Would you sack or keep Ole? (Poll reopened)

Sack or Keep OLE?


  • Total voters
    2,002

Class of 63

Full Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2017
Messages
7,765
Location
Back on the Naughty Step.
Nothing has changed. Ole is still a coward as a manager; he went back to his bus parking ways in the second half, he still doesn't make proactive substitutions, there's still no attacking plan except to counter attack. Liverpool were average and there for the taking today.

Out.
Oh look we've got a comedian, our confidence is on the floor, we're playing the European champions who have won every League game this season and going by this forum 90% of our fans are hoping once Liverpool had got 4 or 5 goals up they'd take pity on us, what the feck were you expecting us to do? Go gung ho looking for a second goal, leaving gaps when they're currently are as good as anybody in Europe at taking advantage of those gaps. Feck me sideways.
 

MisterLupus

New Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2019
Messages
505
Location
Bollocking about fluently.
Oh look we've got a comedian, our confidence is on the floor, we're playing the European champions who have won every League game this season and going by this forum 90% of our fans are hoping once Liverpool had got 4 or 5 goals up they'd take pity on us, what the feck were you expecting us to do? Go gung ho looking for a second goal, leaving gaps when they're currently are as good as anybody in Europe at taking advantage of those gaps. Feck me sideways.
The concept of context is alien to many a creature roaming these forums - so be warned before bellowing such constructs! Nuances too - many are blind to - and paradoxes confuse them so they might cause their noses to bleed.
 

SteveW

Full Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2013
Messages
6,805
What are you talking about? We would have beaten them if we didn't do an error in the 85th minute. Ole hit with his tactics 100 %. After halftime, Klopp sent Henderson out wide pulling Firminio further back and Ole responded with letting McT look after Firmino. We hardly saw Firminio on the field today, and his usually a main man in Liverpool's build-up play. I was almost certain we'd lose this game, but in the end, Liverpool should be happier than us with their point.

As for the substitution, Rashford was pumped - he hardly even ran the last 10 mins before he got subbed. I don't believe Martial or Greenwood would matter, we didn't see the ball anyway, and I believe Martial is a better lone striker than Greenwood also. McT, and Fred were still firing. Pereira started off bad in the 1st half, but his defensive contribution today was really good. Overall a good performance of our boys. We're not the best team in the league, and we don't have the best squad. Liverpool hasn't lost in the league since their defeat against City in January, and today Liverpool didn't look much better than we did against Fulham under Moyes. They hardly created anything.
Wait is that a post tactic about tactics that actually provides some specifics? It's unusual to see that on here.

Good post.
 

NewGlory

Full Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2019
Messages
1,428
Ole outmaneuvered Klopp and got us a great point (could have been a win with some luck and concentration) against reigning champions of Europe and the team that has won every.single.league.game this season. And he did it with major players missing, by completely adapting the tactics for the particular opponent and the squad we had. Clearly he is far from the clueless, inexperienced newb that some blame him to be.

Give the man some credit for feck's sake, seriously.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sultan

RedRonaldo

Full Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2003
Messages
10,886
Our performance vs Liverpool is quite positive and encouraging though. Fact is we have a lot of injuries problems in the early season, so its hard to give a fair judgment, and perhaps not fair to sack him right away. Maybe at least wait until this coming Christmas to see where we are to decide.
 

starman

Full Member
Joined
May 14, 2007
Messages
5,914
Location
Under a tree.
He has no clue about game management. Today was a day we would have beaten them if he got the subs right and manage the game better.
You don't bring in Martial when you are leading with 10 mins to go and the midfield out of gas.
Ole is to blame for us conceding because the players were gone. When you are gone you make mistakes. He should have brought his subs on and all of his subs.
Now people will claim that we nearly beat the CL champions and the fact we didn't is because of Ole.
This is just you guessing, you are saying it like its a sure thing, you are just as clueless of the outcome.
The midfielders on the bench were Garner & Mata, are you saying they would have repelled Liverpool from scoring the goal they scored?
 

