buckooo1978
Full Member
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2008
- Messages
- 13,777
we'd probably be fighting for the league with a midfield of Cleverley and Ando
Evans and Welbeck yes, Nani and Evra I'm not so sure. They would have stayed 2 years more at best.Evra, Nani, Welbeck, Evans would still be at the club, Giggs would be second in command, Rooney would have left summer before 13/14.
One of Evans, Smalling and Jones would have reached their peak.
Strootman would be at the club if he was still managing and maybe Thiago. Chong would also have featured by now..
Chong is just back from a serious injury and his game time is being managed between the u18s, u19s and u23s accordingly.If the great man was still our manager then he would be picking the hungry kids like Chong,Gomes and telling them to express themselves instead of us being linked to yesterdays guys like Bale....
And probably performing better than our current midfield.we'd probably be fighting for the league with a midfield of Cleverley and Ando
Happily there has never been created an avatar face of the shade of grim green sardonic mirth that your post evoked.We’d be winning the league with Herrera and Cleverley in midfield. All of our expenditure would have been for buying Lewandowski a couple of seasons ago.
I don't think Pogba would have refused to return under Fergie. If anything, I think he'd have wanted it more. The stumbling block there would have been getting Fergie to agree to a fee anywhere near the fee we paid for him.Change thread title to "What if Fergie is managing us now?" i.e. SAF managing the current squad (Season 17-18) instead of Mourinho.
Rather than "..still..." since some of our current players he most likely won't bought, or able to eg. Pogba refuse to return.
More plausible.
This.Kane would 100% be playing for us right now.
Not a chance. Fergie is a thinker. He understands change and how to manage change. He took on a club with a drinking culture and turned it around. He adopted to the end of 442, he took on the invincibles, the big bucks of chelsea, the bigger bucks of city. He won 13 titles in 26 years. This is a man who constantly changed.Fergie’s time would have arrived too, he’s an old man now. Football has developed exponentially since he left us, the level has increased a whole lot. Egos are much bigger, some players are actually bigger than the club - and you need the best to win. Agents have a bigger role, Fergie hated them. Social media, commercial activities, you name it. The older you get, the harder it is to accept changes - see Wenger.
Don't think it was that recent. Pretty sure it was about a year ago.Fergie said recently he was a big fan of Iwobi.
Sack Fergie. Sell Iwobi
It evolved into Robert Huth and Wes Morgan being EPL title winning centre-backs. You're letting this season cloud the judgment of what was before.This thread gave me a little chuckle. Football has moved on from being able to dominate a league with mediocre players. SAF would not be winning games against top sides with a shit midfield. He would have had to get with the pace of things elsewhere. City were already in the ascendancy when he retired. And he probably would have spent a lot of money to rebuild a side that badly needed a rebuild while promoting 2-3 from the youths.
That's not true. Rashford was always earmarked as a special talent in our academy.No Fellaini, no Pogba, no Mata, no Mkhitaryan. Not even sure about Rashford to be honest... Rashford didn't exactly stand out as potential word class in youth, James Wilson was a better prospect, I still think LVG was forced to use him due to circumstances at the time and obviously all the dominoes fell down after that, though if the same would of happened under Fergie I don't know. Lingard would still be playing for us, McTominay maybe, I think Fergie would of had more foresight regarding Schneiderlin and not signed him, however, I get the feeling he might of gone in hard for Leon Goretzka, particularly on a free, even if he would of been successful or not. I also think, with his love for pure wingers, he would of loved Pulisic and gone in for him hard as well.
Keeper - De Gea
RB - Rafael
CB - Evans
CB - Stones
LB - Shaw/Tierney
LW - Nani/Kagawa
CM - Carrick
CM - Kroos/Goretzka/Herrera
RW - Lingard/Pulisic
ST - Robin van Persie/Hernandez
He wouldn't sold Rafael, Evans, Nani, Kagawa, RVP or Hernandez, in my opinion.
Football has moved on. Read variations of this many times. I do not agree. This is the first season since he retired when there looks to be a genuinely high level title winner in the making. Let us not pretend that any of the Chelsea(2) or Leicester teams that won the league were special sides, how quickly they fell away was telling. They made the most of the poor level between 2013-17 when the challengers were in transition, going through managerial upheaval and throwing tons of money away on poor choices.This thread gave me a little chuckle. Football has moved on from being able to dominate a league with mediocre players. SAF would not be winning games against top sides with a shit midfield. He would have had to get with the pace of things elsewhere. City were already in the ascendancy when he retired. And he probably would have spent a lot of money to rebuild a side that badly needed a rebuild while promoting 2-3 from the youths.
