The issue is when you're looking at the games of the top teams in the league vs midtable and relegation candidates, they're always going to look dominant by the stats.
Liverpool lost about 6 home games in a row last season, and if you go back and look at the stats for them games you'll see they dominate most of them in terms of possession and shots taken. Do you think they played well in any of them games?
You cannot convince me we played well against Southampton, Wolves and Villa this season for example. If you don't bother watching the games and just look at some of the basic stats then you'd have fans making the case that we dominated in all of them.
I hope you are not implying that I haven't watched the games? I've not missed a United PL game in more than two years. And I am not basing my argument on stats. It's just that sometimes they are clear enough that they clearly contradict some interpretations, and I'm consistent enough in the value I ascribe to them as a measure that I think they count for more than writing "I watched the game, and I thought we were the better team".
I was in any case writing about the Newcastle game, where the post I was responding to claimed we were pretty much lucky not to lose. By any reasonable definition we dominated that game, and it would have been a travesty if we didn't win it. In other words, I was taking issue with what I consider to be an over the top negative reading of our performance in that game. The trouble is, I think a lot of people generally mainly watch the United games, and base their expectations not on what they've seen from teams like Newcastle against other opponents, but on some idea they have of what teams like Newcastle ought to be able to do against teams like United. In reality, you won't see many Newcastle games where Almiron and St. Maximin don't generate a good few decent attacks, as they did against us, albeit more rarely than they do against most other opponents. They still don't often win, because even if they overload the box defensively they're not very good at keeping the goals out until the whistle blows, and they didn't on this occasion either. Why people see that as a failure of control is really beyond me. It's what you'd expect.
I don't think we played well against Southampton (although certainly well enough to deserve to win the game, and easily could have), certainly not against Wolves (where we clearly deserved to lose). Today wasn't great either, it just wasn't the absolute shitshow some here make it out to be - and we were better than Villa.
A rather key point though is that "did we play well?", "did we dominate the game?" and "were we the best team?" are not identical questions with the same answer. Far too many people who think we didn't play as well as we should talk as if that automatically mean we were the inferior team.