indeed - you would have thought as it was a minimum of 7 years that to be doing anything like the minimum sentence there would have had to be some engagement in accepting responsibility and admitting which children she abused would seem a basic part of that.The sentence seems light, especially given she's refused to name her victims.
Yeah but she can't abuse people in Devon and Cornwall though. It's not like kids exist in other places.The sentence seems light, especially given she's refused to name her victims.
She didn't do the minimum sentence though, did she? Was jailed in '09 so prison for 10 years.indeed - you would have thought as it was a minimum of 7 years that to be doing anything like the minimum sentence there would have had to be some engagement in accepting responsibility and admitting which children she abused would seem a basic part of that.
Obviousley there would have been a parole hearing and im sure much evidence for the to review but on just the basic headlines it does seem surprising
Poor post.Christ, usually when stories like these come up where the pedo is a woman, she's usually kind of hot. Not saying it is better but if you had to be molested as a kid... I'd at least hope it wasn't by some kind of night beast like the one in the article.
Stop trying to score points. You know it's true.Poor post.
I literally laughed out loud.Christ, usually when stories like these come up where the pedo is a woman, she's usually kind of hot. Not saying it is better but if you had to be molested as a kid... I'd at least hope it wasn't by some kind of night beast like the one in the article.
thought she was jailed in 10? anyway 9 years is pretty close to the Minimum as in theory it could have been an indefinite sentence I think so yeah not being fully versed in the case I would have thought that to be close t the minimum you would have had to engage actively and a pretty major part of that would have been admitting what she did and to which childrenShe didn't do the minimum sentence though, did she? Was jailed in '09 so prison for 10 years.
If you'd been molested when you were 3 would it really make any difference how attractive the molester was?Christ, usually when stories like these come up where the pedo is a woman, she's usually kind of hot. Not saying it is better but if you had to be molested as a kid... I'd at least hope it wasn't by some kind of night beast like the one in the article.
Christ, usually when stories like these come up where the pedo is a woman, she's usually kind of hot. Not saying it is better but if you had to be molested as a kid... I'd at least hope it wasn't by some kind of night beast like the one in the article.
Your post could make sense if the victims were 16 or something.Christ, usually when stories like these come up where the pedo is a woman, she's usually kind of hot. Not saying it is better but if you had to be molested as a kid... I'd at least hope it wasn't by some kind of night beast like the one in the article.
Tbh, I wrote 'as a kid', not as a baby or a toddler.If you'd been molested when you were 3 would it really make any difference how attractive the molester was?
It's not like a three year old is even attracted to adult women at that point.
I didn't realise they were actually babies and toddlers as it wasn't in the article. But yeah, just saw that tweet.Your post could make sense if the victims were 16 or something.