Philosophically speaking aren't all quotes old once they've been written.old quote? the official site posted it 4 hours ago
https://www.manutd.com/en/news/deta...w-with-club-media-before-aston-villa-friendly
Philosophically speaking aren't all quotes old once they've been written.old quote? the official site posted it 4 hours ago
https://www.manutd.com/en/news/deta...w-with-club-media-before-aston-villa-friendly
Rojo/Romero/Lingard/Mata only have a year left on their deals. Their wages shouldn’t be that much of an issue. I’d hope Jones’ contract is very much incentive based based on appearances but who knows with us!I like them. The guy on from the Athletic has good ties with Ole. He even explained why we cant sell our fringe players (mentioned Jones specifically) because of their wages. What fecking bad management of our club. We can all name the players who should be kicked out. Jones, Rojo, Lingard, Perriera, Mata.
City, yes. But what world class players did Liverpool sign? None of their signings screamed top class when they bought them.
Doesn't really mean anything - it's talking without saying anything.
Philosophically speaking aren't all quotes old once they've been written.
He's talked like that all summer though. Can't get badly quoted later if you don't promise or state things in the media.doesn't mean anything in terms of what could still happen, but that door is now wide open to "well we couldn't get value in the market"
No manager in the world is going to go out on a limb and say “we’re going to sign that guy”. Disaster waiting to happen.He's talked like that all summer though. Can't get badly quoted later if you don't promise or state things in the media.
Maybe Ole has been told it's looking unlikely so he's playing it down but even with Fernandes he did the same.
Yep, the press would destroy him if he promises 2-3 transfers by the end of the window and he got nothing.No manager in the world is going to go out on a limb and say “we’re going to sign that guy”. Disaster waiting to happen.
You’re just asking Dortmund to turn around and say feck off by talking up the possibility of anything happening.
His troubles sleeping will make our mattress sponsor's marketing team very happy!
Sadly there is that underlying feeling that the groundwork is being prepared for statements of this ilk.No value in the market FC coming back.
Doesn't really mean anything - it's talking without saying anything.
If United don't bid £108 million this summer, would you agree that nobody will bid £108 million next summer either.
The real question is how much could Dortmund get next summer and would that bid plus 1 extra season with Sancho make it more profitable for them than selling this summer.
It’s a transfer that will only happen this summer if United overpay imo.
The signing of Sancho is more about increasing the quality and depth of the squad. Take any of the three you mentioned away and we are fecked. 3 players cannot play a whole season. Signing Sancho allows rotation without taking such a drop in qualityHypothetical...say we dont sign Sancho and Greenwood absolutely shines and becomes irreplaceable.
Do we still go after Sancho next year and if yes do we play him at right wing or do we look at him as a replacement for Rashford on the left wing? Or we just decide to move Greenwood in the middle and sell Martial?
Asking because I feel while both Rashford and Martial are good players, Greenwood will be a real superstar and a tier above both.
So if this is the scenario what happens next year? Do we just decide..you know what, maybe we dont even need Sancho? Actually see this scenario as very likely.
For me I keep all 4. Play any three on a given day depending upon situation and sub the one who isn't being effective. From what I see all 4 are capable of playing any position across front line.Hypothetical...say we dont sign Sancho and Greenwood absolutely shines and becomes irreplaceable.
Do we still go after Sancho next year and if yes do we play him at right wing or do we look at him as a replacement for Rashford on the left wing? Or we just decide to move Greenwood in the middle and sell Martial?
Asking because I feel while both Rashford and Martial are good players, Greenwood will be a real superstar and a tier above both.
So if this is the scenario what happens next year? Do we just decide..you know what, maybe we dont even need Sancho? Actually see this scenario as very likely.
We look elsewhere to spend the money, find a backup for Mason. If Mason tears it apart next year and fans still call for Sancho then its down to stubborness imo. You couldn't keep them happy. Fans point to Citys depth but theyve lost Sane and Sancho himself ffs. Bernardo will kick up a fuss soon imo.Hypothetical...say we dont sign Sancho and Greenwood absolutely shines and becomes irreplaceable.
