Russian invasion of Ukraine | Fewer tweets, more discussion

VorZakone

What would Kenny G do?
Joined
May 9, 2013
Messages
32,958
I'm sorry but I can't stop laughing at the word "Blyatzkrieg". Saw it on Reddit.
 

MTF

Full Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2009
Messages
5,243
Location
New York City
I'm not quite grasping who these "in the presidential administration" people are supposed to be. Certainly not those who handle military, security and intelligence affairs, because you can't plan and start a war without those people. So who is left out? People who handle economics and internal political affairs? Great, but its the military and security staff that I want to hear disapproval from.
 

Infra-red

Full Member
Joined
May 4, 2010
Messages
13,423
Location
left wing
Whatever else happens in the coming days and weeks (and I fear it will be bloody and brutal), the image of Putin as a moustache-twirling evil genius has been absolutely shattered. Blundering and poorly-advised buffoon, is more apt.

He is undoubtedly an idiot. A dangerous idiot, but an idiot nonetheless.
 

stefan92

Full Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2021
Messages
6,446
Supports
Hannover 96
I'm not quite grasping who these "in the presidential administration" people are supposed to be. Certainly not those who handle military, security and intelligence affairs, because you can't plan and start a war without those people. So who is left out? People who handle economics and internal political affairs? Great, but its the military and security staff that I want to hear disapproval from.
The thing is that they apparently really did not plan a war, but just a quick military raid. Their logistics and tactics absolutely didn't look like they were prepared for war at first, they are just now slowly catching up to the fact that they actually have to fight a war instead of just driving quickly into Kyiv and replacing the president.
 

TMDaines

Fun sponge.
Joined
Sep 1, 2014
Messages
14,003
Starting to feel as if we are on a cusp of a big refugee/fleeing crisis from Russia too, with foreign students and workers now really considering their future there:


It's hard to say how much of this is them trying to distance themselves from that decision retroactively but it's a good sign anyway. Deripaska, Fridman speaking out, Abramovich forwarding Chelsea money to a fund to support Ukraine...

It's been my daily 3 minutes of optimism, I'll go to hopeless desperation & existential dread now.
Me too, buddy. Keep up the good fight.
 

harms

Shining Star of Paektu Mountain
Staff
Joined
Apr 8, 2014
Messages
28,029
Location
Moscow
I'm not quite grasping who these "in the presidential administration" people are supposed to be. Certainly not those who handle military, security and intelligence affairs, because you can't plan and start a war without those people. So who is left out? People who handle economics and internal political affairs? Great, but its the military and security staff that I want to hear disapproval from.
No, there's literally presidential administration — Anton Vaino, Sergey Kiriyenko etc. Aside from Kiriyenko, technically Vaino's deputy, they aren't that well-known publicly but it's a very important institution in Russian power hierarchy. Although while they were arguably the most important political institution at some point, they've been losing their influence over the past few years with Putin preferring FSB & other law enforcement agencies.
 

VorZakone

What would Kenny G do?
Joined
May 9, 2013
Messages
32,958
The thing is that they apparently really did not plan a war, but just a quick military raid. Their logistics and tactics absolutely didn't look like they were prepared for war at first, they are just now slowly catching up to the fact that they actually have to fight a war instead of just driving quickly into Kyiv and replacing the president.
Rob Lee mentioned this on Twitter. It's like there was a bizarre disconnect between leadership and lower ranks. And part of the reason why the soldiers didn't care about preventing from being filmed pre-invasion. No operational security measures basically.

