Maybe it is you the one who is not reading posts and behave like a know it all. First of all I was making reference to several posts in the thread that defined it as a stonewall penalty not to yours in particular. Secondly there are plenty of former referees including many Spanish ones that have said it was not a penalty and especially it was never a penalty to be given at 93rd deciding the tie.
Having said that I also said if you had bothered to read instead of entering your lecturing mode, that in my opinion it was a soft one but it was not a scandal to give it. The scandal is that the same penalty would not have been given in Real box and I do not need to go far in history to Mjatovic's offside goal or Chiellini red card after Ronaldo's simulation to support that, just one week ago in Turin a much clearer penalty on Cuadrado was not awarded. Just one week ago Dybala was jellow carded for simulation and then red carded after a foul that was right but involuntary, while yesterday Ronaldo has been allowed to dive looking for a penalty several times without a card and so on the list is endless.
The first leg match should not have had any bearing on yesterday's other than using the same meter for both teams and I never said otherwise, but given the precedents they should have sent a better referee with more personality aware of what is going on and that if you give a soft decisive penalty at the 94th minute of a tie you can expect some level of over the top emotional protest and if you are a man you defuse the situation you do not add insult to injury, besides if that was a penalty he should have red carded Benatia, but clearly it was a game to big for this moron.
I am not the one to cry over referees and referees with weak personality that are subject to the strongest club pressure is a fact of life, Juve has to regret several mistakes made in the first game despite playing a far better game that the score tells, but at the very least I would not expect to read that a clearly controversial decision was nothing.
