I know LvG says Rooney is a 'striker' I just feel he does better much deeper. Falcao played his best football up top alone being fed from the flanks or through the middle. I personally don't think Rooney makes a good strike partner as such because he will always drop very deep which is understandable as his long range passing is a hell of a lot better than his short game, he just seems so much more comfortable not having to stay up top.
As for Di Maria I would have played him in a midfield three had we not signed Falcao, now though I would play him slightly further but not as an out and out winger but as a play maker. Mata will be less isolated for me and his game would improve, always thought in those rare games when Mata and Kagawa played together they both looked happier with a player close to them on the same wave length. Just my thoughts though.
Couldn't disagree more. You admit Rooney short passing is weak, yet you think he is better in deeper role? His long range passing would be useful in midfield if that’s what you meant.
Rooney drops deep because we can’t get the ball to him, but if we can solve our midfield problems and move the ball quicker to our attackers this won’t be that much of an issue.
IMO Rooney is a pure striker now, his all round game is a bit meh and he isn’t that quick anymore. I would’ve played him on the left as winger/striker. He would contribute in defense too in that position.
I don’t think you should refer to Di Maria as a playmaker. His job is different, he is excellent in moving with the ball from deep positions, but he doesn’t have playmaker mindset. If he sees a channel, he will run it. Not sure how much have you seen of Di Maria last season, but he was not a playmaker in that sense as I understand it.
This could be even better for Mata, but they won’t be like Kagawa- Mata partnership we’ve seen.