The vaccines | vaxxed boosted unvaxxed? New poll

How's your immunity looking? Had covid - vote twice - vax status and then again for infection status

  • Vaxxed but no booster

  • Boostered

  • Still waiting in queue for first vaccine dose

  • Won't get vaxxed (unless I have to for travel/work etc)

  • Past infection with covid + I've been vaccinated

  • Past infection with covid - I've not been vaccinated


Results are only viewable after voting.

11101

Full Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Messages
21,315
It'll almost certainly be something that put him on the GP database vulnerable list. Maybe a drug he was prescribed during treatment, or for maintenance or a vulnerability it left him with. The list gets updated as they get new data in, but it sometimes throws up anomalies as well.

In principle anyone considered to be immune-compromised could appear on this version of the vulnerable list - in which case they are treating it as a fourth dose. If he's not sure why he's there, he could check with his GP or his hospital care team if he's still getting regular checkups.
Yeah they have told him he's on their vulnerable list (dose 1 and 2 were not done by the GP), though there's nothing actually wrong with him, he was discharged years ago. I just didn't think they were giving the 4th dose to anybody yet.
 

jojojo

JoJoJoJoJoJoJo
Staff
Joined
Aug 18, 2007
Messages
38,299
Location
Welcome to Manchester reception committee
Yeah they have told him he's on their vulnerable list (dose 1 and 2 were not done by the GP), though there's nothing actually wrong with him, he was discharged years ago. I just didn't think they were giving the 4th dose to anybody yet.
That was a general policy statement from the JCVI - to say they didn't plan to follow the Israeli model and start a second round of boosters for all over 70s/carehome residents immediately.

They approved a fourth dose for some people before Christmas (they describe it as a three dose course followed by a booster in some of the documents):
https://www.bma.org.uk/advice-and-support/covid-19/vaccines/covid-19-vaccination-programme
Severely immunosuppressed individuals who have completed their primary course (three doses) should be offered a booster dose with a minimum of three months between the third primary and booster dose.

Those who have not yet received their third dose may be given the third dose now to be able to receive their further booster dose in three months. This is in line with the clinical advice on optimal timing.
 

McGrathsipan

Dawn’s less famous husband
Joined
Jun 25, 2009
Messages
24,700
Location
Dublin
In Ireland -

Census 2016 shows the population of the primary school age group (5-12) stood at 548,693, So you can tack on of few thousand more over the last 5 years I reckon - give or take.

The Health Service has said that as of yesterday, there were around 95,000 children aged 5-11 years registered for a Covid-19 vaccination.

So even if you say that there are 500k between 5 and 11 - less than 1/4 of them have been put forward by parents for a jab and its open for kids a good while now.

What do you think of that @Pogue Mahone
 

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
133,954
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
In Ireland -

Census 2016 shows the population of the primary school age group (5-12) stood at 548,693, So you can tack on of few thousand more over the last 5 years I reckon - give or take.

The Health Service has said that as of yesterday, there were around 95,000 children aged 5-11 years registered for a Covid-19 vaccination.

So even if you say that there are 500k between 5 and 11 - less than 1/4 of them have been put forward by parents for a jab and its open for kids a good while now.

What do you think of that @Pogue Mahone
I think it’s understandable. From the child’s perspective covid poses almost no threat at all. So I can understand why parents might not want to vaccinate their kids when there’s so little upside at an individual level.

I’m actually still on the fence about my own 10 year old. I vaccinated the 12 year old because he just started senior school and I didn’t want him having to sit out for two weeks if it could be avoided when he’s still settling in. Don’t really care if his wee sister misses some primary school, where she’s already very well settled. She’d probably be happy out!
 

2cents

Historiographer, and obtainer of rare antiquities
Scout
Joined
Mar 19, 2008
Messages
16,282
I’ve a six year-old daughter, no plans currently to have her vaccinated.
 

McGrathsipan

Dawn’s less famous husband
Joined
Jun 25, 2009
Messages
24,700
Location
Dublin
I think it’s understandable. From the child’s perspective covid poses almost no threat at all. So I can understand why parents might not want to vaccinate their kids when there’s so little upside at an individual level.

