But Eriksen would be free, and Tielmans will cost £40 million, so there's no way he'd be the fall back option.No-brainer signing if Eriksen turns us down. I have no doubt that Ten Hag will help him build some consistency.
He might be less than that. He only has 1 year left on his contractBut Eriksen would be free, and Tielmans will cost £40 million, so there's no way he'd be the fall back option.
But Eriksen would be free, and Tielmans will cost £40 million, so there's no way he'd be the fall back option.
Story a while ago was that £25-30m could get him.He might be less than that. He only has 1 year left on his contract
Has any of their players had the youth profile of Tielemans?One paced and weak. Typically overpriced, overrated Leicester player. They've been living off players signed 8-9 years ago but still managing to sell the likes of Drinkwater, Maguire and Chilwell as if they are Kante and Mahrez standard.
He played in there with Tadic playing out wide at times, and then they would swap, anyway all to say I could see eriksen playing the same way they did before haller arrived. It would mean we don’t need a striker this yearDo you mean Tadic? Don’t think Berghuis ever played as a false nine.
This is what I would do. Go for Tielemans as an alternative to Eriksen if that isn’t worked on. I’d go for Tielemans over Eriksen due to their age and health issues but I don’t know much about it.Not many rate him. I think he is a good player. Football brain. If we don't get Erickson in then worth a punt for 25 million.
Took the piss out of us last season when they beat us at the king power. Matic and pogba chasing his shadows that day.
Yeah, lock threadAssume this is dead now? For better or worse.
Last year of his contract, £20m will do the trick, I'd sign him regardless of if we want De Jong in addition or not. It might also make Barca soften their stance if they realise that we've got numbers in midfield again.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
A lot better than our actual midfield though! He’d be a very good purchase for the right price. I’d happily take him, FDJ and Eriksen in the squad than having to rely on McT and Fred to play constantly and in positions they aren’t very good at.Not good enough for UTD.
He’s better then mctominay and he’ll add squad depth.Not good enough for UTD.
Some Leicester fans have speculated that he's had his heart out the club for more than a year. I think Tielemans is more than good enough to play for this club. Some opinions on are as if United have just signed Camavinga, Tchouameni and a prime Scholes. The club have easily the worst midfield I can remember it's significantly regressed since Matic, Herrera and Pogba were playing together.Has looked poor for a while. Decent squad player but wouldn't be getting excited about signing him.
I agree with that but personally I wouldn’t pay over 25/30 mil for him.He’s better then mctominay and he’ll add squad depth.
id get him as well as FDJTweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
A better move would be to sell McTominay for 65m. You'd get more money this way.Get Tielemans for 25m and sell McTominay for 40m.
This would be the kind of move that changes the shape of the squad and shows an intention towards a genuine rebuild.
Who’s buying mctominay for 40mGet Tielemans for 25m and sell McTominay for 40m.
This would be the kind of move that changes the shape of the squad and shows an intention towards a genuine rebuild.
Interested in becoming our DoF?A better move would be to sell McTominay for 65m. You'd get more money this way.
Roma!Who’s buying mctominay for 40m
Think there is a reported interest from NewcastleWho’s buying mctominay for 40m