Eric7C

New Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2015
Messages
993
Oh look we've got a comedian, our confidence is on the floor, we're playing the European champions who have won every League game this season and going by this forum 90% of our fans are hoping once Liverpool had got 4 or 5 goals up they'd take pity on us, what the feck were you expecting us to do? Go gung ho looking for a second goal, leaving gaps when they're currently are as good as anybody in Europe at taking advantage of those gaps. Feck me sideways.
As usual, nuance is lost on you. Nobody said we should go gung-ho in second half. We stopped doing the good things we did in the first half: pressing as a team, winning the ball higher up the pitch to put them under pressure, passing to AWB who was always available on the right. Instead we retreated completely, allowing them to start crossing from which the goal came.

A couple of fun facts:
We have not scored more than one goal in any game after the opening weekend.
We have less than 10 shots on target in total in the last 5 games.

Unbelievable that folks can't see the limited play and tactics this coach and consequently this team are capable of. One game raising defensive performance changes nothing.
 

Foxbatt

Full Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2013
Messages
5,206
This is just you guessing, you are saying it like its a sure thing, you are just as clueless of the outcome.
The midfielders on the bench were Garner & Mata, are you saying they would have repelled Liverpool from scoring the goal they scored?
I have said during the match that Fred was finished and couldn't run anymore and he should come off for Jones. Yes Jones. The main reason why we got pushed back was there was nothing more to give.
Klopp managed to get fresh legs on and a sub scored. The reason why the cross came in was because there was so much space for them to put in the cross.
Yes we got a good goal and we were lucky on the VAR yet we didn't play well during the whole match.
Now if he had made the subs in midfield I will still say we would have won.
This is a false Dawn like the PSG match. I still want him gone.
 

Strelok

Full Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2018
Messages
687
What are you talking about? We would have beaten them if we didn't do an error in the 85th minute. Ole hit with his tactics 100 %. After halftime, Klopp sent Henderson out wide pulling Firminio further back and Ole responded with letting McT look after Firmino. We hardly saw Firminio on the field today, and his usually a main man in Liverpool's build-up play. I was almost certain we'd lose this game, but in the end, Liverpool should be happier than us with their point.

As for the substitution, Rashford was pumped - he hardly even ran the last 10 mins before he got subbed. I don't believe Martial or Greenwood would matter, we didn't see the ball anyway, and I believe Martial is a better lone striker than Greenwood also. McT, and Fred were still firing. Pereira started off bad in the 1st half, but his defensive contribution today was really good. Overall a good performance of our boys. We're not the best team in the league, and we don't have the best squad. Liverpool hasn't lost in the league since their defeat against City in January, and today Liverpool didn't look much better than we did against Fulham under Moyes. They hardly created anything.
Good post Sir.

Some are asking for a 90' pressing, the players are still human ffs :lol:

Some even want Jones in for Fred oh my God it seems they didn't watch his last matches :lol:

By the last 15 minutes our midfield and almost our team basically run out of gas without any possible sub while Liverpool could bring in a whole new midfield. You can blame that on Ole or Ed or both but that's all.
 

NK86

Full Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2012
Messages
8,675
As usual, nuance is lost on you. Nobody said we should go gung-ho in second half. We stopped doing the good things we did in the first half: pressing as a team, winning the ball higher up the pitch to put them under pressure, passing to AWB who was always available on the right. Instead we retreated completely, allowing them to start crossing from which the goal came.

A couple of fun facts:
We have not scored more than one goal in any game after the opening weekend.
We have less than 10 shots on target in total in the last 5 games.

