OranjeCafe: The Netherlands at the World Cup

Sixpence

Erroneously Promoted
Joined
Nov 30, 2012
Messages
15,231
Location
Offside
Is this opening up for them? Mexico in the last 16 and either Costa Rica/Greece in the QF? I would be disappointed if they do not reach the SF now.
 

punpun

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 23, 2014
Messages
250
Mexico and Costa Rica are no pushovers but yes, Holland should comfortably beat them.
 

Ole's_toe_poke

Ole_Aged_Slow_Poke
Joined
Jan 7, 2009
Messages
36,846
Draw looks good for them. Knowing the Dutch though they'll probably go and lose to Mexico.
 

dangk1

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 24, 2014
Messages
10
Although the dutch often peak during early games at international tournaments to fail later I dont think Van Gaal is a coach who will let his players loose their heads. It's very simple the players need to realise 1 goal > 1 dream > make history together and approach every game with a good mentality. If they can do that than maybe this WC will be the one were all waiting for so long. I have no doubt Van Gaal will do everything in his power to prepare the players mentally, physically and tactically. #BELIEVE
Back to reality, in football anything can happen and sometimes a match can turn with just a simple foul, penalty or red card.
That said I am already proud of the achievements so far and will not criticise them too much even if they will get knocked out.
For a team that was already ruled out to make it through the group phase nationwide they have done incredibly well and as long as they play with all passion and try their hardest we should be proud.
 

jgprime

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Dec 28, 2013
Messages
117
Mexico and Costa Rica are no pushovers but yes, Holland should comfortably beat them.
Mexico is playing much better than Costa Rica though (IMO Costa Rica's style of play will suffer against Greece since they know how to go defensive too).
 

PlayerOne

Part of first caf team to complete Destiny raid
Joined
Mar 22, 2014
Messages
9,671
Location
London
Manchester United new boss Van Gaal under fire from Dutch for ditching Total Football

Dutch national team boss Louis van Gaal is under fire from their fans – despite eliminating Spain to steer his side into the World Cup last 16.

While Van Gaal’s team will take on Mexico in Fortaleza on Sunday as the tournament top scorers, the Manchester United manager-in-waiting is being slaughtered for abandoning Holland’s Total Football traditions.

Van Gaal has been accused of 'abomination' football - adopting the 'catenaccio' style devised by Inter Milan in the 1960s, for ditching Holland’s usual three striker formation, going five at the back and playing on the counter through Arjen Robben and Robin Van Persie

Even Van Gaal’s protege, Ajax boss Frank De Boer, stepped into the debate when asked if he planned to adopt the same tactics next term.

De Boer said: "My heart says no. Even if we play Barcelona I want to play dominant football. I will not change that so quickly."

Van Gaal, never short of self-belief, or contempt for his critics, is bristling at the stick, his relationship with the Dutch media on the brink.

"I am not interested in what anybody has to say about how we play," he insisted. "The only thing that matters is that you score one more than the opponent. I’ve said that from the start of this World Cup.

Ironically, Holland’s Thursday training session at Flamengo’s Estadio Jose Bastos Padilha was gate-crashed by Zico, the star of Brazil’s great 1982 team which found itself eliminated by Italy.

And while the criticism keeps coming, Van Gaal’s players are backing their soon to be former manager.

Robben, who has been brilliant so far, said: "I know what people are saying back home but me feelings are not as negative.

"We have already done more than I expected. If we beat Mexico, we can go to the Final. It’s simple – we just have to win the next three and we WILL be in the Final."

Wesley Sneijder has also backed the coach, admitting: "I’m not world-class like I was four years ago. Now I have to be a worker."

And PSV Eindhoven skipper and midfielder Georginio Wijnaldum insisted: "It’s not just about beautiful football. In the World Cup, it’s about the result.

"Everyone must be subordinate to the team. Our football might not always be as beautiful and as everyone wants to see, but we’re getting results.

"For years we have been a symbol of good, positive and attractive football.

"But the only thing we’ve won in 40 years was the European Championships in 1988. If you can’t win by playing beautiful football, you just have to win. We are a fighting machine."
The Mirror

Any Dutch fans on here? Is this true? It seems crazy to me, Holland have been great so far.
 

