Jose Mourinho admits he is powerless to stop Marouane Fellaini leaving Manchester United

In Rainbows

Full Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2014
Messages
6,824
That’s probably right as I read that on a Lingard news story which would have been earlier this year. So Dybala has just recently signed a new contract has he? Still 135k a week. One of the best talents on the planet makes only 35k more than Lingard and Felli wants 170k. Erickson is on 70k deli on 60k Harry Kane is on 100k. Just insane some of the wages we pay.

Edit: just checked he signed a new deal in April at 113k a week.
That's why I'll never understand how some posters defend those wages by saying it's not our money so don't worry about it. As if money is just endless and that it can't affect our transfer business. There's no reason to give wages that high for squad players.
 

suhaylah

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Aug 25, 2014
Messages
484
United are offering him a 2 year contract apparently and Fellaini think it's too short length
 

Suedesi

Full Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2001
Messages
23,889
Location
New York City
Why is Jose worried about losing Fellaini? Is Fellaini a world class player that will make the difference when United play Madrid, Munchen, Barcelona or PSG? Has Jose completely lost it?
 

Raees

Pythagoras in Boots
Joined
May 16, 2009
Messages
29,474
It is naive to think that we play hoof ball just because Fellaini is in the squad, as if we didn't when he was injured. If it takes a squad player leaving for us to improve, then something is wrong.
Agree with you but it's the first step towards removing that sort of player who wouldn't really be found at a top club. I hope to see more departures of that ilk.
 

LoneStar

Full Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2017
Messages
3,558
I like him. He always fights for the shirt as opposed to many cowards we have in our team. But he's crazy to think he can get 170k a week.

As long as we buy a more exciting midfielder to replace him, I wouldn't mind it if he left. It might force Jose to rethink the hoofball strategy in the big games.

As for the deadwood argument, there are far worse players than him that need to be moved on before. Fellaini truly offers something unique to the team. The likes of Shaw, Darmian and many others need to be sold this summer.
 

Mastadon

New Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2017
Messages
769
Supports
Arsenal
It’s incredible how he’s gone from a joke signing to a Key player for you lot under Mourinho. All because he allows Mourinho to set up a team that doesn’t need to play football and can just hoof it up front bypassing the midfield. Perfect Mourinho at Utd park the bus player.
 

Ecstatic

Cutie patootie!
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
13,787
Supports
PsG
I think some of you miss the whole picture.

The club and his coach do need to renew his contract so that the club would be in a position to sell him later, say 15-25 millions next year.

Fellaini renews his contract: player in the squad + option to sell him in the future >>> You don't spend money this summer to replace him and can earn money 15-25 later. Fellaini is a decent squad player after all.
Fellaini doesn't renew: you have to acquire a new player this summer to replace him at a high price because you're United >>> You will spend 20-30m to have the equivalent of Fellaini (i.e. a squad player) this summer

Last but not least, Fellaini will play a lot this season to feel the 'confidence' of the club and consequently to be more inclined to renew his contract... Mourinho is asked to consider him to help the club renewing his contract.

From the club standpoint, Fellaini has to be viewed as an ASSET and the club just wants to maximize the return on his investment.

Mourinho also has his own agenda

- Fellaini renews his contract: Mou would be in a position to spend X millions for 4 players next summer for example
- Fellaini doesn't renew: Mou would have to spend the same amount of money X millions for 5 players then, which would make his plans more challenging

Last but not least, Mou knows Fellaini: so if the latter is on the bench, Fellaini won't be a burden within the squad and the situation will be "under control" from a managerial standpoint too.

Of course, it doesn't make sense to offer him a VERY crazy salary package.
 
Last edited:

Josep Dowling

Full Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2014
Messages
7,694
The guy has no room for negotiation in my opinion as he simply isn’t good enough to get the quoted salary. He’s an above average player at best and soon turning 30.

Can he get £170k anywhere else? Can he even get over £100k anywhere else?

I for one will be happy to see him leave.
 

haram

New Member
Joined
May 28, 2017
Messages
12,921
The guy has no room for negotiation in my opinion as he simply isn’t good enough to get the quoted salary. He’s an above average player at best and soon turning 30.

Can he get £170k anywhere else? Can he even get over £100k anywhere else?

