g = window.googletag || {}; googletag.cmd = googletag.cmd || []; window.googletag = googletag; googletag.cmd.push(function() { var interstitialSlot = googletag.defineOutOfPageSlot('/17085479/redcafe_gam_interstitial', googletag.enums.OutOfPageFormat.INTERSTITIAL); if (interstitialSlot) { interstitialSlot.addService(googletag.pubads()); } });

What did Hillary do wrong and what's next for her?

RedPnutz

Full Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2009
Messages
1,512
Hillary failed because her campaign loosened the narrative of Trump as a scary president in the last 3-4 weeks.

She failed because she was pitting Americans (we are with her) against Americans (basket of deplorables).

She was also alienating large portion of white male voters by overemphasis on women power. Note that post election she says she is a champion for women. Wrong, she should have been a champion for Americans.

Trump has orchestrated his campaign superbly.
 

Arruda

Love is in the air, everywhere I look around
Joined
Apr 8, 2009
Messages
12,584
Location
Azores
Supports
Porto
What would him, or Rudy, win by going after her now? Nothing.

Ludicrous idea, that was just Trump being Trump in the debate to win votes. He'll just be pals with her again. Don't think any politician - and Trump is now one - wants to go that deep in the game. They have more in common by living that life than what sets them apart.
 

Kaos

Full Member
Joined
May 6, 2007
Messages
31,872
Location
Ginseng Strip
In an election campaign voters can be quite skeptical of allegations. The dirt on Hillary was acknowledged as fact, even by Hillary herself!
If the allegations were the other way round it wouldn't make a difference. The fact that he's supposedly some outsider, anti-establishment darling means he's given a free pass by his supporters, regardless of what he's done or alleged to have done.

Trump even said it himself:

 

Cheesy

Bread with dipping sauce
Scout
Joined
Oct 16, 2011
Messages
36,181
She allowed a candidate who has said some awful things about a vast number of different groups in the country to get away easily with what he'd said, because she had some damaged skeletons in her own closet.

The fact she literally had the FBI investigating her emails during the process was always something with potential for disaster, and for however successful he was as a President Bill Clinton's overbearing presence was damaging because of his reputation as a sleazebag.

There's nothing much that stood out about her: compared to Obama and Bill she's an average, if not quite poor, public speaker, and even in the debates she relied more on Trump losing than on her winning. Like others have said there was very little to define her campaign and thus it was quite bland.
 

Dr. Dwayne

Self proclaimed tagline king.
Joined
May 9, 2006
Messages
97,769
Location
Nearer my Cas, to thee
If the allegations were the other way round it wouldn't make a difference. The fact that he's supposedly some outsider, anti-establishment darling means he's given a free pass by his supporters, regardless of what he's done or alleged to have done.

Trump even said it himself:

Possibly. He does seem to have an innate ability to relate to people that Hillary lacks.
 

Dirty Schwein

Has a 'Best of Britney Spears' album
Joined
Feb 6, 2012
Messages
32,374
Location
Miracle World
Supports
Luton Town
In the debates I saw, instead of ignoring Trumps ridiculous comments and focusing on her policies, Hillary just played up to his stupid comments and was bickering with him in a war of words she would always lose. I reckon Kanye West will be the next president...
 

Chorley1974

Lady Ole
Joined
Nov 24, 2006
Messages
13,071
Trump schooled her. i don't think he will be the loose cannon that the outside world expects.
 

VorZakone

What would Kenny G do?
Joined
May 9, 2013
Messages
33,173
I'd be lying if I said that I knew all along what mistakes Hillary made. I genuinely thought this was a sure thing for her so I learned my lesson.
 

Ubik

Nothing happens until something moves!
Joined
Jul 8, 2010
Messages
19,019
In my opinion, Hilary constantly answered the wrong question.

- Very soon into her campaign she was preaching to the already converted
- GOP voters did not care enough for her allegations that Trump was 'not fit for the office'
- Older white men did not feel like she knew what they wanted

I find it galling that I can quickly recall many Trump policies and claims but dont really know what Hilary was going to do if she won office.