Zes

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Nov 27, 2012
Messages
88
The Mirror

Any Dutch fans on here? Is this true? It seems crazy to me, Holland have been great so far.
Yes, there is a lot of criticism about our play which I find utterly bizarre. They call it defensive, but well, I think a 10 - 3 goal differential after 3 games says a lot (and I think like 29 attempts on target or something, not sure). I just don't see how you can call that catenaccio. I guess we don't try to dominate games like we usually try to, but attempting that now would probably have lead to absolutely nothing. Van Gaal is just playing to the team's strength, and I find it spectacular. Even the game against Chile, I mean, they created 0 chances and we seemed in full control of the match to me, despite letting them make the play, and it showed in goal scoring attempts and chances, simply very well executed.
The Dutch are just very critical and cynical though, doubt in many other countries there would be such talk after the group phase we just had.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Annihilate Now!

PlayerOne

Part of first caf team to complete Destiny raid
Joined
Mar 22, 2014
Messages
9,671
Location
London
Yes, there is a lot of criticism about our play which I find utterly bizarre. They call it defensive, but well, I think a 10 - 3 goal differential after 3 games says a lot (and I think like 29 attempts on target or something, not sure). I just don't see how you can call that catenaccio. I guess we don't try to dominate games like we usually try to, but attempting that now would probably have lead to absolutely nothing. Van Gaal is just playing to the team's strength, and I find it spectacular. Even the game against Chile, I mean, they created 0 chances and we seemed in full control of the match to me, despite letting them make the play, and it showed in goal scoring attempts and chances, simply very well executed.
The Dutch are just very critical and cynical though, doubt in many other countries there would be such talk after the group phase we just had.
It's crazy on so many levels. Didn't the Dutch have low exceptions going into the World Cup? I remember a few people saying they would be happy if they finish third and now they're one of the favourites to win it, if I was Dutch I would be over the moon.

Plus, I don't think you guys have the players to play Total Football even if LVG wanted to. Honestly though, I'm liking the football Netherlands are playing, I mean the Spain match was just awesome, how can anyone complain after that?
 

Zes

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Nov 27, 2012
Messages
88
It's crazy on so many levels. Didn't the Dutch have low exceptions going into the World Cup? I remember a few people saying they would be happy if they finish third and now they're one of the favourites to win it, if I was Dutch I would be over the moon.

Plus, I don't think you guys have the players to play Total Football even if LVG wanted to. Honestly though, I'm liking the football Netherlands are playing, I mean the Spain match was just awesome, how can anyone complain after that?
Yes. Well, before the tournament I thought expectations were ridiculously low and I would've been really disappointed not to make it out of the group. Considering the draw though, a second round match (and most probably knockout) against Brazil seemed a very likely scenario. I personally am over the moon and hope very much it doesn't all end in anti-climax (so at least semi's(though I'll still be disappointed with anything less winning the WC I'm afraid)).

However, recently I've read some articles written by Dutch newspapers and football magazines from the early 70's, and when Ajax won their first European Cup, they all complained that the match wasn't good. Same in '74 in the World Cup, it was fairly negative, and this was at a time when we only just started to play a real part in international football. It's just a bizarre approach.
Then again, maybe that approach led to us having a style of play that's quite famous and in the case of the early 70's quite inventive. Still, bizarre.
 

CLARiiON

Mes que un Gloryhunter
Joined
May 19, 2014
Messages
1,954
Location
127.0.0.1
Supports
Barcelona
They got the result, but the style is same as in 2010. Not my favorite, but they get the job done.
 

Crustanoid

New Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2008
Messages
18,511
Its not total football, but along with a couple of the South American sides they are playing the most attractive football at this world cup
 

Sarni

nice guy, unassuming, objective United fan.
Joined
Jan 21, 2004
Messages
58,094
Location
Krakow
Wesley Sneijder has also backed the coach, admitting: "I’m not world-class like I was four years ago. Now I have to be a worker."
How modest.
 

