g = window.googletag || {}; googletag.cmd = googletag.cmd || []; window.googletag = googletag; googletag.cmd.push(function() { var interstitialSlot = googletag.defineOutOfPageSlot('/17085479/redcafe_gam_interstitial', googletag.enums.OutOfPageFormat.INTERSTITIAL); if (interstitialSlot) { interstitialSlot.addService(googletag.pubads()); } });
This.Whatever happened to Januzaj FC...remember him and all the furore when he left,whats up with some people,this club has no place for any players who are not prepared to put in the hard yards!
If Sanchez' form doesn't pick up after the summer break it will not. Even so, we've signed Mkhitaryan Zlatan, Lukaku, Sanchez and Pogba on top of Rashford, Martial, Januzaj, Memphis, Mata etc and still we're struggling to build any sort of consistant and coherently working offense. I think it's fair to be critical of how the team and transfers have been managed so far.Selling Martial will mean we'll dip into the market for another attacking player. If we sign Bale based on selling him this thread will disappear into obscurity.
It's not the only type of striker he can use, lets not add to the nonsense that is already in this thread. The reality is that, if you want to play with Martial upfront, you probably need to plan for it from day one and bring players that will fit in a more fluid and probably less disciplined front 6. And to Mourinho's credit we didn't and still don't have a team that can support effectively and consistently this type of set up, so he decided to use a more traditional and adaptable attack and midfield that includes a player like Lukaku, in many ways it's the same problem with France and Giroud.Exactly - give Jose 100 seasons with Messi - not once would he have used him as a false number 9, as a straight CF.
He would have only used him as the winger who cuts in and is asked to cross to a target man. That is the only type of striker he can use - the only type of formation he can play.
Milito, Costa, Lukaklu, Drogba, Benni Mcarthy, Benzema, Higuain (who was vice captain) and so many more. Jose is incapable to be flexible with his tactics and his type of player - martial was out from the day Jose got his job.
TouchéWhatever happened to Januzaj FC...remember him and all the furore when he left,whats up with some people,this club has no place for any players who are not prepared to put in the hard yards!
I mean that's pretty much standard agent speak for "we want more money."I think that when Manchester United, which is the most powerful club in the world it must be remembered, do not find an agreement in eight months of negotiations, it is because they do not really want to make him an important member of the team.
That's not correct at all, the first game Martial was moved to the right for was Spurs away which we lost, he kept his place on the right in the starting XI for the next game away to Newcastle which we also lost. He sat out the FA Cup tie to Huddersfield and away to Seville (where he was by no means the only player to be rotated) but was back in the XI for Chelsea at homeIts not difficult to see why Martial wants to leave. He has to leave. He was player of the month for us, was in a rich vein of form and cemented that left side attack position. Then January hits and Mourinho decides to buy Sanchez. Martial gets moved to the right sided forward position of the 3, Sanchez took his place on the left. He had one average/semi-bad game in the league which i think we lost. Next game, he is benched, the whole front line was accomodated for Sanchez and Martial is the player who sits on the bench. He will not get any proper game time at our club. Simple as that. He has way too much talent to be wasted on the bench. He should leave, and most people in Marital's shoes would do the same. He will never get in the team ahead of Sanchez or Lukaku.
No its because Martial isn't a target man. Everytime Martial has played upfront for Jose which is what 5 games. He has scored in every game.You have to ask yourself, why is Lukaku liked more than Martial. It isn't because of their 'per 90' stats, it's because of their respective attitudes.
You're making some major assumptions there. If we do sign Bale, there's no guarantee he'll be an unqualified success, nor is there any guarantee that Sanchez will be any better than Martial on the left. He hasn't been close so far. So, we're still left hoping that things click up front rather than having any real reason to be sure.Selling Martial will mean we'll dip into the market for another attacking player. If we sign Bale based on selling him this thread will disappear into obscurity.
That is what I read between the lines as well. Let's seeI always thought that Martial might go this summer (sadly, as he is one of my favourite players), but to me what's surprising is that those quotes from his agent sound like it is about the money offered to him in the new contract rather than about lack of playing time lately.
I mean that's pretty much standard agent speak for "we want more money."
Whatever happened to Januzaj FC...remember him and all the furore when he left,whats up with some people,this club has no place for any players who are not prepared to put in the hard yards!
Not this at all.This.
He has had Lingard minutes and Lingard has been poor since February just like Martial only difference is Lingard has a better defensive understanding. Non of our attacking players except for Lukaku has looked good since Sanchez upset the balance.Dunno, but if he had played better, he would have got Lingard's minutes. Lingard is significantly less talented than him and still had a better season.
So maybe, it's not all Jose's fault.
Yes preferably he stays and can nail a first team spot but I really do not see it happening under Jose. I think it is best for both parties selling now as his value will be considerably less next summer when we trigger his one year extension. Maybe we win bugger all and Jose leaves, then he may be tempted to stay on with a new manager.I can't disagree too much. I'm not a huge fan of his, but neither do I particularly yearn for his transfer away. If, rather than Martial, it was Mata or Lingard who had made public their desire to leave, I wouldn't be massively opposed to their departure either. I'm not sure any of them are really indispensable.