Im furious at her. Absolutely furious. She was supposedly the most experienced ever politician to run for office, had personal experience of 3 previous presidential campaigns and was up against the most unpopular ever GOP candidate in living memory. She had the vast majority of US and international media tactcily or openly supporting her and a vast adverting budget far superior to Trump.

And she blew it. She is as much to blame for what we get in the next 4 years as Trump is.
This is utterly ridiculous. Blame Al Gore for Iraq while you're at it.
 

bpet15

Full Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2013
Messages
675
What did she get wrong? Besides being a deceiving, lying, crooked, unethical, entitled cnut? I guess not much.

Not sure about here next move, but it shouldn't be any more than 8-10 years.
 

MoskvaRed

Full Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2013
Messages
5,240
Location
Not Moskva
She might have substance but she is an awkward public speaker. Trump on the other hand, for all his faults, is a great salesman - he keeps it simple and realises that, in the speeded up world of multimedia platforms, memorabke soundbites are more important than consistency of message or veracity. Let's face it, we could all recall 10 things Trump said this campaign whereas I'd struggle to name more than one for Hilary (the tweet/nuclear button jibe at one of the debates). Also, a lot of people simply don't like her, rightly or wrongly.

As for what's next, he won't go after her - it was all electioneering BS and they mix in the same circles at the end of the day. She should put her feet up after two gruelling and unsuccessful campaigns spliced by living on a plane for several years as secretary of state.
 

matherto

ask me about our 50% off sale!
Joined
Nov 3, 2009
Messages
17,564
Location
St. Helens
She never once came across as anything other than pre-prepared and fake to me. Purely and simply a mouthpiece and not a very good one for her 'friends' on Wall Street/in the background of power.

She's a complete charisma vacuum and still manages to be immensely dislikable and untrustworthy at the same time.

Trump is just your common obnoxious cnut in comparison.
 

Raoul

Admin
Staff
Joined
Aug 14, 1999
Messages
130,520
Location
Hollywood CA
In my opinion, Hilary constantly answered the wrong question.

- Very soon into her campaign she was preaching to the already converted
- GOP voters did not care enough for her allegations that Trump was 'not fit for the office'
- Older white men did not feel like she knew what they wanted

I find it galling that I can quickly recall many Trump policies and claims but dont really know what Hilary was going to do if she won office.

Im furious at her. Absolutely furious. She was supposedly the most experienced ever politician to run for office, had personal experience of 3 previous presidential campaigns and was up against the most unpopular ever GOP candidate in living memory. She had the vast majority of US and international media tactcily or openly supporting her and a vast adverting budget far superior to Trump.

And she blew it. She is as much to blame for what we get in the next 4 years as Trump is.
She never wanted to run for President. She was coaxed into it by those around her.
 

Ødegaard

formerly MrEriksen
Scout
Joined
Feb 23, 2011
Messages
11,474
Location
Norway
In my opinion, Hilary constantly answered the wrong question.

- Very soon into her campaign she was preaching to the already converted
- GOP voters did not care enough for her allegations that Trump was 'not fit for the office'
- Older white men did not feel like she knew what they wanted

I find it galling that I can quickly recall many Trump policies and claims but dont really know what Hilary was going to do if she won office.

Im furious at her. Absolutely furious. She was supposedly the most experienced ever politician to run for office, had personal experience of 3 previous presidential campaigns and was up against the most unpopular ever GOP candidate in living memory. She had the vast majority of US and international media tactcily or openly supporting her and a vast adverting budget far superior to Trump.

And she blew it. She is as much to blame for what we get in the next 4 years as Trump is.
:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
 

Cheesy

Bread with dipping sauce
Scout
Joined
Oct 16, 2011
Messages
36,181
She never wanted to run for President. She was coaxed into it by those around her.
And she didn't have to say yes. Could've stepped back if she wanted to and let someone else with less baggage take up the mantle.
 

sammsky1

Pochettino's #1 fan
Joined
Feb 10, 2008
Messages
32,841
Location
London
She never wanted to run for President. She was coaxed into it by those around her.
Ive read that but struggle to believe its true. She was game 8 years ago and had a blast as SoS. Why would she not got fat it, if she was still healthy and able?

If its true, its possibly why she lost then? Her heart was not truly in it as she had no big idea. Thats how she came across. insipid and unloved.
 