Gio

★★★★★★★★
Joined
Jan 25, 2001
Messages
20,378
Location
Bonnie Scotland
Supports
Rangers
I don't know, they look a damn sight better than 2010 now. But I could be biased by Van Gaal.
Yes, it's easier on the eye. It's counter-attacking football and I'm not convinced they'll necessarily have the tools to break down another team that plays them at their own game. But compared to 2010, there's more attacking verve with Robben and Van Persie.
 

devil in me

Full Member
Joined
May 6, 2011
Messages
6,603
Location
Hereford
Crazy to think that they beat Spain 5-1 and scored another in the other 2 group games, including a very good Chile side, and they're getting criticized at home!!!
 

Adebesi

Full Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2006
Messages
19,159
Location
Sanctity, like a cat, abhors filth.
the Dutch are very much of the Wesley Snipes in White Men Cant Jump school: look good first, win second. Its how the country reconciled the loss of the 1974 and 78 WC Finals, especially the former. They had to console themselves with the moral victory of playing the best, and being the best, even if they didnt win, to the point many succeeded in convincing themselves it is actually more important.

I dont know whether this attitude is dying out, they have been more pragmatic in the last couple of WCs so maybe the younger generation will see things differently.
 

Unlikely lad

Full Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2010
Messages
3,750
Location
London
the Dutch are very much of the Wesley Snipes in White Men Cant Jump school: look good first, win second. Its how the country reconciled the loss of the 1974 and 78 WC Finals, especially the former. They had to console themselves with the moral victory of playing the best, and being the best, even if they didnt win, to the point many succeeded in convincing themselves it is actually more important.

I dont know whether this attitude is dying out, they have been more pragmatic in the last couple of WCs so maybe the younger generation will see things differently.
Have you read David Winner's Brilliant Orange? It reconciles the Dutch psyche with their way of playing football, an excellent read. My favourite football book, by quite a mile.

Van Gaal does get some neg rep from Johnny Repp in it though.
 

Unlikely lad

Full Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2010
Messages
3,750
Location
London
On another note, has it been announced who will take the reigns of the national once van Gaal is ours?
 

Adebesi

Full Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2006
Messages
19,159
Location
Sanctity, like a cat, abhors filth.
Have you read David Winner's Brilliant Orange? It reconciles the Dutch psyche with their way of playing football, an excellent read. My favourite football book, by quite a mile.

Van Gaal does get some neg rep from Johnny Repp in it though.
The Simon Kuper books are very good - tho I have only read Why England Lose. Fascinating stuff.

My favourite football book of all time is Brilliant Orange. Though it is very old and may not be that interesting for anyone not interested in Dutch football.
I was reading an interview with Johnny Rep last night, one chapter in the book Brilliant Orange (which is a great book by the way, if anyone is fascinated by the Dutch).

He was not very flattering about Van Gaal. Mainly saying his football is boring because he wont let his players take risks, he hates players who dribble because they risk losing the ball, his teams have no soul.

Just one man's opinion, and hardly the most important or credible person either. But someone who knows a lot about Dutch football and the context of Van Gaal's philosophy.

I dont take it too seriously. I cant say much about his Barca or Munich teams but I remember the Ajax team of the mid 90s, I fell in love with that team and have had a soft spot for Ajax and Holland ever since (hence why I read and reread Brilliant Orange.)
Indeed I have. Brilliant book.
 

GloryHunter07

Full Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2007
Messages
12,152
Didnt we say that about Capello? Didnt we learn from that experience that English footballers cant do tactics?
True, although i feel like Van Gal has more charisma, players just didnt really respond to Capello.

Imagine what he can do with United :drool:
 

CLARiiON

Mes que un Gloryhunter
Joined
May 19, 2014
Messages
1,954
Location
127.0.0.1
Supports
Barcelona
Mou plays with same philosophy as Holland. I don't see Mou getting so much credit like what Holland is suddenly getting now.
 

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
95,997
Location
india
The team isn't great individually. They have to have a good dose of pragmatism in their football and so far it's working excllently.
 

