Why should Arteta be compare with them ?
If you think Manutd have a good team because they spent money and got a good team.
Arsenal - Saka, WIllock, Nketiah all coming through like United with youngsters
Spending
17/18 - £137m
18/19 - £72m
19/20 - £144m
20/21 - £77m
Don't forget Big contracts to Ozil, Aubemayang. Partey, Willian are both over 200k a week.
Manutd
17/18 - £178m
18/19 - £74m
19/20 - £200m
19/20 - £70m
Arsenal have an attacking line worth up to £180m, United's attack is £80m
Firstly on the bolded part, let's please avoid any cherry picking. It'd be like me saying United's defence is worth triple (likely more) Arsenal's because Maguire + Shaw + AWB + Lindelof makes for some heavy spending but only two of them are actually Ole's signings. This isn't conducive to anything so I'd appreciate if we just discuss players actually signed by the managers in question and if we're comparing, we just compare the whole team not sections of it.
The reason he shouldn't be compared to Ole is because our squad overall is better and his signings are paltry compared to Ole and Lampard. Also don't bring big contracts into this when arguing
against United - if there's one thing that's for sure it's that you'll find some huge contracts in our first team (Cavani, Pogba, DDG, Maguire, Rashford, Martial and then our biggest issue is we overpay our squad players as well like Lingard who is on 100k p/w according to the BBC and never plays). I guarantee you, if you want to use that as a factor, that it does not favour Ole. FYI I think it's pointless but you brought it up.
Arteta has signed: Partey, Gabriel, Mari and Runarsson & picked up Willian and Soares on a free. £77m on transfers.
Ole has signed: Maguire, AWB, James, Bruno, Telles, VdB, Diallo, Pellestri, Igahlo (loan) and Cavani (free) for £300m+
Hence why it's much fairer to compare Ole to Lampard who has signed a similar amount of players and spent about £260m & they've both had ample time to get their tactics into place.