2 man midfield
Last Man Standing finalist 2021/22
The ref wasn’t that bad today imo. Couple of weird decisions but nothing massive.
That’s how I feel he was just pure shite tried to give one bad pen for both teams.He was a terrible ref for both sides.
He literally gave us a goal kick for the clearest deflection you're likely to see.
The lad moves his arm out towards the ball. That's always a penalty. He didn't even complain that much himself.Because we got our point thanks to a very soft penalty, the kind that hasn’t been given all season in the Premier League.
The referee made three very suspect decisions. The Dalot free kick for having his shirt pulled. AWB for winning the ball. Maguire for existing at a corner.
You can't rule out match fixing / fixed betting when you see decisions that unusual.
To me it looks like the movement is him trying to actually move his arm away from the ball. Surely we can agree it wasn’t a stonewaller?The lad moves his arm out towards the ball. That's always a penalty. He didn't even complain that much himself.
I just mean those three isolated decisions were so unusual that it is suspicious. Match fixing can be based on an individual decision like Dalot foul in second half. It doesn't have to impact the whole game. Also, a team having 'X or more fouls' and bolstering the numbers through such decisions.Really? Finally saw a ref give us a penalty today; book a player for diving against us and a penalty ruled by VAR.
The ref made some very confusing calls but it was really didn’t feel like any bias towards us today, just a poor ref that really looked lost and overwhelmed
I agree it wasn't a stonewall pen but I also say we've lost 5 points recently because of 3 very very soft pens recently. We'd be in CL discussion with those 5 points.To me it looks like the movement is him trying to actually move his arm away from the ball. Surely we can agree it wasn’t a stonewaller?
The lad moves his arm out towards the ball. That's always a penalty. He didn't even complain that much himself.
The referee made three very suspect decisions. The Dalot free kick for having his shirt pulled. AWB for winning the ball. Maguire for existing at a corner.
You can't rule out match fixing / fixed betting when you see decisions that unusual.
Giving clear decisions isn't evidence a referee isn't being biased by the way. Not that I agree with the claim but your argument doesn't work.Really? Finally saw a ref give us a penalty today; book a player for diving against us and a penalty ruled by VAR.
The ref made some very confusing calls but it was really didn’t feel like any bias towards us today, just a poor ref that really looked lost and overwhelmed
I agree.Seeing it again, does look a pen, soft but yes.
Giving clear decisions isn't evidence a referee isn't being biased by the way. Not that I agree with the claim but your argument doesn't work.
If a bet was based on the number of fouls by United then inventing three free-kicks would have done very well.Match fixing?
He won't have done very well for whoever he's "fixing" it for giving a harsh pen v Bourno!
Why wasn't their keeper sent off for dissent? Got booked for dissent and continued being absolutely rabid towards the ref.
Not sure why VAR seemed so fixated on WHERE that late incident happened and not seemingly looking at whether the Bournemouth player ran into Kambwala.
Im not saying it absolutely wasn’t a foul but they didn’t seem to consider it
You dropped this :I just mean those three isolated decisions were so unusual that it is suspicious. Match fixing can be based on an individual decision like Dalot foul in second half. It doesn't have to impact the whole game. Also, a team having 'X or more fouls' and bolstering the numbers through such decisions.
Again, he gave three fouls against United without any positive evidence of a foul. He could be grossly incompetent but it could be something else.
They usually go in stages. Maybe once they determined it was in the box, then they'd determine if it was actually a foul.Not sure why VAR seemed so fixated on WHERE that late incident happened and not seemingly looking at whether the Bournemouth player ran into Kambwala.
Im not saying it absolutely wasn’t a foul but they didn’t seem to consider it
Great contribution, thanks.You dropped this :
The only contentious call was United's penalty.I think it was very harsh but in the middle of the mental decisions that happened this season, it's understandable.
Great contribution, thanks.
The cheek of articles like this after us being the victim of three dives leading to penalties in the two games beforehand.
Aaaaand this is why it is easy to not give united pens
The joy has been sucked out of the game thanks to refs and the media. They'd rather people were outraged every week to keep them engaged in the endless debate about VAR. The actual quality of the football on offer across the league is actually pretty poor, so they need to generate interest somehow.The cheek of articles like this after us being the victim of three dives leading to penalties in the two games beforehand.
The joy has been sucked out of the game thanks to refs and the media. They'd rather people were outraged every week to keep them engaged in the endless debate about VAR. The actual quality of the football on offer across the league is actually pretty poor, so they need to generate interest somehow.
Bournemouth yesterday were diving all over the place and were genuinely painful to watch, yet we're supposed to feel like they were hard done by. United were poor, but Bournemouth deserved nothing for their lack of sportsmanship. The moment their left back grabbed Dalot's shirt and threw himself to the floor was hilariously bad and the ref still fell for it. There are no gentlemen left in the game these days, which makes it hard to actually root for anyone.
Aaaaand this is why it is easy to not give united pens