Jadon Sancho | £72.9M fee agreed

Status
Not open for further replies.

Infra-red

Full Member
Joined
May 4, 2010
Messages
13,529
Location
left wing
Weren't many in here claiming that he must not fancy us because we haven't gotten this done in record time despite all evidence pointing to the contrary?
Player demands weren't a problem this summer or last, were they?

Problem last year was United thinking that Dortmund were bluffing regarding the fee and the deadline for any deal - they weren't. United don't seem to be making the same mistake this summer.
 

DWelbz19

Correctly predicted Portugal to win Euro 2016
Joined
Oct 31, 2012
Messages
34,234
Adrian Kajumba - who appears to have somewhat of a direct line to Sancho's team - made it clear last year that Sancho wants nothing but the move. Anyone claiming otherwise is very silly.
 

Pexbo

Winner of the 'I'm not reading that' medal.
Joined
Jun 2, 2009
Messages
68,926
Location
Brizzle
Supports
Big Days
Player demands weren't a problem this summer or last, were they?

Problem last year was United thinking that Dortmund were bluffing regarding the fee and the deadline for any deal - they weren't. United don't seem to be making the same mistake this summer.
No, the problem last year was that Dortmund valued him at a level that United felt it wasn’t event worth entering negotiations for. €120m in the middle of a pandemic.
 

choccy77

New Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2008
Messages
6,059
I'm still somewhat suspicious that no other club in the last 2 years has made any move for Sancho.

Given Uniteds track record of buying players, i hope this doesn't end up another expensive bust.
 

GaryLifo

Liverpool's Secret Weapon.
Joined
Feb 26, 2001
Messages
10,862
Location
From here to there
I'm still somewhat suspicious that no other club in the last 2 years has made any move for Sancho.

Given Uniteds track record of buying players, i hope this doesn't end up another expensive bust.
They probably have approached his agent informally and been told he wants to sign only for United, so thanks but no thanks.
 

Jaxa

Full Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2011
Messages
2,928
Location
Old Trafford
I'm still somewhat suspicious that no other club in the last 2 years has made any move for Sancho.

Given Uniteds track record of buying players, i hope this doesn't end up another expensive bust.
Or could be another Bruno ? No one was seriously linked to him bar us and that worked out alright
 

alexthelion

Full Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2019
Messages
3,660
we should be signing Grealish along with the Sancho deal. we need to make a statement of intent this summer.
Buy Grealish just like that? Villa or the player don't get a say in the matter, I suppose?

In that case, as we are deciding everything, are we setting the price as well? Or are we going to let Villa do so?

Some United supporters are so arrogant that they assume we can decide to buy a player and, bingo!, he's automatically ours.
 

sewey89

Incorrectly predicted the de Jong transfer 2022
Joined
Jun 15, 2011
Messages
10,685
Location
Chesterfield
Buy Grealish just like that? Villa or the player don't get a say in the matter, I suppose?

In that case, as we are deciding everything, are we setting the price as well? Or are we going to let Villa do so?

Some United supporters are so arrogant that they assume we can decide to buy a player and, bingo!, he's automatically ours.
Very odd take that.

You could say the same any time any fan says 'we should sign X'

What you rather they said? :lol: "We should approach Aston Villa with a view to signing Jack Grealish after we've completed discussions with Borussia Dortmund for their player, Jadon Sancho"
 

Widow

Full Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2020
Messages
7,239
Location
Can't spell Mkhitaryan
I do.

take the comment in the context of who the feck does he think he is ................
A journo doing journo thing...I don't know!

He is talking sense though, right?

He could have stayed at City and got next to no game time OR move to a team that constantly plays in the CL, plays attractive football and is known for being a stepping stone club.

Sancho has played this right for his career.
 

alexthelion

Full Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2019
Messages
3,660
Well it’s more about club tradition. 7 used to be a meaningful number given to the best and most iconic player of the club. It’s not a must, but would be great to have finally “pass the torch” to a worthy successor. It’s more of a symbolic thing which is meaningful to the club’s tradition, the good old days, golden era from the club history, back from Busby era (Best) to Fergie’s era (Robson, Cantona, Beckham, Ronaldo)
He can wait a year.

Best didn't alweays wear 7, Beckham wore different numbers before getting the 7.
 