Unbelievable that folks can't see the limited play and tactics this coach and consequently this team are capable of. One game raising defensive performance changes nothing.
Don't bother. Nothing Ole does can be wrong for some. People think that just because some are not happy with the way we retreated in the second half means we were expecting the team to go all-out. A simple continuity of the first half game plan and ability to pass with people moving forward would have been appreciated as a sign of some sort of progress. Some will allow our levels to go well below any sort of acceptable level before opening their eyes to the fact that Ole is completely out of his depth here as a manager.
 

mav_9me

Full Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2009
Messages
5,022
Don't bother. Nothing Ole does can be wrong for some. People think that just because some are not happy with the way we retreated in the second half means we were expecting the team to go all-out. A simple continuity of the first half game plan and ability to pass with people moving forward would have been appreciated as a sign of some sort of progress. Some will allow our levels to go well below any sort of acceptable level before opening their eyes to the fact that Ole is completely out of his depth here as a manager.
Nothing we can do. This is going to go on for a few more weeks. Who knows at what point but at some point before the end of the year Ole will be fired. Probably waiting for Poch to be available.

This is as inevitable as Mourinhos was.

My only hope here is it is soon enough to salvage the season (top 4 or EL)
 

Eric7C

New Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2015
Messages
993
Don't bother. Nothing Ole does can be wrong for some. People think that just because some are not happy with the way we retreated in the second half means we were expecting the team to go all-out. A simple continuity of the first half game plan and ability to pass with people moving forward would have been appreciated as a sign of some sort of progress. Some will allow our levels to go well below any sort of acceptable level before opening their eyes to the fact that Ole is completely out of his depth here as a manager.
Precisely. The first half had actually made me hopeful that Ole might be trying to implement a higher energy style - the style he had in the first few months as interim - but we reverted to our lazy no-runs no-support default in the second hoping to hold out for a 1-0. We are not going to win many games with this approach. How many games is it now that we have taken the lead and not gone on to win? Wolves, Southampton, Arsenal, now Liverpool.

Good post Sir.

Some are asking for a 90' pressing, the players are still human ffs :lol:

Some even want Jones in for Fred oh my God it seems they didn't watch his last matches :lol:

By the last 15 minutes our midfield and almost our team basically run out of gas without any possible sub while Liverpool could bring in a whole new midfield. You can blame that on Ole or Ed or both but that's all.
This is a strawman argument. We retreated from the 46th minute onwards. How do you explain that?
 

Mr. Meeseeks

Full Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2011
Messages
687
The concept of context is alien to many a creature roaming these forums - so be warned before bellowing such constructs! Nuances too - many are blind to - and paradoxes confuse them so they might cause their noses to bleed.
Paradoxes should confuse everyone. That is sort of the literal definition of the word.
 

Eric7C

New Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2015
Messages
993
Nothing we can do. This is going to go on for a few more weeks. Who knows at what point but at some point before the end of the year Ole will be fired. Probably waiting for Poch to be available.

This is as inevitable as Mourinhos was.

My only hope here is it is soon enough to salvage the season (top 4 or EL)
Knowing Ed, he will wait till the moment when all reasonable opportunity is lost. We won't get top 4, we will not be able to land targets such as Sancho, the cycle of mediocrity will continue.
 

Strelok

Full Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2018
Messages
687
This is a strawman argument. We retreated from the 46th minute onwards. How do you explain that?
Nope:

Clueless fans who doesn't understand football:

"We are clueless in the 2nd half "

Fans who understands football:

"A winning team chasing a goal to level the score will always step it up in the 2nd half".
Unless you're a class above your opponent, you'll expect them to step up in the 2nd half trying to equalise. Then you sit back and counter.
 

Eric7C

New Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2015
Messages
993
Nope:

Unless you're a class above your opponent, you'll expect them to step up in the 2nd half trying to equalise. Then you sit back and counter.
Clearly, meamth's comment has become gospel for you lot :lol:. It doesn't prove anything.

Perhaps the truth is a bit grey? Good teams will certainly push you back, but it is also true that we came out in the second half with a totally different mentality to only defend? AWB no longer made his supporting runs; Ole even introduced Williams as a second right-back late into the half and specifically asked the team to be more compact which allowed the cross for the goal. He's an uber-defensive manager; it would be clear to everyone if he wasn't a United legend.
 

MisterLupus

New Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2019
Messages
505
Location
Bollocking about fluently.
Clearly, meamth's comment has become gospel for you lot :lol:. It doesn't prove anything.