“Better defensive understanding”He has had Lingard minutes and Lingard has been poor since February just like Martial only difference is Lingard has a better defensive understanding. Non of our attacking players except for Lukaku has looked good since Sanchez upset the balance.
Lool. He didn’t decide because of what he had.. that’s him he could have had Barcelona he would have looked to buy a target man.It's not the only type of striker he can use, lets not add to the nonsense that is already in this thread. The reality is that, if you want to play with Martial upfront, you probably need to plan for it from day one and bring players that will fit in a more fluid and probably less disciplined front 6. And to Mourinho's credit we didn't and still don't have a team that can support effectively and consistently this type of set up, so he decided to use a more traditional and adaptable attack and midfield that includes a player like Lukaku, in many ways it's the same problem with France and Giroud.
Indeed, if Sanchez plays to his Arsenal level it'll be a case of Martial whoI think Sanchez will be much better next season with a break and the full pre-season behind him.
Hope so anyway.
Beneficial to us in what? Not conceding goals? It wasn’t beneficial to us in an attacking sense no!“Better defensive understanding”
In other words his overall game was more beneficial to us than Martial’s.
1000% this. Both hugely talented, but unfortunately you need the mentality as well as the talent.Whatever happened to Januzaj FC...remember him and all the furore when he left,whats up with some people,this club has no place for any players who are not prepared to put in the hard yards!
For me the specific mention of signing Sanchez in January points more to the lack of game time.I always thought that Martial might go this summer (sadly, as he is one of my favourite players), but to me what's surprising is that those quotes from his agent sound like it is about the money offered to him in the new contract rather than about lack of playing time lately.
I mean that's pretty much standard agent speak for "we want more money."
He ended up being an unused sub against Man City, Swansea and West Ham as well as playing just 10 minutes against Sevilla when we needed goals. Can see how it comes across as money in your quotes though. Also, from the other stuff that Bouhafsi has said in the past, contract negotiations halted in December then resumed in March so the 'it is because they do not really want to make him an important member of the team' bit might be referring to that as well though it is clutching at straws a bit.“He was named player of the month three times by the fans. Then the January transfer window came. I will not comment on the consequences of this transfer window. Everyone will have his opinion, I think he must take back control of his career. The time has come.
That's pretty much the conclusion I'm at for now. I've never seen a player like him in the way he plays and only looks interested once somebody gives him the ball to feet. No urgency at all to his play and too little movement off the ball.Supremely talented player, who decides to be one dimensional. Never runs in behind, either with the ball or to receive it. Sulks rather than tracks back when a move breaks down.
While it is sad to see a skillful player leave, he makes us a man light, when defending, and slows us to a stop when attacking. Always cutting inside with no variety to his approach might cause some opponents problems, but can be easily nullified by better players or tactics.
He may have fared better with a decent left back who overlaps and crosses, but his inability to vary his approach has done nothing to strengthen his position here.
The work ethic and attitude though are heavily comparable,we do not need that type of weak mentality!Not this at all.
Januzaj scored 5 goals for the Manchester United first team. The situation with Martial is not even remotely comparable. Januzaj had a couple of good games and because it was during a dreadful season that was a shock to the system for many, people got carried away because they needed some crumbs of comfort to hold on to.
Martial has already performed to a high standard and has been our top scorer. Januzaj didn't even get close to doing what Martial has done in our shirt.
The truth of the matter is that Mourinho and Martial are equally to blame. Mourinho because he's played his games with Martial i.e the mandatory LW substitution every game and rotation for two years. Martial because he could've really knuckled down and shown Mourinho why so many fans hold him in such high regard but instead he's sulked, gone into his shell and has basically said feck you, I'll just go somewhere else.
Martial has not responded well to Mourinho at all, it's been obvious for over 18 months now and that's why he wants to leave.
Ok let me just say Lukaku, De Bruyne and Salah. Then I think you will understand how frustrated we are.Can't remember a potential sale causing this much friction between you lot.
From someone who does not watch all of your games, I can't see the huge fuss about this guy to be honest (but then I said similar of Salah). Talented player for sure but Jose needs to seriously challenge next season and Martial is probably not the man for that job.
Go on crossy please make an educated reply to what I said step by step rather than being 'dramatic' orHow many posts do the new members get in the mains? Because this was one hell of a wasted post.
This.
1000% this. Both hugely talented, but unfortunately you need the mentality as well as the talent.
