Ady87
Full Member
Someone post the Dominic Raab exchange. Can't believe anyone would read that and think it's a good idea to vote Tory or that Brexit isn't all a sham!
If they're going to cover this up any difference between them and RT will be historic. Wouldn't surprise me anymore.https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technolo...rron-banks&link_location=live-reporting-story
We've got our BBC story!
people will fall for anything these daysJesus, it's not difficult to work out that one is fake - it's Guy Ritchie meets The Young Ones, ffs.
Just tried to call the number on the most recent leek. Phone rang but no answer.Apparently the real ones are here. https://twitter.com/number10leaks
There's numbers for Nadine Dorries, Julia Hartley-Brewer and now Banks own number just appeared on there.Just tried to call the number on the most recent leek. Phone rang but no answer.
Boris Johnson government will not carry out any economic impact assessment of his Brexit deal, officials admit
No analysis of the likely economic damage from Boris Johnson’s Brexit deal will be carried out, the government has admitted.
Ministers have dropped plans to publish a Treasury assessment, amid estimates of a hit to the UK economy of anything between £70bn and £130bn, leaving people thousands of pounds worse off.
The stance was attacked as “a dereliction of duty” by Julie Ward, a Labour MEP, who uncovered it after submitting a freedom of information request.
Phwoar this is just like when Hitler stole our sunbeds on the French riveria!Sigh...
Isn't that due to the withdrawal agreement being much more closely aligned with the EU and as such a trade agreement being easier to sort out?We know it's impossible to do it in 11 months but you ain't heard nothing yet - Labour will do it in three, any advance on three, there at the back...
No because firstly the Uk would have to leave first before trade negotiations start. If Labour want a Brexit in name only which Labour remain supporters think is what Corbyn means then Labour would have to accept freedom of movement unconditionally and be in the customs union, neither of which Corbyn is suggesting.Isn't that due to the withdrawal agreement being much more closely aligned with the EU and as such a trade agreement being easier to sort out?
But... UnicornsNo because firstly the Uk would have to leave first before trade negotiations start. If Labour want a Brexit in name only which Labour remain supporters think is what Corbyn means then Labour would have to accept freedom of movement unconditionally and be in the customs union, neither of which Corbyn is suggesting.
I hope your post is true, but I just can’t see it.What you said in your last sentence is precisely why this won't be a Brexit election, because just like you people won't be able to see the bigger picture and get beyond the issues currently facing them.
The Conservatives are in for a huge shock again not only because Labour policies will resonate strongly with what people need but because this time around they can't bring up the magic money tree without ditching their own "promises" of splash the cash policies.
It’s perfect.Seems like a good policy to me
You're a butt unicorn.But... Unicorns
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
What a melt.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Stealing that. Thank you SirJesus, it's not difficult to work out that one is fake - it's Guy Ritchie meets The Young Ones, ffs.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Come on Michel, it's either 11 months or 3 months and Brexit will be sorted. You're not reading the script.It is unrealistic that a global negotiation can be done in 11 months, so we can’t do it all. We will do all we can to get what I call the ‘vital minimum’ to establish a relationship with the UK if that is the time scale.
Why do you pretend to be dumb? The 3 months is a withdrawal agreement and a political declaration which outlines the basis for the future relationship. The 3 months refers to what Johnson has now not a full trade deal.Michel Barnier, the EU’s chief Brexit negotiator, has been recorded telling a private meeting that the EU would not be able to conclude a full trade negotiation with the EU by the end of next year, as Boris Johnson claims. As the Independent reports in its scoop, Barnier said:
Come on Michel, it's either 11 months or 3 months and Brexit will be sorted. You're not reading the script.
Been through this dozens of times. How can you possibly believe this load of crap?Why do you pretend to be dumb? The 3 months is a withdrawal agreement and a political declaration which outlines the basis for the future relationship. The 3 months refers to what Johnson has now not a full trade deal.
It will be closer to Europe with a customs union as minimum and even single market possibly but leaving the political institutions. That requires very little further negotiations as it’s effectively BRINO so it and can be implemented much much faster after the referendum even within 6 months should the country choose so.