Transfer Tweets - 2019/20 | Check the OP for blacklisted sources before posting

Status
Not open for further replies.

P-Nut

fan of well-known French footballer Fabinho
Joined
Oct 16, 2015
Messages
21,664
Location
Oldham, Greater Manchester
If that's true then can someone please explain the following train of thought:

- Manager wants transfers done by preseason
- United interested in Bruno Fernandes
- months worth of links to Bruno
- United still considering signing the player with less than two weeks left of the transfer window

How exactly does that happen? Someone please explain to me how it could possibly be anything other than poor poor handling of our transfers.
Sporting refusing to drop their price
 

Gasolin

Full Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2007
Messages
6,107
Location
NYC
If that's true then can someone please explain the following train of thought:

- Manager wants transfers done by preseason
- United interested in Bruno Fernandes
- months worth of links to Bruno
- United still considering signing the player with less than two weeks left of the transfer window

How exactly does that happen? Someone please explain to me how it could possibly be anything other than poor poor handling of our transfers.
I agree it's poor, but I wonder what is exactly happening in those negotiations. Something is so so weird.
 

Bastian

Full Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2015
Messages
18,593
Supports
Mejbri
Literally why. I swear him and the rest of the Ayews are just constantly swapping between Palace, Swansea and Villa.
Aye.

There's what, six of them, right? We should get one too.
 

Tarrou

Full Member
Joined
May 13, 2013
Messages
25,637
Location
Sydney
If that's true then can someone please explain the following train of thought:

- Manager wants transfers done by preseason
- United interested in Bruno Fernandes
- months worth of links to Bruno
- United still considering signing the player with less than two weeks left of the transfer window

How exactly does that happen? Someone please explain to me how it could possibly be anything other than poor poor handling of our transfers.
i guess we only wanted him if Pogba left
 

Sterling Archer

New Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2016
Messages
4,289
i guess we only wanted him if Pogba left
I got the impression it was independent of Pogba.

I agree it's poor, but I wonder what is exactly happening in those negotiations. Something is so so weird.
My concern is it is a lot like summer of Moyes. When we signed just Fellaini. Are we waiting and lingering on some big galactico type again? We've seen how long our big name signings last...Schwein, Di Maria, Alexis, Matic... We've always peppered those around a core of up and coming talent. So I wish we just made the move for that Milo whatever his name is instead of haggling 5, 10 million on Maggie. Wish we would just send 50 mil to Sporting instead of considering negotiations w levy for Eriksen. Wish we would just sell Lukaku and replace him with someone like Dybala or Werner or even just keep the money and play Greenwood. But the long extended transfer sagas suck.
 

croadyman

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2018
Messages
34,789
i guess we only wanted him if Pogba left
That is what I have thought on the situation all along,has been a funny old day for Utd news on Sky

I would be a complete hypocrite if I said Sky are BS merchants with the Fernandes stuff but was happy about the Maguire stuff later in the afternoon.
 

VanGaalyTime

Full Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2015
Messages
2,126
I agree it's poor, but I wonder what is exactly happening in those negotiations. Something is so so weird.
My concern is we don't have the money. And we're trying to play games with the terms. Sounds like we've only offered 20 for Longstaff. 70 for Maguire. Fine. But the selling teams want more. Follow up. Negotiate now so that we're not scrambling and overpaying. Why wait? It's madness to wait until the last two weeks when the selling team literally can't replace him. I don't know if it's judge or Woodward doing these things but they both need to be removed from the club quickly. We needed to spend 300m to catch up for this season. If we don't get another CB or RW, I can't see us getting top 6. Even with Maguire, top 4 is going to be impossible unless we get very lucky with injuries. Why are we allowing this to happen to our club?
 

Lemansky

Full Member
Joined
May 14, 2014
Messages
970
If that's true then can someone please explain the following train of thought:

- Manager wants transfers done by preseason
- United interested in Bruno Fernandes
- months worth of links to Bruno
- United still considering signing the player with less than two weeks left of the transfer window

How exactly does that happen? Someone please explain to me how it could possibly be anything other than poor poor handling of our transfers.
Only one reason: price demanded by the selling club combined with what the buying club wants to offer. Woodward and the Glazers don’t want to overpay.
 

mariachi-19

Full Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2008
Messages
18,616
Location
I may be the devil, but i'm not a monster
Only one reason: price demanded by the selling club combined with what the buying club wants to offer. Woodward and the Glazers don’t want to overpay.
No reasonable club would. No different to us and Madrid over Pogba.

Unless you want to end up like Barca, massively living beyond your means. If people don’t think shit with Barca will hit the fan at the rate they’re going, they’re kidding themselves.

It’s not about penny pinching owners and woody. It’s about running a self sufficient and successful business
 

Lemansky

Full Member
Joined
May 14, 2014
Messages
970
No reasonable club would. No different to us and Madrid over Pogba.

