How did you come to the bolded conclusion, there is a lot of things that could affect that decision one of them being money since we just extended the manager and his staff?
And what makes you think that the board and SAF like to view it with a long term approach when the current manager was only an interim appointment and was extended for "only" 3 years based on short term results, if what you say is true Ole would have never been extended and they would have followed the announced long term plan of appointing a DOF and then appointing a head coach during Summer but we both know that it didn't happen that way.
And your last paragraph makes no sense in this context because nothing actually tells you how long Conte or ten Hag will last, I mentioned it earlier but someone like Simeone is now on a full decade at Atletico while having a very similar career to Conte before that, a manager longevity has more to do with relative success and the willingness of his club to accomodate him than it has to do with the manager itself, the same is true for ten Hag who didn't stay much in his previous jobs until Ajax. The second point about that paragraph is that you can't talk about the club having a long term view and put ten Hag in the equation because he is at the opposite end of Ole in terms of Football, if the club was to sack Ole then the long term appointment would be a manager that is a continuation of what Ole has done because the long term view starts in June 2019 not today and we need to make the best of that long term view that's why I said last week that in reality someone like Conte is probably the right appointment and if we want to change things the starting point should be after the current expensive core of this team is out or on the decline, we need to keep in mind that we invested a lot of money in the likes of De Gea, Varane, Maguire, Bruno and Ronaldo these investments aren't part of a rebuilt or a new long term plan, they were made for the present.
Well the short term obvious option for any club who have sacked their manager is Conte, that much is pretty obvious, he's the most established manager available. I thought that is pretty much self evident. Like you say he can easily make his system work with these players, as Ole showed against Spurs, so why haven't we gone for him already?
I'm not sure what your opinion is really, whether you think the board are short-term thinkers or long-term. You seem to be claiming they are short-term? I don't agree, at all.
Ole made them believe he was the right man for the job, the entire country were encouraging them to give him a full time contract and they did so after an excellent initial spell as caretaker. They've then done what they
want to do and back him, with a long term view that he will bring success in time. They've said pretty much this a number of times and have just given him a three year new deal, pretty obvious they are trying to play the long ball game with Ole.
Of course no appointment has a guaranteed shelf life, but the intention for it to be a long term appointment can and does effect the selection process. If we hired Conte tomorrow it would be viewed as a decision to gain quick results with a likely short term appointment.
If we hired Ten Haag tomorrow people would rightly expect a transition period with a view to seeing results in time, therefore a longer term approach. But the time it takes varies, there's no definitive.
I'd rather we transition to a different style so I'd rather Ten Haag to Conte. Because I prefer the formers style of football.