Do we still go after Sancho next year and if yes do we play him at right wing or do we look at him as a replacement for Rashford on the left wing? Or we just decide to move Greenwood in the middle and sell Martial?
Asking because I feel while both Rashford and Martial are good players, Greenwood will be a real superstar and a tier above both.
So if this is the scenario what happens next year? Do we just decide..you know what, maybe we dont even need Sancho? Actually see this scenario as very likely.
The signing of Sancho is more about increasing the quality and depth of the squad. Take any of the three you mentioned away and we are fecked. 3 players cannot play a whole season. Signing Sancho allows rotation without taking such a drop in quality
If he has a good season and with COVID under control he will probably be sold for 160m next year.If United don't bid £108 million this summer, would you agree that nobody will bid £108 million next summer either.
The real question is how much could Dortmund get next summer and would that bid plus 1 extra season with Sancho make it more profitable for them than selling this summer.
It’s a transfer that will only happen this summer if United overpay imo.
The signing of Sancho is more about increasing the quality and depth of the squad. Take any of the three you mentioned away and we are fecked. 3 players cannot play a whole season. Signing Sancho allows rotation without taking such a drop in quality
It will. Monday it isPage 1000 will be Sancho Day
Who you calling Soo?Soo.. this is still not on then?
The thing is when you have 4 players of that quality they all want to start, they are not interested in being rotation players. It just doesnt work like that. No team can have absolute top level players and start them off the bench. Thats what the likes of David Brooks are for.
If we do sign Sancho eventually one of them would need to go.
If he has a good season and with COVID under control he will probably be sold for 160m next year.
Wayne Rooney.Who you calling Soo?
Couldnt disagree with you anymore. It's about how those players are managed and keeping them happy. SAF had no issues when we had Cole Yorke Sheringham and Ole competing for 2 place.The thing is when you have 4 players of that quality they all want to start, they are not interested in being rotation players. It just doesnt work like that. No team can have absolute top level players and start them off the bench. Thats what the likes of David Brooks are for.
If we do sign Sancho eventually one of them would need to go.
That's ridiculous. 4 first team players for 3 spots? That's just standard at this level. It's not a first 11. It's a first 16. Injury, form, fitness, many competitions, it's not even about being a rotation player. The others are back up because they are not good enough. Here these 4 will play 40-45 each with important games in that. Rashford could have used starting off the bench for a spell last season but we didn't have a good enough player to actually bench him.
Of course, he won't say yeah we're definitely buying Sancho, 100 percent mate.doesn't mean anything in terms of what could still happen, but that door is now wide open to "well we couldn't get value in the market"
Who would win in a fight ‘ one megathread with 1,000 pages, we really should have 1,000 threads with 1 page.’?Threads are also old the moment they're posted, too! So, rather than having one megathread with 1,000 pages, we really should have 1,000 threads with 1 page.
There is no such thing as first 16 when talking about elite level players. They all want to start and play in every big match.That's ridiculous. 4 first team players for 3 spots? That's just standard at this level. It's not a first 11. It's a first 16. Injury, form, fitness, many competitions, none of them have to be a rotation player. The others are back up because they are not good enough. Here these 4 will play 40-45 games each with important games in that. Rashford could have used starting off the bench for a spell last season but we didn't have a good enough player to actually bench him.
All of the players mentioned are better than Ole. I agree with @HowYouDoin . Greenwood, Martial, Rashford, and Sancho are all young, will expect to be starters, and play in important matches. This isn't FIFA or FM. You can't amass a team of young star players and expect them to be fine jostling for playing time. Eventually one of them will want to leave.Couldnt disagree with you anymore. It's about how those players are managed and keeping them happy. SAF had no issues when we had Cole Yorke Sheringham and Ole competing for 2 place.