Deleted member 101472

Guest
She was never the right candidate, but going down the celebrity endorsement route was, on reflection, such a huge mistake.

Celebrities live a life that doesn't need to be concerned with the goings on of American politics. They can just up and leave whenever they like if push comes to shove,whilst your average family deals with the consequences of policy.

Every time I saw her surrounded by a celeb or saw a video of one endorsing her on Facebook, I cringed, badly, so I can't imagine what your lower class, minimum wage worker actually living in America was thinking.

Trumps final message was one that the average person can relate to, and Hilary brought in people that 99.99% of the world can't relate to.

Trumps not qualified to be commander in chief. I'm not qualified to build a bridge. Surround me with 50 structural engineers and I bet I can end up building you one with my name on it though. Let's hope trump chooses his closest advisors wisely and that it won't be as bad as many people fear.

Ultimately , your average person will do the same routine for the next 4 years that they did for the last 4. Wake up, breakfast, work, lunch, work, dinner, family / personal time, bed, repeat. Why Hilary didn't try to appeal more to those average people I just don't know.
 

Raoul

Admin
Staff
Joined
Aug 14, 1999
Messages
130,520
Location
Hollywood CA
Ive read that but struggle to believe its true. She was game 8 years ago and had a blast as SoS. Why would she not got fat it, if she was still healthy and able?

If its true, its possibly why she lost then? Her heart was not truly in it as she had no big idea. Thats how she came across. insipid and unloved.
A friend of mine who worked for her told me this in 2012. Apparently she was just tired and wanted to retire. At the time I was curious to see whether or not she would run (I thought she would), but was told she had no interest at the time.

Oh and this....

 

Keeps It tidy

Hates Messi
Joined
Jun 6, 2013
Messages
17,638
Location
New York
I am generally not a fan of Clinton as a politician but, I am starting to think she did not much wrong here. She ran an organized campaign, only a had a few gaffes, was able to handle the few controversies sent her way. Let us not rewrite history because Trump somehow pulled this off. He shot himself in the foot about 100 times, there was times during the campaign where there was basically a scandal breaking a day and his campaign was in constant turmoil.
 

Cheesy

Bread with dipping sauce
Scout
Joined
Oct 16, 2011
Messages
36,181
She was never the right candidate, but going down the celebrity endorsement route was, on reflection, such a huge mistake.

Celebrities live a life that doesn't need to be concerned with the goings on of American politics. They can just up and leave whenever they like if push comes to shove,whilst your average family deals with the consequences of policy.

Every time I saw her surrounded by a celeb or saw a video of one endorsing her on Facebook, I cringed, badly, so I can't imagine what your lower class, minimum wage worker actually living in America was thinking.

Trumps final message was one that the average person can relate to, and Hilary brought in people that 99.99% of the world can't relate to.

Trumps not qualified to be commander in chief. I'm not qualified to build a bridge. Surround me with 50 structural engineers and I bet I can end up building you one with my name on it though. Let's hope trump chooses his closest advisors wisely and that it won't be as bad as many people fear.

Ultimately , your average person will do the same routine for the next 4 years that they did for the last 4. Wake up, breakfast, work, lunch, work, dinner, family / personal time, bed, repeat. Why Hilary didn't try to appeal more to those average people I just don't know.
Celebrity thing is a fair point. I think it can work it certain contexts but as you say can also appear alienating and perhaps even condescending to some.

As you say, most of them don't need to deal with the consequences - it's nice of them to care and try to use their sway for some good, of course, but they won't be the ones who suffer from a Trump Presidency. Same with Hilary, too...in her concession speech she sounded fairly disappointed, yeah, but a lot of voters out there will probably be quite angry since she'll be able to slip back into her cosy lifestyle with no consequence whatsoever...provided Trump doesn't arrest her.:lol:
 

Blackwidow

Full Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2011
Messages
7,764
Maybe she is too much female to attract male voters - and acts too less female to attract the female majority?
 

Cheesy

Bread with dipping sauce
Scout
Joined
Oct 16, 2011
Messages
36,181
The more I think on it, the more I'm struggling to buy into the narrative that Hilary was just up against a tidal wave of support for Trump, and that everyone would've struggled against him.

