Took them 108 years to do it.Yeah I know nothing about baseball. Couldn't even name a team but even I heard about that so it must have been pretty special.
Took them 108 years to do it.Yeah I know nothing about baseball. Couldn't even name a team but even I heard about that so it must have been pretty special.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
So abit like Suarez?Many people will point to deflategate and spygate, but that doesn't really bother me so much. It's the fact that Brady is one of the biggest crybabies in the whole league. Whines to the refs like his family's been weonged every time he takes a good hit. Also, him along with Belichick are notorious for playing for the pass interference calls in order to get the first down or big yardage. They did at the end of the game to set up the first and goal. Fitting. Aside from that, I'm a Denver fan and there is a success-based rivalry between the two teams. So yeah, Brady. One of the greatest for sure, but a total feckhead if you ask me. Good riddance once he retires.
I can't wait until they fecking retire, I feel like a Scouser.
Just like the other examples I gave. But if such a rule was in in those sports it would still be an unfair advantage based on the toss of a coin.The advantage has to be earned by actually scoring. Some teams may not have the ability to score and wind up punting and getting scored on by the opposition.
Don't like having your opinions commented on them don't come crying about it being unfair because the team you wanted did not winWhat you talking about? Who said he was cheated?
It's just an opinion relax
But one team having the ball extra cos they guessed a coin toss correct seems unfair
Seems a lot fairer alrightAdd to that, the NFL is the only level of American football that I know of that uses that type of playoff format.
High school - each team gets a possession (from the 10)
College - each team gets a possession (from the 25)
Thing is, if they end up punting, then at least both teams get a possession.The advantage has to be earned by actually scoring. Some teams may not have the ability to score and wind up punting and getting scored on by the opposition.
Same here minus the Scouser part. Pats fans are in need of a good humbling.I can't wait until they fecking retire, I feel like a Scouser.
I couldn't care less what others said about its effect on the game... he cheated.Which was a joke of a thing to begin with, even the overwhelming majority of Brady's peers and former players stated such. It also had zero bearing on the outcome of that Pats beatdown of the Colts. The spygate thing - now that's a legit claim but it falls on Belichick and staff not Brady.
Lol. But it's not fair!!!! Wah wah wahDo they though?
According to http://www.espn.com/blog/statsinfo/post/_/id/112875/numbers-dont-back-up-patriots-ot-strategy
53.8 chance
Don't like having your opinions commented on them don't come crying about it being unfair because the team you wanted did not win
Wah wah wah I don't like the outcome they need to change the rules. Wah wah wah. Cry me a river.
The Falcons could've stopped them by way of turnover, punt, or even FG - but they weren't able to. Likewise, the Pats could've fecked things up by not advancing the ball, but they didn't. They instead did what they had to, to score a TD and win the game and SB.Thing is, if they end up punting, then at least both teams get a possession.
I think for the Superbowl both teams should get a possession regardless of what happens, as it seems like the coin toss gives you advantage (regardless of what the numbers show)
"Stop pretending he was cheated somehow"Don't like having your opinions commented on them don't come crying about it being unfair because the team you wanted did not win
Wah wah wah I don't like the outcome they need to change the rules. Wah wah wah. Cry me a river.
As far as detestability, then it's an alright comparison. Suarez' actions are much worse because he is such a dirty fecker. Brady just whines a lot.So abit like Suarez?
Exactly.The Falcons could've stopped them by way of turnover, punt, or even FG - but they weren't able to. Likewise, the Pats could've fecked things up by not advancing the ball, but they didn't. They instead did what they had to, to score a TD and win the game and SB.
Would you agree that Brady's performance was oodie-doodie great?The Falcons could've stopped them by way of turnover, punt, or even FG - but they weren't able to. Likewise, the Pats could've fecked things up by not advancing the ball, but they didn't. They instead did what they had to, to score a TD and win the game and SB.
