Dybala or Sancho - hypothetical preference

Bastian

Full Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2015
Messages
20,735
Supports
Mejbri
If either scenario was plausible, who would you rather?
 
This thread will shoulder the blow if Dybala doesn’t fancy it :cool:
 
Okay in diff positions. Do you mean this window ? It is a wierd hypothetical like Jan oblak or vicinius junior. Maybe if we can't handle both their wages then it is a choice but barce given 800k a week to AG, we have plenty of room to pay more wages. I really hope nobody here thinks we are signing dybala to play right wing
 
Okay in diff positions. Do you mean this window ? It is a wierd hypothetical like Jan oblak or vicinius junior. Maybe if we can't handle both their wages then it is a choice but barce given 800k a week to AG, we have plenty of room to pay more wages. I really hope nobody here thinks we are signing dybala to play right wing

It’s a simple question, let’s not over complicate it mate.
 
Given what we need on the pitch and the messiness around Dybala’s situation with Juve, I’d prefer Sancho. I think Dybala is the better player though.
 
I'd probably say Dybala at the moment.
Sancho is great, but he's so young. It would take a huge bid to get him and I'd worry that it might be too much pressure for someone his age.
Plus Dybala is a really good player.
I'd take either though, obviously, most people would.
 
I miss having a right winger. Sancho and I didn't even consider who was better.
 
Sancho just because it's about a fecking time we sign a RW.
 
Why all the threads about a guy who is unlikely to join us?
 
Okay in diff positions. Do you mean this window ? It is a wierd hypothetical like Jan oblak or vicinius junior. Maybe if we can't handle both their wages then it is a choice but barce given 800k a week to AG, we have plenty of room to pay more wages. I really hope nobody here thinks we are signing dybala to play right wing
Sorry for derailing this a bit but is Barca really paying AG 800k per week?
 
I want Sancho more just because we’ve had such a rubbish right sided attack for nearly 10 years.

Dybala is currently the better footballer though
 
Either there's some other Sancho you're all on about or he's just become the most overrated player in the history of the caf. With the possible exception of Daley Blind.

If he was better than Dybala he'd never gave left City, because he would have been playing for them.
 
Either there's some other Sancho you're all on about or he's just become the most overrated player in the history of the caf. With the possible exception of Daley Blind.

If he was better than Dybala he'd never gave left City, because he would have been playing for them.

Maybe he is overrated, maybe he isn’t - but he certainly isn’t overrated because of some algorithm you have concocted on the basis that he was once at City and isn’t there now, so therefore can’t be all that.

As you would know anyway, he left City at 17 in search of first team football. Against their wishes. Similar to the not-all-that Pogba when he left us (because Park and Rafael were better central midfielders than him).
 
Hey.
Greenwood
Martial-Dybala-Sancho

Rashford, Gomes and Chong rotating. Yes please​
 
Ones a #10 or false 9 and the other is a winger, so it's apples and oranges and if Ole wants to play 4-2-3-1 we need both, right now I'd take Dybala as he has more experience and is more proven, get Sancho next summer.
 
Sancho as it would surely mean the end of having to watch Lingard go out for his weekly jog. With Dybala there would still be a chance that awful wretch shows up on the right wing.
 
Sancho 110%, Dybala will be a good acquisition long term nonetheless if we get it over the line and will benefit if we sign Sancho next summer.
 
So we actually have a chance at signing Sancho? If so the club has handled it well considering the circus surrounding Maguire.
 
It should be a hypothetical about how awesome we'll be with both.
Rashford - Dybala - Sancho :drool:
 
I wonder how much Sancho would cost in this market. I don't think 100 million would do it