TheGame
Full Member
They are already through.I can see england crashing out of the group stage now.
They are already through.I can see england crashing out of the group stage now.
Yeah, I don’t think going from not starting him to not starting him does much to help you out though.For good reasons, he's not been playing well for quite a while now and tehre are just too many better options.
No chance. No team with 4 points is being dumped out.I can see england crashing out of the group stage now.
Theyre already through basically, you aren't going to get knocked out with 4 points.I can see england crashing out of the group stage now.
On goal difference you can be.No chance. No team with 4 points is being dumped out.
What if three teams have 4 points ?Theyre already through basically, you aren't going to get knocked out with 4 points.
They can go through as best 3rd place team.On goal difference you can be.
3rd place teams can go through it have enough points.What if three teams have 4 points ?
Isn’t that almost impossible with four points now?I can see england crashing out of the group stage now.
He definitely told the full backs to be cautious. Shaw was far far deeper than he plays for United.I get that we just had a Pep/Tuchel CL final. So obviously their tactics are effective.
But why did James and Sterling simply refuse to go forwards? I just don't understand. The number of times James had space out on the right, like 10 yards in front of him, and he chose to stop, put his foot on it then look back to Rice...it's just modern football.
And Sterling was back to 'proper City Sterling': receive ball, quickly turn, take two steps forward, stop, wait for defender, play it backwards.
It's all so negative, and I can't work out why.
Only four of them. It isn't guaranteed3rd place teams can go through it have enough points.
Could always fluke it. I get your point but meeting Sweden is a far easier game for the next round and I'm not sure I fancy England to beat Portugal or Germany if they win this group by beating the Czech republic.I don't quite follow this logic.
We'd have to play a quality side in order to win the thing, so what difference does it make?
I didn't know that.3rd place teams can go through it have enough points.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
AbsolutelySouthgate should switch it up next game. Start Bellingham, Grealish, Sancho, and Trippier
Yes I know that’s why I said you have to have enough points.Only four of them. It isn't guaranteed
It’s absolutely stupid in my opinion.I didn't know that.
Croatia is playing Scotland so they can't finish below 3rd. And there won't be more than 4 teams on 4 points who finish 3rd.What if three teams have 4 points ?
Yeah. I'm guessing it is determined by goals difference after that, though.Yes I know that’s why I said you have to have enough points.
RooneyWe were poor against Croatia which was masked by the media wank-fest in classic England style.
The amount of attacking talent in this squad is the highest I can ever remember, and yet we’re absolutely terrible offensively. Southgate is so out of his depth here.
The double-DM disaster needs to end next game. One of Philipps or Rice, with two offensive #8’s is the way we need to go. Sterling has been really poor in both games, time for Sancho.
Unless they have a play-off or something. But how you can have play-off if 3 teams have the same points ? Seems like a rule favouring the big sides.It’s absolutely stupid in my opinion.
Why do I get the feeling Gareth could put any side out there and they'll still play this dour boring tripe.Southgate should switch it up next game. Start Bellingham, Grealish, Sancho, and Trippier
Current lot are all worth 100 million eachRooney
Owen
Lampard
Scholes
Beckham
Gerrard
Or
Gazza
Mcmanaman
Shearer
Sheringham
Fowler
Cole
Les Ferdinand
These sets of players were better, and had a better defence behind them. Let's stop over hyping these current players. They have achieved nothing yet.
Should have stuck to the same format as previously.Unless they have a play-off or something. But how you can have play-off if 3 teams have the same points ? Seems like a rule favouring the big sides.
I think the good old goal difference should be used.
True, but that first group of players may all be great names, but especially in finals, most of them were piss poor in an England jersey. ALso its too early to judge a lot of this side as they are so young....but you are right, havent achieved diddly for ENgland yet most of themRooney
Owen
Lampard
Scholes
Beckham
Gerrard
Or
Gazza
Mcmanaman
Shearer
Sheringham
Fowler
Cole
Les Ferdinand
These sets of players were better, and had a better defence behind them. Let's stop over hyping these current players. They have achieved nothing yet.
I agree and he also needs to consider dropping Kane who looks miles off the pace. Tonight’s performance could be a blessing in disguise of it makes him change his tactics and starting eleven, not going to hold my breath though.Southgate should switch it up next game. Start Bellingham, Grealish, Sancho, and Trippier
He’s annoyingly bang on.Ugh souness is unbearable
So croatia or scotland can also go through even if one of them wins and england loses its game.Croatia is playing Scotland so they can't finish below 3rd. And there won't be more than 4 teams on 4 points who finish 3rd.