I for one will be happy to see him leave.
I think he will get a signing on fee elsewhere though.
 

snk123

New Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2009
Messages
2,733
Fellaini is very useful when we're a goal down and need to hoof the ball in the last 10 minutes. The problem is that's our only Plan B and we start playing hoofball with Fellani 45 minutes in.
I hope we get this sorted - a player who consistently scores critical goals contrary to what others with short memories might say
 

snk123

New Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2009
Messages
2,733
Can he get £170k anywhere else? Can he even get over £100k anywhere else?
Yes. Jese Fecking Lingard is on 100K. Young is more than 100K. Fellani should get 150K based on his performances and the amount of times he's saved United with vital goals.
 

prath92

Full Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2015
Messages
12,322
Location
India
The guy has no room for negotiation in my opinion as he simply isn’t good enough to get the quoted salary. He’s an above average player at best and soon turning 30.

Can he get £170k anywhere else? Can he even get over £100k anywhere else?

I for one will be happy to see him leave.
If he is actually asking for 170k (which I doubt), then it’s because he has an offer elsewhere. That’s negotiation 101.
 

prath92

Full Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2015
Messages
12,322
Location
India
If he leaves, then we will have to allocate a portion of our budget to replace him too. We would have to replace him and carrick instead of just carrick.
 

iKeano

Full Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2015
Messages
1,755
Cannot wait until him and his ill-fitting New Balance are long gone.
By far the worst player that will reach 100 league appearances for Utd.

Suing his boot company... “a bad workman blames his tools”.

He’s not good in the air either, less than 50% aerial duel win percent in all PL games.

Lock that door behind him José and replace him with someone that can play the game.
 

Josep Dowling

Full Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2014
Messages
7,694
Yes. Jese Fecking Lingard is on 100K. Young is more than 100K. Fellani should get 150K based on his performances and the amount of times he's saved United with vital goals.
So based on average players earning x amount you think Fellaini should earn more? None of those players should be earning that money and that is one of the issues with the club right now.

The only reason I would try to keep Fellaini is for his transfer value but the simple truth is that his inflated salary will mean we won’t be able to get rid of him once he signed the contract. This is the exact issue with Young and Lingard.

These players aren’t good enough for the squad and for once the board should make a decision not based on money but how it will improve the team on the pitch.
 

Ecstatic

Cutie patootie!
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
13,787
Supports
PsG
The guy has no room for negotiation in my opinion as he simply isn’t good enough to get the quoted salary. He’s an above average player at best and soon turning 30.

Can he get £170k anywhere else? Can he even get over £100k anywhere else?

I for one will be happy to see him leave.
If a club wants the equivalent of Fellaini on the market, it would have to pay between 15-25 millions. Fellaini is a free agent next summer so he's in a position to ask for a high salary or a signing bonus.

I'm not a fan of the player but the market take into account some factors: some credentials in the Premier League, will play the next WC...

It's a WIN-LOSE situation between net spending and total payroll.
 

Josep Dowling

Full Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2014
Messages
7,694
If a club wants the equivalent of Fellaini on the market, it would have to pay between 15-25 millions. Fellaini is a free agent next summer so he's in a position to ask for a high salary or a signing bonus.

I'm not a fan of the player but the market take into account some factors: some credentials in the Premier League, will play the next WC...

It's a WIN-LOSE situation between net spending and total payroll.
Yes I understand from the boards perspective he has value. But as I have previously said if he signed the new contract we will never be able to sell him because of his inflated wages.

Therefore we will end up with a player being paid over £150k as a squad player and isn’t good enough to make us take the next step of winning the league.

This has happened previously when we wanted to get rid of the likes of Nani. And why we never get value when we sell players because their wages are too high.

Therefore I would rather get rid now, especially if he is stalling negotiations. We have too many number 10s in the squad anyway.
 

AXVnee7

Full Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2016
Messages
3,393
I wouldn't be torn up about it if he did leave, but surprisingly to replace him would actually prove a bit of a task and players like him are not quite as common as you'd think. I've often referred to Fellaini as a 'tactic' rather than a skilled player, because that's how I feel he's used here. We play him when we want to play a specific way or are looking for certain attributes, and if we don't wish to play that way then he's useless. A far cry from a Pogba for example who has a highly advanced skillset in all areas.