Mozza

It’s Carrick you know
Joined
Jul 13, 2002
Messages
23,353
Location
Let Rooney be Rooney
Mou plays with same philosophy as Holland. I don't see Mou getting so much credit like what Holland is suddenly getting now.
An international coach fits the system to the players available, a team coach buys the players to fit a system, bit of a difference
 

Zes

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Nov 27, 2012
Messages
88
They got the result, but the style is same as in 2010. Not my favorite, but they get the job done.
The style is totally, completely different than 2010. In 2010, every match we completely dominated and our opponents dug themselves in, leading to very boring matches, but not due to any Dutch defensive tactics. They were just completely in control then (bar the first half against Brazil and the final against Spain) but it wasn't spectacular. This time we play the counter attack. It's evidenced in possession stats, where in 2010 we were 3rd only behind Spain and Germany. This time I believe we're like 20th(ish) in possession. Just completely different styles.
 

Firstouch20

Full Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2014
Messages
723
the Dutch are very much of the Wesley Snipes in White Men Cant Jump school: look good first, win second. Its how the country reconciled the loss of the 1974 and 78 WC Finals, especially the former. They had to console themselves with the moral victory of playing the best, and being the best, even if they didnt win, to the point many succeeded in convincing themselves it is actually more important.

I dont know whether this attitude is dying out, they have been more pragmatic in the last couple of WCs so maybe the younger generation will see things differently.
Good point. Its interesting seeing the shift in Dutch and German football. The Dutch are playing more like Germans and the Germans are playing more like the Dutch. Mind you it was Van Gaals influence at Bayern Munich that caused this shift in German football.
 

Firstouch20

Full Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2014
Messages
723
The style is totally, completely different than 2010. In 2010, every match we completely dominated and our opponents dug themselves in, leading to very boring matches, but not due to any Dutch defensive tactics. They were just completely in control then (bar the first half against Brazil and the final against Spain) but it wasn't spectacular. This time we play the counter attack. It's evidenced in possession stats, where in 2010 we were 3rd only behind Spain and Germany. This time I believe we're like 20th(ish) in possession. Just completely different styles.
With all due respect you are rewriting history. Holland never dominated a single game in the world cup. They usually took an early lead and then defended deep the whole game. The attack was very disjointed and lacked cohesion. Robben was an individual, Kuyt was a defensive winger and RvP was left on an Island all by himself with zero support. Holland also played two defensive midfielders who barely ventured outside their half.
I would also like to see those posession stats, i really doubt Holland had the 3rd highest possession in the tournement.
 
Last edited:

Zes

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Nov 27, 2012
Messages
88
With all due respect you are rewriting history. Holland never dominated a single game in the world cup. They usually took an early lead and then defended deep the whole game. The attack was very disjointed and lacked cohesion. Robben was an individual, Kuyt was a defensive winger and RvP was left on an Island all by himself with zero support. Holland also played two defensive midfielders who barely ventured outside their half.
I would also like to see those posession stats, i really doubt Holland had the 3rd highest possession in the tournement.
Holland never dominated a single game? They played in the group against Denmark, Japan and Cameroon, in that order. None of them did any more than try to hold on for a draw. Then Slovakia in round of 16, same story. Then Brazil, for which I excluded the first half. Then Uruguay, which was a fairly open match I guess, but definitely Dutch dominated, then the final against Spain. Which I also excluded as being dominated by Netherlands. The possession stat I'll try to google, but I got it from a physical magazine, Voetbal International, which is a highly reputable source. Not rewriting history at all. Name me one of those matches which Netherlands didn't dominate.Early lead then defending deep also simply isn't true at all. Think you're just going by conjecture here.
 

steve9

New Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2013
Messages
714
Location
Mobile. Now Prague.
I always loved watching the Netherlands playing football. And it was good and fun versus Spain.

But now it reminds me on Mourinho-Chelsea football. Which is least football I like to watch. It might win the title, but I hate to watch it.
 

Zes

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Nov 27, 2012
Messages
88
Well, unfortunately google does not help me in finding total possession stats for 2010 world cup, so I shouldn't have put that in my previous post. Still, in none of those the Dutch defended deep. Yes, the Dutch had two deep lying central midfielders, however, they barely ventured out of their own half? nonsense. The first four matches, none of the teams attacked the Dutch, at all. Then things were different against Brazil, maybe Uruguay, and then Spain.
 
Last edited: