Mourinho and Woodward playing cat and mouse with club.It's question of money... Glazers don't want to pay the full whack.
It definitely doesn't ensure success but past performance can give a reasonable indicator to how future performance may pan out. It seems no one took the debacle at Chelsea seriously enough and we are paying now.You are stuck on Mourinho's past glories instead on analyzing the dire, static, uninspired football right in front of your face. Past success doesn't ensure future success. The world doesn't work like that.
That was years ago. It's not relevant now.I think there is too much talk of getting rid of Jose, with very little serious suggestions of who should take over. Remember Jose was an immensely popular choice esp among fans when he joined Utd.
There is literally no basis in fact of any of the points made in this post.I think there is too much talk of getting rid of Jose, with very little serious suggestions of who should take over. Remember Jose was an immensely popular choice esp among fans when he joined Utd.
As Roy Keane said earlier, they still haven't won anything yet.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Moyes was simply not good enough for UtdExcept the problem is people said exactly the same thing under Moyes and then again under LvG. 75% of posters declared that ANYTHING would be better and we had all the same posts about how people hoped we got “beat 8-0” to hasten their sackings
Forget Jose for one second - at one point, or after how many managers, do we stop and take a reality check because surely they can’t all be bad. Is it the next one? Or the next one? Genuinely interested
But that could take a hit. I’m sure the huge sponsorship deals have conditions such as being in the champions league.You're probably although it's still peanuts in relation to how much money the club is making
I don't get this post. If Mourinho had his way Martial would be swapped with Alexis and if you seriously think Ed Woodward is identifying the targets someone is lying to you.Things that won’t change when Jose is sacked
- The new manager wont be responsible for contracts. That will be Ed
- The new manager wont choose how we prepare for a season, where we Tour, when or who we play. That will be Ed
- The new manager wont have final say on who we sell. That will be Ed (I’m sure the new manager will have input)
- The new manager won’t handle player sales. That will be Ed
- The new manager wont buy players. That will be Ed (I’m sure the new manager will have input)
So if you think Zidane walks in and our problems are solved, think again.
This isn’t even a defence of Jose per se’, it’s a cry for people to realise that a non-footballing accountant is making key footballing decisions at our club, usually in the interests of making money for shareholders. I’d like to know which manager could thrive in this environment because two CL winners have now failed
Spot on. All sacking Jose would do is accelerate sacking the next manager.Except the problem is people said exactly the same thing under Moyes and then again under LvG. 75% of posters declared that ANYTHING would be better and we had all the same posts about how people hoped we got “beat 8-0” to hasten their sackings
Forget Jose for one second - at one point, or after how many managers, do we stop and take a reality check because surely they can’t all be bad. Is it the next one? Or the next one? Genuinely interested
Won no trophies in what - 4 seasons?Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
I agree with that, i was just calling out the posters that chooses their quotes because of some agenda they have.We aren’t finishing 4th and I'd be surprised if we got 6th at this rate. We’ve not played well in months. It’s not just a small dip we’re having, we’ve been shite all season.
I think that is not from today's game.Won no trophies in what - 4 seasons?
At home, against a broken United side. Well done.
Mourinho pulled the 'hand to ear' gesture after beat Juventus away in a crucial CL game.
I'd be very keen to see this Liverpool side against the same Juve...
Not sacking him creates more problems and let’s the club fall even further. He’s toxic and is doing a terrible job.Spot on. All sacking Jose would do is accelerate sacking the next manager.
They currently sit there gormless during the games. They can't be the answer.Easy, Carrick and Mkenna until the end of the season while we work on getting a dof and a new permanent manager.
Fair enough, would be odd for him to do that today - even by Klopp's standards.I think that is not from today's game.
We’d need to go on one of our best runs ever to claw back 4th at this rate. Given that we’re through to the last 16 of the CL already and we’re not going to place in the league. Now is a great time to get rid. Even if they give it to McKenna & Carrick until May I’m fairly confident it won’t get worse. I reckon there’d be a palpable sigh of relief around the club which would be good for a 5 or 6 game bounce until our underlying problems resurface.I agree with that, i was just calling out the posters that chooses their quotes because of some agenda they have.
We will be nowhere near 5th, let alone 4th.
All three have had one thing in common, though: banal, rigid, shit-on-a-stick football which doesn’t compute with the footballing DNA this club is famous for. The players we have - certainly the creative, attacking ones - aren’t suited to that type of football and as a result, they play terribly week after week and are totally bereft of confidence.Except the problem is people said exactly the same thing under Moyes and then again under LvG. 75% of posters declared that ANYTHING would be better and we had all the same posts about how people hoped we got “beat 8-0” to hasten their sackings
Forget Jose for one second - at one point, or after how many managers, do we stop and take a reality check because surely they can’t all be bad. Is it the next one? Or the next one? Genuinely interested
Plenty of us believed he was a risk worth taking, but a risk nonetheless, and are disappointed but really not surprised by what’s happened over the last year or so.No, he wasn't! He was always a divisive choice. Many of us (including myself already have been anti-Maureen from the start).
From I've seen after the game was done he wasn't giddy or anything, shook hands with a lot of our players.Fair enough, would be odd for him to do that today - even by Klopp's standards.
This is an idiotic way to look at it. Only 2 trophies matter. They lost the final of one last season and are currently top of the other. It's 100 times better than what could have ever been expected considering the mess Klopp inherited.As Roy Keane said earlier, they still haven't won anything yet.
And I still think City will win it again.