I think a lot of bizarre facts will come out.
 

do.ob

Full Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2010
Messages
15,626
Location
Germany
Supports
Borussia Dortmund
I'm not quite grasping who these "in the presidential administration" people are supposed to be. Certainly not those who handle military, security and intelligence affairs, because you can't plan and start a war without those people. So who is left out? People who handle economics and internal political affairs? Great, but its the military and security staff that I want to hear disapproval from.
A lot of these reports remind me of transfer gossip. A lot of completely unverifiable reports that tell people what they want to hear or that paint random stuff as if it's huge news. Media grabbing clicks.
 

stefan92

Full Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2021
Messages
6,446
Supports
Hannover 96
Rob Lee mentioned this on Twitter. It's like there was a bizarre disconnect between leadership and lower ranks. And part of the reason why the soldiers didn't care about preventing from being filmed pre-invasion. No operational security measures basically.

I think a lot of bizarre facts will come out.
I think it was more a huge intelligence failure. If those reports can be believed leadership and lower ranks were absolutely in sync thinking that they would not really have to fight, but this was just wrong.

But I agree with your final statement, this whole operation looks like there might be a lot of bizarre details.
 

MTF

Full Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2009
Messages
5,243
Location
New York City
No, there's literally presidential administration — Anton Vaino, Sergey Kiriyenko etc. Aside from Kiriyenko, technically Vaino's deputy, they aren't that well-known publicly but it's a very important institution in Russian power hierarchy. Although while they were arguably the most important political institution at some point, they've been losing their influence over the past few years with Putin preferring FSB & other law enforcement agencies.
Ok, sort of understood. Help me out a little bit, is it maybe as if a US President planned and initiated a war basically by involving just the Dept of Defense, CIA, etc., but cut out the National Security Advisor, National Security Council and his White House advisors?
 

harms

Shining Star of Paektu Mountain
Staff
Joined
Apr 8, 2014
Messages
28,029
Location
Moscow
Starting to feel as if we are on a cusp of a big refugee/fleeing crisis from Russia too, with foreign students and workers now really considering their future there:
Russians themselves are fleeing to Armenia, Georgia, Israel etc. — anywhere where they can, really — in notable numbers. Although with the lack of options in terms of transport & the ridiculous cost of those few tickets that are available it's mostly well established people from Moscow & St. Petersburg (the same people that make up the core of the opposition to Putin's regime and are feeling justifiably threatened by the ever-increasing level of political oppression).
 

harms

Shining Star of Paektu Mountain
Staff
Joined
Apr 8, 2014
Messages
28,029
Location
Moscow
Ok, sort of understood. Help me out a little bit, is it maybe as if a US President planned and initiated a war basically by involving just the Dept of Defense, CIA, etc., but cut out the National Security Advisor, National Security Council and his White House advisors?
Yeah, pretty much. Although it looks like even the "DOD" & "CIA" weren't in on all of the details.
 

marktan

Full Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2017
Messages
6,935

The UK is just a joke. The EU is lining up more sanctions on energy etc, has already blacklisted people like Mikhail Friedman, seized yachts, and the UK as per usual does nothing of good. I swear this country just slowly dies more and more every year especially whenever it's run by the conservatives.
 
Joined
Jun 26, 2014
Messages
22,151
Location
Behind the right goal post as "Whiteside shoots!"
With all the assests that oligarchs have in UK and intelligence data at the disposal of the government, they still can not build up cases against them? Maybe they do not really want to?
No idea if true though one reply (and the original tweet itself to an extent) suggests that law changes a few years back meant it was/is harder to make a case for sanctions… presumably on the basis that even people who probably should be sanctioned, deserve a thorough process/case made against them as all other people who break a law do. Also that if get it wrong, the relevant person can sue.

(* not saying it is or I agree with it)

 

Smores

Full Member
Joined
May 18, 2011
Messages
25,535
What's the deal with visas? Shouldn't we very quickly just be issuing them to Ukranians?
I think they're terrified that if they let the white refugees in they'll then have to let everyone else in too.

Too much of their politics is denying refugees need to come here so it's a question of if they're willing to trade that to do the right thing.
 

TMDaines

Fun sponge.
Joined
Sep 1, 2014
Messages
14,003
what does it say?
There’s a whole Twitter thread. Genuinely batshit stuff most of it, but also like a lot of propaganda it is built of kerns of truth twisted and manipulated.