Perhaps the truth is a bit grey? Good teams will certainly push you back, but it is also true that we came out in the second half with a totally different mentality to only defend? AWB no longer made his supporting runs; Ole even introduced Williams as a second right-back late into the half and specifically asked the team to be more compact which allowed the cross for the goal. He's an uber-defensive manager; it would be clear to everyone if he wasn't a United legend.
Actually United kept pushing for a second goal up until the sixtieth minute and even after that they still tried to get forward but Liverpool really put an extra gear in. It wasn't so much a change in tactic as Liverpool just upping their game as it progressed. Oh and... Williams was thrown in during overtime. They'd already scored at that point. You sure you watched the game? And please stop with this "United legend" bullshit I don't think I've ever heard anyone support him on that basis. Today was a good game from both teams - I know it sucks seeing as how you all want us to fail just so you get to say "I told you so" but that's the truth.

United played good football - Liverpool started a bit slow compared to their usual selves but caught up a third into the second period.
 

Strelok

Full Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2018
Messages
687
Clearly, meamth's comment has become gospel for you lot :lol:. It doesn't prove anything.

Perhaps the truth is a bit grey? Good teams will certainly push you back, but it is also true that we came out in the second half with a totally different mentality to only defend? AWB no longer made his supporting runs; Ole even introduced Williams as a second right-back late into the half and specifically asked the team to be more compact which allowed the cross for the goal. He's an uber-defensive manager; it would be clear to everyone if he wasn't a United legend.
You still don't get it. It's the logic in football. The best tactic against an attacking opponent always is sit back and counter.
If you remember the last match well you'd see we had at least 3 good chances to double the score but somehow could not:
- 2 chances where James got the ball. Rashford ready to make the run with huge space in front. James didn't pass but hold it up or decided to run it himself. Don't know why.
- the chance with Fred.

While we were having those chances Liverpool created basically nothing than random crosses. If we managed to score just one from those chances the match would be settled.

P/s: I run out of quota so see you tomorrow :lol:

Cheers :D
 
Last edited:

Eric7C

New Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2015
Messages
993
Actually United kept pushing for a second goal up until the sixtieth minute and even after that they still tried to get forward but Liverpool really put an extra gear in. It wasn't so much a change in tactic as Liverpool just upping their game as it progressed. Oh and... Williams was thrown in during overtime. They'd already scored at that point. You sure you watched the game? And please stop with this "United legend" bullshit I don't think I've ever heard anyone support him on that basis.
Possession stats in the first 15 mins of the second half: United 25%, Liverpool 75%. No, we definitely retreated after the break.

And yes, I did watch the game, thanks for the snarky comment. Williams might have come on after the goal, but the point is the mindset this manager brings to our team. If it was only against Liverpool, I would have no reason to complain. However, this is a pattern, against big and small teams, we don't go in for the kill.
 

MisterLupus

New Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2019
Messages
505
Location
Bollocking about fluently.
Possession stats in the first 15 mins of the second half: United 25%, Liverpool 75%. No, we definitely retreated after the break.

And yes, I did watch the game, thanks for the snarky comment. Williams might have come on after the goal, but the point is the mindset this manager brings to our team. If it was only against Liverpool, I would have no reason to complain. However, this is a pattern, against big and small teams, we don't go in for the kill.
No we really didn't "retreat" we still tried to create - we just got pushed back as Liverpool got into their rhythm. And even then they had a hard time breaking us down - it was a lucky mistake gifting them that goal.
 

Eric7C

New Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2015
Messages
993
You still don't get it. It's the logic in football. The best tactic against an attacking opponent is always sit back and counter.
If you remember the last match well you'd see we had at least 3 good chances to double the score but somehow could not:
- 2 chances where James got the ball. Rashford ready to make the run with huge space in front. James didn't pass but hold it up or decided to run it himself. Don't know why.
- the chance with Fred.

