TrustInJanuzaj
'Liverpool are a proper club'
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2015
- Messages
- 10,727
You don’t ref based on mood.It doesn't have to be. It's based on the mood.
You don’t ref based on mood.It doesn't have to be. It's based on the mood.
Do you prefer it to be less contact? Weird takeThe type of tackle that was the inevitable consequence of the move to sate the appetites of the 'its a contact sport' crowd.
@GifLord show the identical challenge around 70 to 75 mins in that the ref waved play on. It was a tackle on mane.
Never a red and the ref himself waved played on
Have you seen a different/angle or replay? Nothing has been shown besides real time. And it wasn't a flying tackle. He wasn't from behind, he came from the side. The ankle got caught underneath his leg when it was moving up.You might be right, as one is usually focused on the ball, and that part of the action was ok. However I still think it is a red card that is justified. Flying in from behind in that way is just the wrong way to do things. You can do such a tackle, but you should never hit the player during such a tackle. If he stumbles over you that's fine, that happens all the time (for example as mention when AWB does similar tackles), but not in the way it happened here.
We know they’ve lied about it though. How can Pawson claim with straight he was always going to send him off when he didn’t even give a free kick until he saw the injury?This is funny, are you seriously believing you will get an objective verdict on a United-forum for a red card in favor of Liverpool? What is certain is that you have seen one angle once, the VAR have multiple angles and cameras. I guess the bunch in the room have a better view than you do.
Thanks. Same tackle imo
I said it during the incident, how does he get away with chasing refs around all the time. He went onto the field to talk to the ref, any other manager and they are sent to the stands.They'll rescind the red and cancel the 2 match suspension, but it was the correct decision to remove the player from the field of play.
Klopp was disgraceful however. He was more interested in sanctions than the kid's welfare.
Yeah, but it's human nature, isn't it? The referee is God on the pitch. The human element came into play and Pawson made a choice. Doesn't mean it was by the books but I can see why he'd do it.You don’t ref based on mood.
Looks more like he caught the trailing leg with his momentum in the challenge rather than scissors!?Based on that clip, looks like a scissor tackle with both feet leaving the ground
They're playing Leeds. A United forum is probably a reasonably unbiased place to look for an opinion given we hate them both on similar levels.This is funny, are you seriously believing you will get an objective verdict on a United-forum for a red card in favor of Liverpool? What is certain is that you have seen one angle once, the VAR have multiple angles and cameras. I guess the bunch in the room have a better view than you do.
It wasn't.Based on that clip, looks like a scissor tackle with both feet leaving the ground
Are you sure he didn't kung fu kick Elliot shouting "feck the ball!"?Based on that clip, looks like a scissor tackle with both feet leaving the ground
Everyone knows why he did it. You are the only one who seems to agree with itYeah, but it's human nature, isn't it? The referee is God on the pitch. The human element came into play and Pawson made a choice. Doesn't mean it was by the books but I can see why he'd do it.
Looks to me he launches himself, both feet leaving the ground, catching elliot's leg between hisLooks more like he caught the trailing leg with his momentum in the challenge rather than scissors!?
Every tackle looks like that though no? I mean the act of going full on in front of a player's legs to get a small ball away from them would look psychotic in hindsight if it ended up with a leg break. Regardless of how innocuous a tackle it was. There was a tackle on Mane around the 70 minute mark that was the exact same intensity and type of tackle and it wasn't even a foul. Tackles like that happen 10 times a game in the PL.Looks to me he launches himself, both feet leaving the ground, catching elliot's leg between his
Looks like a psychotic tackle to me honestly, complete disregard for the opponent's safety
Not for me. Here he goes with one straight leg for the ball (as did Struijk), but he bends the other leg to not hit Mane in a harmful way. Struijk kept his leg straight and therefore applied the full force of his motion on Elliot.Thanks. Same tackle imo
I understand why he did it. I don't agree with it based on the evidence I saw. But he has the benefit of talking to his team in the background. I don't. They will never show the VAR replay of the injury, so I can't say much more than that.Everyone knows why he did it. You are the only one who seems to agree with it
Outcome is entirely irrelevant when judging a foul.How anyone can think that's not a foul is beyond me. You can't do whatever you want just because you get the ball. Was it a red? In this case, given the outcome, it's entirely fair.
I would prefer that skillful players can express themselves. Progress has been made over the last couple of decades, but knuckle draggers want to take us back to the 'take the ball then the man' era, which is a backwards step.Do you prefer it to be less contact? Weird take
VAR shouldn’t get involved if they didn’t refer him to the screen?I understand why he did it. I don't agree with it based on the evidence I saw. But he has the benefit of talking to his team in the background. I don't. They will never show the VAR replay of the injury, so I can't say much more than that.
The one from the other clip? Doesn't look the same. Doesn't launch off the ground with both feet, and is mindful to not catch mane's legs between hisThere was a tackle on Mane around the 70 minute mark that was the exact same intensity and type of tackle and it wasn't even a foul. Tackles like that happen 10 times a game in the PL.
I don't believe that's a requisite for any VAR decision. He was having a conversation with the VAR team on his earpiece.VAR shouldn’t get involved if they didn’t refer him to the screen?
Pretty sure it’s standard? VAR ref can’t overrule on pitch decisions.I don't believe that's a requisite for any VAR decision. He was having a conversation with the VAR team on his earpiece.
It clearly isn't though . You can easily say that because it was a leg breaking challenge he did endanger his opponent. I mean, you can say that you see those kind of challenges all the time, but the action his left leg does in the tackle is not pretty IMO.Outcome is entirely irrelevant when judging a foul.
The thing is though the ref waves play on until Salah brought attention to the severity of the situation. It’s hard to say how bad the tackle was with no replays, but it seemed like an unfortunate injury more so than a horrible tackle.No injury - Freekick.
Injury - Red Card.
There is a thin line. I think it is red, just because of the injury. Rules are there.