Brwned
Have you ever been in love before?
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2008
- Messages
- 50,919
It's difficult to control for all of the additional variables (prior form, budget, initial team quality) but let's put that to the side initially, and just look at the peaks in United's history. Post WWII, there have been...
Sir Alex joined a team which finished 4th in 3 of the previous 4 seasons, Ron Atkinson took over a team that had just finished 2nd, Sexton took over a team that had just won the FA Cup, Frank O'Farrell and Tommy Docherty took over teams that reached the semi-finals of the league and FA Cups in back-to-back seasons. Every manager post-Busby came into a team that was capable of success under the right guidance - that's his legacy.
I think there's a good argument that Mourinho has made the most of his situation, excl. the two big ones. Being best of the rest doesn't necessarily mean good enough, especially given the change in resources available, but I think our view on what good enough is has become a bit detached from reality.
We won two trophies in his 1st season, finished in the top 2 in his 2nd season, and are closer to being an elite team than at any point beyond those two exceptional pinnacles. Comparing our current performances against those exceptions will surely only lead to constant despair.
That's not to say there aren't other perfectly valid reasons to think we're better off elsewhere. Reputation, youth promotion, future-building etc. all matter. Purely on performance, though, I think he's well on track to embedding himself as part of an elite trio - a level below the top two, but a level above the rest. Right now I'd say he's already in that top 3.
I'm curious how others see it given the general tone...
- 35 seasons in which we've finished in the top 2 in the league
- 32 seasons in which we've won at least 1 key trophy (league, FA Cup, European tournament)
Sir Alex joined a team which finished 4th in 3 of the previous 4 seasons, Ron Atkinson took over a team that had just finished 2nd, Sexton took over a team that had just won the FA Cup, Frank O'Farrell and Tommy Docherty took over teams that reached the semi-finals of the league and FA Cups in back-to-back seasons. Every manager post-Busby came into a team that was capable of success under the right guidance - that's his legacy.
I think there's a good argument that Mourinho has made the most of his situation, excl. the two big ones. Being best of the rest doesn't necessarily mean good enough, especially given the change in resources available, but I think our view on what good enough is has become a bit detached from reality.
We won two trophies in his 1st season, finished in the top 2 in his 2nd season, and are closer to being an elite team than at any point beyond those two exceptional pinnacles. Comparing our current performances against those exceptions will surely only lead to constant despair.
That's not to say there aren't other perfectly valid reasons to think we're better off elsewhere. Reputation, youth promotion, future-building etc. all matter. Purely on performance, though, I think he's well on track to embedding himself as part of an elite trio - a level below the top two, but a level above the rest. Right now I'd say he's already in that top 3.
I'm curious how others see it given the general tone...