I’m actually still on the fence about my own 10 year old. I vaccinated the 12 year old because he just started senior school and I didn’t want him having to sit out for two weeks if it could be avoided when he’s still settling in. Don’t really care if his wee sister misses some primary school, where she’s already very well settled. She’d probably be happy out!
My lads are 9 and 6.
I've no plans to get them done.
 

stu_1992

Full Member
Joined
May 8, 2013
Messages
4,886
Location
Ireland
Got my booster dose of Pfizer on Saturday, had a pretty rough Sunday with a really bad headache and just generally feeling crap but was okay by the end of the night. However I can't seem to shift my fecking sore arm which didn't happen to me on the previous two. It's somehow sore on the inside of my bicep if I fully stretch out my arm, and also a little sore to touch too. On Monday it felt like it was in my armpit area, then yesterday further down my arm towards the inside of my elbow but now is just right in the middle of the bicep. Fecking annoying.
 

zing

Zingle balls
Joined
Oct 19, 2005
Messages
13,809
A colleagues family and extended family(I am from India) is refusing to get vaccinated because they say that cattle foetal cells are used in the manufacture of all vaccines. They’re the very religious type and the link to cows is what they’re against. He googled and found that this is true of covaxin, the indigenous vaccine here.

https://www.businesstoday.in/corona...making-covaxin-what-experts-298775-2021-06-15

@jojojo, @Wibble, @Brwned, @Pogue Mahone is there anything that is available online that shows this isn’t true for AstraZeneca or Sputnik? These are vulnerable people and it’d be nice if I could help convince them. I am googling but just posting here as you guys have good answers usually.
 

Edgio

Full Member
Joined
May 17, 2005
Messages
3,980
Location
Manchester
A colleagues family and extended family(I am from India) is refusing to get vaccinated because they say that cattle foetal cells are used in the manufacture of all vaccines. They’re the very religious type and the link to cows is what they’re against. He googled and found that this is true of covaxin, the indigenous vaccine here.

https://www.businesstoday.in/corona...making-covaxin-what-experts-298775-2021-06-15

@jojojo, @Wibble, @Brwned, @Pogue Mahone is there anything that is available online that shows this isn’t true for AstraZeneca or Sputnik? These are vulnerable people and it’d be nice if I could help convince them. I am googling but just posting here as you guys have good answers usually.
I think it is used in the production but there are no traces left in the actual vaccine. Difficult one to argue that.
 

Wibble

In Gadus Speramus
Staff
Joined
Jun 15, 2000
Messages
89,039
Location
Centreback
A colleagues family and extended family(I am from India) is refusing to get vaccinated because they say that cattle foetal cells are used in the manufacture of all vaccines. They’re the very religious type and the link to cows is what they’re against. He googled and found that this is true of covaxin, the indigenous vaccine here.

https://www.businesstoday.in/corona...making-covaxin-what-experts-298775-2021-06-15

@jojojo, @Wibble, @Brwned, @Pogue Mahone is there anything that is available online that shows this isn’t true for AstraZeneca or Sputnik? These are vulnerable people and it’d be nice if I could help convince them. I am googling but just posting here as you guys have good answers usually.
I don't know for sure but the most common use of bovine cells is in the growth medium when microorganisms are involved but there is no bovine material in the vaccines themselves as far as I can tell. With mRNA vaccine it is less clear (to me) but the same is possible/likely as the custom DNA is replicated inside bacteria. I also seem to remember (but could be wrong) that fetal bovine serum was used in the research/development stage of mRNA vaccines. So no cells as FBS is the liquid remaining after cells and proteins are removed from fetal bovine blood.
 

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
133,954
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
A colleagues family and extended family(I am from India) is refusing to get vaccinated because they say that cattle foetal cells are used in the manufacture of all vaccines. They’re the very religious type and the link to cows is what they’re against. He googled and found that this is true of covaxin, the indigenous vaccine here.

https://www.businesstoday.in/corona...making-covaxin-what-experts-298775-2021-06-15

@jojojo, @Wibble, @Brwned, @Pogue Mahone is there anything that is available online that shows this isn’t true for AstraZeneca or Sputnik? These are vulnerable people and it’d be nice if I could help convince them. I am googling but just posting here as you guys have good answers usually.
I actually don’t know. I could google but you’ve obviously already done that! To get a definitive answer you could phone/email the pharma company (“contact us” on website) They all have Medical Information departments who deal with enquiries like this every day. They’ve probably been asked that exact question many times before.
 

