Mata felt like a king that day. Will be showing his grandkids his day as a titan.Mata dominated him physically. That's the most worrying thing.
Mata felt like a king that day. Will be showing his grandkids his day as a titan.Mata dominated him physically. That's the most worrying thing.
Didn't notice it but if true then not a good one for Chelsea fans.Mata dominated him physically. That's the most worrying thing.
Of course his rigid manager plays a big role in this but I'm still talking about Jorginho in particular instance where he has space and options but still resort to pointless sideways passing. Last night, he had several opportunities to speed things up but he always went for the safe and slow option.It's making him look like a terrible, inflexible coach if he has no yield or contingency whatsoever. Especially so when he's not getting the best out of a single player at his disposal.
It's easy to pile on Jorginho all season because the same things will keep happening, perhaps even worse as his last dribs of confidence erode, but he's not the one to be pointing the finger at if nothing in the system being played is adjusted.
I think the running commentary in here will repeat on itself until the manager changes somethingOf course his rigid manager plays a big role in this but I'm still talking about Jorginho in particular instance where he has space and options but still resort to pointless sideways passing. Last night, he had several opportunities to speed things up but he always went for the safe and slow option.
You got the wrong the idea if you think I'm singling him out but this is his thread so his individual performance will be the main focus.
Well, he probably would look better under Pep in that City side. Probably.Pep will have to change his name to Neo with all the bullets he's been dodging - Sanchez, Jorginho, Fred etc
Also Kovacic is a shadow of the player he looked like he would become at Inter. Pointless player these days.To be fair the entire midfield is a mess. Kanté is doing alright but he isn't at his best, while the other two midfielders have undefined roles and provide absolutely nothing, they don't defend, don't move the ball effectively through passes or dribbles, they provide no goal threats too.
He is one of the players I had in mind, whether they use Barkley or Kovacic the LCM is pointless. While Jorginho was hyped a little bit too much, there is a massive difference between playing with Hamsik, Insigne and Mertens, these players are actually making themselves available all the time for easy passes, someone like Callejon is always making sharp runs too.Also Kovacic is a shadow of the player he looked like he would become at Inter. Pointless player these days.
He always has options. people are making excuses because its the type of continental player they like/obsess over.Of course his rigid manager plays a big role in this but I'm still talking about Jorginho in particular instance where he has space and options but still resort to pointless sideways passing. Last night, he had several opportunities to speed things up but he always went for the safe and slow option.
You got the wrong the idea if you think I'm singling him out but this is his thread so his individual performance will be the main focus.
I don't know about that. A manager can influence things greatly of course but it doesn't change the fact he's shite (like Lukaku who is still shite despite the manager's change that has positively affected most of the squad).I think the running commentary in here will repeat on itself until the manager changes something
If I were barely able to run and knew any bad pass I made would be resultant in me having to do so, I'd be hesitant too.
Exactly. High passing percentages mean nothing in we don't go into details about how it's actually significant or not.He always has options. people are making excuses because its the type of continental player they like/obsess over.
If he was isolated and was bereft of options he wouldn't have one of the highest passing stats in the league. (I haven't seen the up to date stats but he was number one for successful passes for a long period of time)
Because Sarri sees him as a regista and has decided playing with one is vital for him. Kante is not a regista.Why must he play at DM? Why not as one of the 2 advanced CM's in front of the DM?
He'll have to do something very soon if he doesn't wanna get fired.Because Sarri sees him as a regista and has decided playing with one is vital for him. Kante is not a register.
People keep bleating on about Kante's position but playing Kante and a DM means Sarri would have to change his entire system from top to bottom.
I wouldn't call Jorginho one either presently, his passing range isn't good enough especially when there is pressure put on him. It's unfortunate for that lad as when he first came he did well. But this is the PL, teams sussed him out quickly, you don't get the time and space you get in Italy and now he's basically a passenger, and every team knows now to press him.Because Sarri sees him as a regista and has decided playing with one is vital for him. Kante is not a regista.
People keep bleating on about Kante's position but playing Kante and a DM means Sarri would have to change his entire system from top to bottom.
I think this is it. Looks unsuited to the premier league style.Press him and he crumbles.
