Watch something being done about this because the scouse cnuts have been on the receiving end of it
But, but remember what Dermot Gallagher said, once they put the lines down it’s right. They have all the angles, etc. Yet he seemed to forget that they have already apologized for putting the lines in the wrong place previously.They need to show/explain these decisions because it ‘s starting to feel like borderline corruption. I mean not only are decisions so inconsistent but they’re starting to actually get easy calls wrong.
That Diaz offside is a complete farce
That would be interesting to see if there is a stat for ball in play.TBH I think the most inexplicable thing of the entire day was how only 4 minutes were added on with the new rules around added time. The ball must have been in play for a maximum of 20 minutes in the second half and I felt sure I was going to see double digits at the very least.
They have obviously scrapped it, a bunch of clueless clowns.TBH I think the most inexplicable thing of the entire day was how only 4 minutes were added on with the new rules around added time. The ball must have been in play for a maximum of 20 minutes in the second half and I felt sure I was going to see double digits at the very least.
Literally stopped a clear chance for Rashford with his hand. Terrible decision.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
It’s probably more down to Klopp going apoplectic and Liverpool as a club having the balls to put in an official complaint.Watch something being done about this because the scouse cnuts have been on the receiving end of it
Every year they start the season off saying we are going to crack down on this, that and the other. Few weeks in and they don’t care anymore. Happens every season. Remember players having to leave the pitch at the closest point. That lasted about one match week. They just can’t manage games….don’t know how to control the players.They have obviously scrapped it, a bunch of clueless clowns.
when it hit 80 i felt so comfortable, i genuinely thought it would be about 10 minutes added.TBH I think the most inexplicable thing of the entire day was how only 4 minutes were added on with the new rules around added time. The ball must have been in play for a maximum of 20 minutes in the second half and I felt sure I was going to see double digits at the very least.
YepBut, but remember what Dermot Gallagher said, once they put the lines down it’s right. They have all the angles, etc. Yet he seemed to forget that they have already apologized for putting the lines in the wrong place previously.
I think they didn’t even look at the leg of the defender…they were just looking at the player right next to Diaz and said it’s not close so offside. Forgot about the other player on the pitch that could be playing him on.
Honestly I've been convinced this was the case from the very start. These refs all have huge egos so what better way of preserving their ego than self-sabotaging the computer system which does their job for them and makes them obsolete.Maybe the refs are being deliberately shit with var to get it scrapped, makes as much sense as some of the decisions this season.
If they were as bad for every team.Maybe the refs are being deliberately shit with var to get it scrapped, makes as much sense as some of the decisions this season.
I hope he says something juicy. He needs to. They didn't got a chance to win the game. Just like us in lot of games last couple of years.Klopp’s presser promises to be juicy
The hand clearly comes out just as the ball hits it.They must have put the lines on the other defender by mistake....
That Utd clip, no way it's deliberate handball and no unnatural position or moving hand to ball. They've really screwed up what's meant to be called as handball in the last few years.
The Curtis Jones tackle is never a red card. Yet another example of slowmotion and still pictures blurring things, creating the illusion of an intent that just isn't there. His foot slips over the ball, it's happenstance, and everyone who has played football and looks at that challenge live knows that is not a red card. Slowmotion should be banished in the VAR room.Thought the only big mistake today was the Diaz goal. Not sure why the outrage about all the rest?
Nah, there is consistency with those decisions and I agree with it. Can't go into tackle studs up and expect that if you win the ball you can just maintain the momentum into other player. Unlucky - yes. Red - also yes.The Curtis Jones tackle is never a red card. Yet another example of slowmotion and still pictures blurring things, creating the illusion of an intent that just isn't there. His foot slips over the ball, it's happenstance, and everyone who has played football and looks at that challenge live knows that is not a red card. Slowmotion should be banished in the VAR room.