Wibble

In Gadus Speramus
Staff
Joined
Jun 15, 2000
Messages
89,039
Location
Centreback
Amazed so many aren't getting their kids vaccinated. Kids may not have that much individual reward themselves but you get vaccinated to protect those who can't and for the benefit to society and the economy by reducing the overall spread. It will be interesting to see how many of our 5-11 year olds get the jab here as the uptake has been reasonably enthusiastic in the 12-15 ages group. 16+ is already North of 90% but the 20-29 year group are lagging with less than 87% vaccinated. 12-15s are climbing and are over 80% already.
 

Wibble

In Gadus Speramus
Staff
Joined
Jun 15, 2000
Messages
89,039
Location
Centreback
I actually don’t know. I could google but you’ve obviously already done that! To get a definitive answer you could phone/email the pharma company (“contact us” on website) They all have Medical Information departments who deal with enquiries like this every day. They’ve probably been asked that exact question many times before.
Good idea. With 1.2 billion Hindus in the world you would think they really should have an answer readily available.
 

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
133,954
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
Amazed so many aren't getting their kids vaccinated. Kids may not have that much individual reward themselves but you get vaccinated to protect those who can't and for the benefit to society and the economy by reducing the overall spread. It will be interesting to see how many of our 5-11 year olds get the jab here as the uptake has been reasonably enthusiastic in the 12-15 ages group. 16+ is already North of 90% but the 20-29 year group are lagging with less than 87% vaccinated. 12-15s are climbing and are over 80% already.
I can fully understand parents who would rather not vaccinate their U12s. We have a huge set of data to reassure us about safety in adults but the numbers aren’t anything like as big for kids and they’re physiologically very different. I’m not really worried about any nasty surprises but in the absence of any compelling upside for the kid getting the jab it’s far from an easy decision. Even at a societal level when we know how effectively vaccines have defanged omicron if enough adults get vaccinated there shouldn’t be any need for the youngest kids to follow suit. And that’s without even getting into the relatively low effectiveness vs transmission of omicron. Which weakens the notion of “taking one for the team”
 

Wibble

In Gadus Speramus
Staff
Joined
Jun 15, 2000
Messages
89,039
Location
Centreback
I can fully understand parents who would rather not vaccinate their U12s. We have a huge set of data to reassure us about safety in adults but the numbers aren’t anything like as big for kids and they’re physiologically very different. I’m not really worried about any nasty surprises but in the absence of any compelling upside for the kid getting the jab it’s far from an easy decision. Even at a societal level when we know how effectively vaccines have defanged omicron if enough adults get vaccinated there shouldn’t be any need for the youngest kids to follow suit. And that’s without even getting into the relatively low effectiveness vs transmission of omicron. Which weakens the notion of “taking one for the team”
I don't get it at all TBH. You get a benefit for your own kid and you also benefit the society you live in. But then I've always been a vaccine advocate and had my son vaccinated well beyond the normal kiddy regime. Omicron may evade vaccines in terms of infection to some degree but it isn't total or even close and protection will only get better when the mRNA vaccines are tweaked for Omicron (assuming we don't get another variant soon).
 

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
133,954
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
And I'm not sure the risk for kids of getting covid is insignificant in comparison to the miniscule risk of harm from the vaccine.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/...covid-far-outweigh-the-risks-of-myocarditis1/
The model’s main scenario was based on the incidence of COVID in the U.S. as of September 11, 2021, and assumed a vaccine efficacy of 70 percent against disease and 80 percent against hospitalization
Efficacy of two doses against catching omicron is nowhere near 70%. Could be less than half that.

Also need to consider the risk of myocarditis from covid in that article is pre-omicron. I’d like to see some data on omicron but there’s an excellent chance it’s significantly lower.
 

Wibble

In Gadus Speramus
Staff
Joined
Jun 15, 2000
Messages
89,039
Location
Centreback
Efficacy of two doses against catching omicron is nowhere near 70%. Could be less than half that.

Also need to consider the risk of myocarditis from covid in that article is pre-omicron. I’d like to see some data on omicron but there’s an excellent chance it’s significantly lower.
That would be interesting data and you would hope the covid related harms in general would be less, hopefully far less.

