Frank Lampard | Former Chelsea manager

Hugh Jass

Shave Dass
Joined
Apr 16, 2016
Messages
11,303
Always saddens me to see someone out themselves as a Daily Mail reader.
Sarcasm: the last refuge of modest and chaste-souled people when the privacy of their soul is coarsely and intrusively invaded.
 

youmeletsfly

New Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2018
Messages
2,528
One of my mates said that Frankie picked the same consecutive midfield setup only in 3 out of 35 or so games. Don't know if that is true, but it's crazy as feck if it is.
 

DWelbz19

Correctly predicted Portugal to win Euro 2016
Joined
Oct 31, 2012
Messages
34,060
Don’t think he’ll figure out his best side in time. Think his biggest issue is he has quite a lot of ‘good players’ who all want to play in similar positions — mostly midfield and attack. Got to find the balance between fielding a side that is of the best general player quality and who actually should be starting for cohesion and on merit.
 

TheReligion

Abusive
Joined
Nov 22, 2006
Messages
51,465
Location
Manchester
What is all the nonsense about figuring out his best side? Surely if he can't do that they should sack him anyway. Kind of an important thing to be able to do when you're the club manager.

His back 5 picks itself now. Kante plays, Mount, Pulisic, Ziyech.

If Frank can't decide on the other 2 players then he needs firing into the sun. Feck me
 

thatsme

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Dec 5, 2020
Messages
185
I'm not interested in that. I am talking about him lasting the season.

And not to be rude but you've been here for a few weeks. I don't trust you to pay out!
We're all just names on a screen, no matter how long we've been here. So why trust any one?

Anyway,. For what my opinion is worth, i don't think Lampard should be sacked. As with Arteta, he needs more time. This time next season would be a better indication to see if they're seriously improving their teams. I would add Ole as well, but it already looks like he's improving his team.

in my opinion the person who really needs to go is Jody Morris. The build up play is far too slow, resulting in you always facing a packed penalty area. Without a player with the talent to unlock a defence with a killer pass all you have left is to pass it wide and get a cross in. Pretty hopeless tactics for a wannabe top four team.
Villa look a well balanced, well coached side, so you could a lot worse than bring Terry back from Villa.
 

Withnail

Full Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2019
Messages
30,247
Location
The Arena of the Unwell
What is all the nonsense about figuring out his best side? Surely if he can't do that they should sack him anyway. Kind of an important thing to be able to do when you're the club manager.

His back 5 picks itself now. Kante plays, Mount, Pulisic, Ziyech.

If Frank can't decide on the other 2 players then he needs firing into the sun. Feck me
This season is more about rotation anyway. Best side goes out the window when you're playing 10 games in 30 days.

With all the new additions, he may well be still figuring out some player's best positions or which combinations work best.
 

Chief123

Full Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2013
Messages
12,787
Werner is on a bad run of form for sure but we're not even halfway through the season yet. Too early to write anyone off.

Anyone who thought bringing in 6 starters into the side would lead to a stable and settled side was off their head. I still think we'll get top 4.
But Werner is doing what he has always done. Been a very busy and energetic player with inconsistent output at the end of it.
 

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
95,789
Location
india
Lampard showed potential early on his Chelsea career as far as his approach - high press, quick short passing, transitions etc However there's plenty of upcoming managers who want to play that way and you have to actually be a really good manager too if you want to lead a club like Chelsea, and he's been a bit mediocre since the first half of last season. Spent an enormous amount in the summer and plenty of question marks over those additions too. Depth aside, I don't even feel they're better than us and I don't even rate us that highly as a unit.

Also the sentimental aspect regarding Lampard does surprise. Both from Chelsea fans and the media. At the end of the day he's at a big club with big expectations. This notion that he's a rookie manager who should be allowed to learn on the job is something I can't understand.
 

