The vaccines | vaxxed boosted unvaxxed? New poll

How's your immunity looking? Had covid - vote twice - vax status and then again for infection status

  • Vaxxed but no booster

  • Boostered

  • Still waiting in queue for first vaccine dose

  • Won't get vaxxed (unless I have to for travel/work etc)

  • Past infection with covid + I've been vaccinated

  • Past infection with covid - I've not been vaccinated


Results are only viewable after voting.

AngeloHenriquez

Full Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2009
Messages
13,405
Location
Location Location
Supports
Stevenage
Yes, in a perfect world you should be classed as just as well protected from recent infection or vaccination there should be no discrimination between the two for these covid passports.

Unfortunately its not guaranteed that you will be alive post natural infection or your quality of life would be the same as before infection. So it would be an issue morally going round telling people to catch the natural infection so they are trying to discourage this as much as possible.

You are correct in simple terms that post infection and vaccination should both be accepted if there was no politics at play.
Again as a disclaimer, I don't wish to catch the new strain, I've had the first and was quite badly hit from it, I've recovered fully but also understand a lot haven't, this was purely hypothetical and appreciate the answers guys, thank you
 

Bosws87

Full Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2015
Messages
3,709
Longer than that vs symptomatic illness. And still no evidence of waning vs sever illness/death.

Besides, booster did a great job of taking the edge off the delta wave. It could have got very nasty otherwise. Hopefully delta will be completely eradicated soon.
I saw the data about how many times difference in Switzerland the other day (might of even been you who posted it)

Is this just because of the relative time the booster was given and we will all go back to the same baseline rather then it improving anything in the long term, has enough time even passed to answer this question?

That would be my thoughts anyway it certainly had its place for the vulnerable in this part of the pandemic not so sure it was necessary population wide apart from trying to ease disruption to society.
 

Balljy

Full Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2016
Messages
3,303
There could be a valid reason to get a 4th shot when the Omicron specific vaccine is ready to protect against any future nasty variants that come from that. I believe Moderna are in phase III trials and Phizer are aiming for March.

I also saw that Moderna are aiming for a combined COVID-19, influenza and RSV vaccine ready for Autumn next year with each element specifically targeted at what is around at the time (similar to influenza now). I can't see any reason not to do that annually as long as it's not a crazy cost to buy.
 

jojojo

JoJoJoJoJoJoJo
Staff
Joined
Aug 18, 2007
Messages
38,145
Location
Welcome to Manchester reception committee
You have always struck me as a learned person and I haven't always replied when we have spoken in this thread due to the number of overwhelming replies but a question specifically for you, if you have had the virus (100%) both strains, your body builds an immunity based on antibodies. What is the point of that person getting the vaccine since the vaccine is essentially putting small amounts of the virus in your body to allow your body to create those antibodies (In a more controlled manner), is that correct? Keen to get your thoughts as I know some countries etc are starting to accept proof of having COVID in the past in lieu of a vaccination due to this. What am I missing or do you agree with that logic?
The trouble is that, it depends on how long ago you were infected, which variant and how powerful was your immune response at the time. We know that people with past infection + vaccination are better protected than those with vaccine alone or infection alone. Boosters also help both groups.

I've not seen data on a twice infected/no vaccine group as yet. In the UK at least they would be rarities, though I guess there are a lot more of them now - so maybe we'll know the answer next winter. That's always going to be an issue really, it's going to be hard to get evidence that's as up to date as the evidence we can get on the vaccinated.

 

Wibble

In Gadus Speramus
Staff
Joined
Jun 15, 2000
Messages
88,602
Location
Centreback
There could be a valid reason to get a 4th shot when the Omicron specific vaccine is ready to protect against any future nasty variants that come from that. I believe Moderna are in phase III trials and Phizer are aiming for March.