Wouldn't it be nice if we got to a state where extra shots to maintain antibodies weren't needed and memory cells were sufficient protection? Might take a while of course with much of the world still not sufficiently vaxxed. I think the "end" of this shit show may be when we realise that covid hasn't been discussed in everyday conversation for a whole week. I for one am totally over it all.
 

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
133,954
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
That would be interesting data and you would hope the covid related harms in general would be less, hopefully far less.

Wouldn't it be nice if we got to a state where extra shots to maintain antibodies weren't needed and memory cells were sufficient protection? Might take a while of course with much of the world still not sufficiently vaxxed. I think the "end" of this shit show may be when we realise that covid hasn't been discussed in everyday conversation for a whole week. I for one am totally over it all.
Yeah, it’s really hard to predict where we go from here with vaccines. I think annual jabs are inevitable for elderly and clinically vulnerable. Not sure if this will be the plan for younger adults (never mind kids) where I suspect we’ll end up relying on repeat infections to keep their immune response topped up.
 

Pexbo

Winner of the 'I'm not reading that' medal.
Joined
Jun 2, 2009
Messages
68,723
Location
Brizzle
Supports
Big Days

4th dose (second booster) not showing much benefit in Israel. Have to say I’m pleased. Seems a terrible waste of vaccines now omicron is dominant.
Yeah I feel like Omicron with two jabs and a booster is going to get us to a point where, and I hate to use this phrase, “it’s just a bad flu”.

It’s essential at this point that jabs are going into fresh arms around the world. Zero sum says that will save more lives long term than scraping the west up from 93% to 95% or whatever the difference is.
 

WPMUFC

Full Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2013
Messages
9,652
Location
Australia

4th dose (second booster) not showing much benefit in Israel. Have to say I’m pleased. Seems a terrible waste of vaccines now omicron is dominant.
It feels like such a "rich problem". Wondering if we should move to a 4th dose when low-income states are <10% first dose and thus critical areas for variant production. I think the science of understanding the effect of a 4th dose is noble, but sheesh we have to move quicker on vaccinating the world.

https://ourworldindata.org/covid-vaccinations
 

R'hllor

Full Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2013
Messages
15,417
Have a friend who decided to get a full set, he is missing Moderna and Sputnik, next week he is going for Chinese lul.
 

massi83

Full Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2009
Messages
2,596
It feels like such a "rich problem". Wondering if we should move to a 4th dose when low-income states are <10% first dose and thus critical areas for variant production. I think the science of understanding the effect of a 4th dose is noble, but sheesh we have to move quicker on vaccinating the world.

https://ourworldindata.org/covid-vaccinations
There's more than enough cases in the vaccinated countries for variant production. It has been a boring mantra, with little basis on reality, from WHO for a while. Also African countries are wasting 100s of millions of doses through their own incompetence and lack of demand.
 

jojojo

JoJoJoJoJoJoJo
Staff
Joined
Aug 18, 2007
Messages
38,299
Location
Welcome to Manchester reception committee

4th dose (second booster) not showing much benefit in Israel. Have to say I’m pleased. Seems a terrible waste of vaccines now omicron is dominant.
I'm pleased as well. Acknowledging the covid vaccines as a 3-shot seemed reasonable. Annual boosters (for those who need them or want them) seems inevitable. Things that encourage the idea that everyone keeps getting jabbed to topup circulating antibodies every few months just feel wrong.
 

Bosws87

Full Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2015
Messages
3,728

4th dose (second booster) not showing much benefit in Israel. Have to say I’m pleased. Seems a terrible waste of vaccines now omicron is dominant.
Who would of thought piling people with a vaccine that is avoided by the most dominant variant isn't very useful, didn't see that one coming.
 

AngeloHenriquez

Full Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2009
Messages
13,432
Location
Location Location
Supports
Stevenage

4th dose (second booster) not showing much benefit in Israel. Have to say I’m pleased. Seems a terrible waste of vaccines now omicron is dominant.
You have always struck me as a learned person and I haven't always replied when we have spoken in this thread due to the number of overwhelming replies but a question specifically for you, if you have had the virus (100%) both strains, your body builds an immunity based on antibodies. What is the point of that person getting the vaccine since the vaccine is essentially putting small amounts of the virus in your body to allow your body to create those antibodies (In a more controlled manner), is that correct? Keen to get your thoughts as I know some countries etc are starting to accept proof of having COVID in the past in lieu of a vaccination due to this. What am I missing or do you agree with that logic?
 