Polling that came out last night showed remarkably high approval for Obama, especially impressive after being in office for eight years and almost paradoxical in the context of what came afterwards. It's a general sentiment that seems to be prevailing, too - that the US is only realising how lucky they were to have Obama and will view him very positively in hindsight.

Based on that, I think a good Dem candidate would've won, and probably done so quite comfortably. Sanders is a different case because of the socialist candidate and independent background but the major argument I've seen many, many people use in regards to this election was how shite both candidates were. The narrative that both were as bad as each other was a frustrating one, but it was a narrative that persisted nonetheless and Sanders wouldn't have been able to be tagged in the same light.

Even if it wasn't him though, I reckon a decent, strong Democrat candidate with a clean background and a likable personality would've won. Clinton's biggest problem by far was that she ultimately lost the swing states - in a number she only needed a small swing and a better candidate than her would have surely been able to achieve that.
 

George Owen

LEAVE THE SFW THREAD ALONE!!1!
Joined
May 7, 2010
Messages
15,913
Location
Gold Coast, Australia
I am generally not a fan of Clinton as a politician but, I am starting to think she did not much wrong here. She ran an organized campaign, only a had a few gaffes, was able to handle the few controversies sent her way. Let us not rewrite history because Trump somehow pulled this off. He shot himself in the foot about 100 times, there was times during the campaign where there was basically a scandal breaking a day and his campaign was in constant turmoil.
Her only wrong was to think she could have won it.
 

Cal?

CR7 fan
Joined
Mar 18, 2002
Messages
34,976
Run again in 4yrs after Trump runs the economy to the ground with his tax cuts?
 

Keeps It tidy

Hates Messi
Joined
Jun 6, 2013
Messages
17,638
Location
New York
And just looking at the final numbers just like with the Republican primaries it looks less impressive for Trump. Trump has won the election through voter apathy not passion.
 

RedTiger

Half mast
Joined
Oct 6, 2013
Messages
23,058
Location
Beside the sea-side, Beside the sea.
No - that was her problem. She didn't preach enough to her flock and some of them ended up going astray :lol:

She took for granted the already converted. She didn't visit Wisconsin once during the presidential run (she did during the primaries).
This was quite a shock for me, I always assumed presidential candidates would visit every single state at least once, even the likes of Hawaii, Alaska and Montana.
 

Nikhil

New Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2007
Messages
2,348
Location
Form is temporary, bans are permanent.
She was never the right candidate, but going down the celebrity endorsement route was, on reflection, such a huge mistake.

Celebrities live a life that doesn't need to be concerned with the goings on of American politics. They can just up and leave whenever they like if push comes to shove,whilst your average family deals with the consequences of policy.

Every time I saw her surrounded by a celeb or saw a video of one endorsing her on Facebook, I cringed, badly, so I can't imagine what your lower class, minimum wage worker actually living in America was thinking.

Trumps final message was one that the average person can relate to, and Hilary brought in people that 99.99% of the world can't relate to.
Good post. Celebrity endorsements don't work at all. When millions of people in the US are struggling to find jobs and have seen wages stagnate for decades, why should they listen to millionaire celebrities who can't relate to them at all? Jay Z and Katy Perry don't know what it's like to be crushed by rising costs of living and to struggle to pay for childcare and healthcare. Celebrity endorsements drive people away from supporting those candidates, especially in an anti-establishment environment.

Her campaign was always about how her opponent was a bad person. It was never about her own policies and what she stood for, because she actually stood for nothing. She was a corporate stooge and worked for the lobbyists and special interests that back her. When the ordinary person in the electorate has seen wages stagnate for decades, that doesn't play well.
 

Dumbat12

New Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2014
Messages
1,468
The Democrats should have given the nomination to Bernie. Clinton was damaged goods from the start while Bernie had a real chance of winning against Trump.
 

Cal?

CR7 fan
Joined
Mar 18, 2002
Messages
34,976
Nope, she's finished. The US wont touch another Clinton for a while.
One would think so, but she's still closer to the Dem establishment than anyone alive, maybe Chelsea will run in 2020. ;)