Sunny Jim
Full Member
I see no difference between Moyes and Mourinho's football. Both pathetic.
Says a lot about the players bought by Jose then.Managers aside I think the squad is in a worst state now than what Moyes had available.
Many were declining but I'd expect the 13/14 team of say De Gea, Evra, Vidic, Rio, Rafael, Valencia, Carrick, Fletcher, Giggs, Rooney, Van Persie to beat our current best XI which is seriously lacking in quality.
Like mentioned above even Moyes team were capable of the odd big win like Leverkusen because the quality was there despite Moyes.
It says a lot about how average this team is that there's never a sign of a big win where everything clicks. This just seems to be the level for the majority of our players.
Champions league winners surelySteady on! Although I have to admit I've always wondered how LVG's third season would have panned out on the back of an FA Cup win?
It may well have if given the money Jose has spent on players and Rooney moved on.Champions league winners surely
I’ve gotten to the point where I really don’t care who takes over, as long as someone takes over and I’m just treading water till Jose is giving his marching orders.
Moyes would never be able to beat Juventus in Turin or get us out of that group. Comparing Moyes to Mourinho is an insult to the great Portuguese man.Say what you want about Moyes but at least he was capable of winning a game on cruise control once every two months.
Fine. Let's sack Jose and replace him, but unless the people at the top are gone, nothing will change in the long term. As long as men like Woodward are calling the shots, we'll just blunder on. Van Gaal was a damned good manager in his day. Not everyone's cup of tea but he had a good record and had managed big clubs. He left despising Woodward and wouldn't piss on him if he was on fire. I suspect Jose's relationship with Woodward is somewhat similar and when he does finally up sticks, he won't be shy in dishing the dirt on the poison dwarf and his masters. If the likes of Mourinho and Van Gaal can't make a go of it at United, then who can?Champions league winners surely
I’ve gotten to the point where I really don’t care who takes over, as long as someone takes over and I’m just treading water till Jose is giving his marching orders.
Compare this to what Liverpool had 3 years ago - the difference being Klopp signed right players, Mourinho didn't. So how can it be the boards fault for signing Bailly, Pogba, Matic, Lindelöf, Lukaku and Fred ?I think we need to realise that as bad as all the managers have been after SAF, it is the fault of the people who run the club just as much if not more.
The players that have been here under Moyes and LVG have to be accountable for the pitch performances.
Unfortunately Mata, Fellaini, Jones, Smalling, Young, Valencia are just not good enough and haven’t been good enough. Add to that the poor signings after Moyes left, and we have a right old mess on the pitch.
Well considering it is common knowledge that Woodward refused to allow Mourinho to sign Mina, Maguire, Alderweireld (not saying they would be good enough) then it is safe to assume that the board decided on which of Mourinho’s targets to sign.Compare this to what Liverpool had 3 years ago - the difference being Klopp signed right players, Mourinho didn't. So how can it be the boards fault for signing Bailly, Pogba, Matic, Lindelöf, Lukaku and Fred ?
This 100%.We have good players that are capable of a lot more than we're seeing which is frustrating.
Jose Mourinho is a good manager but he's not a Manchester United manager. Times up and he shouldnt be given anymore money. Having not been backed to buy a defender isn't an excuse for our serious lack of attacking strategy.
We had 60% possession today our defence are still passing the ball back and sideways while Southampton sit back waiting for the long ballWith LVG we kept possession and kept passing the ball without attacking or taking a shot on goal. With Jose we do not keep possession and we do not pass and we are unable to take a shot on goal. The end result may be the same but at least we kept possession and bored everyone else to death with LVG, while here with Jose we do not keep possession and make everyone bored to to death.
Absolutely not, it’s shocking! It totally is to do with us trying to be traditional. But we’ve given him plenty of time compared to what other clubs would have.Ask yourselves this: would this be acceptable at any other big club? Playing like underdogs against the likes of Bournemouth and Southampton. It's absolutely disgraceful. I don't even think Pep would survive if City were in our position. Why do we insist on protecting managers so much? Part of me thinks it's to do with the way we want to be viewed as a traditional football club, especially with the likes of Neville reluctant to say anything in the media against the manager as well. The game has changed.
It's so depressing, Jose has sucked out any enjoyment from football in the same way that Moyes and LvG did. He won us a couple of trophies but ultimately we made no progress.
I don't even particularly rate Herrera all the highly but even to this day the lad would be wonderful for Liverpool who still have a complete rubbish midfield - yet people will talk about us seemingly having a bad squad like no other when plenty have had rubbishCompare this to what Liverpool had 3 years ago - the difference being Klopp signed right players, Mourinho didn't. So how can it be the boards fault for signing Bailly, Pogba, Matic, Lindelöf, Lukaku and Fred ?
Mourinho must have given the okayWell considering it is common knowledge that Woodward refused to allow Mourinho to sign Mina, Maguire, Alderweireld (not saying they would be good enough) then it is safe to assume that the board decided on which of Mourinho’s targets to sign.
It is also safe to presume that Bailly, Lindelof, Fred, were all most likely not the managers first choice, maybe not even second choice. The board should be held accountable in my opinion because they are obviously making decisions ahead of the manager.
We topped our group in 2014 though, made it past the round of 16 and got a draw at home with Bayern in the quarter finals at least. I hated Moyes as much as anyone, but this season is genuinely worse than that one. This great portuguese man is long past his best days and now is just a shell of that man, and for the purposes of our club right now, is as bad as anyone could possibly be. So that's why he has to be sacked ASAP.Moyes would never be able to beat Juventus in Turin or get us out of that group. Comparing Moyes to Mourinho is an insult to the great Portuguese man.
The Dutch had a plan!!! He just needed more time, and money!Moyes was worse than Van Gaal. And this is worse than Moyes now. Moyes only made us suffer for 10 months or whatever it was.
Don't care what any other posters say, that's genuinely how I feel. This is the lowest I've felt post-Ferguson.
I actually understood what Van Gaal was trying to do. It was shite in the end but the big loveable feckwit had a plan (in between diving on the sideline and calling reporters fat).
This guy is a genuinely incompetent feck who (to make it even worse) is also a horrible human being.
We sold our soul completely when we appointed a scumbag like Mourinho. And boy are we paying for it.
And the thing is that I'd argue any defence of a manager on this basis should generally be when they're slightly under-performing, or doing just a little bit less than expected. Look at Wenger - it'd been obvious for years it was time for Arsenal to move on, but so long as he continually got top four there was at least some justification for keeping on someone who'd been immensely successful at the club, even if that success had dried up.Ask yourselves this: would this be acceptable at any other big club? Playing like underdogs against the likes of Bournemouth and Southampton. It's absolutely disgraceful. I don't even think Pep would survive if City were in our position. Why do we insist on protecting managers so much? Part of me thinks it's to do with the way we want to be viewed as a traditional football club, especially with the likes of Neville reluctant to say anything in the media against the manager as well. The game has changed.
It's so depressing, Jose has sucked out any enjoyment from football in the same way that Moyes and LvG did. He won us a couple of trophies but ultimately we made no progress.
Indeed. 2013-14 was dreadful but by the end almost became fascinating in a macabre sort of way - every pessimistic prediction about Moyes had come true, and so once our season was killed off you could almost detach yourself and watch it as a car crash which would serve as a blip once things were corrected. LVG was always going to be a stopgap anyway, and so once things turned to shite there was disappointment but also recognition he'd just been temporary, and again the feeling that things would soon improve. In a weird way though, the fact Mourinho actually seemed to be building something decent in the past couple of years is what makes this so grim. Even if plenty saw it coming in the summer.This season it undoubtedly is, yes. Though his time here in general hasn’t been.
What lowers it so drastically this year is that there are no bright seeds of hope to keep us going. LVG at least brought in a lot of exciting youngsters which allowed us to dream of a prosperous future, even when the football was dirge. And Moyes was still technically playing with a group of Champions.
Jose is not only intent on playing like dirge, but on playing it almost exclusively with his anointed band of favourite cloggers and try hards, at the expense of our few actual good players, whom he seems intent on trying to undermine and alienate at every turn. And who will almost certainly leave if he stays.
I wanted LVG gone, but I never thought he was actively sabotaging the club, or in danger of ruining its recovery or permanently damaging its squad with every day he remained in charge.
Just because they (potentially) weren’t his first choices, doesn’t mean they weren’t still his choices. They would’ve been on his shortlist. There are lots of reasons why a first choice might have been unattainable. Woodward, for all his faults, has managed to close deals for the likes of Pogba, Zlatan, Di Maria, Falcao - even fecking over Chelsea for Lukaku & Matic etc, so it’s not as if he’s incapable of landing big targets. But sometimes you can’t. Obviously. Real life isn’t like Football Manager. So it seems utterly bizarre to me to instinctively blame the board for the performances of players the manager has suggested and coaches every day! It’s also something I’m never aware of seeing before (was Gil the one accused of fecking up when we signed Valencia & Owen to replace Ronaldo?) and it only seems to have become a thing in the last days of Mourinho ... because he needs excuses. There’s always excuses!Well considering it is common knowledge that Woodward refused to allow Mourinho to sign Mina, Maguire, Alderweireld (not saying they would be good enough) then it is safe to assume that the board decided on which of Mourinho’s targets to sign.