Unless you want to end up like Barca, massively living beyond your means. If people don’t think shit with Barca will hit the fan at the rate they’re going, they’re kidding themselves.

It’s not about penny pinching owners and woody. It’s about running a self sufficient and successful business
From a supporters view this can be very frustrating though, especially when last summers transfer window also was underwhelming.
 

Lash

Full Member
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
12,169
Location
Buckinghamshire
Supports
Millwall, Saint-Etienne
My concern is we don't have the money. And we're trying to play games with the terms. Sounds like we've only offered 20 for Longstaff. 70 for Maguire. Fine. But the selling teams want more. Follow up. Negotiate now so that we're not scrambling and overpaying. Why wait? It's madness to wait until the last two weeks when the selling team literally can't replace him. I don't know if it's judge or Woodward doing these things but they both need to be removed from the club quickly. We needed to spend 300m to catch up for this season. If we don't get another CB or RW, I can't see us getting top 6. Even with Maguire, top 4 is going to be impossible unless we get very lucky with injuries. Why are we allowing this to happen to our club?
This is a very naive way of looking at it. We’ve offered 70m bloody pounds for Maguire and your negotiating tactic is just pay more? We’d run out of bloody cash. If teams won’t budge on price, we shouldn’t creep up when we’ve already made a very fair bid.
 

Josep Dowling

Full Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2014
Messages
7,659
This is a very naive way of looking at it. We’ve offered 70m bloody pounds for Maguire and your negotiating tactic is just pay more? We’d run out of bloody cash. If teams won’t budge on price, we shouldn’t creep up when we’ve already made a very fair bid.
Move on then and find another option. It’s mental just to hope we sign him.
 

Funky Futurista

Full Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2017
Messages
277
Location
Norway
I think slowing down a bit on the transfer front is fine as well. We won't have a title challenge next year anyway, so we should give this whole youth thing a shot and if Ole flops horribly we won't be stuck with yet another re-build job once a new manager / philosophy come in.

We'll make atleast one more big money signing (I'd much rather it be some CM / Winger than Maguire), but even if we've only got James, Maguire, AWB, we'd have strengthened key deficiencies in the squad really well. If we get someone like Eriksen (or any other AM like Fernandes) to top it off, it'll be the perfect summer for me.

Excited to see a 4-4-2 diamond (we've played this with Mata at the tip of the diamond last season)

---------------- De Gea -------------------
-- AWB -- Maguire -- Lindelof -- Shaw --
------------------ Matic -------------------
---------- McTominay -- Pogba -----------
------------------ Eriksen -----------------
-- Rashford -------------------Martial ----

In defence it will look more like a traditional 4-5-1 with Eriksen / Rashford occupying the forward role and the other one dropping off to cover the RW.

---------------- De Gea -------------------
-- AWB -- Maguire -- Lindelof -- Shaw --
------------------ Matic -------------------
--Rashford-- McTominay -- Pogba -- Martial
------------------ Eriksen -----------------

It looks like we have enough depth at CM but someone like Longstaff to rotate with Matic would be great as well. McTominay can play the Matic role when he's rested / injured. McSauce can be rotated with Fred / Pereira. If Pogba is rested, we'd have to switch to a different formation and play a 5-3-2 (with Rojo replacing him) or 4-5-1 with James / some other winger replacing him and Rashford upfront.
We won't play a 4-4-2 diamond. We've been playing 4-2-3-1 all preseason, and if we're gonna play something else it'll probably be 4-3-3. 4-4-2 diamond might happen in certain games, but not as our main formation. I'm guessing you haven't seen that many games this preseason?
 

Lash

Full Member
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
12,169
Location
Buckinghamshire
Supports
Millwall, Saint-Etienne
Move on then and find another option. It’s mental just to hope we sign him.
We don’t know what the rejection was, was it just the structure of the deal or a flat out no. We also could have moved on as well, but getting similar prices. I don’t think we’re playing this as bad as everyone thinks.
 

NWRed

Full Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2019
Messages
1,177
If that's true then can someone please explain the following train of thought:

- Manager wants transfers done by preseason
- United interested in Bruno Fernandes
- months worth of links to Bruno
- United still considering signing the player with less than two weeks left of the transfer window

How exactly does that happen? Someone please explain to me how it could possibly be anything other than poor poor handling of our transfers.
1) journalists make shit up (all the time), then other journalists make up some more shit based on the original shit, and eventually you have a massive story based on feck all.