Meanwhile during we was having those chances Liverpool created basically nothing than random crosses. If we managed to score just one from those chances the match would be settled.
Sorry, this is not a great revelation. I am not arguing against counter-attacking. I am arguing against a complete withdrawal into our own half by holidng our wing-backs and isolating our forwards completely. There's a line between trying to counter and trying to do a Jose.
 

Eric7C

New Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2015
Messages
993
No we really didn't "retreat" we still tried to create - we just got pushed back as Liverpool got into their rhythm. And even then they had a hard time breaking us down - it was a lucky mistake gifting them that goal.
We tried to create in the only way we know how under Ole - pass the ball into the channels for Rashford and James. However, in the first half we had Perreira, McTominay and Fred pressing them creating opportunities for play closer to their box. This was shut down quite deliberately in the second half because the approach had completely changed.
 

Bobcat

Full Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2014
Messages
4,020
Location
Behind the curtains, leering at the neighbors
Possession stats in the first 15 mins of the second half: United 25%, Liverpool 75%. No, we definitely retreated after the break.

And yes, I did watch the game, thanks for the snarky comment. Williams might have come on after the goal, but the point is the mindset this manager brings to our team. If it was only against Liverpool, I would have no reason to complain. However, this is a pattern, against big and small teams, we don't go in for the kill.
Sorry, this is not a great revelation. I am not arguing against counter-attacking. I am arguing against a complete withdrawal into our own half by holidng our wing-backs and isolating our forwards completely. There's a line between trying to counter and trying to do a Jose.
We got much to defensive in the latter parts of the second half true, but we still got several good chances to catch them on the break, but failed to capitalize on them. Everyone knows completely retreating into your own box is hardly ideal but its what happens when legs tire and you defend a lead
 

MisterLupus

New Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2019
Messages
505
Location
Bollocking about fluently.
We tried to create in the only way we know how under Ole - pass the ball into the channels for Rashford and James. However, in the first half we had Perreira, McTominay and Fred pressing them creating opportunities for play closer to their box. This was shut down quite deliberately in the second half because the approach had completely changed.
First you say "the only way we know how under Ole" and then the very next sentence you admit he tried a different approach during the first half? Make up your mind - is he a one-trick pony or not? Also - do you think today's match was a poor display?
 

Gomes

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 14, 2016
Messages
275
Considering the next fixtures, there is still time to save the season. For that to happen Ole needs to be gotten rid of midweek.

But it's too much to expect of United to be proactive. Ole will somehow get 6 points from 15 and people who believe in fairy tales put that on Tuanzebe being injured.
 

Eric7C

New Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2015
Messages
993
First you say "the only way we know how under Ole" and then the very next sentence you admit he tried a different approach during the first half? Make up your mind - is he a one-trick pony or not? Also - do you think today's match was a poor display?
He is a one-trick pony about 99% of the time. He wasn't in his first couple of months at the club and he wasn't in the first half yesterday - I was quite pleased and hopeful to see it. But he reverted to his default in the second. Liverpool are an impressive team, but they were not impressive yesterday. We could have won that game with the correct mindset.

Yesterday's match in isolation wasn't a poor display at all - it was very good, in fact. However, the pattern is clear: we are not good in putting together attacks and this will be evident in the coming weeks against lesser opposition (as it has been all season).

Edit:
Just to repeat:
1. Not scored more than 1 goal in any game this season after opening weekend.
2. Not had 10 shots on target in total in the last 5 games.

This team is simply not good at attacking and Ole seems clueless in changing it.
 

John Blund

Full Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2013
Messages
1,165
He is a one-trick pony about 99% of the time. He wasn't in his first couple of months at the club and he wasn't in the first half yesterday - I was quite pleased and hopeful to see it. But he reverted to his default in the second. Liverpool is an impressive team, but they were not impressive yesterday. We could have won that game with the correct mindset.

Yesterday's match in isolation wasn't a poor display at all - it was very good, in fact. However, the pattern is clear: we are not good in putting together attacks and this will be evident in the coming weeks against lesser opposition (as it has been all season).
We made Liverpool look like an average side. The only mindset I'd like to change yesterday was Rojo's. Why the feck did he leave Lallana as that cross came in?

