g = window.googletag || {}; googletag.cmd = googletag.cmd || []; window.googletag = googletag; googletag.cmd.push(function() { var interstitialSlot = googletag.defineOutOfPageSlot('/17085479/redcafe_gam_interstitial', googletag.enums.OutOfPageFormat.INTERSTITIAL); if (interstitialSlot) { interstitialSlot.addService(googletag.pubads()); } });

Jadon Sancho| Staying at Dortmund for now

Status
Not open for further replies.

Mickeza

still gets no respect
Joined
Aug 21, 2012
Messages
14,121
Location
Deepthroating information to Howard Nurse.
I like them. The guy on from the Athletic has good ties with Ole. He even explained why we cant sell our fringe players (mentioned Jones specifically) because of their wages. What fecking bad management of our club. We can all name the players who should be kicked out. Jones, Rojo, Lingard, Perriera, Mata.
Rojo/Romero/Lingard/Mata only have a year left on their deals. Their wages shouldn’t be that much of an issue. I’d hope Jones’ contract is very much incentive based based on appearances but who knows with us!

I don’t think crowds will be back fully by January so that transfer window may be far more active than normal. I’m coming round to the idea we get rid of Pereira, Lingard, Rojo, smalling, Romero and Dalot this summer and only add Sancho to DVB. Net spend of around 70m and maybe wait until January where I do think there’ll be some proper bargains as the COVID impact starts to really hit. Ighalo’s wages will be gone then too. We may be able to get the 3/4 additional to challenge we need and spend nothing in the summer. It would also give everyone a chance to settle in before a title charge in 21/22 in front of packed stadiums!
 

Adam-Utd

Part of first caf team to complete Destiny raid
Joined
Sep 10, 2010
Messages
39,954
doesn't mean anything in terms of what could still happen, but that door is now wide open to "well we couldn't get value in the market"
He's talked like that all summer though. Can't get badly quoted later if you don't promise or state things in the media.

Maybe Ole has been told it's looking unlikely so he's playing it down but even with Fernandes he did the same.
 

crossy1686

career ending
Joined
Jun 5, 2010
Messages
31,955
Location
Manchester/Stockholm
He's talked like that all summer though. Can't get badly quoted later if you don't promise or state things in the media.

Maybe Ole has been told it's looking unlikely so he's playing it down but even with Fernandes he did the same.
No manager in the world is going to go out on a limb and say “we’re going to sign that guy”. Disaster waiting to happen.

You’re just asking Dortmund to turn around and say feck off by talking up the possibility of anything happening.
 

Adam-Utd

Part of first caf team to complete Destiny raid
Joined
Sep 10, 2010
Messages
39,954
No manager in the world is going to go out on a limb and say “we’re going to sign that guy”. Disaster waiting to happen.

You’re just asking Dortmund to turn around and say feck off by talking up the possibility of anything happening.
Yep, the press would destroy him if he promises 2-3 transfers by the end of the window and he got nothing.

I hope for his sake Woodward/Judge know what they're doing and can give him the extra players we need - but i'm not feeling so confident right now.
 

RuudTom83

Full Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2013
Messages
5,638
Location
Manc
If United don't bid £108 million this summer, would you agree that nobody will bid £108 million next summer either.

The real question is how much could Dortmund get next summer and would that bid plus 1 extra season with Sancho make it more profitable for them than selling this summer.

It’s a transfer that will only happen this summer if United overpay imo.
 

HowYouDoin

New Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2019
Messages
1,020
Hypothetical...say we dont sign Sancho and Greenwood absolutely shines and becomes irreplaceable.
Do we still go after Sancho next year and if yes do we play him at right wing or do we look at him as a replacement for Rashford on the left wing? Or we just decide to move Greenwood in the middle and sell Martial?
Asking because I feel while both Rashford and Martial are good players, Greenwood will be a real superstar and a tier above both.

So if this is the scenario what happens next year? Do we just decide..you know what, maybe we dont even need Sancho? Actually see this scenario as very likely.
 

lysglimt

Full Member
Scout
Joined
Jun 1, 2008
Messages
15,366
So we have some persons on twitter complaining that Chelsea can afford to spend £200+ million and we can't...ah yeah, let's compare Chelsea to other clubs - that seems clever

Then we have some persons claiming that if Newcastle can sign 2 players in 3 days - so should we. And yes - if we wanted a Jeff Hedrick - I am sure we could sign 2 players in 3 days as well :)

Oh the intelligence of football fans.
 