I also saw that Moderna are aiming for a combined COVID-19, influenza and RSV vaccine ready for Autumn next year with each element specifically targeted at what is around at the time (similar to influenza now). I can't see any reason not to do that annually as long as it's not a crazy cost to buy.
Further shots could be to either keep active antibodies going so we don't have to rely on the slightly delayed reaction of memory cells or because a new vaccine, tweaked for Omicron (or anther new dominant variant), becomes available.

The former will be likely imo until most of the world is hugely vaccinated and we enter some sort of endemic state. The later until new variants stop arising, which is also largely dependent on vaccinating the world.
 

Eyepopper

Lowering the tone since 2006
Joined
Sep 1, 2006
Messages
66,894
Boostered today after putting it off til we were back in work (get a half day off for it).

Briefed my boss there's a good chance I'll be sick tomorrow, having been sick after both previous doses and just worked through it.

He was fine with that, and told me, because I didn't take the half days for the first and second shots (was sick for 2 days after the second, but again, worked through it) my booster will be recorded as my first shot and I can take 2 more half days whenever suits.

Sweet!
 

RedDevilQuebecois

Full Member
Joined
May 27, 2021
Messages
7,787
Received my booster last Sunday. I'm also lucky that I haven't caught the virus so far despite one or two close calls.
 

Eyepopper

Lowering the tone since 2006
Joined
Sep 1, 2006
Messages
66,894
In other new, 8 hours after my booster, the arm is totally dead.... looks like I'll be one handed wanking tomorrow.
 

UnrelatedPsuedo

I pity the poor fool who stinks like I do!
Joined
Apr 15, 2015
Messages
10,047
Location
Blitztown
Last I read a few days ago the UK government was still against the fourth dose of the vaccine.

My father has just been contacted by his GP's office and booked in for a fourth jab. He had cancer a few years ago and although he wasnt on the vulnerable list for dose 1 and 2, he was early to get the 3rd jab.

So did the government change their mind? Is the GP getting paid per dose?
Anecdotal, but my best friend is a GP. He is not incentivised to vaccinate people (to a degree that would affect his judgement). And he HATES his job right now. I can’t see a world in which he’s happy to administer vaccines instead of treating patients.
 

UnrelatedPsuedo

I pity the poor fool who stinks like I do!
Joined
Apr 15, 2015
Messages
10,047
Location
Blitztown
There's more than enough cases in the vaccinated countries for variant production. It has been a boring mantra, with little basis on reality, from WHO for a while. Also African countries are wasting 100s of millions of doses through their own incompetence and lack of demand.
No. Happy to be proven wrong. But that’s very wrong I think. Thousands, yes. Hundreds of millions, no.
 

massi83

Full Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2009
Messages
2,595

UnrelatedPsuedo

I pity the poor fool who stinks like I do!
Joined
Apr 15, 2015
Messages
10,047
Location
Blitztown
https://sports.yahoo.com/more-100-million-covid-19-120339141.html

Maybe I can change plural 100.000.000 to singular, at most. You would still be 100-900x wrong. If you meant hundreds of thousands. If you meant thousands, as in 2-9k, you would be 11.111-50.000x wrong. That's actually impressive!
That link is evidence that the world is letting Africa down. Not that Africa is wasting vaccines. WE (the developed world) wasted those vaccines.

Anyway, yep. I meant thousands as in 1000 to 999,999. Not 9000 or less.
 

massi83

Full Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2009
Messages
2,595
That link is evidence that the world is letting Africa down. Not that Africa is wasting vaccines. WE (the developed world) wasted those vaccines.

Anyway, yep. I meant thousands as in 1000 to 999,999. Not 9000 or less.
If a country is so disorganised they can't get vaccines in arms in less than 3 weeks, it is only their own fault. The Kenyan guy is crying that 10 weeks is not enough :lol: But as you are more than 100x wrong in your numbers, I don't really care to waste more time on this with you.
 