UNITED ACADEMY

New Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2018
Messages
13,127
Supports
Erik ten Hag
Lampard’s tactic is only put crosses as much as you can & if the attempt of crosses are cleared away or blocked then rely on corner kick.
 

WeePat

Full Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2015
Messages
17,412
Supports
Chelsea
Lampard’s tactic is only put crosses as much as you can & if the attempt of crosses are cleared away or blocked then rely on corner kick.
I don't know how or why we developed into this cross and inshallah team but it's kind of frustrating to watch. Without consulting stats, we were far more inventive and creative last season, even earlier this season. The last truly enjoyable performance was the Leeds game.
 

edcunited1878

Full Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2014
Messages
8,935
Location
San Diego, CA
If he persists with Jorginho and Kante in the same central midfield like today, then he's asking for trouble. There were a lot of moments where if there was any other central midfielder or 8 in the good positions Kante was popping up when Chelsea had the ball in their attacking 3rd, you'd feel like something could be created. When Havertz came on and Kante dropped into his best position, Havertz looked lost and was not getting into the same good attacking positions as Kante...which is strange and to me that comes down to coaching and expectations of players within a system/team. Havertz didn't look so lost or out of place when he was at Leverkusen (disregarding his output).
 

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
95,789
Location
india
I don't know how or why we developed into this cross and inshallah team but it's kind of frustrating to watch. Without consulting stats, we were far more inventive and creative last season, even earlier this season. The last truly enjoyable performance was the Leeds game.
I think you were excellent to watch in the 1st of last season. Lots of quick short snappy passing to drive you forwards. Maybe Lampard is trying too hard to emulate Livepool and the big teams of the 00s with the focus on Chilwell and James being the outlets ? I mean, Abraham is no Drogba with that kind of service nor do you have a Lampard from midfield feeding off the second balls.
 

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
95,789
Location
india
:lol:

and they were asking for Ole's head after the first game of the season.
They're a joke. Their recent headline "Chelsea didn't beat Villa but Lampard will take a draw". Why the feck is that?! Chelsea should be expected to be Aston Villa at home. Always. It's funny. I'm not even a fan of Jose but when he called his players out they questioned his sanity. When Lampard says his lads are lazy they're like "at some point the players have to be held accountable".

But then again, nobody can take that lot seriously and watch them for insight.
 

Gasolin

Full Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2007
Messages
6,107
Location
NYC
I think you were excellent to watch in the 1st of last season. Lots of quick short snappy passing to drive you forwards. Maybe Lampard is trying too hard to emulate Livepool and the big teams of the 00s with the focus on Chilwell and James being the outlets ? I mean, Abraham is no Drogba with that kind of service nor do you have a Lampard from midfield feeding off the second balls.
The only reason to rely on full backs for creativity and crosses/passes is if you have a creativity issue within your midfield. It's what United and Ole had to do when our midfield was not able to create. Notice how this is less of an issue now that Bruno is creating, and to a lesser extend, Pogba, Mata... notice also that still, the full backs attack for us, but not as much as Liverpool.

Why is Lampard doing this? Does he think he has an issue with creating throughout his midfield? That has to be his opinion, but it's a strange one then. They have plenty of players, sure some of them are injured, but still? I am certain he has a rationale and is sharing that with the players. But it's just difficult to comprehend.
 

UNITED ACADEMY

New Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2018
Messages
13,127
Supports
Erik ten Hag
The only reason to rely on full backs for creativity and crosses/passes is if you have a creativity issue within your midfield. It's what United and Ole had to do when our midfield was not able to create. Notice how this is less of an issue now that Bruno is creating, and to a lesser extend, Pogba, Mata... notice also that still, the full backs attack for us, but not as much as Liverpool.

