There are some good British kids around, but like you I don't want all our signings to be like this. Who would the experienced players in the team? The ones who are letting us down now? Ole should remember that if SAF had followed this policy then maybe he wouldn't have been signed. Some of our best players have been foreign. Ole himself, Vidic, Evra, King Eric, Big Pete etc.
Thanks
@ti vu how did I forget Ronaldo?
Exactly, we already have a bunch of British kids in the academy, why buy more of them when what we need is some proven quality that can lead the kids we already have, it just doesn't make any sense to me, hopefully it's just paper nonsense.
Except Fergie didn't really focus too much on British talent, he bought young potentially great players and developed them regardless of nationality. Hope we're not fixated on any signings being British first and foremost.
Fergie was always in for the best British players though, but that was when there was some exceptional talents like Rio and Rooney, or top talent like Carrick, but even other than that he still went for the likes of Neil Webb, Smalling, Jones and Young. I think he felt having a British nucleus was important.
Aren't England youth teams winning pretty much every youth tournament right now? Or arent they atleast winning games that the senior time generally doesn't? Where is this perception coming from then? Except maybe France, I don't see any other teams generally loaded with as many quality players as I see England right now.
Youth teams yes, but if you look at the 3 best youth players, 2 of them (Foden and Hudson-Odoi) ar ealready at rivals and the other is Sancho. However we don't need yet more kids, we start two young, inconsistent forwards every week, we have Greenwood, Gomes and Garner from our own youth that cover the Britishness needed, we need some proven quality to help the youth we have, not Crystal Palace and West Ham's kids, and if we want proven quality we will have to look outside of the British isles.