UnrelatedPsuedo

I pity the poor fool who stinks like I do!
Joined
Apr 15, 2015
Messages
10,047
Location
Blitztown
If a country is so disorganised they can't get vaccines in arms in less than 3 weeks, it is only their own fault. The Kenyan guy is crying that 10 weeks is not enough :lol: But as you are more than 100x wrong in your numbers, I don't really care to waste more time on this with you.
1. Africa is not a country.
2. You’re wrong.
3. I clarified my numbers. I was right.

The so called developed world can’t just ship vaccines ad hoc and blame third world countries for not utilising them. You sound like you’ve never been there. Have you?
 

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
133,349
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
Are there any studies covering booster risk (myocarditis etc) vs Omicron severity in double-vaxxed males in their 30s? I.e. have we proven that the difference in protection between 2 and 3 doses is worth the risk of the 3rd dose, across all adult age groups? Not a loaded question - I'd taken it as a given until now, hadn't really thought about it.
The increase in “vaccine risk” between 2nd and 3rd dose is so trivial it’s not worth thinking about. Basically, if you’re one of the unlucky handful of people out of every million that has a serious adverse reaction to the vaccine then that would have already been uncovered after the first two doses.
 

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
133,349
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
That link is evidence that the world is letting Africa down. Not that Africa is wasting vaccines. WE (the developed world) wasted those vaccines.

Anyway, yep. I meant thousands as in 1000 to 999,999. Not 9000 or less.
You’re still wrong though. In that linked article they refer to 100 million doses rejected in December alone. By the end of 2021 the EU had made available 380 million doses, of which only 255 million had been accepted.

All of which means that if the EU decided to stop vaccinating its citizens tomorrow in order to follow the WHO’s request to “vaccinate the world” the main consequence would be an astronomical amount of vaccines ending up in landfill.

There’s a discussion to be had about what more can be done to help developing countries with the infrastructure needed to better vaccinate their citizens but it’s obvious that vaccine supply is not the rate limiting step here.
 

RobinLFC

Cries when Liverpool doesn't get praised
Joined
May 20, 2014
Messages
20,806
Location
Belgium
Supports
Liverpool
The increase in “vaccine risk” between 2nd and 3rd dose is so trivial it’s not worth thinking about. Basically, if you’re one of the unlucky handful of people out of every million that has a serious adverse reaction to the vaccine then that would have already been uncovered after the first two doses.
Also if you get a different booster? People around here who had been Pfizer vaxxed, myself included, got a Moderna booster.

Apart from that I'd also assume that the risk of omicron is still much higher than the risk of a vaccine, even if omicron is somewhat "mild" for a lot of people.
 

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
133,349
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
Also if you get a different booster? People around here who had been Pfizer vaxxed, myself included, got a Moderna booster.

Apart from that I'd also assume that the risk of omicron is still much higher than the risk of a vaccine, even if omicron is somewhat "mild" for a lot of people.
If it’s an either/or decision between vaccine or catching covid then it’s a no brainer. The relative risk of a bad outcome isn’t even in the same ballpark. When community spread is very low that changes things up a bit (because there’s a good chance you will never be exposed to covid) but we’re nowhere near that stage at the moment.
 

RK

Full Member
Joined
May 23, 2008
Messages
16,102
Location
Attacking Midfield
The increase in “vaccine risk” between 2nd and 3rd dose is so trivial it’s not worth thinking about. Basically, if you’re one of the unlucky handful of people out of every million that has a serious adverse reaction to the vaccine then that would have already been uncovered after the first two doses.
I got AZ for my first two. Next will be one of the mRNA ones, not sure which my clinic has.
 

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
133,349
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
I got AZ for my first two. Next will be one of the mRNA ones, not sure which my clinic has.
So there’s a slightly different risk profile between those classes of vaccines but there is overlap. So if you didn’t have any bother with the first two you’d have to be extraordinarily unlucky for something to go wrong with the next one. Plus AZ protection seems to wane quite dramatically but the combination of AZ with and mRNA booster seems to give excellent protection. Basically, you should get boosted!
 

11101

Full Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Messages
21,203
That link is evidence that the world is letting Africa down. Not that Africa is wasting vaccines. WE (the developed world) wasted those vaccines.