Defensive, we witnessed some tactical masterclass against a top 3 attacking team in the world yesterday. I don't know if it's because they had a better time to prepare, or if they've spent more time analyzing Liverpool, but this was probably the best defensive performance we've had under Ole. Against PSG, we were just lucky. PSG would win that game with the number of chances they created any other day.

Going forward, we were better than against Newcastle, then again, if we play as we did against Newcastle, we'll get relegated. Rashford showed his strength several times. I didn't know he could be such a beast. We lack creativity, decision, and skill going forward.
 

MisterLupus

New Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2019
Messages
505
Location
Bollocking about fluently.
He is a one-trick pony about 99% of the time. He wasn't in his first couple of months at the club and he wasn't in the first half yesterday - I was quite pleased and hopeful to see it. But he reverted to his default in the second. Liverpool are an impressive team, but they were not impressive yesterday. We could have won that game with the correct mindset.

Yesterday's match in isolation wasn't a poor display at all - it was very good, in fact. However, the pattern is clear: we are not good in putting together attacks and this will be evident in the coming weeks against lesser opposition.
It's not so much putting together the attack that's the problem - it's the end product. Our buildup warrants more than our players are able to convert. I doubt anyone with eyes in their sockets will disagree that our attack is sub-par - but I can't agree that our tactics are to blame for this. Both because this is not what I'm actually seeing - and also due to statistics pointing towards a different problem. Spaces are being opened and opportunities created - but we simply can't convert these into actual chances and even when we do manage to get a shot in our players too often miss the target. We lack cool heads up front that are adept at teamply - and (not to mention!) goalscorers.

As for the Liverpool game - I can't fault anyone's "mindset" - we got so close to beating one of the best teams in Europe and it wasn't even a fluke. By the time we scored the first goal we deserved to be ahead - and by the time they scored theirs... Well they deserved it no questions - this draw was a fair result - but our team showed a lot of resolve during that second half more class to our defense than I've witnessed so far during Ole's reign - and I'm pretty sure Liverpool felt very lucky to get anything from it because despite their pressure not only did they struggle to break us down - but we also looked dangerous on the counter and could have easily scored another.

Also we managed to piss Klopp off - he was whining like a princess scorned during that press conference - so yeah there's that too :devil:
 

Charles89

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Nov 9, 2014
Messages
17
Possession stats in the first 15 mins of the second half: United 25%, Liverpool 75%. No, we definitely retreated after the break.

And yes, I did watch the game, thanks for the snarky comment. Williams might have come on after the goal, but the point is the mindset this manager brings to our team. If it was only against Liverpool, I would have no reason to complain. However, this is a pattern, against big and small teams, we don't go in for the kill.
Would you be saying that if Fred had scored from his shot? Both teams had similar amount of chances up until Liverpool scored, if we took our chances, we would have been 2-0 up.

People on here talk as if we didn't have any shots on goal in the 2nd half, but we did. We just blew our chances and then Rojo went for a wander for 1-1.
 

Foxbatt

Full Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2013
Messages
5,206
Do some people realise that our players were finished by then. Why? Because technically Liverpool were better than us.
Where I had huge issues with Ole is his lack of planning in game management.
He should have put in new players in midfield and taken off Fred because he was dead on his feet. When we needed to be compact, we were not.
Now there will be a huge celebration because he drew with Liverpool. Expectations are so low that a draw with Liverpool at OT is now taken as if we have won a trophy.
They were tactically much better and their movements were much better.
 

JSW Devil

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Oct 4, 2019
Messages
37
A better performance only compared to the rubbish we’ve had to endure in the last games, but still only the minimum you would expect against our biggest rivals, lots of effort and high pressing in the first half which was obviously going to fade in the second half and scoring only 1 goal again (we average less than 1 goal a game) creating very few chances. This team needs a rebuild and I still don’t think Ole is the right man to do it.
 

