Agree on the first point, disagree on the second. In the end it doesn't matter how many points you got, second is second and you don't get a trophy for it.If we're doing "if it wasn't for Pep and City", then the team second to them would have won the league. Does he want bigger imaginary trophies for winning these imaginary titles by more points? How would he have "cleaned up year after year" if he only even managed second twice?
The Sky narrative of the "Pep vs Klopp era" has been taken hook, line and sinker by a lot of people.
On the other hand, it's easy to see where the narrative comes from given that Pep vs Klopp has given us two of the most memorable title races in PL history, so even if we didn't compete with them on our down years (in the league), those two title race seasons will still be on top of peoples' minds when thinking back about this period (and not for example Solksjaer's or Mourinho's (?) second place finishes which were way off City's points total if I'm not mistaken).