Anyway, yep. I meant thousands as in 1000 to 999,999. Not 9000 or less.
This is the key quote in that article:

Increased supply caught many recipients unprepared.
It is the responsibility of Covax to get vaccines to the poorer nations which is now happening. When vaccines arrived in Europe they were being used within days. If African nations cant organise to do the same in months, that's not the world's fault.
 

UnrelatedPsuedo

I pity the poor fool who stinks like I do!
Joined
Apr 15, 2015
Messages
10,047
Location
Blitztown
You’re still wrong though. In that linked article they refer to 100 million doses rejected in December alone. By the end of 2021 the EU had made available 380 million doses, of which only 255 million had been accepted.

All of which means that if the EU decided to stop vaccinating its citizens tomorrow in order to follow the WHO’s request to “vaccinate the world” the main consequence would be an astronomical amount of vaccines ending up in landfill.

There’s a discussion to be had about what more can be done to help developing countries with the infrastructure needed to better vaccinate their citizens but it’s obvious that vaccine supply is not the rate limiting step here.
I’m not. African countries are rejecting the vaccines. Not pissing them away.

The ‘developed’ and apparently civilised world is sending vaccines with short shelf life’s, at short notice, to some of the poorest nations on earth.

We treat Africa with such disregard. “They need vaccines, here’s 100m of them” That’s a sound approach if they’re going to Kinshasa or Addis Ababa, but chucking product at a continent where 4 in every 5 people have no internet connection isn’t helpful.

We should be sending structured Aid, supply chain assistance and vaccines with the longest shelf life’s, not the shortest. The truth obviously exists somewhere between Massis over the top number and my massive undersell. I just take exception to these generalisations about Africa. Probably too sensitive.
 

UnrelatedPsuedo

I pity the poor fool who stinks like I do!
Joined
Apr 15, 2015
Messages
10,047
Location
Blitztown
If African nations cant organise to do the same in months, that's not the world's fault.
Respectfully…. Yes it Fcuking is. Many African cities are every bit as developed as London or Paris. But it’s a whopping great big land mass and we’re giving some of the poorest nations on earth, shorter time frames than we work to. It’s madness.

If I remember correctly, only 25% of African women have access to contraception, but 50% want access to it. Various disease outbreaks have had decades long education programs attached to them. But Covid? We send surplus vaccines with short shelf lives. What the feck are we doing? We are failing. It IS our problem.

Again, probably being a little sensitive and puritanical, but there we go.
 

11101

Full Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Messages
21,203
Respectfully…. Yes it Fcuking is. Many African cities are every bit as developed as London or Paris. But it’s a whopping great big land mass and we’re giving some of the poorest nations on earth, shorter time frames than we work to. It’s madness.

If I remember correctly, only 25% of African women have access to contraception, but 50% want access to it. Various disease outbreaks have had decades long education programs attached to them. But Covid? We send surplus vaccines with short shelf lives. What the feck are we doing? We are failing. It IS our problem.

Again, probably being a little sensitive and puritanical, but there we go.
It's the responsibility of the respective governments in those countries to effectively distribute the vaccines to their population, just as it was the governments of Europe and America. If they have the vaccines and are not doing that, you can't point the finger anywhere else. They've had a year to prepare for this yet they're being caught by surprise at the sudden volume increase. 10 weeks is over 2 months. It's more than enough time to use them. When vaccines first arrived here they were literally going in people's arms the day after they were trucked in.
 

jojojo

JoJoJoJoJoJoJo
Staff
Joined
Aug 18, 2007
Messages
38,145
Location
Welcome to Manchester reception committee
I’m not. African countries are rejecting the vaccines. Not pissing them away.

The ‘developed’ and apparently civilised world is sending vaccines with short shelf life’s, at short notice, to some of the poorest nations on earth.

