Yup.I’d rather keep Lukaku to be honest. For me he’s the better player.
Yup.I’d rather keep Lukaku to be honest. For me he’s the better player.
Precisely.He's the hero United deserves, but not the one it needs right now.
He actually routinely averages one of the highest conversion rates in Europe. Normally a limited Inter side who create little and Icardi scoring a lot.I agree with this. He's a talented finisher but his all round play is average and that is certainly not what we need right now. That's the type of player you need when you're creating a dozen chances each game and feck them up. That's not where we're at.
Tbf, Inter seem to have a decent wing play and provide him with some decent crosses, away from other crap areas.He actually routinely averages one of the highest conversion rates in Europe. Normally a limited Inter side who create little and Icardi scoring a lot.
Your general point still does stand though. No striker would have major joy in our system which is so far from cohesive consistent attacking football.
The highest last year with 29 goals from 101 shots. That is serious going when you look at some of the names behind him on that list and how far behind they are.He actually routinely averages one of the highest conversion rates in Europe. Normally a limited Inter side who create little and Icardi scoring a lot.
"Create little chances". Not sure I can agree with that. Just look at the below.He actually routinely averages one of the highest conversion rates in Europe. Normally a limited Inter side who create little and Icardi scoring a lot.
Your general point still does stand though. No striker would have major joy in our system which is so far from cohesive consistent attacking football.
He is actually pretty clinical, has one of the best conversion rates in EuropeEvery time I see highlights from the Inter game he can't hit the barn door, managers here see the goals and think how good he is while he would be even more frustrating then Lukaku, not talking about his overall game which could be also poor. We need someone better if we want an upgrade
What's even more impressive is that it isn't a one off. He has been putting up similar numbers for 3 or 4 seasons now.The highest last year with 29 goals from 101 shots. That is serious going when you look at some of the names behind him on that list and how far behind they are.
https://www.planetfootball.com/quic...version-rate-of-the-top-10-scorers-in-europe/
His conversion rate is higher as he doesnt shoot from outside the box or take chances from tight angles like Kane takes. In a way you can say that's good as he doesn't waste possession but I want striker to be like Kane who tries from tight angles.He actually routinely averages one of the highest conversion rates in Europe. Normally a limited Inter side who create little and Icardi scoring a lot.
Your general point still does stand though. No striker would have major joy in our system which is so far from cohesive consistent attacking football.
He had a release clause of €110m in the summer however that’s expired now and Inter are trying to increase it to €160m with another renewal. I don’t think Inter would be willing to negotiate and Icardi seems to love the club. If he was to leave, Real would be a more likely destination!How much is he likely cost?
He’s already in a top club.Could he do the job for a top team? Would you guys want him at United?
Of course, bad wording on my part, what I meant by that was playing for a club that is amongst the best in the world (not including United). I don't follow Italian football much but I know Inter were 4th last season and 7th the season before. I know they're doing well this season but I'm not sure if they'd be included amongst the world's best sides.He’s already in a top club.
History aside, I m not talking about the past glorious history of the club but the progressive regrowing of inter since Suning came in 2016 is clear, the revenues have been exceptionally doubled without Champions League football (according to recent stats the 3rd most virtuous club in the world about the growth only behind to Liverpool and City) and the results on the pitch todays are just the beginning of this work, Inter have a prospective of coming back to an elite world club football again for sureOf course, bad wording on my part, what I meant by that was playing for a club that is amongst the best in the world (not including United). I don't follow Italian football much but I know Inter were 4th last season and 7th the season before. I know they're doing well this season but I'm not sure if they'd be included amongst the world's best sides.
Inzaghi won a few Champions League trophies in his time, and he was even less involved than Icardi is.Not for me. Not sure teams wanting to challenge for top honours can have a player who offers so little in the build up.
Tbh that was long back and game has changed. Teams used to win titles without good attacking FBs too or CBs who weren't good with the ball, now all top teams want FBs who are good attackers and CBs who can pass the ball between lines and calm in possession. They also want strikers who is active in the build up play.Inzaghi won a few Champions League trophies in his time, and he was even less involved than Icardi is.
Was it Fergie that said Inzaghi was born offside?Inzaghi won a few Champions League trophies in his time, and he was even less involved than Icardi is.
Our record with any signings is poor. I dont think we should use that as a reason never to sign more players though. We just need better selection of the players.Our record with Argentinian signings being successful is poor. He's not really a Jose type striker when you think of some of Jose's best strikers, warriors like Drogba and Diego Costa. Sarri would love him and would be a good manager for him.
yes, very typicalI've only ever seen him the once (against Spurs a few weeks ago) and he was anonymous until he scored and absolute stunner, would this be a typical performance from him?
Yes, except he won't score like that, just from inside the box.I've only ever seen him the once (against Spurs a few weeks ago) and he was anonymous until he scored and absolute stunner, would this be a typical performance from him?
Times have changed thoughInzaghi won a few Champions League trophies in his time, and he was even less involved than Icardi is.
Gimme one striker that's even close to the overall quality that RVN has, don't think there's one these days.From the sounds of it he's poor in general and outstanding in the box. If we're getting a pure goalscorer it has to be someone like RVN who was considered to be a one-note but in reality was excellent at all things a CF should excel at. Obviously strikers like him don't come around that frequently but I don't think we need players who are average in the buildup.
City already have 1 such player, Aguero, who is lethal and a real big game player for them, 300 games, 200 goals isn't to be sniffed at. Has the lot to his game, pace, control and ability to finish, he's probably a better all round player than RVN as well.Gimme one striker that's even close to the overall quality that RVN has, don't think there's one these days.
Icardi is a good striker, more inclined to the traditional type of number 9, no tricks or flicks, mostly operates around the box, has a bomb of a shot on him and the occasional spectacular goal. Most of the people with an opinion on him don;t even watch him that often.
He has good movement around the box, can drag defenders after him, good positioning and he's strong, that would make for a perfect striker. Sadly, it doesn't really work that way.
Being a box striker means he needs service, quality service from the wings or the occasional through ball. Given the fact our wingers can't put in a decent cross even if their lives would depend on it, Icardi coming to Man United will turn into absolute dogshi7 in no time.
Put him in a Barca/Madrid or City shirt and he'd score buckets.