Couldn't be more further from the truth - Januzaj was running on the good games he had for Moyes - did nothing for LVG & Mourinho & was rightfully sold; even though some people saw promise.Touché
This has to be put in classic. What a rant.This is very true mate. Im not trying to hide - the people who see no future for martial here have been fed little spoons of negativity from Jose from the start- from changing his shirt number from striker to a winger. has had maybe one game as a striker in 2 seasons ( is that a coincidence? if you say it is or that winger is his best position - id say that is strong bias) , replaced by 2 strikers : ibrahimovic who was merely promised as a short term option to both Rashford and martial then low and behold - replaced by a younger target man ( same tactics? Bias if unable to see he has not changed tactics to accomadate the players at his disposal).
Then! Rashford & Martial compere for the same position - A fight he can win on the pitch but is put in direct competition against one of our own born and bred players - bit coincidental
Then! Martial starts overshadowing Rashford in the LW - Jose adds another LW ( who has the ability to play at RW ) - doesn't play him on the right and puts him in to straight drop martial to the bench! Brings him back to the RW (instead of Sanchez ) and fails miserably; which is a surprise (not really).
So now Martial is put in at a game he cant win - ranking 3rd at ST, and 2nd/3rd at LW.
How can you possibly be so biased to think there is not been manipulaltion by our manager? Some people will gladly take the Jose biscuit - others are not so fooled by his sadistic game. That is why anyone who is against martial & his ability to be a good player for United (not world class) is a Jose fan boy and will fight any battle for him.
Just fact checking this, as I said earlier, Martial started 3 of our 4 league games after Sanchez joined. Two on the right, then he got injured. That's when he was "dropped".This is very true mate. Im not trying to hide - the people who see no future for martial here have been fed little spoons of negativity from Jose from the start- from changing his shirt number from striker to a winger. has had maybe one game as a striker in 2 seasons ( is that a coincidence? if you say it is or that winger is his best position - id say that is strong bias) , replaced by 2 strikers : ibrahimovic who was merely promised as a short term option to both Rashford and martial then low and behold - replaced by a younger target man ( same tactics? Bias if unable to see he has not changed tactics to accomadate the players at his disposal).
Then! Rashford & Martial compere for the same position - A fight he can win on the pitch but is put in direct competition against one of our own born and bred players - bit coincidental
Then! Martial starts overshadowing Rashford in the LW - Jose adds another LW ( who has the ability to play at RW ) - doesn't play him on the right and puts him in to straight drop martial to the bench! Brings him back to the RW (instead of Sanchez ) and fails miserably; which is a surprise (not really).
So now Martial is put in at a game he cant win - ranking 3rd at ST, and 2nd/3rd at LW.
How can you possibly be so biased to think there is not been manipulaltion by our manager? Some people will gladly take the Jose biscuit - others are not so fooled by his sadistic game. That is why anyone who is against martial & his ability to be a good player for United (not world class) is a Jose fan boy and will fight any battle for him.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
I do think that if we do end up signing a wide player then it will be Bale. Still have big question marks on whether we will end up doing that though. Just seems the stars are aligning for that to be the case. Think De Gea thing could also sway it possibly.So assuming he goes now and that the stories about Jose not prioritising a LB at the moment this all points to a spectacular right sided attacker coming in doesn't it?
I can't see him using Sanchez on the right out of choice so who is it going to be?
We've said that a few times now. Also briefed the press that Martial will be a big part of our plans for next season.Sky sports have just said we've said we aren't interested in selling Martial this year
When has he ever completely given up? He's a 22 year old flair player playing in a risk-averse side and he still posts some of the best numbers in the league relative to the little minutes he's been given. He's only played 90 minutes in consecutive league games once all season. A little continuity wouldn't go amiss.People keep blaming Sanchez like it isn't Martial just completely giving up and not even trying to fight for his place.
His agent is a cnut too.
Lukaku was sold at his request because Mourinho kept buying old players like Eto'o to play in his position which restricted his game time.We'll sell him at his request, nothing like the cases you've listed. He's 22 and getting plenty of game time.
If he's not happy with that its his issue not ours. Whats worse than these soft football players is thode fans who seem to have bought into it. Our club isn't a safe space for footballers feelings ffs its tough. These kids can man up or he coddled elsewhere
https://www.theguardian.com/football/2013/nov/29/jose-mourinho-romelu-lukaku-chelsea-evertonLukaku said:It wasn't the fact that I wasn't wanted. I think I was wanted but I had to make a decision for myself and analyse what was the best thing for me.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/f...u-Lukaku-tells-Chelsea-he-wants-to-leave.htmlLukaku said:“You know Chelsea, every year they buy a new top striker,” said Lukaku. “I remember me coming into the dressing room last year and seeing Samuel Eto’o and Demba Ba and going, ‘Whoah! What’s happening here?’
https://www.theguardian.com/football/2017/oct/20/kevin-de-bruyne-stubborn--world-beaterDe Bruyne said:I told him that I had a feeling that I would never get a fair chance. That’s when the club started looking at a transfer too.
https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/id-quit-chelsea-mohamed-salahs-11573517Hazard said:When you are not playing in one club, you need to go. You need a chance, and he took his chance at Fiorentina. So he did everything that you have to do when you are not playing. If I am not playing, I want to go.