A second thread with conclusions:

 

GlastonSpur

Also disliked on an Aston Villa forum
Joined
Feb 4, 2007
Messages
17,716
Supports
Spurs
What's happening is essentially the struggle of freedom against control and oppression. The major part of global history since the year dot has always boiled down down to this.

The only security threat that a free and independent Ukraine poses is the threat posed to Putin's gangster-state regime by the existence - and example to the Russian people - of democracy and freedom.

The above also applies to NATO - a defensive alliance of free and democratic nations. The idea that NATO would ever invade Russia is laughable, all the more so given Russia's nuclear weapons.

Putin fears the spread of freedom and democracy into Russia. Everything else is lies from a thug dictator who, even a week ago, denied that Russian troops would invade Ukraine (beyond being already in Crimea).

There are credible people (e.g. from Bellingcat) who say that Russia cannot finance this large-scale military invasion for more than another 2 - 3 weeks.

I therefore think, if Kiev is still in Ukranian hands after this time, that the risk of Putin using nuclear weapons is, unfortunately, significantly higher than most people suppose. I believe that he might well use a tactical nuke in Ukraine if that becomes his only way of avoiding military humiliation.

What NATO's response would be, if he does use a tactical nuke, is anyone's guess.

Finally, please note: I'm here to discuss the Ukrainian situation - nothing else.
 
Joined
Jun 26, 2014
Messages
22,151
Location
Behind the right goal post as "Whiteside shoots!"
Who is that? Someone from Ireland I assume?
Gerry Adams. You can Google him as there’s quite a lot there, though what you read will depend on that writer’s beliefs probably (if they like him, it’ll be good… if they don’t, it’ll be bad).

Are you seeing any signs of sanctions kicking in where you are? UK media suggests hurting Russia but never know if that’s the case or how reported.
 

Dans

Correctly predicted Portugal to win Euro 2016
Joined
Jun 4, 2001
Messages
26,972
Location
Oberbayern
Just seen reports here in Germany suggesting that China might have known full well what was going to happen and may have asked Russia to wait until after the Olympics.
 
Joined
Jun 26, 2014
Messages
22,151
Location
Behind the right goal post as "Whiteside shoots!"
What's happening is essentially the struggle of freedom against control and oppression. The major part of global history since the year dot has always boiled down down to this.

The only security threat that a free and independent Ukraine poses is the threat posed to Putin's gangster-state regime by the existence - and example to the Russian people - of democracy and freedom.

The above also applies to NATO - a defensive alliance of free and democratic nations. The idea that NATO would ever invade Russia is laughable, all the more so given Russia's nuclear weapons.

Putin fears the spread of freedom and democracy into Russia. Everything else is lies from a thug dictator who, even a week ago, denied that Russian troops would invade Ukraine (beyond being already in Crimea).

There are credible people (e.g. from Bellingcat) who say that Russia cannot finance this large-scale military invasion for more than another 2 - 3 weeks.

I therefore think, if Kiev is still in Ukranian hands after this time, that the risk of Putin using nuclear weapons is, unfortunately, significantly higher than most people suppose. I believe that he might well use a tactical nuke in Ukraine if that becomes his only way of avoiding military humiliation.

What NATO's response would be, if he does use a tactical nuke, is anyone's guess.

Finally, please note: I'm here to discuss the Ukrainian situation - nothing else.
Bloody hell. It’s Glastonspur!! :)
 

VorZakone

What would Kenny G do?
Joined
May 9, 2013
Messages
32,958
Just seen reports here in Germany suggesting that China might have known full well what was going to happen and may have asked Russia to wait until after the Olympics.
Yes, New York Times reported it too.
 

harms

Shining Star of Paektu Mountain
Staff
Joined
Apr 8, 2014
Messages
28,029
Location
Moscow
Gerry Adams. You can Google him as there’s quite a lot there, though what you read will depend on that writer’s beliefs probably (if they like him, it’ll be good… if they don’t, it’ll be bad).

