We’ve criminally underused Matic and Mata these past few seasons

Stacks

Full Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2015
Messages
10,905
Location
Between a rock and Gibraltar
We have seen them long enough under multiple managers and they have never been reliable enough.we go through this same process every season they play a 'handful' of decent games before we complain their leg s have gone
 

SadlerMUFC

Thinks for himself
Joined
Dec 7, 2017
Messages
5,757
Location
Niagara Falls, Canada
All these people who under rate Matic because he doesn't buzz around the field have absolutely no idea what they're talking about. Matic can't play two games a week, but he should at least start one. And if he had, he wouldn't be leaving. Mata should also had played more. Problem is he was used on the wing way too much when he should have been playing in midfield while Bruno should have been playing on the wing
 

groovyalbert

it's a mute point
Joined
Feb 14, 2013
Messages
9,730
Location
London
Nah, anyone can look good in an end of season dead-rubber.

They've been decent servants to us at a difficult time, and never the problems here, but I think we got what we realistically could out of both.
 

bond19821982

Last Man Standing champion 2019/20
Joined
Oct 26, 2008
Messages
10,429
Location
Nnc
Mata hasn't been used by any of the managers except LVG and he was pragmatic. He never got the right manager after 2013 .

Matic's problem was he never got a right partner with us. He played with Kante & Ramires at Chelsea and we tried to pair him with Pogba . Matic - Herrera was decent for few games.

Both would have been brilliant under the right setup and a right manager. We just couldn't offer them.
 

TheReligion

Abusive
Joined
Nov 22, 2006
Messages
51,465
Location
Manchester
Both very good players who were sadly bought during a very chaotic period at the club. Mata came in not long after Fellaini under the Moyes era. I mean can you get any two more dissimilar types of player? No long term vision or philosophy. Looking back it was obvious.

Matic arrived and looked fantastic in the middle with Pogba to begin with and in all honesty it felt like the right kind of signing. That said he was a little bit late in his career, tapered off and lacked consistency. Often asked to do the job of two. Ideally we’d have had Fred with him at this point and it may well have worked and allowed Pogba further forward but the timings were out.
 

TheReligion

Abusive
Joined
Nov 22, 2006
Messages
51,465
Location
Manchester
Mata hasn't been used by any of the managers except LVG and he was pragmatic. He never got the right manager after 2013 .

Matic's problem was he never got a right partner with us. He played with Kante & Ramires at Chelsea and we tried to pair him with Pogba . Matic - Herrera was decent for few games.

Both would have been brilliant under the right setup and a right manager. We just couldn't offer them.
Yeah my thoughts. Just bad timing with them and lack of planning by the club in terms of making the pieces fit. Both great players though.
 

kthanksbye

Full Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2014
Messages
1,503
We've never known how to play with a #10, even when we had Kagawa and Mata both, especially when we had both, we've played games with neither of them in the #10 position. Bruno plays well not because we play to his strengths, he plays well despite it.

Matic was always more than a player who breaks up play, his passing between the lines is very underrated, if we had someone in midfield who could cover ground, Matic could easily have played as a deep lying play maker.

Yes, we indeed have utilized them badly.
 

TheReligion

Abusive
Joined
Nov 22, 2006
Messages
51,465
Location
Manchester
We've never known how to play with a #10, even when we had Kagawa and Mata both, especially when we had both, we've played games with neither of them in the #10 position. Bruno plays well not because we play to his strengths, he plays well despite it.

Matic was always more than a player who breaks up play, his passing between the lines is very underrated, if we had someone in midfield who could cover ground, Matic could easily have played as a deep lying play maker.

Yes, we indeed have utilized them badly.
Fred now would have been perfect for the younger Matic
 

tentan

Poor man's poster.
Joined
Oct 5, 2013
Messages
4,583
Nah. Don't let one game fool you, the whole team turned up when's there's nothing left to play for.
 

