SARS CoV-2 coronavirus / Covid-19 (No tin foil hat silliness please)

Sarni

nice guy, unassuming, objective United fan.
Joined
Jan 21, 2004
Messages
57,903
Location
Krakow
Experts in Poland saying now that we can semi-open in two weeks but it'd be only for select services and shops with additional restrictions. Bars and restaurants with limited capacity maybe in the Summer. Travel/movement restrictions, ban of mass gatherings including sports events and concerts and obligatory wearing of masks likely to remain for 2+ years until vaccine is found and proven to be efficient.
 

Posh Red

Full Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2013
Messages
3,491
Location
Peterborough, England
Yeah this is going to impact on everybody in a shitty way. Older folk's pension's are being obliterated, middle age folk are losing jobs with little or no possibility of retraining and many still with hefty mortgages to pay, the younger folk are struggling to get a house and stable employment and many will have lost their jobs. It's a giant shit sandwich and we all gotta take a bite.
Agree with your points in general but from the perspective of pensions younger people will be hit harder on average potentially. Older people are more likely to have final salaries/defined benefit schemes, and also are more likely
To be invested in lifestyle funds which wouldn’t have felt the impact of the crash as much (this does of course depend on what you define as ‘older’)
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
66,059
Location
France
Aye, your posts have just been dripping with that over the past few pages when you've been slagging posters off left right and centre for daring to think they might not do well after this.

And, of course, you make that statement in a paragraph where what you have written equates to 'I will suffer worse than anyone and I'm putting on a stiff upper lip so I don't want to hear about anyone else's problems'. You, you have decided, are allowed to be a martyr about how bad things might get, and anyone that deigns to challenge your perceptions and perhaps suggest that things could be worse for other generations (and, hey, maybe they are wrong, time will tell) has been met with snark, accusations of entitlement, and general hostility by you. In fact, not only that but you've attempted to co-opt any idea that the younger generations might suffer by stating that would take some emotional toll on you so, really, that's your cross to bear too.

The irony of all ironies being that you've spent most of the morning whinging about how bad things are for your generation, but apparently not realising you've done that either.

Self aware indeed.
To be fair to @Feed Me, he is a millenial and a massive whinger. Maybe he is using himself as an example which would be to some extent a sign of self awareness.:angel:
 

Feed Me

I'm hungry
Joined
Apr 8, 2004
Messages
29,319
Location
Midlands, UK
Aye, your posts have just been dripping with that over the past few pages when you've been slagging posters off left right and centre for daring to think they might not do well after this.

And, of course, you make that statement in a paragraph where what you have written equates to 'I will suffer worse than anyone and I'm putting on a stiff upper lip so I don't want to hear about anyone else's problems'. You, you have decided, are allowed to be a martyr about how bad things might get, and anyone that deigns to challenge your perceptions and perhaps suggest that things could be worse for other generations (and, hey, maybe they are wrong, time will tell) has been met with snark, accusations of entitlement, and general hostility by you. In fact, not only that but you've attempted to co-opt any idea that the younger generations might suffer by stating that would take some emotional toll on you so, really, that's your cross to bear too.

The irony of all ironies being that you've spent most of the morning whinging about how bad things are for your generation, but apparently not realising you've done that either.

Self aware indeed.
I haven’t slagged anyone off. That’s seemingly your domain. Go and look up the original post that sparked this all off. The poster has even since admitted that it smacked of a woe is me attitude. You’re really over analysing the whole thing too much when all I’ve said is that it’s imprudent to get into a dick measuring contest about which cross-section of society is most impacted when a) we don’t know how things will pan out and b) every person will have hardships to endure. I’m going for a walk, it’s not healthy to sit here ranting on. Apologies if I offended you in any way.
 

711

Verified Bird Expert
Scout
Joined
Dec 10, 2007
Messages
24,296
Location
Don't sign old players and cast offs
Agree with your points in general but from the perspective of pensions younger people will be hit harder on average potentially. Older people are more likely to have final salaries/defined benefit schemes, and also are more likely
To be invested in lifestyle funds which wouldn’t have felt the impact of the crash as much (this does of course depend on what you define as ‘older’)
One third of over 50s have no personal pension or savings whatsoever. Many of those that do will have relatively small amounts.

https://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money...13/One-third-of-over-50s-have-no-pension.html
 

Alabaster Codify7

New Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2015
Messages
6,553
Location
Wales
Experts in Poland saying now that we can semi-open in two weeks but it'd be only for select services and shops with additional restrictions. Bars and restaurants with limited capacity maybe in the Summer. Travel/movement restrictions, ban of mass gatherings including sports events and concerts and obligatory wearing of masks likely to remain for 2+ years until vaccine is found and proven to be efficient.

Sounds about right. It's what I expect from most of Europe, the UK of course being behind the curve a bit due to the dilly-dallying bullshit.

How does 'obligatory wearing of masks' work in restaurants and bars, though? And the workplace, where conversations are necessary (lectures as well). Just a thought.
 

Heardy

Full Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2009
Messages
8,869
Location
Looking for the answers...
I also hope there’s a remote working revolution which would have major benefits for the environment. We know it can work so there’s no excuses.
Agree with this. I work in professional services and I can’t see how people will justify travelling to London for a meeting via train when you can do it so easily remotely!
 

Jippy

Sleeps with tramps, bangs jacuzzis, dirty shoes
Staff
Joined
Nov 19, 2009
Messages
57,466
Location
Jet fuel doesn't melt steel beams
Going to uni is a choice. Young people need to be more savvy about choosing to go down that route and saddling themselves with debt for a two bit degree.
I agree with that in many ways, but it will need a big attitude shift from employers and society more broadly towards accepting apprenticeships and the like as equivalents.
I'm sat here now sifting through applications for a project on highlighting up and coming younger talent in financial services and of the 30 selected, only two have not had a university education. These individuals are still seen as massive outliers, despite going on to pick up stacks of vocational qualifications along the way.
 

balaks

Full Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2014
Messages
15,335
Location
Northern Ireland
Supports
Tottenham Hotspur
Agree with your points in general but from the perspective of pensions younger people will be hit harder on average potentially. Older people are more likely to have final salaries/defined benefit schemes, and also are more likely
To be invested in lifestyle funds which wouldn’t have felt the impact of the crash as much (this does of course depend on what you define as ‘older’)
They are also much more likely to lose everything (they die) so I guess that balances it out a bit. Some of the richer older folk will be fine but like everything in life they are the minority and many older people have little to no savings and a meagre pension.
 

Hound Dog

Full Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2011
Messages
3,213
Location
Belgrade, Serbia
Supports
Whoever I bet on
Experts in Poland saying now that we can semi-open in two weeks but it'd be only for select services and shops with additional restrictions. Bars and restaurants with limited capacity maybe in the Summer. Travel/movement restrictions, ban of mass gatherings including sports events and concerts and obligatory wearing of masks likely to remain for 2+ years until vaccine is found and proven to be efficient.
2+ years. Where did that come from. Hell, why not 30?

Most predictions seem to be that it will be 12-18 months until a vaccine is approved and some are claiming as early as September, with potential mass distribution near the end of the year. 2+ I never heard before.

Also, is a partial lockdown that long economically viable?
 
Last edited:

Skills

Snitch
Joined
Jan 17, 2012
Messages
42,118
I agree with that in many ways, but it will need a big attitude shift from employers and society more broadly towards accepting apprenticeships and the like as equivalents.
I'm sat here now sifting through applications for a project on highlighting up and coming younger talent in financial services and of the 30 selected, only two have not had a university education. These individuals are still seen as massive outliers, despite going on to pick up stacks of vocational qualifications along the way.
They're not really equivalent though. There's a problem with even the better apprenticeship programs (talking about it as an engineer myself) - you basically learn to work in a way that specific business wants you to work. From a young age, you're taught to do things one way only. That's fine, if you're going to stay there for the rest of your life but you're not as useful once you leave that environment.
 

Heardy

Full Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2009
Messages
8,869
Location
Looking for the answers...
And how would their position have been affected more so than younger pension savers?
my pension has taken an absolute battering but I’m 34 so theory is I’m not able/planning to cash it on for 25 - 30 years so it has time to rebuild.
If someone at say 59 has taken a similar percentage hit on their fund it will have lost way more in absolute terms and they have little/no time to rebuild, so quality of retirement or indeed ability to retire is adversely affected.
 

NinjaFletch

Full Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2009
Messages
19,818
I haven’t slagged anyone off. That’s seemingly your domain. Go and look up the original post that sparked this all off. The poster has even since admitted that it smacked of a woe is me attitude. You’re really over analysing the whole thing too much when all I’ve said is that it’s imprudent to get into a dick measuring contest about which cross-section of society is most impacted when a) we don’t know how things will pan out and b) every person will have hardships to endure. I’m going for a walk, it’s not healthy to sit here ranting on. Apologies if I offended you in any way.
Not sure that's how it comes across, but each to their own.

I think we all have to acknowledge that everyone struggles differently and some people are very worried about the future and will use this thread to vent. I'm just not sure dog pilling those posters and telling them that it's entitled to dare to think about themselves or their peers is really helping anyone. It just comes across as dismissive.

But agreed that it's not healthy to continue this on, enjoy your walk!
 

Skills

Snitch
Joined
Jan 17, 2012
Messages
42,118
Sounds about right. It's what I expect from most of Europe, the UK of course being behind the curve a bit due to the dilly-dallying bullshit.

How does 'obligatory wearing of masks' work in restaurants and bars, though? And the workplace, where conversations are necessary (lectures as well). Just a thought.
I'd say masks only for public transport.

Bars can work around it by limiting the number of people inside - same for restaurants.
 

balaks

Full Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2014
Messages
15,335
Location
Northern Ireland
Supports
Tottenham Hotspur
2+ years. Where did that come from. Hell, why not 30?

Most predictions seem to be that it will be 12-18 months until a vaccine is approved and some are claiming as early as September, with potential mass distribution near the end of the year. 2+ I never heard before.

Also, is a partial lockdown that long economically viable?
It will be probably the quickest vaccine in history if we manage to get one ready for mass use in 18 months. Most vaccines take 6-9 years to develop. We could be looking at 2-3 years realistically though hoping for much less than that of course but 18 months is likely best case scenario.

What we really need right now are some breakthroughs in effective treatments - the vaccine will come eventually but it's on down the line.
 

Posh Red

Full Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2013
Messages
3,491
Location
Peterborough, England
my pension has taken an absolute battering but I’m 34 so theory is I’m not able/planning to cash it on for 25 - 30 years so it has time to rebuild.
If someone at say 59 has taken a similar percentage hit on their fund it will have lost way more in absolute terms and they have little/no time to rebuild, so quality of retirement or indeed ability to retire is adversely affected.
This is partially true, but like I said, many funds for people approaching retirement are invested on a ‘lifestyle’ basis, which means the risk profile is decreased gradually as you approach retirement (which is why proportionately, younger peoples funds have been more adversely affected, which was part of the initial point I made). I work in pension income brokering and can only go off what I’ve seen of late. A few of our clients have lost a lot of money, but many haven’t felt the hit nearly as much as you might think.

How your fund rebuilds is another story and I hope you’re right and it builds back up nicely. On a side note, the older generation as a minimum have more certainty regarding their state pensions, which is something the younger generation do not, and this won’t have been helped by what is happening now.
 

rotherham_red

Full Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2005
Messages
7,411
You would hope that lessons will be learned but sadly we have heaps of examples of humanity failing to change its ways in the aftermath of disasters.

It goes without saying that personal hygiene should be a focus area, but that feels a little like shutting the barn door after the horse has bolted.

Surely the biggest issue is ensuring a punitive crackdown on wet markets where this sort of virus is widely accepted to have emanated from?
Why stop there? Factory farming in America has just as many egregious practices, which likely led to the H1N1 epidemic in 2009. They didn't learn their lessons and neither will the CCP.

What needs to happen is a fundamental rethink on the current political and socio-economic system. When we let the market dictate and decide on the allocation of resources we see shit like this occurring. It's no coincidence that the last 30-40 years have been amongst the most financially turbulent outside of wartime.

Something has to change, unfortunately there are too many vested interests which preclude such a change from occurring.
 

Hugh Jass

Shave Dass
Joined
Apr 16, 2016
Messages
11,314
It will be probably the quickest vaccine in history if we manage to get one ready for mass use in 18 months. Most vaccines take 6-9 years to develop. We could be looking at 2-3 years realistically though hoping for much less than that of course but 18 months is likely best case scenario.

What we really need right now are some breakthroughs in effective treatments - the vaccine will come eventually but it's on down the line.

This. If we could find some drugs that could treat those who are actually infected, that could tide us over until the vaccine.

Just read in the independent that Ireland expects restrictions until the vaccine is found. That is going to impact the economic system hugely.
 

BootsyCollins

Full Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2012
Messages
4,287
Location
Under the roof, above the clouds
It will be probably the quickest vaccine in history if we manage to get one ready for mass use in 18 months. Most vaccines take 6-9 years to develop. We could be looking at 2-3 years realistically though hoping for much less than that of course but 18 months is likely best case scenario.

What we really need right now are some breakthroughs in effective treatments - the vaccine will come eventually but it's on down the line.
This.
 

Arruda

Love is in the air, everywhere I look around
Joined
Apr 8, 2009
Messages
12,584
Location
Azores
Supports
Porto
Is there a cruise ship itinerary review like we can find for airplanes? Marella Explorer is currently heading for France, after passing close to Azores with already 3 deaths on board and hundreds of infected.

When has this cruiseship originally left port? I presume they left from Europe, were denied anchoring in the US, and had to turn back. But when the feck did they originally started the trip? How long have they been at sea? Or have they been "abandoned" in the sea for over a month?

Someone help me understand this. I found a site called "cruise mapper" which shows its position and planned future trips, but I would like to know it's recent itinerary.
 

Sarni

nice guy, unassuming, objective United fan.
Joined
Jan 21, 2004
Messages
57,903
Location
Krakow
Sounds about right. It's what I expect from most of Europe, the UK of course being behind the curve a bit due to the dilly-dallying bullshit.

How does 'obligatory wearing of masks' work in restaurants and bars, though? And the workplace, where conversations are necessary (lectures as well). Just a thought.
Probably going to make tables far apart and you will have to wear them when you are not eating, or something. You can speak with a mask on though it obviously sounds a bit silly.
 

balaks

Full Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2014
Messages
15,335
Location
Northern Ireland
Supports
Tottenham Hotspur
This. If we could find some drugs that could treat those who are actually infected, that could tide us over until the vaccine.

Just read in the independent that Ireland expects restrictions until the vaccine is found. That is going to impact the economic system hugely.
It will be likely most other countries will be doing the same thing unless something dramatic changes. This is going to go on in one way or another for over a year at least which is a very depressing thought.
 

Sarni

nice guy, unassuming, objective United fan.
Joined
Jan 21, 2004
Messages
57,903
Location
Krakow
2+ years. Where did that come from. Hell, why not 30?

Most predictions seem to be that it will be 12-18 months until a vaccine is approved and some are claiming as early as September, with potential mass distribution near the end of the year. 2+ I never heard before.

Also, is a partial lockdown that long economically viable?
2 years sounds right. Vaccine will probably get approved within 12-18 months indeed but distribution among population will take months, and they will have to slowly see if that works and there are no mutations at that point that could overcome it to be 100% confident. Simply no country can allow the curve to get very high.

I don't know if it's economically viable but there's no other choice. Having millions of people die is not a solution either. There are thousands of jobs that will not exist for those 2 years though so it's certainly very difficult but it's not like we are presented with a choice here. There's absolutely no way in hell that you can allow people back into stadiums and concerts and not have a massive outbreak again.
 

Garethw

scored 25-30 goals a season as a right footed RW
Joined
Feb 7, 2005
Messages
17,028
Location
England:
So how long do we think the UK lockdown will get extended by? Anything less than 4 weeks is surely too soon?
 

One Night Only

Prison Bitch #24604
Joined
Oct 16, 2009
Messages
30,862
Location
Westworld
So how long do we think the UK lockdown will get extended by? Anything less than 4 weeks is surely too soon?
Yeah 4 weeks I reckon, then we can see what happens to those countries lifting their lockdowns in those 4 weeks and make an informed decision then.
 

balaks

Full Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2014
Messages
15,335
Location
Northern Ireland
Supports
Tottenham Hotspur
So how long do we think the UK lockdown will get extended by? Anything less than 4 weeks is surely too soon?
I'm not expecting any changes until June at the earliest and even then likely to be minor loosening of things (kids going back to school most likely). There will likely not be a total return to normal life for probably 2-3 years unless we get a vaccine sorted before then. I'm pessimistic on this because I don't see a way out of this right now.
 