GaryLifo

Liverpool's Secret Weapon.
Joined
Feb 26, 2001
Messages
10,845
Location
From here to there
If United don't bid £108 million this summer, would you agree that nobody will bid £108 million next summer either.

The real question is how much could Dortmund get next summer and would that bid plus 1 extra season with Sancho make it more profitable for them than selling this summer.

It’s a transfer that will only happen this summer if United overpay imo.
I think they are happy to have him one more season and then look for a bidding war next summer. Even if they don't get the bidding war they'll still get £90 million for him with 2 years still on his contract IMO.
 

red4ever 79

New Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2015
Messages
9,530
Location
Czech Republic
Hypothetical...say we dont sign Sancho and Greenwood absolutely shines and becomes irreplaceable.
Do we still go after Sancho next year and if yes do we play him at right wing or do we look at him as a replacement for Rashford on the left wing? Or we just decide to move Greenwood in the middle and sell Martial?
Asking because I feel while both Rashford and Martial are good players, Greenwood will be a real superstar and a tier above both.

So if this is the scenario what happens next year? Do we just decide..you know what, maybe we dont even need Sancho? Actually see this scenario as very likely.
The signing of Sancho is more about increasing the quality and depth of the squad. Take any of the three you mentioned away and we are fecked. 3 players cannot play a whole season. Signing Sancho allows rotation without taking such a drop in quality
 

Kapil Srivastav

New Member
Newbie
Joined
May 3, 2018
Messages
14
Hypothetical...say we dont sign Sancho and Greenwood absolutely shines and becomes irreplaceable.
Do we still go after Sancho next year and if yes do we play him at right wing or do we look at him as a replacement for Rashford on the left wing? Or we just decide to move Greenwood in the middle and sell Martial?
Asking because I feel while both Rashford and Martial are good players, Greenwood will be a real superstar and a tier above both.

So if this is the scenario what happens next year? Do we just decide..you know what, maybe we dont even need Sancho? Actually see this scenario as very likely.
For me I keep all 4. Play any three on a given day depending upon situation and sub the one who isn't being effective. From what I see all 4 are capable of playing any position across front line.
 

cyberman

Full Member
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
37,331
Hypothetical...say we dont sign Sancho and Greenwood absolutely shines and becomes irreplaceable.
Do we still go after Sancho next year and if yes do we play him at right wing or do we look at him as a replacement for Rashford on the left wing? Or we just decide to move Greenwood in the middle and sell Martial?
Asking because I feel while both Rashford and Martial are good players, Greenwood will be a real superstar and a tier above both.

So if this is the scenario what happens next year? Do we just decide..you know what, maybe we dont even need Sancho? Actually see this scenario as very likely.
We look elsewhere to spend the money, find a backup for Mason. If Mason tears it apart next year and fans still call for Sancho then its down to stubborness imo. You couldn't keep them happy. Fans point to Citys depth but theyve lost Sane and Sancho himself ffs. Bernardo will kick up a fuss soon imo.
Imagine having 108m and spending it on a star who plays in Masons position after that, ignoring LB, CB etc. It would be ridiculous.
 

HowYouDoin

New Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2019
Messages
1,020
The signing of Sancho is more about increasing the quality and depth of the squad. Take any of the three you mentioned away and we are fecked. 3 players cannot play a whole season. Signing Sancho allows rotation without taking such a drop in quality
The thing is when you have 4 players of that quality they all want to start, they are not interested in being rotation players. It just doesnt work like that. No team can have absolute top level players and start them off the bench. Thats what the likes of David Brooks are for.
If we do sign Sancho eventually one of them would need to go.
 

UnofficialDevil

Anti Scottish and Preoccupied with Donkeys.
Joined
Aug 5, 2006
Messages
19,096
Location
I'm not anti Scottish, I just wanted Moyes out.
If United don't bid £108 million this summer, would you agree that nobody will bid £108 million next summer either.

