2 man midfield
Last Man Standing finalist 2021/22
So all the refs were in agreement that the goal should stand, which is exactly why it wasn’t allowed to.
Clear as mud.
Clear as mud.
So all the refs were in agreement that the goal should stand, which is exactly why it wasn’t allowed to.
Clear as mud.
Thought the only big mistake today was the Diaz goal. Not sure why the outrage about all the rest?
So all the refs were in agreement that the goal should stand, which is exactly why it wasn’t allowed to.
Clear as mud.
No, the linesman called it offside so the ref's initial decision was that the goal shouldn't stand.
Why he’s even flagging in the first place needs looking at. What happened to leaving your flag down on the tight calls so var can do its job?
Feel like we finally have common ground.Exactly, thank you. He wouldn't have flagged a similar situation if Son scored that. Something's not quite right. Then Darren 'makes a mistake' straight after, or something. Yeah, all above board.
Are people still claiming that VAR cannot be wrong about offsides now?
Close the CAF.Feel like we finally have common ground.
Why he’s even flagging in the first place needs looking at. What happened to leaving your flag down on the tight calls so var can do its job?
Fecking arseholes. All of them agreed it was a goal and still couldn't communicate that. Fecking firing offence.
And why is that cnuting linesman getting off Scott free? Why raise the flag after playing on in such a tight call? Let VAR do it's job. Cnuting cheats the lot of them. Arab money at play.
We have history with both the linesman and Darren at VAR from before (just saw some stats in other tweets). These cnuts are going to games with specific Arab orders. Cnuts.
Without question there is a destinct bias by refs and VAR favouring London clubs it is blatantly ovious this season. God forbid I am supporting the scousers but the ref certainly had a cockeral stamped on his forhead in their game today.Handballs by Arsenal players aren't penalties this season either.
The amount of times I’ve read this. It’s just a video replay, the lines and freezing is no where near accurate enough.
Exactly. Either they replay this Spurs game (can of worms I know) or they allow Klopp 2 minutes of screen time calling each ref involved in the game cnuts, bastards, mother feckers, clear Arab money grabbing cheats, etc.
But, hey we got an apology.
Liverpool are going to get even more help from the refs than usual now.
Exactly, thank you. He wouldn't have flagged a similar situation if Son scored that. Something's not quite right. Then Darren 'makes a mistake' straight after, or something. Yeah, all above board.
Totally the wrong call but of course it is Liverpool who get an apology.
We have had:
- The Spurs handball
- The Garnacho goal wrong angle
- Hojlund goal v Brighton only 1 angle
- Evans goal
- Palace handball and studs up challenges today
And no apology.
And let's not forget the absolute nonsense week of media scrutiny about the Onana incident which ignored Wolves keeper doing the same thing previously, and us not getting a similar call earlier in the game.
It actually annoys me that ETH and the club aren't screaming from the rooftops about this because fecking Klopp is, and would be.
Not to mention todays handball travelled 30 yards and denied a goal scoring opportunity.Literally, I wonder why there isn't more outrage at the handball not given against Utd. The player literally looks behind him at the ball as it approaches the penalty area and blatantly outstretched his arm to block the ball while making it look accidental.
The fact that someone has the ability to look at that on a screen multiple times and not even recommend a review is mind-boggling.
As I said, they're supposed to use the first frame available to them in which the ball has been clearly played. So I don't know why you're saying the bold as if you didn't expect to see the ball having been played in the frame they used. There is indeed room for difference between that frame and the hypothetical perfect frame that would exist if the camera framerate was better, which is why they have the MOE Garnacho fell outside. You can feel free to complain that the MOE doesn't sufficiently compensate for the gap in frames if you want, but it is what it is. Until the tech improves, they can only work with the frames and MOE at their disposal, which they did.
And they didn't use the wrong part of the body. The defender's shoulder was further forward than his head because his upper body was turned. Again, that's something they're able to easily determine with the scope lines they use, and in this case I thought it was pretty clear just from looking at the image. Though given at least one poster tried to tell me it was physically impossible to have your shoulder further forward than your head, I'm not surprised there's an unwillingness to accept that.
There was no conspiracy or error in that offside call. You don't have to like it, you might think there is room for error in the system, but it was completely consistent with how offsides are supposed to be applied. In fact we've had much tighter calls than that go against us in the past.
Totally the wrong call but of course it is Liverpool who get an apology.
We have had:
- The Spurs handball
- The Garnacho goal wrong angle
- Hojlund goal v Brighton only 1 angle
- Evans goal
- Palace handball and studs up challenges today
And no apology.
And let's not forget the absolute nonsense week of media scrutiny about the Onana incident which ignored Wolves keeper doing the same thing previously, and us not getting a similar call earlier in the game.
It actually annoys me that ETH and the club aren't screaming from the rooftops about this because fecking Klopp is, and would be.
Justify it in which ever way helps you sleep at night but the wrong decision was made due to the incorrect use of technology and human error. No different to Liverpool, save for the apology.
Still no explanation why no lines were drawn. Even if they thought he was onside, why were the lines not drawn to confirm that case. Neville says they get a preview of decisions before the live audience and the lines were never drawn, and it was said check complete. How can that be without an actual check, with the lines drawn?
Something seems very strange here.