Those big oafs, are bizarrely, poor in the air.Jose sadly, I don't have the same faith in, he has shown absolutely zero signs of wanting to adapt, too dogmatic, too obsessed with signing these big oafs who are average in possession.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/fo...der-Herrera-as-Manchester-United-targets.htmlHerrera and Martial wouldn’t have been Ferguson signings.
It's been around 3 months since he returned from injury and it's more than plausible to think our best attacker from the Academy would've featured under SAF by now...Chong is just back from a serious injury and his game time is being managed between the u18s, u19s and u23s accordingly.
He's only just gone up to the u23s and they didn't risk him in the u19s Champions League game on the shopping centre roof. They are clearly being cautious with him and rightly so. There is no rush.It's been around 3 months since he returned from injury and it's more than plausible to think our best attacker from the Academy would've featured under SAF by now...
It evolved into Robert Huth and Wes Morgan being EPL title winning centre-backs. You're letting this season cloud the judgment of what was before.
I'm not doubting SAF would have gotten everything he possibly could from most of his players. But the way some people were talking was if we'd be able to win the league with mediocre players. He bought RVP because we lacked quality. It was only a matter of time before he would have had to do major surgery on defense and midfield. That was my point. Not that all of a sudden everyone else was Real Madrid and Barca. The romanticism is a bit over the top. Like SAF was somehow infallible. And it also assumes that he wouldn't regress one bit, but just always keep the same level. I'm glad he retired when he did, leaving on top. Beautiful. The club obviously made a major mistake followed by a major mistake in the aftermath of that, which shows that there was no proper long-term planning in place.Football has moved on. Read variations of this many times. I do not agree. This is the first season since he retired when there looks to be a genuinely high level title winner in the making. Let us not pretend that any of the Chelsea(2) or Leicester teams that won the league were special sides, how quickly they fell away was telling. They made the most of the poor level between 2013-17 when the challengers were in transition, going through managerial upheaval and throwing tons of money away on poor choices.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not putting down Leicester achievement one bit, but look at the bolded part. Change the midfielder for a striker, as Fergie was usually spot on when it comes to strikers and you have basically Ferguson's United. And he kept it season after season even during rebuilding years.I'm not doubting SAF would have gotten everything he possibly could from most of his players. But the way some people were talking was if we'd be able to win the league with mediocre players. He bought RVP because we lacked quality. It was only a matter of time before he would have had to do major surgery on defense and midfield. That was my point. Not that all of a sudden everyone else was Real Madrid and Barca. The romanticism is a bit over the top. Like SAF was somehow infallible. And it also assumes that he wouldn't regress one bit, but just always keep the same level. I'm glad he retired when he did, leaving on top. Beautiful. The club obviously made a major mistake followed by a major mistake in the aftermath of that, which shows that there was no proper long-term planning in place.
And that Leicester team wasn't bad. Yes, a bit of a fluke season, but mentally superior to other players. They were as true a team as you can see. Everyone knew their role, fought for each other, and they had some outstanding performers and the best midfielder in the league.
I don't think SAF would have kept United as title favourites in the last 4-5 years without buying major quality. I just don't.
This!Kane would 100% be playing for us right now.
I don't disagree with that. What I found amusing was people thinking we'd be continuing with players like Cleverley and somehow that would be good enough. Purchases like Rio, Keane, Rooney etc. in this day and age are enormous transfer deals. When people say SAF would have bought Kane and Alli, it means he would have spent 100s of millions of pounds. Which is my point, the reality of competing at the top today. To go for the 2nd tier of players wouldn't have worked, even for SAF.Don't get me wrong, I'm not putting down Leicester achievement one bit, but look at the bolded part. Change the midfielder for a striker, as Fergie was usually spot on when it comes to strikers and you have basically Ferguson's United. And he kept it season after season even during rebuilding years.
Of course, he would he have to buy and fix some positions, but he also did it so many times. And if he thought some player would improve us he didn't hesitate to blow the competition out of the water like in Keane, Rio, Rooney, RVP case. Not to mention there was also some players who moved during years and can be considered "real value in the market" which he usually bought. Alcantara, Kroos and that best midfielder in the league which you already mentioned in Kante for example.
Simply, the standard of the league, until this season doesn't indicate that he would struggle one bit imo.