VAR and Refs | General Discussion | Forest go into meltdown

MrMarcello

In a well-ordered universe...
Joined
Dec 26, 2000
Messages
52,770
Location
On a pale blue dot in space
I fail to comprehend how a ref is dropped a level down after a major error yet gets a reprieve a week later to officiate the reigning champions match. It reeks of incompetence and gives fuel to other beliefs.
 

Bubz27

No I won’t change your tag line
Joined
Aug 17, 2009
Messages
21,580
Pundits saying its not clear and obvious error now. Where's that line been for months?
 

SER19

Full Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2008
Messages
12,682
Pundits saying its not clear and obvious error now. Where's that line been for months?
Theyre being told to, its pretty obvious how bad refs have become and pundits are being told to dial back in criticism. Its so bad this season it's almost a write off of a season
 
Joined
Jun 26, 2014
Messages
22,135
Location
Behind the right goal post as "Whiteside shoots!"
Pundits saying its not clear and obvious error now. Where's that line been for months?
One, it was but regardless, this “clear and obvious” thing has to be ignored because they’re looking at it too black and white and being selective. If it’s a goal or pen and VAR thinks ref might be wrong, just ask him to have a look at replays/angles.

They say they don’t want to re-ref games but they are SOMETIMES.

We‘ve got technology and we’re not using it to ensure key decisions are right.

And while I’m clearly biased, it’s hard not to think decisions go against United/for City (and Arsenal and Newcastle to a lesser extent).

There‘ll always be human errors even with VAR, but we could reduce them.
 

Bangor_Red

Full Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2006
Messages
733
Location
Bangor,NI
Was a clear foul. The type players always play for. It's actually laughable how lucky city get. Also fairly sure it's a handball given the way those have been going against goalscorers in past 2 seasons
 

autopilot

Full Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2013
Messages
461
Supports
Chelsea
Surely it was a foul on Gallagher in the build up to this?
Unfortunately not given, and match restarted since it was given a City throw-in instead of a Chelsea freekick, so that handcuffs them I assume. But yea that was annoying.
 

NotChatGPT

Brownfinger
Joined
Jul 3, 2023
Messages
562
The penalty decision in the first half is mental. If they decide that the tug by Cucurella warrants a penalty, then surely Haalands pull on Cucurella to get in front of him, which is rather obvious, should cancel it out and result in a Chelsea freekick. How they completely overlook that segment, and only focus on the last second, is beyond me.
 

njred

HALA MADRID!
Joined
Nov 3, 2001
Messages
7,239
Supports
Liverpool
How was this not a straight red card?

You’re looking at a still. Isn’t that what we’ve been complaining about? You can take a still of almost any passage of play and there would be a foul in there somehow. Maybe you didn’t watch the match because if you did you would have realized that it’s not a red. Looks like you’re a proponent of VAR .
 

Bangor_Red

Full Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2006
Messages
733
Location
Bangor,NI
Rodri pulls players back constantly throughout every game and gets away with nothing. Did it 3 times in about 10 seconds and nothing given at all. Yet hoijland touches him at a corner and he's given a pen. City have gotten away with tactical fouls for years
 

90 + 5min

Full Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2019
Messages
5,259
Why do managers keep their players on pitch?
This is what you get when clubs don’t go out and say enough. Refuse to play until There is equal chance for teams. Not when you know that ref is on their side.
 
Joined
Jun 26, 2014
Messages
22,135
Location
Behind the right goal post as "Whiteside shoots!"
I fail to comprehend how a ref is dropped a level down after a major error yet gets a reprieve a week later to officiate the reigning champions match. It reeks of incompetence and gives fuel to other beliefs.
Not only dropped down (though why lower league clubs should have to suffer is odd… just suspend him for a week?), but in the Preston Coventry game, he made ANOTHER mistake… gave a pen and EFL have come out and agreed not a penalty.

His punishment this time… … straight back to ref the City match. Unbelievable
 

caid

Full Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2014
Messages
8,314
Location
Dublin
You’re looking at a still. Isn’t that what we’ve been complaining about? You can take a still of almost any passage of play and there would be a foul in there somehow. Maybe you didn’t watch the match because if you did you would have realized that it’s not a red. Looks like you’re a proponent of VAR .
If rashford was a red then context doesn't matter.
 

Withnail

Full Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2019
Messages
30,058
Location
The Arena of the Unwell
If rashford was a red then context doesn't matter.
Even in the still it's doubtful it's a red. Whoever's posted that on twitter is using a still taken before the point of contact because this is the angle at which the challenge looks worse. This type of stuff is a bit pathetic and undermines the criticism of actual bad decisions.
 