It is also safe to presume that Bailly, Lindelof, Fred, were all most likely not the managers first choice, maybe not even second choice. The board should be held accountable in my opinion because they are obviously making decisions ahead of the manager.
I genuinely feel this way. There is worse to come. Brace yourselves for it. Our manager and owners are past it, especially our owners and board. Jose was never going to work. Absolute idiots.Good word, Nadir. Underused generally and nicely used here.
I would argue that this may not even be the nadir...so help us God
Disagree with that. LVG had to go because we were failing and mind-numbingly dull.I hate to say this but the grass in not greener on the other side re LVG. He was a much better coach than this shite we are seeing now. We should have kept with him one more year in hindsight.
Indeed. Fergie never always got everyone he wanted either - throughout the 2000s we lost a string of first-team players to Real (albeit some more willingly than others) and on several occasions lost out on players we'd have otherwise liked to sign. Indeed the situation now in regards to our transfer budget is almost identical to a decade ago in that we were largely outmatched financially by Chelsea. The difference, then, of course was that we were just off the back of a league and CL double. Whereas now top four seems like a laughable prospect to even consider.Just because they (potentially) weren’t his first choices, doesn’t mean they weren’t still his choices. They would’ve been on his shortlist. There are lots of reasons why a first choice might have been unattainable. Woodward, for all his faults, has managed to close deals for the likes of Pogba, Zlatan, Di Maria, Falcao - even fecking over Chelsea for Lukaku & Matic etc, so it’s not as if he’s incapable of landing big targets. But sometimes you can’t. Obviously. Real life isn’t like Football Manager. So it seems utterly bizarre to me to instinctively blame the board for the performances of players the manager has suggested and coaches every day! It’s also something I’m never aware of seeing before (was Gil the one accused of fecking up when we signed Valencia & Owen to replace Ronaldo?) and it only seems to have become a thing in the last days of Mourinho ... because he needs excuses. There’s always excuses!
I don’t think Ed is a remotely good footballing CEO, for what it’s worth, but people seem to have a very weird idea of what he does if they’re intent on blaming him for player performances, or our ongoing on-field calamity. Especially as those same people will invariably also claim that we masked all these hideous cancerous boardroom issues under Fergie for so long, only by virtue of....erm.... having a really good manager!
Disagree with that. LVG had to go because we were failing and mind-numbingly dull.I hate to say this but the grass in not greener on the other side re LVG. He was a much better coach than this shite we are seeing now. We should have kept with him one more year in hindsight.
Agree with this. He's right that we need stronger defenders but that has been the case since Moyes left. That isn't an excuse for how crap we are offensively and for him refusing to let the team attack which is when they're clearly better.We have good players that are capable of a lot more than we're seeing which is frustrating.
Jose Mourinho is a good manager but he's not a Manchester United manager. Times up and he shouldnt be given anymore money. Having not been backed to buy a defender isn't an excuse for our serious lack of attacking strategy.
It's also worth saying, despite both tenure's being car crashes, both Moyes and LvG also gave us a glimmer of hope for the future even if they haven't all turned out quite as we'd hoped. Moyes gave us Januzaj who carried us for the season and for a while looked brilliant and LvG gave us Martial and Rashford, we don't have anyone like that with Mourinho, that's what makes it even more depressing for me personally.Indeed. 2013-14 was dreadful but by the end almost became fascinating in a macabre sort of way - every pessimistic prediction about Moyes had come true, and so once our season was killed off you could almost detach yourself and watch it as a car crash which would serve as a blip once things were corrected. LVG was always going to be a stopgap anyway, and so once things turned to shite there was disappointment but also recognition he'd just been temporary, and again the feeling that things would soon improve. In a weird way though, the fact Mourinho actually seemed to be building something decent in the past couple of years is what makes this so grim. Even if plenty saw it coming in the summer.
Typical "Careful of what you wish for. They may come true."I actually feel that with LVG he needed a freer hand without Giggs around. He may have improved our football the next season. Yes I wanted him sacked too in the end but never thought it would get to this with Jose.
We played some great stuff towards the end of 2014-15. We could have stuck about 6 or 7 past City at Old Trafford."4-0 Jose" was better than anything produced by Moyes or LVG.