Not at all & its incredibly reductive to assume this too.
Lindelof doesn't need to be an 'aggressive lump', nor am I expecting him to thrash into people - my favourite defender of all time is Rio, so I understand and appreciate a defender who isn't tackle first, but rather reads the game, and is clever with his positioning and selective with his interceptions.
Lindelof just isn't good enough - he gets bullied off the ball, doesn't have the pace to recover, doesn't have the aerial skills to challenge, his tackling is good to average depending on his starting position, there's nothing good enough about his game that is good enough to offset the bad things. People mention his ball skills and you'd assume he was pinging balls all over the park, and laying it on a plate for our attackers every match - he's nowhere close to that. He'll play one or two cute passes here and there when he's in acres of space, and I remember some good over the top balls in the latter half of the season too, that's about it.
Lindelof is a passive defender in every sense of the word imo, he needs to be next to someone who is more dominant, (I don't mean that to be 'aggressive' either) authoritative and has leadership skills because Lindelof doesn't have those characteristics - which is why him being 3rd choice suits him.