We treat Africa with such disregard. “They need vaccines, here’s 100m of them” That’s a sound approach if they’re going to Kinshasa or Addis Ababa, but chucking product at a continent where 4 in every 5 people have no internet connection isn’t helpful.

We should be sending structured Aid, supply chain assistance and vaccines with the longest shelf life’s, not the shortest. The truth obviously exists somewhere between Massis over the top number and my massive undersell. I just take exception to these generalisations about Africa. Probably too sensitive.
Yep, a lot of short shelf life stuff arriving at short notice and without any logistical support. Plus, we're now so far down the track that most people will have had (or think they've had) covid and motivation levels will be low. Supplies that would have snapped up 6 months ago will seem less important (to individuals and to government healthcare providers) in places where delta and now omicron have raced through the community.

In vaccine rich countries it's easy to see the advantages of vaccines, even in people with past infection, and for people with minimal known risk factors - and even so, not everyone is convinced. In a country that hasn't seen the vaccine impact, people get used to the idea that they can fend for themselves, a kind of "hasn't killed me yet" resignation.

The switch in the US and Europe to more or less mRNA only vaccine strategies probably leaves a mark as well. Logistically easier (and cheaper!) vaccines like AZ, or the inactivated virus ones like Covaxin/Bharat or the Chinese brands can get labelled as second rate options - which is no help to anyone.
 

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
133,349
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
Respectfully…. Yes it Fcuking is. Many African cities are every bit as developed as London or Paris. But it’s a whopping great big land mass and we’re giving some of the poorest nations on earth, shorter time frames than we work to. It’s madness.

If I remember correctly, only 25% of African women have access to contraception, but 50% want access to it. Various disease outbreaks have had decades long education programs attached to them. But Covid? We send surplus vaccines with short shelf lives. What the feck are we doing? We are failing. It IS our problem.

Again, probably being a little sensitive and puritanical, but there we go.
That’s the point though, isn’t it?

Getting vaccines into arms in Africa means fixing systemic problems that have persisted for decades despite aid programs pumping vast sums of money into the continent. The nature of this pandemic means you’ve got months to try and sort out those chronic problems.

Translating aid into tangible benefits is a complex and politically sensitive task, as I’m sure you know. You can’t just send in a foreign army to march all over the continent and sort shit out.

Maybe there are some quick fixes? There are people much better qualified than me to have an opinion about that. Whatever, it’s obvious that the first and most urgent problem is finding a way for Africa to make better use of the vaccines already allocated. So whenever the WHO (or assorted Twitter whingers) get outraged about booster programs and say “those doses should be going to Africa instead!” it’s fair to say they’re missing the point.
 

decorativeed

Full Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2009
Messages
12,328
Location
Tameside
A colleagues family and extended family(I am from India) is refusing to get vaccinated because they say that cattle foetal cells are used in the manufacture of all vaccines. They’re the very religious type and the link to cows is what they’re against. He googled and found that this is true of covaxin, the indigenous vaccine here.

https://www.businesstoday.in/corona...making-covaxin-what-experts-298775-2021-06-15

@jojojo, @Wibble, @Brwned, @Pogue Mahone is there anything that is available online that shows this isn’t true for AstraZeneca or Sputnik? These are vulnerable people and it’d be nice if I could help convince them. I am googling but just posting here as you guys have good answers usually.
I've seen a very similar rumour is spread by antivax groups targeting different faiths. So Hindus are told that the vaccine contains cow foetus cells, Muslims are told it contains pig foetus cells and Christians are being told it contains human foetus cells. I'd be very surprised if any of this were true.
 

roseguy64

Full Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2010
Messages
12,172
Location
Jamaica
This is the key quote in that article:



It is the responsibility of Covax to get vaccines to the poorer nations which is now happening. When vaccines arrived in Europe they were being used within days. If African nations cant organise to do the same in months, that's not the world's fault.
Yes it is. You have to account for why these countries don't have the resources to do it.
 

roseguy64

Full Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2010
Messages
12,172
Location
Jamaica
I’m not. African countries are rejecting the vaccines. Not pissing them away.