Its the same as Casemiro for us last year, dont think either is red.The Curtis Jones tackle is never a red card. Yet another example of slowmotion and still pictures blurring things, creating the illusion of an intent that just isn't there. His foot slips over the ball, it's happenstance, and everyone who has played football and looks at that challenge live knows that is not a red card. Slowmotion should be banished in the VAR room.
Intent isn't the only red card criterion. Planting your studs with a straight leg on the shin of a planted leg transfers quite a lot of force from you onto the other player and is a big risk of a break. Endangering the safety of an opponent is a red card criterion which is why that's a certain red card. I just wish that they applied that part of the rule to other dangerous incidents like scissor tackles where the player's centre of gravity goes straight above an ankle (that's how Garnacho and Eriksen were taken out for several months), and bicycle kicking an opponent in the head.The Curtis Jones tackle is never a red card. Yet another example of slowmotion and still pictures blurring things, creating the illusion of an intent that just isn't there. His foot slips over the ball, it's happenstance, and everyone who has played football and looks at that challenge live knows that is not a red card. Slowmotion should be banished in the VAR room.
He does not go into it studs first. He goes into it with his toe first and then slips over the ball. There's absolutely nothing reckless about the way he goes into that challenge, the fact that it ends up as a risky impact is entirely accidental. The fact that there's a consistency of making bad decisions does not warrant another one.Nah, there is consistency with those decisions and I agree with it. Can't go into tackle studs up and expect that if you win the ball you can just maintain the momentum into other player. Unlucky - yes. Red - also yes.
But he is out of control.He does not go into it studs first. He goes into it with his toe first and then slips over the ball. There's absolutely nothing reckless about the way he goes into that challenge, the fact that it ends up as a risky impact is entirely accidental. The fact that there's a consistency of making bad decisions does not warrant another one.
Was it a straight red or second yellow?The Curtis Jones tackle is never a red card. Yet another example of slowmotion and still pictures blurring things, creating the illusion of an intent that just isn't there. His foot slips over the ball, it's happenstance, and everyone who has played football and looks at that challenge live knows that is not a red card. Slowmotion should be banished in the VAR room.
So you reckon players should be jumping on the ball from above with studs and if they fail to control it, have an excuse of "slipping" when they injure the opponent. You should not in any way end up in a position where an opponent leg could easily be broken because you failed to control yourself when making a challenge. Red all day.He does not go into it studs first. He goes into it with his toe first and then slips over the ball. There's absolutely nothing reckless about the way he goes into that challenge, the fact that it ends up as a risky impact is entirely accidental. The fact that there's a consistency of making bad decisions does not warrant another one.
You can get sent off for an accidentally reckless challenge. There doesn’t always need to be intent for a red card.He does not go into it studs first. He goes into it with his toe first and then slips over the ball. There's absolutely nothing reckless about the way he goes into that challenge, the fact that it ends up as a risky impact is entirely accidental. The fact that there's a consistency of making bad decisions does not warrant another one.
Straight red.Was it a straight red or second yellow?
I thought the casemiro decision last season was harsh but you couldn't complain about a yellow there. You'd be lucky to get that little really.
Human error is the official statement from PL.I wonder what Howy is going to say about the Diaz "offside". Has to be the most blatant var error so far
Redknapp for some reason thinks its the 1970s where you're allowed to stud into someone above ankle hight if you skim the ball.Thought the only big mistake today was the Diaz goal. Not sure why the outrage about all the rest?
Exactly. I have no problems with red card but that goal being disallowed. Come on. For what?You can get sent off for an accidentally reckless challenge. There doesn’t always need to be intent for a red card.
The most annoying thing for every fan is these ultra marginal calls that no-one would for a second wonder about if the goal was given.Things like red cards can be debatable but getting decisions wrong that should take 30 seconds to check with the lines is just unacceptable. It’s a disgrace to be honest.
You have to wonder just how many decisions they get wrong, they’ve shown time and time again that it’s far from an accurate technology