It's sell on clause. Ducker said release clause, poor guy.
Transfer Tweets - 2021/22 | Check the OP for blacklisted sources before posting
- Thread starter Damien
- Start date
- Status
I'm expecting that Tweet to be deleted soon, but it's still up for now.
Yeah same here, thought it would be deleted by now.I'm expecting that Tweet to be deleted soon, but it's still up for now.
Wtf is a 4-5% sell on clause! Atleast Woody should have negotiated a 10% clause
Probably thought he wouldnt be sold again for any stupid amount and wanted more cash insteadWtf is a 4-5% sell on clause! Atleast Woody should have negotiated a 10% clause
Give it to Phil Jones and send him on his way to Blackburn on a free
Yeah, even with Inter being a circus club he wouldnt have thought Lukaku would leave so soon. I dont think Lukaku wants to play in england again.Probably thought he wouldnt be sold again for any stupid amount and wanted more cash instead
Jacob Steinberg reports what Di Marzio reported + some more info:
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
- Inter want cash only
- Chelsea must submit an offer to satisfy Inter as Lukaku won't push for a sale.
- If Inter sell Lautaro Martínez, then Chelsea will have a much tougher time purchasing Lukaku.
- Chelsea outgoings
- [Irrelevant point] for Sale
- Tammy Abraham for sale
- Valued at 40 million Pounds by Chelsea
- Targeted by Arsenal, West Ham, and Aston Villa (growing interest)
- Grealish sale could help Villa in paying for Abraham.
- Hudson-Odoi is for sale, but the player isn't pushing to leave Chelsea.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Given how this has gone, it seems like Grealish isn't necessarily pushing for a move, so City have to offer a package that'd convince Villa to sell the player.
It would seem with all the chatter about Lukaku, this is going to happen.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
To be fair, there was lot of chatter about Haaland to Chelsea as well. That didn't happen. But I would love you lot to sign Lukaku. I feel he deserves another chance in the PL.
Still think Martinez goes which allows Inter to keep lukaku , question is who gets Martinez?
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Lukaku is a good striker, but so was Berbatov. While Berbatov had a lot more to his game than Lukaku, he was not that bad of a goalscorer either.
But if a competitor where to spend £100 mill + on a striker I really hope it will be Lukaku. Very limited, a good goalgetter (but a level below the best) and appears to struggle when it gets tough (there is also a lot of mileage on him).
Last edited:
Lukaku must be the only striker in world football who gets judged for scoring goals wherever he goes.
How many players can move clubs like he does and get goals for every single one of them, as well as consistently for his country, year in year out, independently of the quality of teammates.
It’s an extremely small number and he deserves far more credit that he gets.
How many players can move clubs like he does and get goals for every single one of them, as well as consistently for his country, year in year out, independently of the quality of teammates.
It’s an extremely small number and he deserves far more credit that he gets.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Plus more importantly we have a sell on percentage and they haven’t paid us yet !
5% and we’ve already spent / taken into account the money
Pogba is already pictured back in training and is obviously not joining "in next couple of days".
Last edited:
Have we?
UTD should've been in for him, I suspect despite it will be his first season in the EPL that he will end the season as widely regarded as Spurs best defender during the 21/22 season, time will tell.
I feel the same, but I can see why United spent a slightly smaller amount on bringing in Varane instead of Romero. Personally speaking, I'd rather we spent a few more million Euros to bring in Romero and reap the long-term benefits.
I still feel like Tammy Abraham is going to have a very good career in or around the top level. Might have to take a step down now but I think it'll be met with a step up again in a few years.
A bit like.. Lukaku, funny enough
A bit like.. Lukaku, funny enough
Looked like he was training by himself. Maybe he joins the group when they get back from Scotland?
Well they are 100% taken into account when the club calculates what they can spend on incomings. And usually clubs take a loan against it to get it immidiately or faster.
Yeah, his NT record is insane. He constantly has a chip on his shoulder and he’s really sensitive about criticism, but I agree. He’s one of the best strikers just below the elite tier but often he doesn’t get that respect.
How in the feck would that work?
He could go now for 120m and we'd get 5m ish or leave on a free in a few years and we'd get nothing
EDIT: Never mind I see you meant the money they owe us. Yes that's already put in the books.
Why are they up in Scotland?
If we had a pre-season friendly against a Scottish team, I could understand it but as we haven't I don't see the point in them going to Scotland.
It's just like the training camp we had a couple weeks ago. To replicate the feeling of being on tour.
Might be Arsenal. Would be a smarter choice than Ramsdale.
Yeah, it wouldn't surprise me if they are. Even Verweij has hinted at them given their prior interest.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
They said bigger club
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Yup, he's going to be one of the highest-paid players in the league.
feck me, we sold Lukaku on the cheap? Who’d have thunk it listening to this place.
- Status