Joined
May 22, 2017
Messages
13,122
Player demands weren't a problem this summer or last, were they?

Problem last year was United thinking that Dortmund were bluffing regarding the fee and the deadline for any deal - they weren't. United don't seem to be making the same mistake this summer.
United didn’t think Dortmund were ‘bluffing’, just didn’t want to pay the fee they wanted, so the transfer went nowhere.

we all know the ‘deadline’ meant nothing.
 

cyberman

Full Member
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
37,331
United didn’t think Dortmund were ‘bluffing’, just didn’t want to pay the fee they wanted, so the transfer went nowhere.

we all know the ‘deadline’ meant nothing.
Exactly. Saying we thought they were bluffing doesn't make sense if we never made an acceptable bid. It would only make sense if we bid what they wanted after the deadline. Other than that it really is we refused to pay 120m
 

Withnail

Full Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2019
Messages
30,857
Location
The Arena of the Unwell
A journo doing journo thing...I don't know!

He is talking sense though, right?

He could have stayed at City and got next to no game time OR move to a team that constantly plays in the CL, plays attractive football and is known for being a stepping stone club.

Sancho has played this right for his career.
I just took that Winter tweet as further confirmation that this one is in the bag.
 

shamans

Thinks you can get an STD from flirting.
Joined
Oct 25, 2010
Messages
18,226
Location
Constantly at the STD clinic.
Buy Grealish just like that? Villa or the player don't get a say in the matter, I suppose?

In that case, as we are deciding everything, are we setting the price as well? Or are we going to let Villa do so?

Some United supporters are so arrogant that they assume we can decide to buy a player and, bingo!, he's automatically ours.
"Respectfully, we should see if we get the permission to ask for Jack Grealish to come to United" would that be better?

I imagine how you'd react as fans sung fergie sign him up
 

Jordan_mufc

Full Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2016
Messages
471
Excuse my ignorance on this matter but hopefully someone can clear this up for me.

What's the point in submitting a bid that we know (or are pretty sure) is going to get rejected? Is it just to test the waters or is there another meaning for it?
 

Shark

@NotShark
Joined
Feb 1, 2012
Messages
26,634
Location
Ireland
Or could be another Bruno ? No one was seriously linked to him bar us and that worked out alright
Bruno is a shining example among many duds over the past seven years or so. Ole in fairness has more or less gotten transfers right in regards to us holding down a top four position. AWB and Maguire have been good, VDB and James have been crap but may improve next season. A season we definitely need to actually seriously challenge for the top honors and win a trophy or two so this summer is pretty vital.
 

alexthelion

Full Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2019
Messages
3,660
Very odd take that.

You could say the same any time any fan says 'we should sign X'

What you rather they said? :lol: "We should approach Aston Villa with a view to signing Jack Grealish after we've completed discussions with Borussia Dortmund for their player, Jadon Sancho"
No, it's the "we should buy Grealish as well" part, as if all it takes is us to say we want him and bingo!, here he comes, just like that.
 

Chesterlestreet

Man of the crowd
Joined
Oct 19, 2012
Messages
19,635
I'm still somewhat suspicious that no other club in the last 2 years has made any move for Sancho.
Valuation (the asking price is very high now - and was just silly a year ago) and - dare we think so - the player's own preferences. He apparently wanted to sign for United last summer - and still does.
 

cyberman

Full Member
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
37,331
Valuation (the asking price is very high now - and was just silly a year ago) and - dare we think so - the player's own preferences. He apparently wanted to sign for United last summer - and still does.
Apparently he wanted to sign for us after leaving City but they wouldn't sell to us.
 

Withnail

Full Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2019
Messages
30,857
Location
The Arena of the Unwell
Excuse my ignorance on this matter but hopefully someone can clear this up for me.

What's the point in submitting a bid that we know (or are pretty sure) is going to get rejected? Is it just to test the waters or is there another meaning for it?
Because it's a negotiation and you don't know it'll be rejected til you make the offer. Clubs say all sorts of things to get the best price and there's usually room for compromise.

Nobody just straight up pays the asking price because often the asking price is artificially high. You'd feel like a dope if you paid 100m only to find out they'd actually have accepted 90.
 