Yorke to Cole

Full Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2020
Messages
924
Let's not get carried away over Mata. We've seen a few of these good performances against poor opposition where he's given loads of time on the ball. Then we've played him next game and he's been completely dominated.
That is true. But he could have played in this season's FA Cup game against Middlesborough and even more so in the draws against Burnley, Watford, Leicester amongst others.

That invention, craft and wisdom could have earned us an extra 6 to 8 points, when we had a run opposition in the lower half of the table.
 

Tiber

Full Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2014
Messages
10,294
Matic was well past his best when we signed him. The fact he has been played a significant number of games in recent years is part of the problem.
 

NewGlory

United make me feel dirty. And not in a sexy way.
Joined
Jul 13, 2019
Messages
4,371
Welp, despite the wildly different scores, judging by performance and increasing quality of the last 3 matches, it does feel like using more Matic and Mata (even if they need to be subbed at 70th) fixes midfield and our defense, while still shaky, is much better without Maguire in his current form

You fix midfield and defense, shockingly you play better :) Especially so if you don't play that waste of space that Rashford has become
 

Red00012

Full Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2018
Messages
12,296
It was Brentford who we were playing and who were happy to take part in our going away party for the boys. I wouldn’t be reading much into it.
 

Blindpew

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Messages
50
Both should have played more in recent seasons. Playing McFred week in week out really hurt us in games where teams were defensive and hard to break down. So many games cried out for a bit of Mata magic as we all watched another hopeless attack breakdown. Matic’s legs have gone but here was a need for his experience to go alongside an able runner.
 

bosnian_red

Worst scout to ever exist
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
58,113
Location
Canada
I feel like our past few managers either saw them as players who can play every game or can't be used in any game. Nobody who needed game time managed to keep them fresh was used well. Even Ronaldo this year. Look at the difference in his level when he's fit.
 

TuzlaUnited

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Apr 5, 2022
Messages
102
We have seen them long enough under multiple managers and they have never been reliable enough.we go through this same process every season they play a 'handful' of decent games before we complain their leg s have gone
This.
It was fecking Brendford.
How many games he did play where he was bullied on the ball buy average players.
Same shit every year, give X player chance he will become good. I already wrote in one post, that Michu guy from Swansea would still be on our books.
Real benched Bale, Hazard and we are still talking about Matic and Mata.
 

kelvinwong2026

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 22, 2022
Messages
45
We were playing counter attacking football mostly under Ole, so I don't think Mata suits that style. For Matic, he is classy but he can hardly play more than than 70mins
 

SAFMUTD

New Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2018
Messages
11,787
They havent been, they're not good enough. Both are slow, Mata specially doesnt have the physique to compete in the premier league. One good game, against a poor side, doesnt change that.

Im glad they'll both be gone, we need way more quality to compete.
 

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
95,796
Location
india
Agreed.

We dont have a CM who is as good on the ball as Matic. And we don't have an AM who is as technically reliable especially in tight spaces as Mata. Both should go this summer but I agree with the OP that they should have had a bigger role.
 

R'hllor

Full Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2013
Messages
15,419
I see gold fish mode is enabled, dont you remember how Matic got his extension and how he played before that "playing for new contract" stint? Same goes for Mata just different type of issue.
 

AFC NimbleThumb

New Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2019
Messages
8,363
OP laying the boot in on a departing Frenchman when Matic should have been starting over McAverage is peak Caf.

I’d agree both may have seen more game time but neither are transformative in their current state. Peak versions of the 2 would walk into this team & improve it, they’re currently good pros who put their counterparts to shame.
 

Jibbs

New Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2013
Messages
2,238
I don’t know how many times I have repeated this but we have wasted a talent like DeBruyne and Silva, in Mata. Matic in any other functioning team which would still be performing at a much higher level.
 

roonster09

Hercule Poirot of the scouting world
Scout
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
36,777
No, they had stinkers too and they don't have legs to play regularly. They could have played bit more but not regularly.

