i would, he’s dreamy. but i wouldn’t want to see him at united.
Yeah I hear that, but we will need that plan B. The Leeds game was a good example of being lost for ideas and if Cavani goes we will need some form of an equivalent to turn to.If he's on the bench, yes, he'll always get goals but not as a starter. Greenwood has the ability if we can get someone like Sancho.
Top strikers also have to be available, and it needs to be viable economically too. I don't think we've ignored the striker problem as much as we have the right wing.We have signed too many stop gap strikers since Ferguson retired.
Only signed one who was an attempt to improve in Lukaku and he is gone.
yeah. there are definitely worse things, like following through in the supermarket, or being mistaken for a peado and having your car torched, but still.
If Cavani is off there are worse options...I think.
like the famously only really any good for one season rvp?Enough with the stop gaps. We haven't had a proper striker since RvP.
Absolutely, I'd take him in a heartbeat if he's not going to cause issues with being a plan B. I actually think, and this might be an unpopular opinion given Cavani has a bit of a cult following, that Giroud would suit us better/score more goals because he's a great finisher, despite being weaker than Cavani in other areas.Yeah I hear that, but we will need that plan B. The Leeds game was a good example of being lost for ideas and if Cavani goes we will need some form of an equivalent to turn to.
That excuse doesn't fly when we have only signed 1 since 2013 and he has been sold.Top strikers also have to be available, and it needs to be viable economically too. I don't think we've ignored the striker problem as much as we have the right wing.
You rarely have the opportunity to sign more than one in 7 years, top strikers are a bit rare and generally not for sale.That excuse doesn't fly when we have only signed 1 since 2013 and he has been sold.