Judas

Open to offers
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
36,510
Location
Where the grass is greener.
No, it's the "we should buy Grealish as well" part, as if all it takes is us to say we want him and bingo!, here he comes, just like that.
If we put in a reasonable bid for Grealish, he'd come. If you believe the whispers we pretty much had a deal for him in place last year and then Villa stayed up.He's also always had affection for the club too. Again it looks like you're trying to take things a bit too literally, picking at peoples words, simply so you can get angry, which is a strange use of time.
 

FreddieTheReddie

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 23, 2019
Messages
385
Yes, that too - there's a long-ish history there of him fancying United (bless 'im).
I wonder why, though? United hasn’t been the best since he joined City, and he admitted in an interview that he was a Chelsea fan growing up, loved Lampard and Drogba. Not that I’m complaining, but I would like to know why he fancies United now.
 

Fortitude

TV/Monitor Expert
Scout
Joined
Jul 10, 2004
Messages
23,273
Location
Inside right
I'm still somewhat suspicious that no other club in the last 2 years has made any move for Sancho.

Given Uniteds track record of buying players, i hope this doesn't end up another expensive bust.
United have had a clear run at Sancho because of a perfect storm that may well change in 2022. First of all, the amount of clubs that can afford Sancho reduces the possibilities to less than five.

Secondly, you have to look at what those clubs have, or want to buy, and why they wouldn't be in for Sancho at the current time:

Real - want Mbappe. They are rumoured to be throwing their hat into the ring for Haaland, too. That's an outlay of over 300 million euros on two players. Plus, they're 'broke' so not going to take a punt on a costly player like Sancho.

Barca - Messi. They also are rumoured to be saving pennies for Neymar. Plus, they're 'broke' so won't be taking punts.

City - He left there for a reason. He and Pep don't get on and they're rumoured to be in for Grealish and Kane, which is an outlay of god knows how much once you add in their under the table supplementation.

Liverpool. Have Salah and Mane. Also cannot afford the outlay for Sancho without selling first.

Chelsea. Spent a gazillion on their forwards last summer and have other areas of the team to prioritise.

PSG. He isn't going there and they also aren't going to enter the market for an attacking flanker whilst having the best pairing in football currently.

Bayern. Would not match the monies needed to get him. Dortmund also less likely to sell to them, plus Sancho wants a return to England.

You can rule out Italy because he won't go there, and that's your lot.

Thirdly, supposedly, Sancho wants United. If that is indeed the case, other clubs will already know and have moved on.

Once you go beyond a certain level of player, the amount of viable clubs is always going to be thin and mostly reliant on a carousel of movement (one big signing setting the market off). We're in a fortunate position to be the only top club with an immediate need for a RWF fix, as the only other one have their eyes set on an even more expensive player.
 
Last edited:

Jordan_mufc

Full Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2016
Messages
471
Because it's a negotiation and you don't know it'll be rejected til you make the offer. Clubs say all sorts of things to get the best price and there's usually room for compromise.

Nobody just straight up pays the asking price because often the asking price is artificially high. You'd feel like a dope if you paid 100m only to find out they'd actually have accepted 90.
I see, I was always under the impression that prices were hashed out in negotiations before an official bid is launched. I.e. the bid is just a formality at that point.
 

bosnian_red

Worst scout to ever exist
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
58,316
Location
Canada
I'm still somewhat suspicious that no other club in the last 2 years has made any move for Sancho.

Given Uniteds track record of buying players, i hope this doesn't end up another expensive bust.
All the big clubs were interested in him. Barca, Madrid, PSG, Bayern were ruled out long ago due to him only wanting to return to England. Within England, City wasn't an option due to how he left (from either side), so you're left with United, Liverpool, Chelsea. He's a boyhood Chelsea supporter so of course they were an option, but United was in for him for years already. Liverpool would almost certainly go for him and were a genuine threat, had they sold Mane or Salah. They haven't sold either yet so they can't afford him and he wouldn't go there. Chelsea spent a good chunk on Havertz, Ziyech, Werner, Pulisic over the past 2 years in addition to having CHO, so likely just haven't prioritized wingers and need a striker more than anything. Sancho is better than each of those, but they have decent options in big quantity, and United has been after him for years so he probably just wanted United.
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
66,597
Location
France
He fancies United because he knows that he will look great in red, it's the best way to spite City, we have a talented young core of english players including players that he knows personally, United pay very well and despite many mistakes we have remained around the top of the league.