However we don't need to replace him like-for-like. If he leaves, as far as I'm concerned it leaves the door open for players such as Pereira and TFM. The answer doesn't always have to come from the transfer market. Sure neither of those are what Fellaini is, but both are better footballing-wise.
 

tony54

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 9, 2016
Messages
614
Location
spain
I'm a fan of Fellaini , apart from his elbows, and will miss him as I think he is easily in the top echelon of the team and provides much need physical strength to the team. I think he will command a good price and wish him luck and no doubt he will be more loved than he has been here.
 

Ecstatic

Cutie patootie!
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
13,787
Supports
PsG
Yes I understand from the boards perspective he has value. But as I have previously said if he signed the new contract we will never be able to sell him because of his inflated wages.

Therefore we will end up with a player being paid over £150k as a squad player and isn’t good enough to make us take the next step of winning the league.

This has happened previously when we wanted to get rid of the likes of Nani. And why we never get value when we sell players because their wages are too high.

Therefore I would rather get rid now, especially if he is stalling negotiations. We have too many number 10s in the squad anyway.
I'm of those who think quality should always prevail over quantity so let him go and focus your money on super stars.

If he renews his contract and gets crazy wages, the risk is high to make him a sporting and financial burden

Ben Arfa never plays for PSG and doesn't want to leave the club because nobody is likely to offer him a similar salary package. His last game with PSG was a year ago I think. End of the contract next summer. so he won't try to move next winter even if he knows the clubs wants him to go.
 

wolvored

Full Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2016
Messages
10,006
If its true hes after a lengthy contract and £170 grand a week, call his bluff. Who else will pay him that kind of money? If there is a club willing to then let him go. Its him that causes us to play long hit and hope ball a lot of the time especially second half, and we need to be more skillful than that.
 

Siorac

Full Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2010
Messages
23,833
It's a little bit worrying that Mourinho looks so desperate to keep Fellaini of all players...

I think some of you miss the whole picture.

The club and his coach do need to renew his contract so that the club would be in a position to sell him later, say 15-25 millions next year.

Fellaini renews his contract: player in the squad + option to sell him in the future >>> You don't spend money this summer to replace him and can earn money 15-25 later. Fellaini is a decent squad player after all.
Fellaini doesn't renew: you have to acquire a new player this summer to replace him at a high price because you're United >>> You will spend 20-30m to have the equivalent of Fellaini (i.e. a squad player) this summer

Last but not least, Fellaini will play a lot this season to feel the 'confidence' of the club and consequently to be more inclined to renew his contract... Mourinho is asked to consider him to help the club renewing his contract.

From the club standpoint, Fellaini has to be viewed as an ASSET and the club just wants to maximize the return on his investment.

Mourinho also has his own agenda

- Fellaini renews his contract: Mou would be in a position to spend X millions for 4 players next summer for example
- Fellaini doesn't renew: Mou would have to spend the same amount of money X millions for 5 players then, which would make his plans more challenging

Last but not least, Mou knows Fellaini: so if the latter is on the bench, Fellaini won't be a burden within the squad and the situation will be "under control" from a managerial standpoint too.

Of course, it doesn't make sense to offer him a VERY crazy salary package.
All that assumes that we would be able to sell a player on the wrong side of 30 after signing a bumper new contract. The far more realistic scenario is that we wouldn't be able to get rid of him until his contract is up (or we just decide to let him go for free) because no club would pay a transfer fee AND meet his salary demands. Also, if he gets a new contract he might not want to leave at all and simply refuse offers anyway.
 

wolvored

Full Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2016
Messages
10,006
I think some of you miss the whole picture.

The club and his coach do need to renew his contract so that the club would be in a position to sell him later, say 15-25 millions next year.

Fellaini renews his contract: player in the squad + option to sell him in the future >>> You don't spend money this summer to replace him and can earn money 15-25 later. Fellaini is a decent squad player after all.
Fellaini doesn't renew: you have to acquire a new player this summer to replace him at a high price because you're United >>> You will spend 20-30m to have the equivalent of Fellaini (i.e. a squad player) this summer

Last but not least, Fellaini will play a lot this season to feel the 'confidence' of the club and consequently to be more inclined to renew his contract... Mourinho is asked to consider him to help the club renewing his contract.