Matic is good option from bench, not as a regular starter.
 

Eddy_JukeZ

Full Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2012
Messages
17,153
I heavily disagree on Mata. He should have binned a very long time ago.

I do think Matic could have been used a bit more, but his legs have gone and his time is up.
 

shahzy

Full Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2014
Messages
985
Thread title says it all.

Persisted too long with overhyped and careless on the ball Pogba when Matic should have played more. Bruno has been too reckless, and maybe it’s because we always expect the Hollywood pass from him, but having Mata on allows us to build up and progress up the pitch waiting for the moment to pass.

Matic and Mata are two seasoned, experienced and calm heads. They play intelligently. Imagine some of the games in the last year or two where we get nervous and it shows in our play. Ole should have used their experience way more.

This thread isn’t to say they should stay, but there’s obviously something still there that many of our other players lack.
Whole heartedly agree. Watching Mata link up at CAM reminded me everything that's wrong with us. Bruno is not a good CAM. Left suits him more because you can try the Hollywood pass and make runs from there. CAM has to be a good dribbler, ball retainer, good passer rather than a guy who scores.

Keep Bruno on the left or teach him how to be a CM. Cam is not a position he is suited for
 

MUFC OK

New Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2014
Messages
7,216
I think mata still has a lot to offer, his ball retention is second to none at United. Played really well the last few games. I’d expect ETH to offer him a new deal.
 

MUFC OK

New Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2014
Messages
7,216
I don’t know how many times I have repeated this but we have wasted a talent like DeBruyne and Silva, in Mata. Matic in any other functioning team which would still be performing at a much higher level.
This is the closest post to the truth within this thread. Mata is one of the only players Pep would take from our squad - lovely footballer.
 

Valencia Shin Crosses

Full Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2015
Messages
6,871
Location
"Martial...He's isolated Skrtel here..."
Nah Matic was a nailed on starter when he wasn't hurt for the longest time, and was excellent in the lockdown season when we were the best we've been as a team in recent times. Just lost his legs and battled injuries.

Mata was only good for games similar to today where he wasn't going to be asked to run a ton, but under Ole we were much more of a countering, direct side so his style isn't useful.
 

Man-United

Full Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2003
Messages
16,211
Mata could have been used like Giggs in his last five seasons at the club.
 

OldRed1

Full Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2000
Messages
1,365
Location
Withington at Western Australia
Shouldn't the title have read "criminally abused". I doubt I've read a decent thing about Matta for months. Somebody reckoned he'd never been a good footballer which staggered me and now people are raving about him.
 

bucky

Full Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2011
Messages
9,599
No, we haven't. We have failed to move on from them earlier.
 

The Siege

Full Member
Joined
May 26, 2016
Messages
282
Yeah, no.
Mata has been mediocre for large parts of his Manchester United career, although I agree he should have been subbed on in some situations.
Matic is an excellent footballer, for exactly 60 mins of a match. After that the man becomes a liability because his legs won't carry him anymore.
 

Bebestation

Im a doctor btw, my IQ destroys yours
Joined
Oct 9, 2019
Messages
11,862
I don't think we have underrated Matic personally.

He was the only actual CDM we have had for 2 years and have used him as much as we can until he loses his energy.

Pogba for example always looked better with Matic than anyone else imo.
 

skc_18

Full Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2021
Messages
375
Everyone has been complaining about Matic and Mata for 2-3 years now. Couple of performances and we are like OMG we are going to miss them.
Mata has been given enough chances, he plays well in a game here and there and then goes missing for large part of season.
Matic just does not have legs (and not just now, its been for last few years) to play 90 mins , let alone a season. Matic was awful when Jose was the manager , always giving away possession. He did well when Ole was interim and again went missing.

So, now we are not going to miss either Mata or Matic. And we did not underuse either. We did not use them even when they were available and there is a good reason for that.