Why is Lampard doing this? Does he think he has an issue with creating throughout his midfield? That has to be his opinion, but it's a strange one then. They have plenty of players, sure some of them are injured, but still? I am certain he has a rationale and is sharing that with the players. But it's just difficult to comprehend.
Exclude Ziyech who has been injured, Jorginho, Havertz, Kovacic & Mount. I don’t think it’s much of an issue there in term of option. Those four might not Bruno or Pogba but they have the ability to make passes to penetrate through line, and I remember watching Chelsea fans made compilation how many assists Jorginho could have under sari if it wasn’t because poor finishing issue and in those compilation lot of passes he created coming from the middle. And it’s not like Pulisic is crossing type of winger either.

In term of options, Lampard have much more variety in his squad compared to our squad. The difference is obviously the manager. One still hasn’t realised what’s the strength of his squad or may be he simply just clueless about it (who knows) while the other manager knows the strength and the weakness of his squad and choose to play on the strength to get the best out of the current team.
 

Acole9

Outstanding
Joined
Feb 17, 2013
Messages
12,507
Always comes across so bitter in post match interviews, I don't know whether he's using it as a distraction technique to take the heat off the team. They're always the better team.

I remember when we beat them 4-0 and he said they were the better team, you've just lost 4-0 how can you possibly say that.
 

WeePat

Full Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2015
Messages
17,412
Supports
Chelsea
I think you were excellent to watch in the 1st of last season. Lots of quick short snappy passing to drive you forwards. Maybe Lampard is trying too hard to emulate Livepool and the big teams of the 00s with the focus on Chilwell and James being the outlets ? I mean, Abraham is no Drogba with that kind of service nor do you have a Lampard from midfield feeding off the second balls.
We were fine earlier this season too, maybe someone more analytically inclined than me can explain it better, but creativity through the middle may have been the trade off Lampard made for defensive solidity. We started scoring goals again after the two scoreless draws, and seeing that put me at ease because the big talk around that time was 'can Lampard find the balance between parking the bus and the gung-ho attack' but just looking back through the goals we scored since then, maybe just a handful of them have not come from a set piece or a James, Chilwell, Ziyech cross - in fairness, some of those crosses have indeed been a result of creative play through the middle, including the goal vs Villa - but the general play tends to always gravitate to the wings and from there we either cross it or recycle possession towards the opposite wing.

Ziyech appears to be a big miss in general as he's great player but he is our most creative player and he's only started 4 league games.
 
Last edited:

duffer

Sensible and not a complete jerk like most oppo's
Scout
Joined
Jun 24, 2004
Messages
50,434
Location
Chelsea (the saviours of football) fan.
We're all just names on a screen, no matter how long we've been here. So why trust any one?

Anyway,. For what my opinion is worth, i don't think Lampard should be sacked. As with Arteta, he needs more time. This time next season would be a better indication to see if they're seriously improving their teams. I would add Ole as well, but it already looks like he's improving his team.

in my opinion the person who really needs to go is Jody Morris. The build up play is far too slow, resulting in you always facing a packed penalty area. Without a player with the talent to unlock a defence with a killer pass all you have left is to pass it wide and get a cross in. Pretty hopeless tactics for a wannabe top four team.
Villa look a well balanced, well coached side, so you could a lot worse than bring Terry back from Villa.

I've had bets with people on here before and been paid out. I've given my home address when we did a secret Santa (and sent things to other users homes). I wouldn't do it with someone who has been here for a few weeks.

And why does Morris get the sack but not any of the other coaches?
 

RedSky

Shepherd’s Delight
Scout
Joined
Jul 27, 2006
Messages
74,281
Location
Hereford FC (Soccermanager)
The inconsistent results cost him his job, lasted a little longer than I expected, surprised Roman didn't pull the trigger a little sooner! They'll have a much better end to the season though and will look much stronger next year when the new signings have had a proper 12 months to settle. Frank leaves Chelsea with a 49.12% win rate in the league and a 31.58% loss rate. Ouch. It was always going to be an incredibly hard job at Chelsea though.

