You can read any thread on here to see who wants him gone. This has become a toxic forum full of toxic fans.
Our fans feel inclined to stay behind the manager and blindly have faith in him no matter what. They don’t care what they see on the pitch but if the manager smiles, talks about the United way and waves to the crowd, he will get unconditional support from majority of our fans. That’s very unfortunate and one of the reasons of our downfall. We are constantly lowering our targets so much that now finishing in TOP 10 would be seen as overachievement from Ole.
I can't blame people for wanting Ole out, as there are no signs we're heading back to the top under him. But I don't see how you can guarantee that our malaise will end with the hiring of the 'right' manager, when we have massive issues with the squad and the structure of the club. I think we also have to face the fact that we're an increasingly tarnished proposition to top managers, so as defeatist as it may seem I think sticking with Ole is hoping he can bring the squad together once everyone's fit is or best option, given we're between a rock and hard place.
Should we be positive at how inept, clueless & poor we have?
Hardly that surprising is it? We create nothing and half our goals have actually come from penalties so far this season.
We have been the better team via xG in every match apart from last night's game.
Where did you get all that from? We’ve had more chances and shots than our opponent in every game we played this season.
People have forgotten that was part of the reason we didn't like Mou. LVG was right. Ole is basically Mourinho except without the negativity.
Why were you at Old Trafford last night hearing more that 38k fans boo or signal they wanted Ole out?
We're playing worse football than we ever did under Mourinho and LvG in my opinion. Never thought I would say that.
he was right about that but lets not forget the tumescent sh*t that his teams were playing and the fact that he wasted over £150m on transfers that didn't work out, he is a part of this mess.
Thanks for the education. Please don't give up on me.
I don't think either of those are true, really. We still let in plenty of silly goals defensively and our midfield barely shows any bite, Scotty aside.
Scotty has been subpar most of the time this season like his teammates.
If by instant success you mean not playing like a relegation candidate, then I'm guilty.
Imagine expecting us to be better than relegation fodders. You are clearly an entitled gloryhunter and should be ashamed of yourself.
I voted to keep him. How I feel is summed up in these posts @Bilbo. Yes things aren't great the now but the squad is dreadful and due to injuries we are still having to rely on players who aren't good enough. I'm willing to give him more time. Sacking him and starting over yet again at this point just doesn't seem right to me.
We're playing like a team that's going to be in a relegation battle this season. We can't score more than one goal in a match to save our lives and it's our worst start in 30 years. I knew this season was going to be tough but I wanted to see us at least implement a playing style and play football that will excite the fans. I was willing to give Ole time but what I'm seeing on the pitch is awful and Ole looks fecking clueless and out of his depth.
How much of it is him? I agree he's not improving us but we were only marginally better under Jose - one of the best managers ever. What does anyone achieve with this group of players? Or do they resort to the hard to beat approach which is our best bet with this group? Again no one would be satisfied.
I'm afraid that's too simplistic. What if the defensive organisation of the team (which isn't that great tbh, we haven't played the best teams in the league, especially away from home)) is at the expense of the attack and the deficiencies in attack are not only due to individuals but the overall set-up of the team? I think the latter is more likely than missing 1-2 quality players in attack.
The 'silly' goals we have conceded this season are often individual blunders like yesterday when Tuanzebe turned creator for Arsenal or Lindelof and De Gea vs Palace. There actually hasn't been a game yet where I felt like our defence looked weak collectively.
Eddie Howe.
We are a broken club with a broken fanbase. From by far the biggest dog around in England to being the laughing stock of the league, that sort of change was never going to be handled well.
This is just silly. I can argue as to why I feel backing him is right thing to do easily - and have so over and over as has numerous countless others. You're no psychoanalyst - maybe you should just stick to what people are actually saying rather than attempt to read their minds questioning their motives. If "you are sheep that's the only reason you back someone" is your strongest argument against them - despite them actually putting forth an actual case for their viewpoint - then guess what you're just blowing air at people and might as well shut your stupid face.
Of course. He was boring too. The point is that Ole was supposed to be different from Mourinho in his football. We've had 6 seasons of boring football, and I would argue it was a little boring under Fergie too. Difference is we won under Fergie. We're at a point where we wanted attacking football, and now many fans have ignored that.
Well if you take into account the fact that Lingard is 26, then we are one +25 player away from 18/19 Dortmund.