Ekkie Thump

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2013
Messages
3,893
Supports
Leeds United
6k more deaths than usual in the week ending 3rd April, only 3,475 linked to covid-19: ONS dataset

Looks like quite a few covid-19 deaths are going unreported and that dealing with covid is lessening the quality and availability of care provision elsewhere. Also seems like this latter factor could more than counterbalance the number of deaths from covid who would have died anyway.
 
Last edited:

Ludens the Red

Full Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2009
Messages
17,507
Location
London
Experts in Poland saying now that we can semi-open in two weeks but it'd be only for select services and shops with additional restrictions. Bars and restaurants with limited capacity maybe in the Summer. Travel/movement restrictions, ban of mass gatherings including sports events and concerts and obligatory wearing of masks likely to remain for 2+ years until vaccine is found and proven to be efficient.
2 years sounds right. Vaccine will probably get approved within 12-18 months indeed but distribution among population will take months, and they will have to slowly see if that works and there are no mutations at that point that could overcome it to be 100% confident. Simply no country can allow the curve to get very high.

I don't know if it's economically viable but there's no other choice. Having millions of people die is not a solution either. There are thousands of jobs that will not exist for those 2 years though so it's certainly very difficult but it's not like we are presented with a choice here. There's absolutely no way in hell that you can allow people back into stadiums and concerts and not have a massive outbreak again.
Mega lolz. I swear you’ve literally repeated the exact same posts about 200 times now.
 

RobinLFC

Cries when Liverpool doesn't get praised
Joined
May 20, 2014
Messages
20,941
Location
Belgium
Supports
Liverpool
So how long do we think the UK lockdown will get extended by? Anything less than 4 weeks is surely too soon?
France extended until 11 May yesterday, Belgium will extend until 3 May tomorrow, probably with possibility to extend further until mid-May.

You shouldn't be hopeful for anything before mid-May, realistically.
 

711

Verified Bird Expert
Scout
Joined
Dec 10, 2007
Messages
24,296
Location
Don't sign old players and cast offs
And how would their position have been affected more so than younger pension savers?
I replied to you because you seemed to believe older people were all wealthy and living off good pensions, which is far from the truth.

You've now introduced a new question and my answer is that a great many people of all ages will be affected by a lengthy depression. If you must insist on bringing age into it then the difference is the over 50s will have less time to do anything about it. It's common for those in their 30s and 40s to struggle to raise a family and have nothing left over, but look upon their final decade of work as the time to save and prepare for their own retirement, and it's looking as though for many that won't happen.
 

Sarni

nice guy, unassuming, objective United fan.
Joined
Jan 21, 2004
Messages
57,903
Location
Krakow
Mega lolz. I swear you’ve literally repeated the exact same posts about 200 times now.
Health minister literally said this today so it's not just my view now. You think it's unrealistic to have no mass gatherings for 2 years?

We are actually opening up pretty early but our curve has not got that high. We locked down when we were at like 10 cases per day I think so we did not allow it to spread too much. Our total death count is a third of daily deaths in UK in recent days.
 
Last edited:

Sarni

nice guy, unassuming, objective United fan.
Joined
Jan 21, 2004
Messages
57,903
Location
Krakow
The 'people do not develop antibodies' is a bit misleading. One of Chinese studies showed 6% of people did not develop them. Antibodies are not needed in everyone to prevent disease from spreading, even if 80% of patients develop antibodies and are immune it's good enough to slow it down very significantly. Also I don't think it's going to matter for vaccine, and vaccine will be there long before we can achieve 'herd immunity' from getting everybody sick. Even if you allowed 50,000 people to get sick every day in UK it'd take you almost 3 years to get 'herd immunity' and you obviously can't allow 50k to get sick every day.
 

Lentwood

Full Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2015
Messages
6,864
Location
West Didsbury, Manchester
The “lockdown” phase is surely just stalling for time whilst we measure how deadly the disease it, how easily it’s transmitted, how long it takes to recover etc...as well as doing the necessary to help bolster defences.

The question is, what do we do next? Because it seems to be commonly accepted that there will be no widely available vaccine for at least one year, if not two. I also think we all accept that we can’t operate under lockdown conditions for a prolonged period of time.