US Politics

sullydnl

Ross Kemp's caf ID
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
34,063
Very true. And of those that are, the small percentage that result in a conviction can end up like this: https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/10325560

Anyone with empathy can understand why someone who has just been put through an ordeal like that, once they have gotten over the shock and denial stage, might think that they had been put through enough already.
You don't even need to have empathy. Just the ability to read about the thousands upon thousands of widely publicised cases where this has been the case.
 

langster

Captain Stink mouth, so soppy few pints very wow!
Scout
Joined
Jun 28, 2014
Messages
21,607
Location
My brain can't get pregnant!
I call bullshit on that. Imagine you were raped, your emotions, adrenaline all running high from it. Your pain is sharp. You will go as earliest as possible and tell your story, if it is in fact true. If it's not, you'll wait 36 years later, when you've basically have forgotten this whole thing, or at least the details about it, and tell your story to the entire world.
Are you for fecking real? Go and read about reported sex crimes v unreported. Try to show empathy and understanding for the victims who are often parylised with fear, guilt, shame. Some think it's their fault. Some are too afraid to say anything in case they get accused of making it up or using it as an excuse for cheating. Some are petrified of reliving the ordeal and want to pretend it never happened. Many don't want to have to go over the ordeal in public or to strangers in a police station or court on the chance they are called a liar or they end up feeling like they were assaulted all over again. There are countless reasons and you with your disgusting and heartless statement not only show you haven't the intelligence, compassion or empathy to think of those reasons, but also prove many victims right in their way of thinking because someone like you could be the officer they speak to or the judge in court or on the jury.

Seriously you have absolutely no fecking clue what you are talking about and are just coming out with some of the most thoughtless, nasty and uneducated comments I have seen on this forum.
 

Damien

Self-Aware RedCafe Database (and Admin)
Staff
Joined
Mar 4, 2010
Messages
97,448
Location
Also won Best Gif/Photoshop 2021
So your saying that you believe he has shown himself to be untrustworthy? Seems then that there should be no need for a delay and he should simply be considered unfit for a position of this sort.
Apparently lying is a good thing to do if you think telling the truth will make you look bad.
 

Tincanalley

Turns player names into a crappy conversation
Joined
Apr 12, 2011
Messages
10,329
Location
Ireland
5 - 4 something brunette with red dress seems to signal.... strawss...
 

Halftrack

Full Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2014
Messages
3,983
Location
Chair
Well they won’t be able to “remember” it will they. Otherwise they would be dragged through it to for being complicit etc.
If they were to be questioned by the FBI, Kavanaugh would lose his "the witnesses have provided sworn statements saying they don't remember the party" defense. Because if questioned by the FBI, I'm sure all of them would definitely say that it's possible that the party/gathering happened, they just can't remember that specific one, as there were many get-togethers like it. And who knows, maybe Judge would break down and admit to it. He's already gone into hiding, so it's obvious that he wants to get as far away as possible from it all.
 

Raoul

Admin
Staff
Joined
Aug 14, 1999
Messages
130,827
Location
Hollywood CA
Wow.....discussions to delay the vote for a week pending an FBI investigation. Massive news if true.
 

oneniltothearsenal

Caf's Milton Friedman and Arse Aficionado
Scout
Joined
Dec 17, 2013
Messages
11,254
Supports
Brazil, Arsenal,LA Aztecs
Reports they might delay a week for a "short" FBI investigation
 

Dumbat12

New Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2014
Messages
1,468
PTSD has nothing to do with this. PTSD in veterans is from combat, not from a specific person.

And Devil's Triangle being a drinking game and him saying he was a virgin until 20... you believe all that? And if not, why lie?
I have no clue about Devil's Triangle, can't say that I've played it. As for him being a virgin until 20, obviously not. But in his situation it's understandable why he may lie as, again, saying those things would put him in a bad spot.

There is little point engaging with an ideologue like you but just as one large example: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/14/us/catholic-church-sex-abuse-pennsylvania.html
Children no older than 18 months. She was fecking 16, for Christ sake. Practically a grown woman. How can you compare the two?

I’m calling bullshit on that.

You’ve no clue what you would do.
You may call bullshit however many times you like. I certainly won't keep quiet about it.