The ‘developed’ and apparently civilised world is sending vaccines with short shelf life’s, at short notice, to some of the poorest nations on earth.

We treat Africa with such disregard. “They need vaccines, here’s 100m of them” That’s a sound approach if they’re going to Kinshasa or Addis Ababa, but chucking product at a continent where 4 in every 5 people have no internet connection isn’t helpful.

We should be sending structured Aid, supply chain assistance and vaccines with the longest shelf life’s, not the shortest. The truth obviously exists somewhere between Massis over the top number and my massive undersell. I just take exception to these generalisations about Africa. Probably too sensitive.
This entirely. People acting like it's easy to do just because they're in a place that can do it easily.
 

Eyepopper

Lowering the tone since 2006
Joined
Sep 1, 2006
Messages
66,894
Jaysis, spent most of the day with my skin crawling, not able to eat, absolutely freezing, and totally exhausted after my third dose yesterday.

Each additional shot has given me ever increasing side effects, not that I'm complaining too much, this doesn't come anywhere near being in ICU on a ventilator, so happy enough to suffer it (and call in sick while i do!).

Anecdotally seems there's a bit of a trend of people I know who had Pfizer initially and then modena for the booster being fecked by the booster.

The wife had the exact same doses as me and had no ill effects, the bitch!
 

Wibble

In Gadus Speramus
Staff
Joined
Jun 15, 2000
Messages
88,602
Location
Centreback
Convenient.

If the pharmaceutical companies apply this concept to testing new drugs, then no negative side effects will ever be attributed to their products.
What an odd take. This just demonstrated that lots of the minor reported side effects were imaginary and/or because people were looking for them.
 

Wibble

In Gadus Speramus
Staff
Joined
Jun 15, 2000
Messages
88,602
Location
Centreback
Jaysis, spent most of the day with my skin crawling, not able to eat, absolutely freezing, and totally exhausted after my third dose yesterday.

Each additional shot has given me ever increasing side effects, not that I'm complaining too much, this doesn't come anywhere near being in ICU on a ventilator, so happy enough to suffer it (and call in sick while i do!).

Anecdotally seems there's a bit of a trend of people I know who had Pfizer initially and then modena for the booster being fecked by the booster.

The wife had the exact same doses as me and had no ill effects, the bitch!
The third shot often has the greatest side effects. Good in a way as it means your immune system is working well.
 

Wibble

In Gadus Speramus
Staff
Joined
Jun 15, 2000
Messages
88,602
Location
Centreback
I've seen a very similar rumour is spread by antivax groups targeting different faiths. So Hindus are told that the vaccine contains cow foetus cells, Muslims are told it contains pig foetus cells and Christians are being told it contains human foetus cells. I'd be very surprised if any of this were true.
Bovine cells or biological material is used in vaccine research and the growth medium in vaccine production. The vaccines themselves don't contain bovine material from what I've read.
 

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
133,349
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
Convenient.

If the pharmaceutical companies apply this concept to testing new drugs, then no negative side effects will ever be attributed to their products.
I’m not sure what your point is here. This isn’t a new phenomenon. It’s been known about for decades. In every placebo controlled study ever reported the subjects in the placebo arm always get a load of side effects.
 

Eyepopper

Lowering the tone since 2006
Joined
Sep 1, 2006
Messages
66,894
The third shot often has the greatest side effects. Good in a way as it means your immune system is working well.
Yeah, being an alpha, I take it as proof my system is winning the good fight against the shot :)

I've had the worst side effects of anyone I know to every shot, even the wife thinks I'm milking it at this stage. Added to that I've a pretty extreme, completely irrational, phobia of needles, but feck it, you suffer it (in context), getting the shot yesterday, for some reason was the hardest one so far for me in terms of anxiety. But now I can go see my 79 year old mam next week with a little less worry.

And you can be damn sure I'm ringing in sick tomorrow and taking the dogs out instead if I feel up to it.