He doesn't have to. He can a 4-2-3-1 with Kante and Jorginho both double pivot. His mind is to stubborn to think of that.Because Sarri sees him as a regista and has decided playing with one is vital for him. Kante is not a regista.
People keep bleating on about Kante's position but playing Kante and a DM means Sarri would have to change his entire system from top to bottom.
He feels the best way he can educate the team on his positional play philosophy is by getting them used to a 433. Most coaching articles I've read say a 433 formationn is the easiest way to master the style, where each of the three midfielders have clearly defined roles, knowing the positions they take on the pitch relative to the ball. Once they are fully adept, he can tinker with the formation. Its not working atm but there's certainly reasons why he's doing what he's doing. He's not just making it up.He doesn't have to. He can a 4-2-3-1 with Kante and Jorginho both double pivot. His mind is to stubborn to think of that.
His current system is shite, doesn't work and there's absolutely zero guarantee it will ever work for Chelsea in the future to take the risk and endure humiliation. He either tweaks it for it to succeed in England or he gets sacked. There's no other option for him.He feels the best way he can educate the team on his positional play philosophy is by getting them used to a 433. Most coaching articles I've read say a 433 formationn is the easiest way to master the style, where each of the three midfielders have clearly defined roles, knowing the positions they take on the pitch relative to the ball. Once they are fully adept, he can tinker with the formation. Its not working atm but there's certainly reasons why he's doing what he's doing.
This is probably for the Sarri thread but I think they should stick with Sarri and back him. Chelsea knew what they were getting when they signed him.
Does that really make much of a difference? If Jorginho is being pressed or man marked it still requires Kanté to take up a creative role which he is far too limited to do.He doesn't have to. He can a 4-2-3-1 with Kante and Jorginho both double pivot. His mind is to stubborn to think of that.
No man.Still think we need someone like him in our team, although he was completely shackled last night.
I don't know. I think we do need someone like him, but better in every way, and nothing like him.No man.
We do not need someone like Jorginho in our team.
...down the drain£50million
Most ex-player pundits are clueless and just jump on the bandwagon.One thing I don't understand is all the pundits (and Wenger apparently) coming out and saying Jorginho is playing in Kante's position and that the latter is better as DM or deeper in midfield.
But Matic was the holding DM and freeing Kante to go be the ball winner when they last won the league title under Conte. He played in a CM duo then and he was the more advanced of the two. And he did more than fine that was arguably is best season.
My point is that I think all those guys are confusing Jorginho being utterly shit for this league and Chelsea not adapting well to a 4-3-3 with Kante being played out of position. Chelsea's midfield is imbalanced because Jorginho is shit and Kovacevic/Barkley seem nothing special. Not because Kante is played out of position.
I don't mean him exactly, but someone in similar style. Someone who can control the play and hold the ball for us.No man.
We do not need someone like Jorginho in our team.
So pretentious to use one word that everyone knows the meaning of instead of unnecessarily describing a role in the team every time.Feck off with the ‘regista’ talk it’s so pretentious.
Kante is kind of playing out of position as well though and it's hurting them. It's the balance in midfield that is all wrong. He is still in similar areas to where he was, but Sarri is playing him in a completely different role than where he played when he's won everything. Chelsea just don't have the correct balance in the centre, not even close to be honest.One thing I don't understand is all the pundits (and Wenger apparently) coming out and saying Jorginho is playing in Kante's position and that the latter is better as DM or deeper in midfield.
But Matic was the holding DM and freeing Kante to go be the ball winner when they last won the league title under Conte. He played in a CM duo then and he was the more advanced of the two. And he did more than fine that was arguably is best season.
My point is that I think all those guys are confusing Jorginho being utterly shit for this league and Chelsea not adapting well to a 4-3-3 with Kante being played out of position. Chelsea's midfield is imbalanced because Jorginho is shit and Kovacevic/Barkley seem nothing special. Not because Kante is played out of position.
I know, right? Like door, pffft I hate that pretentious word too. I much prefer "a hinged, sliding, or revolving barrier at the entrance to a building, room, or vehicle"Feck off with the ‘regista’ talk it’s so pretentious.