The only players that may not want to join United right now are the ones that are already in similar clubs, the ones that prefer an other country or super stars in their prime(late 20s). And even then I would guess that it's a small minority.
 
Last edited:

Volumiza

The alright "V", B-Boy cypher cat
Joined
Jul 13, 2018
Messages
13,699
Location
Somewhere in the middle
No, the problem last year was that Dortmund valued him at a level that United felt it wasn’t event worth entering negotiations for. €120m in the middle of a pandemic.
Were any other top clubs actually needing that position filled though? I think ours was the greatest need in that area.
 

Ali Dia

Full Member
Joined
May 10, 2013
Messages
14,475
Location
Souness's Super Sub/George Weahs Talented Cousin
United have had a clear run at Sancho because of a perfect storm that may well change in 2022. First of all, the amount of clubs that can afford Sancho reduces the possibilities to less than five.

Secondly, you have to look at what those clubs have, or want to buy, and why they wouldn't be in for Sancho at the current time:

Real - want Mbappe. They are rumoured to be throwing their hat into the ring for Haaland, too. That's an outlay of over 300 million euros on two players. Plus, they're 'broke' so not going to take a punt on a costly player like Sancho.

Barca - Messi. They also are rumoured to be saving pennies for Neymar. Plus, they're 'broke' so won't be taking punts.

City - He left there for a reason. He and Pep don't get on and they're rumoured to be in for Grealish and Kane, which is an outlay of god knows how much once you add in their under the table supplementation.

Liverpool. Have Salah and Mane. Also cannot afford the outlay for Sancho without selling first.

Chelsea. Spent a gazillion on their forwards last summer and have other areas of the team to prioritise.

PSG. He isn't going there and they also aren't going to enter the market for an attacking flanker whilst having the best pairing in football currently.

Bayern. Would not match the monies needed to get him. Dortmund also less likely to sell to them, plus Sancho wants a return to England.

You can rule out Italy because he won't go there, and that's your lot.

Thirdly, supposedly, Sancho wants United. If that is indeed the case, other clubs will already know and have moved on.

Once you go beyond a certain level of player, the amount of viable clubs is always going to be thin and mostly reliant on a carousel of movement (one big signing setting the market off). We're in a fortunate position to be the only top club with an immediate need for a RWF fix, as the only other one have their eyes set on an even more expensive player.
Good post. This and why he costs what he does should just be pinned to the top of the thread.
 

Volumiza

The alright "V", B-Boy cypher cat
Joined
Jul 13, 2018
Messages
13,699
Location
Somewhere in the middle
He fancies United because he knows that he will look great in red, it's the best way to spite City, we have a talented young core of english players including players that he knows personally, United pay very well and despite many mistakes we have remained around the top of the league.

The only players that may not want to join United right now are the ones that are already in a similar clubs, the ones that prefer an other country or super stars in their prime(late 20s). And even then I would guess that it's a small minority.
Correct. It amazes me that people on here don't think top players, or prospects, won't want to come here. Even without major silverware for a few years, we are still a desirable destination for top players.
 

lysglimt

Full Member
Scout
Joined
Jun 1, 2008
Messages
15,434
Who else wants to buy Sancho?

Real & Barca have no money, PSG & Chelsea have other priorities and there's no chance he's going back to City. Bayern don't need him so it appears its a one horse race as he's certainly not in the league of Kane, Haaland or Mbappe.
So just because no other clubs can afford to buy him - we should not pay Dortmunds asking price ? Dortmund don't need to sell him - they can easily sell him for £40-50 million even next year with 1 year left of his transfer. But if we tell Sancho 2 summers in a row - sorry, we couldn't afford to buy you - I can promise you, he wont sign for us next summer.
 

cyberman

Full Member
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
37,331
So just because no other clubs can afford to buy him - we should not pay Dortmunds asking price ? Dortmund don't need to sell him - they can easily sell him for £40-50 million even next year with 1 year left of his transfer. But if we tell Sancho 2 summers in a row - sorry, we couldn't afford to buy you - I can promise you, he wont sign for us next summer.
It has been 2 summer in a row.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.