2) agents from either the selling club and/or the player are feeding gullible journalists false or misleading stories to either engineer a move, raise the profile of their player or start an auction to raise the price of a player they think is a saleable asset (see Lemina story for a prime example of this)

3) there is genuine interest from the buying club, but it depends on departures that may or may not happen. For us this would apply to Pogba, if Real were to stump up money we can't refuse with a week left of the transfer window we'd need to sign a replacement pretty sharpish, and if they hadn't done some ground work on a player like Fernandes then they'd be up shit creek

4) players who weren't intended to be part of the squad have impressed so much in pre season training and matches that a player in that position is no longer considered a priority or even necessary

5) higher priority targets in other positions cost more money than budgeted and so there isn't the cash left to make the signing, despite the interest being real

I could go on, but you get the idea.
 

sparx99

Full Member
Joined
May 22, 2016
Messages
3,952
Only one reason: price demanded by the selling club combined with what the buying club wants to offer. Woodward and the Glazers don’t want to overpay.
There’s also a chance that Gomes has impressed on tour and we decided to give him an opportunity before bringing someone else in.
 

Lemansky

Full Member
Joined
May 14, 2014
Messages
970
There’s also a chance that Gomes has impressed on tour and we decided to give him an opportunity before bringing someone else in.
Might be. However I read often here the term “just pay what they want”. That’s not how negotiations work in real life - and would be horrible business regardless of who owns us.
 

Alemar

Full Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2017
Messages
7,617
i guess we only wanted him if Pogba left
And if Pogba stays, we are happy with Mata and Lingard? It simply cannot be if the manager has any ambition

We might want someone else more than Bruno, but it’s unthinkable that we only want a midfielder if Pogba leaves
 

Crashoutcassius

Full Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2013
Messages
10,320
Location
playa del carmen
And if Pogba stays, we are happy with Mata and Lingard? It simply cannot be if the manager has any ambition

We might want someone else more than Bruno, but it’s unthinkable that we only want a midfielder if Pogba leaves
Sounds like a 10 is only a priority if pogba leaves though. Right now priority appears to be a cb and depth in the double pivot, which will likely cost between 100 and 140m based on prices quotes for maguire and longstaff. That brings spending to 150 to 200m. I doubt they want to jist sign a 10 for 75m when the priority positions aren't sorted
 

Sunny Jim

Full Member
Joined
May 8, 2007
Messages
29,392
Location
Warsaw...that's too far away from Edinburgh...
Sounds like a 10 is only a priority if pogba leaves though. Right now priority appears to be a cb and depth in the double pivot, which will likely cost between 100 and 140m based on prices quotes for maguire and longstaff. That brings spending to 150 to 200m. I doubt they want to jist sign a 10 for 75m when the priority positions aren't sorted
And as return we may get the CL next season which gives 50-60 mil in revenue. IMHO the club wont invest until sponsorship deals are in danger.
 

Alemar

Full Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2017
Messages
7,617
Sounds like a 10 is only a priority if pogba leaves though. Right now priority appears to be a cb and depth in the double pivot, which will likely cost between 100 and 140m based on prices quotes for maguire and longstaff. That brings spending to 150 to 200m. I doubt they want to jist sign a 10 for 75m when the priority positions aren't sorted

We have 4 priority positions now that RB is sorted. We can’t hope to challenge for the league if we dont buy strong CB, DM, AM and RF.

It’s only if we lost ambition and are happy with a top 4 finish - but the supporters won’t be happy with that
 

Crashoutcassius

Full Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2013
Messages
10,320
Location
playa del carmen
We have 4 priority positions now that RB is sorted. We can’t hope to challenge for the league if we dont buy strong CB, DM, AM and RF.

It’s only if we lost ambition and are happy with a top 4 finish - but the supporters won’t be happy with that
These are your priorities though and not the priority reported by the 3 or 4 reliable journalists
 

OohAahMartial

Full Member
Joined
May 16, 2016
Messages
3,164
Location
Back in the UK
And if Pogba stays, we are happy with Mata and Lingard? It simply cannot be if the manager has any ambition

We might want someone else more than Bruno, but it’s unthinkable that we only want a midfielder if Pogba leaves
We can't buy a midfielder until we are sure Pogba stays or goes, as the whole composition and balance would change. If he goes then we need a replacement, and have a far bigger budget left to get another midfielder too, who would be bought to fit for example Savic rather than Pogba. We need Real to hurry up and offload Bale and James. Regardless of what Ole says, this delay in buying midfielders just confirms to me that Pogba does have a price. Just one that Real can't afford without selling Bale and James first.

Similarly I think we are waiting to offload Lukaku, to have a better idea of our budget. If we were certain Inter could afford him and would buy him, maybe we wouldn't wait, but Inter make derisive offers, so we have to see if they can actually afford him. Which they can't. Unless they sell Icardi. And so again, we wait.
 

OoopsMisclick

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Oct 7, 2013
Messages
282
Location
Gold & Green
Would be such a poor move from him, salary increase aside. Surely he can hold out for a top 4 club for another season.
I don't think he has the quality for a top 4 side.
We should be happy with this move for him. Everton will stump up some extra cash to get him and we'll get a bit of money because of it.

Maybe we can use that money to actually reinforce the squad... Just a wild idea.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.