Yes. We know this. We know the Super Bowl wasn't decided on the toss of coin. But the toss gives one team an advantage. That's all we're saying. It seems a crazy way to decide such a major sporting event.The Falcons could've stopped them by way of turnover, punt, or even FG - but they weren't able to. Likewise, the Pats could've fecked things up by not advancing the ball, but they didn't. They instead did what they had to, to score a TD and win the game and SB.
But youre relying on half your whole team, rather than the full element. Because of the luck of a coin toss one team gets that advantage.The Falcons could've stopped them by way of turnover, punt, or even FG - but they weren't able to. Likewise, the Pats could've fecked things up by not advancing the ball, but they didn't. They instead did what they had to, to score a TD and win the game and SB.
Haters gonna hate!I couldn't care less what others said about its effect on the game... he cheated.
He also benefited from the organization cheating in Spygate, which leads to me not standing the Pats, which feeds into me not liking him.
And what @SaintTresano said.
1) Because the defender made contact with the receiver before the receiver made contact with the ball.Anyway as an outsider, couple of questions:
Why was that last pass called pass interference? Seemed like he just knocked it off his hand, surely that's legitimate in a sport where almost anything goes?
Isn't it bit ridiculous to have the first touch-down wins in a possession-based game like American football? Winning the toss is a crazy advantage.
Are most of the quarterbacks in the game white? Why is that so?
1. Till the receiver catches the ball he is almost untouchable. Minimal contact is allowed. When he has caught the ball it is clobbering time.Always amazes me that the owner collects the trophy - guess that's a reflection of modern-day capitalism: workers do the work, owner gets the credit.
Anyway as an outsider, couple of questions:
Why was that last pass called pass interference? Seemed like he just knocked it off his hand, surely that's legitimate in a sport where almost anything goes?
Isn't it bit ridiculous to have the first touch-down wins in a possession-based game like American football? Winning the toss is a crazy advantage.
Are most of the quarterbacks in the game white? Why is that so?
And cheaters cheat.Haters gonna hate!
And have all the players but the kicker take the attempts!I think they should have a field goal shootout. Move back 10 yards after every kick.
Because he wasn't facing the ball. They'll usually call that interference when the hands are also in the face. Not always consistent, though.Always amazes me that the owner collects the trophy - guess that's a reflection of modern-day capitalism: workers do the work, owner gets the credit.
Anyway as an outsider, couple of questions:
Why was that last pass called pass interference? Seemed like he just knocked it off his hand, surely that's legitimate in a sport where almost anything goes?
Isn't it bit ridiculous to have the first touch-down wins in a possession-based game like American football? Winning the toss is a crazy advantage.
Are most of the quarterbacks in the game white? Why is that so?
Yes. We know this. We know the Super Bowl wasn't decided on the toss of coin. But the toss gives one team an advantage. That's all we're saying. It seems a crazy way to decide such a major sporting event.
Please explain how they cheated this win, por favor.And cheaters cheat.
Its completely fair when you consider all participants know the rules going into the game. It may seem a bit odd to someone just learning the rules from the outside. The Falcons had plenty of chances to thwart the Pats from scoring their final two TDs and preventing the game from even reaching OT, but they couldn't do it. So they were forced into a situation where the rules of OT were in play and it cost them. There's nothing unfair about it when both teams and all viewers know the rules going in.But youre relying on half your whole team, rather than the full element. Because of the luck of a coin toss one team gets that advantage.
It's more a thinking man's position mixed with some extent of relative athletcism that can be performed by more ethnic backgrounds than say RB or WR.
Genious! Could you imagine Brady or one the the big fat linemen kicking a 50 yard field goal.And have all the players but the kicker take the attempts!
I don't believe I ever said that..Please explain how they cheated this win, por favor.
And who did Aaron Hernandez play for?Suarez is a despicable human inflicted with some kind of personality disease.
Brady is nowhere near the childish, nastiness level. Probably hasn't been a US athlete that despicable since Ty Cobb. Well, unless we take into account the athletes that committed murder like Aaron Hernandez et al.
That is... not sound logicIts completely fair when you consider all participants know the rules going into the game.