I refuse to believe you're this ignorant, and unable to understand simple sense so I'm willing to bet that if Clinton had won the election, and if this was a Democratic senator up for the Supreme Court you'd just be posting reasonably that anyone accused of sexual assault should be investigated and not blindly cast it aside just so that you can have your person in power. You mention that the opposite side has their own agenda and will never listen to you, at least have the goddamn common courtesy to realise that you're no different, be a man and own it. You might not like what it says about you, but at least stand by your convictions instead of talking bollocks trying to cover it up as something else.
I don't have an agenda. I may be to the right, but I care nothing for the Republicans or Democrats. I see a liar accusing an innocent man and I say it. Whether Kavanaugh was a Republican or a Democrat doesn't matter. I would have said the same things either way.

Or answer me this, if this is true, and if he tried to rape her, and she didn't report it - in your mind is it her fault and she has to stay silent and live with it forever? Her time has passed? Tough shit, you missed out? Yes or no, no bullshit trying to worm your way out of it, yes or no. If the answer is yes, then wow. At least say so so we know where you really stand, if no then I don't really see what course of argument you have because timing is irrelevant. The important thing is whether it's true or not. Any question about timing is just as much Republicans turning this into a political weapon as Democrats who may have used it politically themselves. What people like you are missing is that that's semantics, the important thing is whether or not it happened.
Oh, using typical lawyer strategies. Nice. Anyway, yes. Let's give this scenario: If a person flies goes in Saudi Arabia and tells that Muhammad is a pedophile, he'd get beaten to death. He knew what was going to happen and he did it anyway. The situation is a little different, but still the same. 30+ years to come out with getting raped in a ridiculous showing? Nah.

Neither has Kavanaugh, all he has are people saying they don't remember such a get-together. Which isn't all that strange, seeing as how it would have just been any other lazy night for all but three of them, and two of would of course deny it, true or not. She started trying to get in touch with her representatives long before he was nominated, when he was just one of several names on a shortlist. She only came forward when it was clear that all the press had found out about it.

In a just society, you'd be less of a disgusting sack of shit. And I'll gladly take a warning for saying that.
Oh, but she, the intoxicated and drugged, barely able to stand somehow remembers the event? Okay. Oh, she started being in touch with her representatives and when Kavanaugh came up, she immediately sprang into action? Very convenient. It's almost like all of this has been planned.

Absolute rubbish, you clearly know nothing about sexual assault. Do any kind of research on the topic and you will see how incredibly wrong you are.
And I assume you're some kind of an expert in sexual assault?

How the hell would you know, you don't know the trauma people that have been assaulted suffered. You are in no position to judge how someone that has been assaulted sexually should react. Are you calling bullshit on kids and teenagers that are coming out tens of years after about the sexual assaults they suffered?
Ugh, she wasn't a kid. She was almost a full on adult.

Moreover, you believe someone that has lied multiple times over someone that has not a single time in her testimony. I would I agree if you said that nothing can be decided from the two hearings, but saying that she's lying while believe Kavanaugh is definitly an agenda driven statement.
I believe someone who has lied "mu;ltiple" times in his testimony about benign things over someone who has lied about practically everything.

Are you for fecking real? Go and read about reported sex crimes v unreported. Try to show empathy and understanding for the victims who are often parylised with fear, guilt, shame. Some think it's their fault. Some are too afraid to say anything in case they get accused of making it up or using it as an excuse for cheating. Some are petrified of reliving the ordeal and want to pretend it never happened. Many don't want to have to go over the ordeal in public or to strangers in a police station or court on the chance they are called a liar or they end up feeling like they were assaulted all over again. There are countless reasons and you with your disgusting and heartless statement not only show you haven't the intelligence, compassion or empathy to think of those reasons, but also prove many victims right in their way of thinking because someone like you could be the officer they speak to or the judge in court or on the jury.

