Kush
Hyperbolic and will post where they like!!
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2010
- Messages
- 3,451
No that would be income from capital gain, which he can write off when he files ITR next FY.that sounds expensive. shouldnt that be taxable?
No that would be income from capital gain, which he can write off when he files ITR next FY.that sounds expensive. shouldnt that be taxable?
Lol ! You told me you wern't a WUM!Am I missing something here - in what way is that advert anything to do with him going to Utd?
The 'Jose calling' thing is just a bit of tongue in cheek?
Is that watch company also a Utd sponsor or something?
Confused!
My point is that as far as I know this clause only exists for spanish clubs to activate. Ie, it doesn't mean anything when Italian or English clubs come calling.All Spanish clubs must have clauses in contracts for all their players, but the clause's exist for any club to purchase. If that's what you were asking?
I meant in the sense that they might try hard to keep him if they can't get a replacement in.The transfer ban is a registration ban. They can sign and sell but can't register to play until January. Nothing to do with selling players.
It's an advert mate. Don't take it too literally.Wow, nobody is noticing that he actually rejected jose?
Used to be 20% tax but there isn't anymore.that sounds expensive. shouldnt that be taxable?
Us paying him the money is a capital gain, him giving Atleti the money is a capital loss, they cancel out.that sounds expensive. shouldnt that be taxable?
Just us I think, quite fun though, as long as he's our's at the end of it all.Do any other clubs have saga's like this or is it literally just us?
Is that not just the story from earlier on today?SSN quoting Ag as saying he has never asked to leave
Not a rejection. He was already on the call and hung up. Its just a silly bantz add anyway.Wow, nobody is noticing that he actually rejected jose?
SSN have completly fallen awaySSN quoting Ag as saying he has never asked to leave
Just going to the farce that this so called transfer is developing intoIs that not just the story from earlier on today?
Edward? Eddy? Woody?Wow that's hilarious. Any name but Jose
You got to be working on something Olly, can't waitApologies!
He didn't reject him, he was already talking to him and put the phone down to talk to the couple, so cocks definitely outWow, nobody is noticing that he actually rejected jose?
The advert is also a theme on changing focusI hope so its epic when we are the ones getting the good news. If it was david de gea doing some shit with perez i would be pissed off
I can live with itOur marquee ones
he didn't reject the call, he hung up on him, so that's good?!
Clearly the conversation was already over and he had already agreed to join. No need to linger on the phone then.he didn't reject the call, he hung up on him, so that's good?!
Pretty sure he was already on the call?!he didn't reject the call, he hung up on him, so that's good?!
It's a name... He even has a team mate called Jose so I don't think permission is neededAll we should take from that is that he must have had Mourinho's permission to do the advert which bodes well.
I disagree here - he wouldn't have needed Jose's permission to just use "Jose". It could be anyone.All we should take from that is that he must have had Mourinho's permission to do the advert which bodes well.
Yeah, because Mourinho is the only person in the world with that first name and owns all copyright on it..All we should take from that is that he must have had Mourinho's permission to do the advert which bodes well.
Yeah, because Mourinho is the only person in the world with that first name and owns all copyright on it..
The Steve Urkel or Simple Jack of football. I know that it's not important but he seriously lacks rhythm or "swag" (as they say) and is trying too hard to be cool.If he does come to United, then he'll have to get rid of this shite celebration.
It's a name... He even has a team mate called Jose so I don't think permission is needed
I disagree here - he wouldn't have needed Jose's permission to just use "Jose". It could be anyone.
It's the context behind it though.Yeah, because Mourinho is the only person in the world with that first name and owns all copyright on it..
It's to make people think the following:Wow, nobody is noticing that he actually rejected jose?
How would you hang up on someone if you weren't already on a call? Have you used a phone before, Crackers?!Pretty sure he was already on the call?!