Bosws87

Full Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2015
Messages
3,728
You have always struck me as a learned person and I haven't always replied when we have spoken in this thread due to the number of overwhelming replies but a question specifically for you, if you have had the virus (100%) both strains, your body builds an immunity based on antibodies. What is the point of that person getting the vaccine since the vaccine is essentially putting small amounts of the virus in your body to allow your body to create those antibodies (In a more controlled manner), is that correct? Keen to get your thoughts as I know some countries etc are starting to accept proof of having COVID in the past in lieu of a vaccination due to this. What am I missing or do you agree with that logic?
The new vaccines aren't putting any virus into your body (MRNA ones) they are sending instructions to your cells to make a specific part of the original virus that attaches to human cells.

This is where all the scepticism and stupid gene therapy and altering your DNA crap came from.
 

AngeloHenriquez

Full Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2009
Messages
13,432
Location
Location Location
Supports
Stevenage
The new vaccines aren't putting any virus into your body (MRNA ones) they are sending instructions to your cells to make a specific part of the original virus that attaches to human cells.

This is where or the scepticism and stupid gene therapy and altering your DNA crap came from.
If they are sending instructions to your cells to make a specific part of the virus that attaches to our cells, is the point not that the body does the same thing and creates antibodies? Genuine question
 

syrian_scholes

Honorary Straw Hat
Joined
Jan 10, 2011
Messages
14,000
Location
Houston
You have always struck me as a learned person and I haven't always replied when we have spoken in this thread due to the number of overwhelming replies but a question specifically for you, if you have had the virus (100%) both strains, your body builds an immunity based on antibodies. What is the point of that person getting the vaccine since the vaccine is essentially putting small amounts of the virus in your body to allow your body to create those antibodies (In a more controlled manner), is that correct? Keen to get your thoughts as I know some countries etc are starting to accept proof of having COVID in the past in lieu of a vaccination due to this. What am I missing or do you agree with that logic?
It is not though.
 

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
133,954
Location
&quot;like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
You have always struck me as a learned person and I haven't always replied when we have spoken in this thread due to the number of overwhelming replies but a question specifically for you, if you have had the virus (100%) both strains, your body builds an immunity based on antibodies. What is the point of that person getting the vaccine since the vaccine is essentially putting small amounts of the virus in your body to allow your body to create those antibodies (In a more controlled manner), is that correct? Keen to get your thoughts as I know some countries etc are starting to accept proof of having COVID in the past in lieu of a vaccination due to this. What am I missing or do you agree with that logic?
If you’ve already had covid twice then yes, the additional protection from a vaccine is likely to be fairly minimal. I don’t think that applies to many people though. The best possible protection seems to come from catching covid once, followed by vaccination. Based on the data to hand anyway.

Goes without saying that choosing to boost your immunity by covid - when you could have the vaccine instead - would be a dumb decision for most people. Young kids being a probable exception.
 

AngeloHenriquez

Full Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2009
Messages
13,432
Location
Location Location
Supports
Stevenage
If you’ve already had covid twice then yes, the additional protection from a vaccine is likely to be fairly minimal. I don’t think that applies to many people though. The best possible protection seems to come from catching covid once, followed by vaccination. Based on the data to hand anyway.
Good response, thanks, I've only had it once (to my knowledge anyway) it was a hypothetical
 

Bosws87

Full Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2015
Messages
3,728
If they are sending instructions to your cells to make a specific part of the virus that attaches to our cells, is the point not that the body does the same thing and creates antibodies? Genuine question
Yes, in a perfect world you should be classed as just as well protected from recent infection or vaccination there should be no discrimination between the two for these covid passports.

Unfortunately its not guaranteed that you will be alive post natural infection or your quality of life would be the same as before infection. So it would be an issue morally going round telling people to catch the natural infection so they are trying to discourage this as much as possible.

You are correct in simple terms that post infection and vaccination should both be accepted if there was no politics at play.