Except for City and Liverpool who’s really going to make Chelsea Look bad? They’ll have a better team next season and the teams competing with them for top 4 will be just as inconsistent for it to go unnoticed.
We'll finish comfortably above Chelsea next season imo.
I don’t they’ve improved there squad and we’ll probably just get Sancho. I don’t see how anything changes. Both teams have distinctive managerial flaws which will mean they will remain on a par.
That's because you're hatred of Ole clouds your judgement. It's cool, I can't wait to see you back track next season. :)
Hates a big word. I like Ole he seems like a nice guy. If I seen him I’d ask for a picture.

But as I was saying. I think Frank would have a decent enough squad to Survive a full season and I’ll repeat those clubs close to him won’t expose him enough to get the sack. So it’s up to Roman how much he wants the title back. Same goes for us.

No back tracking will be happening. Unless you believe we will get close to get back our title?
They're making too many changes to their first eleven for them to be competitive imo. They've also changed nothing currently to their defense which is clearly their biggest flaw. They'll have worse issues than we did at the start of this season and Lamps will be gone by Christmas. We on the other hand don't really have much improvement to do to our first eleven, Sancho possibly coming in to take the RW position but other than that it'll be mainly squad changes. We'll do far better this season in the league, not title chasing but personally think we'll finish comfortably 3rd and much closer to City/Liverpool. We won't be far behind City, as they need big changes themselves.
There not finished so I don’t see why you are so confident. They might not have money for their defence. But a duo of Werner Zyiach and Pulisic is a top 4 attack. If they add Havertz to that I don’t see where they have issues.

I believe they will change their keeper this window which will reduce some of their frailties. Especially if the keeper is composing. We will definitely be neck and neck. As for what excel in with a first eleven they will excel in being a better footballing side.
Football isn't played on paper, they're going to completely change their attack. That's going to take time to gel and while it does they're going to need to rely on a shite defense. They'll be better long term with these signings but whether Lampard can make it through the inconsistent results that will continue to occur for the next 3/4 months while the new signings settle is a different matter. My prediction is he won't be Manager on the 1st January, he'll be sacked by then.

We're going into the season with a settled first eleven. That gives us a huge advantage imo (same with Liverpool).
I think your basing this on hope rather than any actually logical reasoning. I mean for example. If we signed a RW; CDM, CB and. New Goal keeper for instance. Which improved those players they were replacing... I doubt you would be saying it’s not going to work because we will have too many players that need to gel.
But those players aren't the entire forward line are they? If we signed a totally new back four then clearly it would take time for the players to gel and settle. It took us 4 months for our defense to finally click and get regular clean sheets and that was with only two changes.

Players generally take 12-18 months to settle at new clubs. We lucked out massively with Bruno coming in and immediately sparking, that's very rare. This isn't FIFA where you buy a bunch of players and they transfer their club form over, these players are coming from different leagues, learning a new language, settling in a new city, moving their families etc. It's a massive deal, which is destructive for their work and home life.
I think your issue is in assuming we're signing a totally new back 4. At the very most we're going for a GK, LB, and one CB.
You seem to be missing my entire point...
HAH whoosh, that's gone right over my head! Good call! My apologies.

I think it's totally valid and correct to bring up whether an attacking unit will gel. Little point in speculating the outcome now but it's definitely something to keep an eye on.
 
Last edited:

dal

New Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2013
Messages
2,207
He got fourth last season, they should have given him until the end of the season at least.

Oh well it’s Roman so what do you expect.
 

Mainoldo

New Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2004
Messages
22,965
The inconsistent results cost him his job, lasted a little longer than I expected, surprised Roman didn't pull the trigger a little sooner! They'll have a much better end to the season though and will look much stronger next year when the new signings have had a proper 12 months to settle. Frank leaves Chelsea with a 49.12% win rate in the league and a 31.58% loss rate. Ouch. It was always going to be an incredibly hard job at Chelsea though.
:lol: Fair play. But only a manager the level of Lampard could make this not work.