Seriously you have absolutely no fecking clue what you are talking about and are just coming out with some of the most thoughtless, nasty and uneducated comments I have seen on this forum.
I show empathy to real victims, not those who lie. Her supposed sexual assault is reported, it's not "unreported"

As for the rest of your post, you've described just how illogical your reasoning is yourself. She wants to pretend it never happened but somehow speaks 36 years later about it to her husband? She doesn't want to go over the ordeal, but she does anyway in the most grandiose way possible? She doesn't want to go to court, but gives her testimony? Okay, okay. You've totally convinced me with your innane ramblings
 

Adisa

likes to take afvanadva wothowi doubt
Joined
Nov 28, 2014
Messages
50,510
Location
Birmingham
Part of me wants the GOP to ram this through. I don't know if anyone else feels like that?
 

bazalini

The Baz Man - He made us laugh 2000 - 2012
Joined
May 17, 2000
Messages
24,589
Location
Dines out
so an FBI investigation which will last a week.

seems the most obvious thing to do.
 

nimic

something nice
Scout
Joined
Aug 2, 2006
Messages
32,139
Location
And I'm all out of bubblegum.
Flake wants a one week delay
That's crazy! I really, really didn't expect this to happen.

I call bullshit on that. Imagine you were raped, your emotions, adrenaline all running high from it. Your pain is sharp. You will go as earliest as possible and tell your story, if it is in fact true. If it's not, you'll wait 36 years later, when you've basically have forgotten this whole thing, or at least the details about it, and tell your story to the entire world.
This is possibly the most ignorant horseshit I've read in the CE. Other people have been banned for wumming, but you should honestly be banned for your astonishing levels of wilful ignorance.

You're an awful person.
 

Solius

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Staff
Joined
Dec 31, 2007
Messages
87,394
PTSD has nothing to do with this. PTSD in veterans is from combat, not from a specific person.


I have no clue about Devil's Triangle, can't say that I've played it. As for him being a virgin until 20, obviously not. But in his situation it's understandable why he may lie as, again, saying those things would put him in a bad spot.


Children no older than 18 months. She was fecking 16, for Christ sake. Practically a grown woman. How can you compare the two?


You may call bullshit however many times you like. I certainly won't keep quiet about it.


I don't have an agenda. I may be to the right, but I care nothing for the Republicans or Democrats. I see a liar accusing an innocent man and I say it. Whether Kavanaugh was a Republican or a Democrat doesn't matter. I would have said the same things either way.


Oh, using typical lawyer strategies. Nice. Anyway, yes. Let's give this scenario: If a person flies goes in Saudi Arabia and tells that Muhammad is a pedophile, he'd get beaten to death. He knew what was going to happen and he did it anyway. The situation is a little different, but still the same. 30+ years to come out with getting raped in a ridiculous showing? Nah.


Oh, but she, the intoxicated and drugged, barely able to stand somehow remembers the event? Okay. Oh, she started being in touch with her representatives and when Kavanaugh came up, she immediately sprang into action? Very convenient. It's almost like all of this has been planned.


And I assume you're some kind of an expert in sexual assault?


Ugh, she wasn't a kid. She was almost a full on adult.


I believe someone who has lied "mu;ltiple" times in his testimony about benign things over someone who has lied about practically everything.



I show empathy to real victims, not those who lie. Her supposed sexual assault is reported, it's not "unreported"

As for the rest of your post, you've described just how illogical your reasoning is yourself. She wants to pretend it never happened but somehow speaks 36 years later about it to her husband? She doesn't want to go over the ordeal, but she does anyway in the most grandiose way possible? She doesn't want to go to court, but gives her testimony? Okay, okay. You've totally convinced me with your innane ramblings
You seem nice.
 

langster

Captain Stink mouth, so soppy few pints very wow!
Scout
Joined
Jun 28, 2014
Messages
21,607
Location
My brain can't get pregnant!
I show empathy to real victims, not those who lie. Her supposed sexual assault is reported, it's not "unreported"

As for the rest of your post, you've described just how illogical your reasoning is yourself. She wants to pretend it never happened but somehow speaks 36 years later about it to her husband? She doesn't want to go over the ordeal, but she does anyway in the most grandiose way possible? She doesn't want to go to court, but gives her testimony? Okay, okay. You've totally convinced me with your innane ramblings
Nothing inane about truth. Your post just proves you haven't the intelligence or compassion to understand any of this.
 
Last edited:

Member 90887

Guest
CNN saying that flake is discussing a potential FBI investigation and a no-more than one week delay.