Are you seeing any signs of sanctions kicking in where you are? UK media suggests hurting Russia but never know if that’s the case or how reported.
Yeah, it's absolutely brutal. Our economy was shit in the first place but what had happened over the past few days was nothing short of catastrophic — and it's only the beginning. Since we'll obviously going to see more and more consequences in the next few weeks & months. By all projections if nothing changes we're going to drop back to the early 90's level — and, considering that "do you want back to the 90's" was one of Putin's most effective counter-arguments to any critique of his internal policy it'll probably cause a huge reaction... in a bit though. People need to feel long-term consequences, right now what we see can be written off by some (who don't really understand more global economical processes) as a panic reaction.
 

TheReligion

Abusive
Joined
Nov 22, 2006
Messages
51,465
Location
Manchester
Yeah, it's absolutely brutal. Our economy was shit in the first place but what had happened over the past few days was nothing short of catastrophic — and it's only the beginning. Since we'll obviously going to see more and more consequences in the next few weeks & months. By all projections if nothing changes we're going to drop back to the early 90's level — and, considering that "do you want back to the 90's" was one of Putin's most effective counter-arguments to any critique of his internal policy it'll probably cause a huge reaction... in a bit though. People need to feel long-term consequences, right now what we see can be written off by some (who don't really understand more global economical processes) as a panic reaction.
I’m sorry you’re having to go through this :(
 

BluesJr

Owns the moral low ground
Joined
May 15, 2013
Messages
9,052
Just seen reports here in Germany suggesting that China might have known full well what was going to happen and may have asked Russia to wait until after the Olympics.
Remember when people thought China would save the day?
 

TheReligion

Abusive
Joined
Nov 22, 2006
Messages
51,465
Location
Manchester
What's happening is essentially the struggle of freedom against control and oppression. The major part of global history since the year dot has always boiled down down to this.

The only security threat that a free and independent Ukraine poses is the threat posed to Putin's gangster-state regime by the existence - and example to the Russian people - of democracy and freedom.

The above also applies to NATO - a defensive alliance of free and democratic nations. The idea that NATO would ever invade Russia is laughable, all the more so given Russia's nuclear weapons.

Putin fears the spread of freedom and democracy into Russia. Everything else is lies from a thug dictator who, even a week ago, denied that Russian troops would invade Ukraine (beyond being already in Crimea).

There are credible people (e.g. from Bellingcat) who say that Russia cannot finance this large-scale military invasion for more than another 2 - 3 weeks.

I therefore think, if Kiev is still in Ukranian hands after this time, that the risk of Putin using nuclear weapons is, unfortunately, significantly higher than most people suppose. I believe that he might well use a tactical nuke in Ukraine if that becomes his only way of avoiding military humiliation.

What NATO's response would be, if he does use a tactical nuke, is anyone's guess.

Finally, please note: I'm here to discuss the Ukrainian situation - nothing else.
Is your return because India abstained from the vote yesterday?
 

Hound Dog

Full Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2011
Messages
3,211
Location
Belgrade, Serbia
Supports
Whoever I bet on
Yeah, it's absolutely brutal. Our economy was shit in the first place but what had happened over the past few days was nothing short of catastrophic — and it's only the beginning. Since we'll obviously going to see more and more consequences in the next few weeks & months. By all projections if nothing changes we're going to drop back to the early 90's level — and, considering that "do you want back to the 90's" was one of Putin's most effective counter-arguments to any critique of his internal policy it'll probably cause a huge reaction... in a bit though. People need to feel long-term consequences, right now what we see can be written off by some (who don't really understand more global economical processes) as a panic reaction.
Does the Swift ban mean that it will be impossible for Russian residents to receive any money from abroad?

If so, that's remote workers fecked.