Remember the geese
Full Member
Who cares about Osimhen?Good luck to us getting him next summer and dealing with Aurelio De Laurentiis now that Kane is moving to Bayern
Who cares about Osimhen?Good luck to us getting him next summer and dealing with Aurelio De Laurentiis now that Kane is moving to Bayern
In a world where DMs like Rice and Caicedo cost £100-£110m, Napoli's demands for Osimhen actually seem pretty reasonable.
Posted this in the wrong forum.https://gianlucadimarzio.com/it/napoli-osimhen-rinnovo-calciomercato-news-13-agosto-2023
According to the above, he's set to renew with a €150m release clause. Very doable for most big EPL clubs, even this summer.
Posted this in the wrong forum.
Off the back of one elite season. Wow. Football is a mad game. It’s basically whoever is flavour of the monthWages in the region of £1million per week. Wow.
Very doable for most big EPL clubs, even this summer.
Posted this in the wrong forum.
In a world where DMs like Rice and Caicedo cost £100-£110m, Napoli's demands for Osimhen actually seem pretty reasonable.
Agree. The market is absolutely bonkers though. When the next Maradona/Messi type players shows up, I shudder at what price said player would command at the age of 22/23,It's mad isn't it. It was only a couple of months ago that these +100 million figures were being floated for the likes of Osimhen and everyone thought it was crazy. Now with the prices we've seen for the likes of Rice, Caicedo and fecking Paqueta, Napoli seem well withing their rights to want 140 mil for one of the top strikers around.
Couldn’t be dropping 150 on himWe made a huge mistake by not going for him this summer.
We could have but we decided to spend budget in different way. Imo, i think that we would be stronger with him than we will be with Hojlund and Mount.Couldn’t be dropping 150 on him
He wouldn't change a thing if our midfield is as shambolic as it was today.We made a huge mistake by not going for him this summer.
We could have but we decided to spend budget in different way. Imo, i think that we would be stronger with him than we will be with Hojlund and Mount.
We made a huge mistake by not going for him this summer.
We could have but we decided to spend budget in different way. Imo, i think that we would be stronger with him than we will be with Hojlund and Mount.
We made a huge mistake by not going for him this summer.
You don’t think he did it for social media interactions do you?Worth noting that Mikel said this whilst laughing and joking. It was not a serious comment at all. Romano stripped all the context.
It would be unfair to assume, seeing as he has no previous with this. I'm inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt.You don’t think he did it for social media interactions do you?
Yes, and tax free!!Wages in the region of £1million per week. Wow.
Osimhen for Old Trafford would be a huge upgrade. He doesn't leak.Oshimen for anyone at Old Trfford would be a huge upgrade.
Osimhem for ArnoldOshimen for anyone at Old Trfford would be a huge upgrade.
Yeah. Luckily for us we have those high earning - little to no contribution players in abundance. Martial and Sancho, and I’d guess all his wages are covered, and then some.We’d need to shift about 4 players to afford him
Yeah. Luckily for us we have those high earning - little to no contribution players in abundance. Martial and Sancho, and I’d guess all his wages are covered, and then some.
It’s raising the transfer fee I’d worry about as our high wages generally means we’re unable to shift players on successfully.
My understanding is very high level but I’d think we’d have to. FFP is based on revenue/earnings and a cash injection from owners/sale of shares doesn’t qualify as revenue - its a capital contribution, per se. Now it would make us more liquid and could assist us on spending on infrastructure but our revenue levels would remain, and so would our expenditure capabilities on players/wages etc.If Ratcliffe were to lavish this £325m when he is confirmed, would we still have to get rid of those guys for FFP?
My understanding is very high level but I’d think we’d have to. FFP is based on revenue/earnings and a cash injection from owners/sale of shares doesn’t qualify as revenue - its a capital contribution, per se. Now it would make us more liquid and could assist us on spending on infrastructure but our revenue levels would remain, and so would our expenditure capabilities on players/wages etc.
My high level understanding anyway.
I don’t think we’re getting anything worth shouting about for Sancho, Martial or Donny. Not even sure we can afford to lose Maguire or McTominay now, and those were the main potential sources of income last summer - until we needed to rely on their goals! I think it’ll all rest on the owners.Yeah. Luckily for us we have those high earning - little to no contribution players in abundance. Martial and Sancho, and I’d guess all his wages are covered, and then some.
It’s raising the transfer fee I’d worry about as our high wages generally means we’re unable to shift players on successfully.
I’m sure I read that your FFP threshold can be extended if your owners decide to add a one off cash injection - which obviously the glazers never have. Not sure how much that is, or whether it’d be enough to land Osimhen. But we’re broke otherwise.If Ratcliffe were to lavish this £325m when he is confirmed, would we still have to get rid of those guys for FFP?
Osimhen would instantly make us better. Sure he would also need supply from the midfield or wingers, but compared to Hojlund who - with all respect - is not a clinical CF yet, he would win games by himself by just doing the simple goal scoring. Hojlund misses too many chances imo and would be much better as a joker. Too bad we spent so much on him that we will unlikely bench him though...
I agree that 150m would be too much for any player at our current state, but you cant deny that Hojlund is not even half the player as Osimhen who is likely a top 3 CF currently after Haaland and Kane.Huh? Højlund doesn't get nearly as much service as Osimhen does, and Osimhen misses a lot of big chances as well. He would improve us, sure, but not at all worth €150m.
I agree that 150m would be too much for any player at our current state, but you cant deny that Hojlund is not even half the player as Osimhen who is likely a top 3 CF currently after Haaland and Kane.