The real question is how much could Dortmund get next summer and would that bid plus 1 extra season with Sancho make it more profitable for them than selling this summer.

It’s a transfer that will only happen this summer if United overpay imo.
If he has a good season and with COVID under control he will probably be sold for 160m next year.
 

Garethw

scored 25-30 goals a season as a right footed RW
Joined
Feb 7, 2005
Messages
17,032
Location
England:
The signing of Sancho is more about increasing the quality and depth of the squad. Take any of the three you mentioned away and we are fecked. 3 players cannot play a whole season. Signing Sancho allows rotation without taking such a drop in quality
Exactly. Imagine if Martial gets another long lay off, or Rashford’s back problem flares up again. We are totally screwed. The replacements that will come in are barely PL standard.
 

Garethw

scored 25-30 goals a season as a right footed RW
Joined
Feb 7, 2005
Messages
17,032
Location
England:
Just pay the fecking money you tight bunch of ginger goblins!
 

Redlyn

Full Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2011
Messages
3,683
The thing is when you have 4 players of that quality they all want to start, they are not interested in being rotation players. It just doesnt work like that. No team can have absolute top level players and start them off the bench. Thats what the likes of David Brooks are for.
If we do sign Sancho eventually one of them would need to go.
That's ridiculous. 4 first team players for 3 spots? That's just standard at this level. It's not a first 11. It's a first 16. Injury, form, fitness, many competitions, none of them have to be a rotation player. The others are back up because they are not good enough. Here these 4 will play 40-45 games each with important games in that. Rashford could have used starting off the bench for a spell last season but we didn't have a good enough player to actually bench him.
 
Last edited:

red4ever 79

New Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2015
Messages
9,530
Location
Czech Republic
The thing is when you have 4 players of that quality they all want to start, they are not interested in being rotation players. It just doesnt work like that. No team can have absolute top level players and start them off the bench. Thats what the likes of David Brooks are for.
If we do sign Sancho eventually one of them would need to go.
Couldnt disagree with you anymore. It's about how those players are managed and keeping them happy. SAF had no issues when we had Cole Yorke Sheringham and Ole competing for 2 place.
 
Joined
May 22, 2017
Messages
13,122
That's ridiculous. 4 first team players for 3 spots? That's just standard at this level. It's not a first 11. It's a first 16. Injury, form, fitness, many competitions, it's not even about being a rotation player. The others are back up because they are not good enough. Here these 4 will play 40-45 each with important games in that. Rashford could have used starting off the bench for a spell last season but we didn't have a good enough player to actually bench him.
Yes no issue at all. Would be very easy to keep those 4 players happy.

Rashford had a great season, it could have done with someone else to stand in for him after lockdown as he clearly wasn’t fit. Martial was injured for months, and Greenwood is only 18 and won’t be/ shouldn’t be playing every game at his age.
 

macheda14

Full Member
Joined
May 22, 2009
Messages
4,656
Location
London
Threads are also old the moment they're posted, too! So, rather than having one megathread with 1,000 pages, we really should have 1,000 threads with 1 page.
Who would win in a fight ‘ one megathread with 1,000 pages, we really should have 1,000 threads with 1 page.’?
 

MackRobinson

New Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2017
Messages
5,134
Location
Terminal D
Supports
Football
That's ridiculous. 4 first team players for 3 spots? That's just standard at this level. It's not a first 11. It's a first 16. Injury, form, fitness, many competitions, none of them have to be a rotation player. The others are back up because they are not good enough. Here these 4 will play 40-45 games each with important games in that. Rashford could have used starting off the bench for a spell last season but we didn't have a good enough player to actually bench him.
There is no such thing as first 16 when talking about elite level players. They all want to start and play in every big match.

Couldnt disagree with you anymore. It's about how those players are managed and keeping them happy. SAF had no issues when we had Cole Yorke Sheringham and Ole competing for 2 place.
All of the players mentioned are better than Ole. I agree with @HowYouDoin . Greenwood, Martial, Rashford, and Sancho are all young, will expect to be starters, and play in important matches. This isn't FIFA or FM. You can't amass a team of young star players and expect them to be fine jostling for playing time. Eventually one of them will want to leave.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.