From the club standpoint, Fellaini has to be viewed as an ASSET and the club just wants to maximize the return on his investment.

Mourinho also has his own agenda

- Fellaini renews his contract: Mou would be in a position to spend X millions for 4 players next summer for example
- Fellaini doesn't renew: Mou would have to spend the same amount of money X millions for 5 players then, which would make his plans more challenging

Last but not least, Mou knows Fellaini: so if the latter is on the bench, Fellaini won't be a burden within the squad and the situation will be "under control" from a managerial standpoint too.

Of course, it doesn't make sense to offer him a VERY crazy salary package.
Your only saying this because the press reckons PSG are after him and you dont want him lol Said in jest
 

el3mel

New Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2016
Messages
43,736
Location
Egypt
Will be happy for him to stay but if he wants to leave good luck for him. He can leave with his head up as he gave us 100% of what he can and was a good servant for us despite being continuously slaughtered by fans.

However him leaving isn't the end of the world and we'll do fine to replace him. He's at his 30 and we would have been forced to replace him sooner or later anyway.
 

deafepl

New Member
Joined
May 19, 2017
Messages
2,974
Barca has just renewed Lionel Messi's contract and we are struggling to renew a useless sack of dogshite, in Fellaini's. Levels.
 

Cristiano Lell

BANNED LOLZ
Joined
Nov 20, 2014
Messages
2,201
Location
Berlin
Supports
Bayern München
Barca has just renewed Lionel Messi's contract and we are struggling to renew a useless sack of dogshite, in Fellaini's. Levels.
Not a good comparison. I'm sure Fellaini would stay if you offered him what Barca are paying Messi.
 

deafepl

New Member
Joined
May 19, 2017
Messages
2,974
Not a good comparison. I'm sure Fellaini would stay if you offered him what Barca are paying Messi.
Fellaini is one of the best players on the earth and could have won a couple of Ballon D'or if FIFA wasn't corrupt. it's mad how we are struggling to renew.
 

Alabaster Codify7

New Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2015
Messages
6,553
Location
Wales
Look, I like Fellaini.
But MUFC should not be 'battling' to keep a player like him. Imagine SAF 'battling' to keep say, Park, at the club. Would never have happened and speaks volumes of where we are a club at the moment.
 

Cristiano Lell

BANNED LOLZ
Joined
Nov 20, 2014
Messages
2,201
Location
Berlin
Supports
Bayern München
Fellaini is one of the best players on the earth and could have won a couple of Ballon D'or if FIFA wasn't corrupt. it's mad how we are struggling to renew.
inb4 Fellaini renews and Moyes' West Ham pay the 700m € release clause
 

Paul_Scholes18

Full Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2014
Messages
13,891
Our squad management is a bit poor in general. We don't get much for the players we sell and overpay for the ones we buy a lot of the time.

Will not miss Fellaini very much, but we will lack numbers. Although I hope we don't waste millions on more squad players. We need to get in some top level quality winger in my view to compete with the best. Hopefully we can get more young players stepping up as squad players. They give me the hope. More to follow Rashford hopefully.
 

Home&Away

New Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2017
Messages
1,100
PSG won't pay the 15mil for fellaini - it will be seen as a step backwards from spending the money on neymar & mbappe; so José is encouraging a free transfer to PSG because the guy is going there too. Simple.
 

Banat

Full Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2010
Messages
517
Location
Germany
Really hope it's true and we get rid asap, in january if possible, while we can get something for him.
 

Siorac

Full Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2010
Messages
23,833
PSG won't pay the 15mil for fellaini - it will be seen as a step backwards from spending the money on neymar & mbappe; so José is encouraging a free transfer to PSG because the guy is going there too. Simple.
Why would PSG want Fellaini? I'm sure there have been stranger transfers in the history of football than that one - but not many...
 

SachinJ22

Poster of Nonsense
Joined
Dec 21, 2015
Messages
1,097
Location
India
Fellaini doesn't renew: you have to acquire a new player this summer to replace him at a high price because you're United >>> You will spend 20-30m to have the equivalent of Fellaini (i.e. a squad player) this summer
Tuanzebe or Fosu Mensah can take his spot if he leaves and Fosu Mensah is almost the same height as him.