (miles offside).

Not sure how you are even arguing the CP goal was similar and offside.

Fulham goal was offside, as has been discussed over and over. I have yet to see a professional say otherwise.

I could not remember the Wolves pen claims you are talking about, so I watched the highlights to remind myself but there is nothing there.

No idea why some United fans like to play the victim.
 

90 + 5min

Full Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2019
Messages
5,329
Garnacho was offside vs Arsenal.

Man City pen was soft, but it's accurate for the rules.

Out goal vs Burnley was offside (miles offside).

Not sure how you are even arguing the CP goal was similar and offside.

Fulham goal was offside, as has been discussed over and over. I have yet to see a professional say otherwise.

I could not remember the Wolves pen claims you are talking about, so I watched the highlights to remind myself but there is nothing there.

No idea why some United fans like to play the victim.
Garnacho was not offside. It is offside if you put lines wrong and wait until ball was passed and not the first contact before release of the ball.

How come there is so few, if any penalties, after corners when people wrestle with eachother? Why did we get decision against us? No penalties before and no after that game. How strange.

Evans goal was not offside. Keeper didn't have a chance. And if we compare, why did ManCity have their goal allowed for similiar if not worse situation?

CP goal. If you want to say that Evans goal was offside. Look at CP goal. The shot comes when they have other player in offside that we could argue did disturb Onana.

Fulham goal was onside. Magurie didn't touch the ball. He didn't in any way disturb goalkeeper or anyone else that was part of that goal.

There were two penalties we should have against Wolves. In first and second half. First was when ball hit hand almost on the way towards goal. The other was when Anthony played the ball and got tackled by their keeper. Almost same as Onanan but with his feet.

Highlights, professionals you talk about and so on are part of ABU. ManUtd fans don't need to play victims. We have fact and truth on our side. The only thing we want is transparency and that we are being treated in the same way as teams like ManCity, Liverpool, Arsenal, Tottenham and so on.
 

saivet

Full Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2013
Messages
25,412
Anyone seen the Celtic red card? Personally think it's ridiculous he got sent off that.
 

tomaldinho1

Full Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
18,026
Anyone seen the Celtic red card? Personally think it's ridiculous he got sent off that.
It's fine if that is enforced across leagues - unfortunate, probably unintentional but it's studs up, off the ground and badly timed - but we see these stay as yellows all the time.
 

Red in STL

Turnover not takeover
Joined
Dec 1, 2022
Messages
10,046
Location
In Bed
Supports
The only team that matters
It's fine if that is enforced across leagues - unfortunate, probably unintentional but it's studs up, off the ground and badly timed - but we see these stay as yellows all the time.
I haven't seen this one but European refs are always more strict on this kind of thing, have been for years and long before VAR was ever a thing as well
 

tomaldinho1

Full Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
18,026
I haven't seen this one but European refs are always more strict on this kind of thing, have been for years and long before VAR was ever a thing as well
Yep no doubt - the Celtic one we saw a lot in the PL last year where player stepped over the ball or got there slightly late and it was usually a yellow. in Europe any foot off the ground + contact runs the risk of being a red even if completely by accident (Nani being a prime example)
 

Gio

★★★★★★★★
Joined
Jan 25, 2001
Messages
20,348
Location
Bonnie Scotland
Supports
Rangers
There was next to no force in the contact. That’s the important thing. It’s the force that is dangerous. It’s such a basic point I don’t see how referees keep messing up on it.
 

Hammondo

Full Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2015
Messages
6,978
Garnacho was not offside. It is offside if you put lines wrong and wait until ball was passed and not the first contact before release of the ball.

How come there is so few, if any penalties, after corners when people wrestle with eachother? Why did we get decision against us? No penalties before and no after that game. How strange.

Evans goal was not offside. Keeper didn't have a chance. And if we compare, why did ManCity have their goal allowed for similiar if not worse situation?

CP goal. If you want to say that Evans goal was offside. Look at CP goal. The shot comes when they have other player in offside that we could argue did disturb Onana.

Fulham goal was onside. Magurie didn't touch the ball. He didn't in any way disturb goalkeeper or anyone else that was part of that goal.

There were two penalties we should have against Wolves. In first and second half. First was when ball hit hand almost on the way towards goal. The other was when Anthony played the ball and got tackled by their keeper. Almost same as Onanan but with his feet.

Highlights, professionals you talk about and so on are part of ABU. ManUtd fans don't need to play victims. We have fact and truth on our side. The only thing we want is transparency and that we are being treated in the same way as teams like ManCity, Liverpool, Arsenal, Tottenham and so on.
He was offside, using correct lines.

It was a soft penalty, but rules are rules.

Evans goal was offside, you cannot be in front of the keeper like that, that's very basic.

None of the players offside were close to the keeper. Had 0 impact.

Maguire was in the way of the defender and attempted to kick the ball, it was very close.

Stop trying to be a victim and blaming someone else for our losses.
 

RedRocket9908

Full Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2023
Messages
2,509
Location
Manchester
Im suprised they didnt award a pen against Maguire for handball there, the refs in Europe have given much more ridiculous ones against us over the last 18 months.
 

90 + 5min

Full Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2019
Messages
5,329
He was offside, using correct lines.

It was a soft penalty, but rules are rules.

Evans goal was offside, you cannot be in front of the keeper like that, that's very basic.

None of the players offside were close to the keeper. Had 0 impact.

Maguire was in the way of the defender and attempted to kick the ball, it was very close.

Stop trying to be a victim and blaming someone else for our losses.
The lines that were used were not correct.

Rulas are rules for who? Because if rules are rules, why aren't they being used for all teams. Why just us?

Wierd that impact is always negative towards us.

Maguire didn't disturb any player that could reach the ball. He had no effect on the goal.

I'm no trying to be victim. This is fact. What we need is transparency and answers why we are treated differently. Why don't we get same decisions as some other teams? Why don't we get our VAR tapes released? Why don't we get apologies even if they don't mean anything.
 

LawCharltonBest

Enjoys watching fox porn
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
15,535
Location
Salford
I really don’t get it

you’ll see that happen in the next round of cl fixtures and it won’t even be reviewed
 

sullydnl

Ross Kemp's caf ID
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
34,063
Pretty obvious red tbf. Intent doesn't really matter and he wasn't remotely near the ball.
 

Jev

Full Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2008
Messages
8,085
Location
Denmark
Harsh. I think it's another case of slowmotion and still pictures creating the illusion of an intent that isn't there. In real time hardly anyone would call that a red.
 

MikeUpNorth

Wobbles like a massive pair of tits
Joined
Apr 26, 2007
Messages
19,939
Don’t think we have much to complain about with this one. Hit him with studs above the ankle and nowhere near the ball.
 

arnie_ni

Full Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2014
Messages
15,251
Don't think he can argue. They've targeted those sorts. Remember awbs red a fee seasons ago in the CL. Anything on the ankle like that is a red in Europe
 

AndySmith1990

Full Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2021
Messages
6,345
It's an obvious red. But some will moan about literally every VAR decision against us as if there's a conspiracy
 

Solius

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Staff
Joined
Dec 31, 2007
Messages
86,847
So everyone who’s ever stepped across an opponent to protect the ball should be sent off if someone’s leg moves under them during that movement?