Cutch

Full Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2008
Messages
16,404
Location
Northern Ireland. Stretty W3102, Row 2, Seat 129
You’re looking at a still. Isn’t that what we’ve been complaining about? You can take a still of almost any passage of play and there would be a foul in there somehow. Maybe you didn’t watch the match because if you did you would have realized that it’s not a red. Looks like you’re a proponent of VAR .
I didn't think Rashfords was a red but loads on here claimed it was endangering an opponent. If that is the case Endo is guilty of the same thing as he goes studs first into the opponents knee
 

RedRocket9908

Full Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2023
Messages
2,364
Location
Manchester
You’re looking at a still. Isn’t that what we’ve been complaining about? You can take a still of almost any passage of play and there would be a foul in there somehow. Maybe you didn’t watch the match because if you did you would have realized that it’s not a red. Looks like you’re a proponent of VAR .
Look at where his put is, he is high up on the players leg with his stoods up, thats dangerous so is a red
 

Zed is not dead

Full Member
Joined
Apr 9, 2023
Messages
1,418
He barely touches him with the follow through. It isn't dangerous or reckless as the level of force is quite low.
The camera showed the Brentford player’s knee with blood and the mark of the studs.
In live you could clearly see Endo went in studs up with no control whatsoever and rushing in to make up for a bad first touch.
It was at the very least a yellow and going on by the kind of challenges that were deemed of a red this season, then this one should have been a 100% red
 

Withnail

Full Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2019
Messages
30,058
Location
The Arena of the Unwell
All apply to Rashford and Casemiro challenges but we've repeatedly been told this is irrelevant by pundits.
I'm dont know who you've been listening to but level of force and words like reckless and dangerous are in the rules.

When Red Cards Are Warranted

1. Serious Foul Play: A red card is issued for actions that constitute serious foul play. This includes tackles that are reckless, involve excessive force, or endanger the safety of an opponent

The camera showed the Brentford player’s knee with blood and the mark of the studs.
In live you could clearly see Endo went in studs up with no control whatsoever and rushing in to make up for a bad first touch.
It was at the very least a yellow and going on by the kind of challenges that were deemed of a red this season, then this one should have been a 100% red
I've seen the replay and it looked a yellow to me. It certainly wasn't a leg-breaker and breaking the skin doesn't constitute a red card.
 

MackRobinson

New Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2017
Messages
5,134
Location
Terminal D
Supports
Football
Why do managers keep their players on pitch?
This is what you get when clubs don’t go out and say enough. Refuse to play until There is equal chance for teams. Not when you know that ref is on their side.
Because they are smart enough not to forfeit a match due to not liking the refereeing decisions.
 

Mb194dc

Full Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2015
Messages
4,661
Supports
Chelsea
Taylor was ok today, don't have a problem with any of the calls.

Seems people are getting hysterical now even when the referees do fine.
 

Bubz27

No I won’t change your tag line
Joined
Aug 17, 2009
Messages
21,580
Taylor was ok today, don't have a problem with any of the calls.

Seems people are getting hysterical now even when the referees do fine.
You serious? City got a goal head start because of a terrible decision. Even if he's perfect for the rest of the game, that's huge.
 

Mb194dc

Full Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2015
Messages
4,661
Supports
Chelsea
You serious? City got a goal head start because of a terrible decision. Even if he's perfect for the rest of the game, that's huge.
Bit of joint pulling then Cucu is wrong side and puts his hand around his waist to stop him getting to the ball, that's a foul 8 days a week. He wasn't getting to the ball anyway either, which is probably why it was a yellow. Stupid.
 

Oranges038

Full Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2020
Messages
12,208
You’re looking at a still. Isn’t that what we’ve been complaining about? You can take a still of almost any passage of play and there would be a foul in there somehow. Maybe you didn’t watch the match because if you did you would have realized that it’s not a red. Looks like you’re a proponent of VAR .
Yeah, that wasn't a red, much the same way Rashford's shouldn't have been a red.

Get a still of Dawson with his boot in Son's nuts yesterday and it will look like a red.
 

NotChatGPT

Brownfinger
Joined
Jul 3, 2023
Messages
562
Bit of joint pulling then Cucu is wrong side and puts his hand around his waist to stop him getting to the ball, that's a foul 8 days a week. He wasn't getting to the ball anyway either, which is probably why it was a yellow. Stupid.
Ofcourse it’s a foul by Cucurella, but isn’t the entire point here that Haaland equally fouls Cucurella in order to get in front of him in the very same sequence of play.
 

Longshanks

Full Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2020
Messages
1,783
Look at where his put is, he is high up on the players leg with his stoods up, thats dangerous so is a red
There both on the floor though, it's not a particularly high challenge nor has it got alot of force behind it.

It would be fair to call it careless bordering on reckless so yellow card is fair.
 

Oscar Bonavena

Full Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2022
Messages
1,289
Location
Ireland
Here's the thing I don't get. Re the Endo tackle, they've spent 5 minutes checking it for a red, so it must be obvious to Tierney that this is a close one, one of those "orange cards" that could go either way.

Eventually word comes down from VAR that it's not a red. Fine, whatever. But surely if they've spent that f**king long looking at it, it must be at least a free kick to Brentford and a yellow to Endo!

And yes, I know VAR doesn't check for yellows or free kicks so Tierney was obliged to just restart play again with a throw in, but it's a real anomaly of VAR (one of the many).
 

Longshanks

Full Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2020
Messages
1,783
Did Endo get a yellow for that tackle?
I assumed he did, but just checked and apparently not. So yeah should of been a yellow ref is looking straight at it aswell, poor call from the ref that. VAR can't call for a yellow card and it's not enough for a red in fairness.