#07
makes new threads with tweets in the OP
- Joined
- Oct 25, 2010
- Messages
- 23,449
I pray for a 2-1 win in the derby with 20-30 per cent possession. Two headed goals, one from a corner and one from a floated free kick, by Eric Bailly and Phil Jones.
Where did I say that I don't rate Pep? I rate him but he's still a prick.2017
2015
He's saying that City, Chelsea and Spurs like to build play from the back, while we prefer to get the ball forward quickly and use our aerial prowess/physicality to win knock-downs in dangerous areas."...you have the second balls.", what does that mean?
Yes sometimes its just annoying and we could do a lot better, but its not bedded in the way we play everytime.Well Pep isn't wrong we often play the long ball when we could just play it out from the back but that isn't a bad thing if you keep possession. Against Southampton that was the case. The difference with us and Pep's City they have a great game plan, if you can keep possession and attack with pace then defending isn't important, (when it goes to plan) but if it doesn't they don't have a plan B.
This morning I read that Aguero got injured in a car accident and could be out for a month maybe two. This happens to City every year, Aguero getting injured and when he is out they drop points. The first team they play that marks De Bruyne out of the game, City will drop points because everything goes through him.
But its only the case 10% of times , and people judge you on that assuming its our standard routine is down right hillarious and D grade negetive propoganda.He's saying that City, Chelsea and Spurs like to build play from the back, while we prefer to get the ball forward quickly and use our aerial prowess/physicality to win knock downs in dangerous areas.
He's right, we are more direct than those three sides. And that's fine. No reason for people to be so precious about it.
Another way of saying - I have no clue how to play against their style so why don't I spout some righteous bullshit in the media to manipulate them into changing it to a style that I can play against.
We are a different beast this season. I expect us to do much better now. We just couldn't score last season. Even against these two teams, we had clear chances which we squandered.They did a pretty decent job handling it last season though.
What does that supposed to mean? He rates Pep as one of the best, doesn't mean he is not annoying twat or cnut.2017
2015
Also this post was made in October 2015 when I still thought van Gaal would be successful at United. Pep was my original choice to succeed van Gaal but that was before Jose parted ways with Chelsea, van Gaal and his football turned out to be shit and unsuccessful.2017
2015
Mate, it's the Pep **** they're fecking weird. They think if you rate Pep you have to hang posters of him on your bedroom walls and defend him over everything on a rival fans forum.What does that supposed to mean? He rates Pep as one of the best, doesn't mean he is not annoying twat or cnut.
Yeah never seen more annoying bunch than Pep fanboys. I'm sure they will be wearing underwear with Pep photo printed and also Pjs.Mate, it's the Pep **** they're fecking weird. They think if you rate Pep you have to hang posters of him on your bedroom walls and defend him over everything on a rival fans forum.
And if he moves to another club you have to start supporting that club. Perfect example of that is @FCBarca
We mostly don't play like that though.He's saying that City, Chelsea and Spurs like to build play from the back, while we prefer to get the ball forward quickly and use our aerial prowess/physicality to win knock-downs in dangerous areas.
He's right, we are more direct than those three sides. And that's fine. No reason for people to be so precious about it.
Mourinho's sides are more direct than Guardiola's sides, this has been and will always be the case.We mostly don't play like that though.
they are certainly a bunch of cults...It's the same guy who said he doesn't teach tackling, feck him and his cultists.
No, the annoying thing is that we don't play that way as a matter of course, it is simply an additional weapon in our armoury - it is absolutely used as a means of having a dig at United and perpetuates a myth. I doubt any of us are going to be having sleepless nights about it, but this is a forum and we're just having our say.Pep vs Mou: 9W 6D 4L - 1.7 ppg
People on here seriously like to get offended though. It's only a real dig at United if you believe yourself that long balls are a bad thing.
Pep vs Mou: 9W 6D 4L - 1.7 ppg
People on here seriously like to get offended though. It's only a real dig at United if you believe yourself that long balls are a bad thing.
He's LVG's student. Winning/losing comes secondary to philosophy.So he hopes to lose ?
There are two ways to be direct, One is long balls target man midfeild by pass , and the second one is direct vertical passing along the ground and linkup play.Mourinho's sides are more direct than Guardiola's sides, this has been and will always be the case.
In other news, water is wet.
It's a term used for long ball tactics. When a long ball is launched another player has to win the second ball or the header resulting from the long ball."...you have the second balls.", what does that mean?
Aren't everyone's sides more direct than Pep's?Mourinho's sides are more direct than Guardiola's sides, this has been and will always be the case.
In other news, water is wet.