John Blund

Full Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2013
Messages
1,165
Do some people realise that our players were finished by then. Why? Because technically Liverpool were better than us.
Where I had huge issues with Ole is his lack of planning in game management.
He should have put in new players in midfield and taken off Fred because he was dead on his feet. When we needed to be compact, we were not.
Now there will be a huge celebration because he drew with Liverpool. Expectations are so low that a draw with Liverpool at OT is now taken as if we have won a trophy.
They were tactically much better and their movements were much better.
Liverpool has a better squad than us. They're better than us, end of discussion. But in yesterday's game, we made Liverpool look like an average side. Aside from their goal, which I would blame on Rojo, they didn't create much. You can't have seen the same game I saw. Fred was firing. A few minutes before Liverpool scored, Fred had a shot just outside their post. It's not a great chance, but he hit the ball rather good, and we're not that far off a 2-0 lead.
And we were compact. Perhaps even too compact. AWB or James should be out wide when Robertson hits the cross, in an ideal world, but Liverpool moved the ball quickly, and it's often better to stay compact in front of our goal than starting to push out wide to pressure the holder of the ball. Especially when Liverpool moved the ball as they did.

Game management, Ole hit it spot on. We didn't let Liverpool create anything. Klopp was really getting frustrated. Klopp sent Henderson out wide at the start of 2nd half. Dropping Firmino a bit back, and moving Mané in more centrally. Ole changed it around, sent Young out on Henderson, had McT following Firmino. You hardly saw Firmino and Mané in the 2nd half. Hardly in the first half either. Because we were bang-on with our tactics. You might say "yes, but it was Ole who started Rojo!". Yes, but it wasn't his intention to start Rojo. We were going to start Tuanzebe, but he got injured.

Nobody is celebrating the draw. I feared a loss, but in the end, I'm disappointed that we didn't take all three points against them.
Now we need some wins away. I don't really care much about the EL and the cup-tie against Chelsea, but if we can use them to gain some confidence, that would be good. Norwich and Bournemouth will be the next tests.
 

fergiesarmy1

New Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2013
Messages
3,595
Nothing has changed. Ole is still a coward as a manager; he went back to his bus parking ways in the second half, he still doesn't make proactive substitutions, there's still no attacking plan except to counter attack. Liverpool were average and there for the taking today.

Out.
Your a disgrace as a united fan.
 

Untd55

Full Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2018
Messages
766
Your a disgrace as a united fan.
A disgrace for wanting the team to perform to the level it should be? Solskjaer has the team under performing and people have bought in to the idea that he is doing as good as he can. Gullible fans are the best kind of fans for a manager. You can do absolutely no wrong in their eyes.

He is doing a diabolical job. He has had pretty much half a season as permanent manager. 18 games, 4 wins, 6 draws, 8 losses - 25 goals conceded and 17 scored. He should have already been sacked. This is Manchester United not Brighton.
 

dove

Full Member
Joined
May 15, 2013
Messages
5,077
A disgrace for wanting the team to perform to the level it should be? Solskjaer has the team under performing and people have bought in to the idea that he is doing as good as he can. Gullible fans are the best kind of fans for a manager. You can do absolutely no wrong in their eyes.

He is doing a diabolical job. He has had pretty much half a season as permanent manager. 18 games, 4 wins, 6 draws, 8 losses - 25 goals conceded and 17 scored. He should have already been sacked. This is Manchester United not Brighton.
According to our fans - yes. You should expect nothing from the team, staying clear of relegation is as much as we can hope for (gonna be difficult this year though). I heard people say we have worse squad than Newcastle's. You want to see us score 2 goals in 1 match? Clearly a spoilt and entitled fan as it's ridiculous to expect that from Manchester United, biggest club in world football according to same fans who are delighted with how it's going now with Ole in charge.
 

Sil

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 24, 2016
Messages
49
Keep Ole - He's building for the future. Cut out all this negativity - be more positive and give him all our support.